Skip to main content

Limiting error in calculated power

Short answer

Power P = 120²/50 = 288 W. Limiting error: relative error = 2×0.5% + 1% = 2%, absolute error = ±5.76 W, so P = 288 ± 5.76 W (2%). Systematic error is a constant bias (e.g., zero error); random error varies unpredictably (e.g., noise) and is reduced by averaging.

(a) The power dissipated in a resistor is calculated from P=V2/RP = V^2/R. The voltage is measured as 120 V with a limiting error of ±0.5%\pm 0.5\% and the resistance is 50 Ω\Omega with a guaranteed accuracy of ±1%\pm 1\%. Calculate the power and its limiting error in watt and in percent.

(b) Differentiate between systematic error and random error, giving one cause of each.

Power and its limiting error

Given: V=120V = 120 V (±0.5%\pm 0.5\%), R=50 ΩR = 50\ \Omega (±1%\pm 1\%).

P=V2R=120250=288 WP = \frac{V^2}{R} = \frac{120^2}{50} = 288\ \text{W}

For a quantity P=V2R−1P = V^2 R^{-1}, limiting (worst-case) relative errors add, each multiplied by its power:

δPP=2 δVV+δRR=2(0.5)+1=2%\frac{\delta P}{P} = 2\,\frac{\delta V}{V} + \frac{\delta R}{R} = 2(0.5) + 1 = 2\% δP=0.02×288=5.76 W\delta P = 0.02 \times 288 = 5.76\ \text{W}

Answer: P=288±5.76P = 288 \pm 5.76 W (limiting error ±2%\pm 2\%).

If the errors are independent, the probable error is (2×0.5)2+12=1.41%\sqrt{(2\times 0.5)^2 + 1^2} = 1.41\%, about ±4.1\pm 4.1 W.

Systematic and random errors

PointSystematic errorRandom error
NatureConstant or varies in a known way, same signVaries unpredictably, positive or negative
Cause exampleZero error, wrong calibration, loading effectElectrical noise, friction, vibration, observer variation
EffectShifts all readings (affects accuracy)Scatters readings (affects precision)
ReductionCalibration, correction, better methodAveraging many readings, statistics

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Instrumentation and Measurement chapter 1 questions →