- 2069 Bhadra · 5 marks
Failure mode: HS N45E/70, bedding N55E/45
Short answer
Using assumed 30° friction angle, bedding (45/145) daylights and exceeds friction, so plane failure is main. Bedding-J2 intersection plunges 32.6° toward 195° above friction and daylights, so wedge failure also possible. Reduce cut below 45° and support.
Suggest the possible mode of failure from the following figure. Hill slope: N45°E/70°; Bedding: N55°E/45°; Joint 1: N47°W/31°; Joint 2: N77°E/36°; Joint 3: N20°E/10°. [Figure: stereonet]
Method (lower-hemisphere stereonet, equal-angle): plot the great circle of the slope face and of each discontinuity, draw the friction circle of radius , and mark intersections of great circles. Then apply the kinematic tests below.
Data and assumptions
All planes strike as given and are taken to dip on the side that appears in the figure: Hill slope N45°E/70° SE = 70/135; Bedding N55°E/45° SE = 45/145; J1 N47°W/31° SW = 31/223; J2 N77°E/36° SE = 36/167; J3 N20°E/10° SE = 10/110. The friction angle is not stated, so is assumed.
Single planes
| Plane (dip/dip dir) | Diff. of dip dir from slope | Daylights () | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedding (45/145) | 10° | yes | yes | Plane failure |
| J1 (31/223) | 88° | yes | yes | Safe |
| J2 (36/167) | 32° | yes | yes | Safe |
| J3 (10/110) | 25° | yes | no | Safe |
Intersections
| Pair | Intersection plunge/trend | Face apparent dip along trend | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bedding x J1 | 29.1° / 201° | 48.0° | Stable (plunge below ) |
| Bedding x J2 | 32.6° / 195° | 53.8° | Wedge failure |
| Bedding x J3 | 6.7° / 062° | 38.4° | Stable (plunge below ) |
| J1 x J2 | 29.8° / 205° | 43.1° | Stable (plunge below ) |
| J1 x J3 | 8.1° / 147° | 69.6° | Stable (plunge below ) |
| J2 x J3 | 9.4° / 090° | 62.8° | Stable (plunge below ) |
Result
- Bedding dips off the face direction at : , so it daylights and can slide: plane failure.
- J3 dips only , below : stable. J1 dips across the slope (88° from the face direction).
- The Bedding x J2 intersection plunges towards 195°, in the face (apparent dip ) and above : wedge failure is also possible.
Possible mode of failure: plane failure along the bedding planes (main), with wedge failure formed by bedding and J2. Reduce the cut angle below and provide bolting and drainage.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Failure mode from stereonet: HS 40/050 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Failure mode: HS 75/230, BP 68/045 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Canal slope stability: HS 138/45 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Stability: HS 310/43, BP 306/31 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Failure mode: HS 170/50, BP 160/42 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Cut slope design: HS 110/40, B 130/20 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Strike of limestone bed directed N20°E, dip 45° · Engineering Geology I, chapter 5
- Normal: 31% under 45, 8% over 64 · Probability and Statistics, chapter 3