Skip to main content

Capacitance depends on conductor size and spacing

Short answer

For a transposed three-phase line, capacitance per phase to neutral is C = 2*pi*epsilon0 / ln(Deq/r). This expression contains only the conductor radius r and equivalent spacing Deq, with epsilon0 constant. Hence conductor size and spacing are the primary factors; voltage, current and frequency do not appear.

Show that the capacitance per phase of a three-phase overhead transmission line is primarily determined by the conductor size and conductor spacings.

The capacitance to neutral of a transposed three-phase line is Cn=2πε0ln⁡(Deq/r)C_n = \frac{2\pi\varepsilon_0}{\ln(D_{eq}/r)}. It contains only the conductor radius r and the spacings (through DeqD_{eq}), apart from the constant ε0\varepsilon_0. The derivation below shows this.

Potential difference between two conductors

For a long conductor with charge q C/m, the potential difference between two points at distances D1D_1 and D2D_2 is V12=q2πε0ln⁡D2D1V_{12} = \frac{q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\frac{D_2}{D_1}. For a group of conductors, using superposition:

Vab=12πε0[qaln⁡Dabr+qbln⁡rDab+qcln⁡DbcDca]V_{ab} = \frac{1}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left[q_a\ln\frac{D_{ab}}{r} + q_b\ln\frac{r}{D_{ab}} + q_c\ln\frac{D_{bc}}{D_{ca}}\right]

Equilateral spacing D

Vab=12πε0[qaln⁡Dr+qbln⁡rD]Vac=12πε0[qaln⁡Dr+qcln⁡rD]\begin{aligned} V_{ab} &= \frac{1}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left[q_a\ln\frac{D}{r} + q_b\ln\frac{r}{D}\right]\\ V_{ac} &= \frac{1}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left[q_a\ln\frac{D}{r} + q_c\ln\frac{r}{D}\right] \end{aligned}

Adding and using qb+qc=−qaq_b + q_c = -q_a (balanced charges):

Vab+Vac=3qa2πε0ln⁡DrV_{ab} + V_{ac} = \frac{3q_a}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\frac{D}{r}

For a balanced system, Vab+Vac=3VanV_{ab} + V_{ac} = 3V_{an}. So

Van=qa2πε0ln⁡Dr,Cn=qaVan=2πε0ln⁡(D/r) F/mV_{an} = \frac{q_a}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\frac{D}{r}, \qquad C_n = \frac{q_a}{V_{an}} = \frac{2\pi\varepsilon_0}{\ln(D/r)}\ \text{F/m}

Unsymmetrical spacing (transposed)

Averaging VabV_{ab} over the three transposition sections gives the same form, with D replaced by the geometric mean spacing:

Cn=2πε0ln⁡Deqr,Deq=DabDbcDca3C_n = \frac{2\pi\varepsilon_0}{\ln\dfrac{D_{eq}}{r}}, \qquad D_{eq} = \sqrt[3]{D_{ab}D_{bc}D_{ca}}

For bundled conductors, r is replaced by the bundle's self-GMD for capacitance, for example rd\sqrt{rd}.

Conclusion

  • ε0\varepsilon_0 is a constant (air). So C depends only on the ratio Deq/rD_{eq}/r, that is, on conductor size and spacing.
  • Larger r (or bundling) gives higher C. Larger spacing gives lower C. The dependence is logarithmic, so a big change in geometry causes only a modest change in C.
  • Current, voltage and frequency do not appear in C. The earth's effect (images) is small for normal conductor heights and is neglected. That is why size and spacing are the primary factors.

Example: r = 1 cm and D = 4 m give Cn=5.563×10−11ln⁡400=9.29C_n = \frac{5.563\times10^{-11}}{\ln 400} = 9.29 nF/km. Doubling D to 8 m gives 8.32 nF/km.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power System Analysis I chapter 4 questions →