Skip to main content

3-unit string with guard ring: redistribution of voltage

Short answer

With earth capacitance 0.2C and line 0.1C, KCL gives voltages 31.0%, 30.3%, 38.7% of phase voltage, efficiency 86.1%. Increasing lower pin line capacitance to 0.3C redistributes to 32.6%, 32.4%, 35.0%, raising efficiency to 95.4%.

Determine the voltage across each disc of a suspension insulator comprising of 3 units as a percentage of the line voltage to earth. The self and capacitance to ground of each disc is C and 0.2C respectively. The capacitance between the link pin and the guard ring is 0.1C. If the capacitance to the line of the lower link pin were increased to 0.3C by means of a guard ring, determine the redistribution of voltage. Also determine the string efficiency in each case.

A guard ring adds capacitance between each link pin and the line conductor. This line capacitance partly cancels the charging current lost to the tower, so the voltage spreads more evenly across the discs.

Circuit and junction equations

Number the discs 1 (tower end) to 3 (line end), with voltages V1,V2,V3V_1, V_2, V_3. Let VV be the voltage of the line to earth. Each link pin has 0.2C0.2C to earth and g Cg\,C to the line.

 Tower ─[C]─ A ─[C]─ B ─[C]─ Line (V)
             |       |
   earth ─0.2C     0.2C
   line  ─gA·C     gB·C

Kirchhoff's current law at a junction (current entering from the line side = current leaving towards the tower + current to earth):

Vk+1=Vk+m (V1+⋯+Vk)−g [ V−(V1+⋯+Vk) ]V_{k+1} = V_k + m\,(V_1+\dots+V_k) - g\,[\,V-(V_1+\dots+V_k)\,]

Case 1: line capacitance 0.1C at both pins

Junction A (m=0.2, g=0.1m=0.2,\ g=0.1):

V2=V1+0.2V1−0.1(V−V1)=1.3V1−0.1VV_2 = V_1 + 0.2V_1 - 0.1(V - V_1) = 1.3V_1 - 0.1V

Junction B:

V3=V2+0.2(V1+V2)−0.1(V−V1−V2)=1.99V1−0.23V\begin{aligned} V_3 &= V_2 + 0.2(V_1+V_2) - 0.1(V - V_1 - V_2)\\ &= 1.99V_1 - 0.23V \end{aligned}

Since V1+V2+V3=VV_1+V_2+V_3 = V: 4.29V1−0.33V=V4.29V_1 - 0.33V = V, so V1=0.3100VV_1 = 0.3100V.

DiscVoltage (% of VV)
1 (top)31.00 %
230.30 %
3 (line end)38.69 %
η=V3V3=13×0.38695=86.14 %\eta = \frac{V}{3V_3} = \frac{1}{3\times 0.38695} = 86.14\ \%

Case 2: guard ring raises the lower pin's line capacitance to 0.3C

Junction A is unchanged: V2=1.3V1−0.1VV_2 = 1.3V_1 - 0.1V.

Junction B (g=0.3g = 0.3):

V3=V2+0.2(V1+V2)−0.3(V−V1−V2)=2.45V1−0.45V\begin{aligned} V_3 &= V_2 + 0.2(V_1+V_2) - 0.3(V - V_1 - V_2)\\ &= 2.45V_1 - 0.45V \end{aligned}

Sum: 4.75V1−0.55V=V4.75V_1 - 0.55V = V, so V1=0.3263VV_1 = 0.3263V.

DiscCase 1Case 2 (guard ring)
1 (top)31.00 %32.63 %
230.30 %32.42 %
3 (line end)38.69 %34.95 %
String efficiency86.14 %95.38 %
η2=13×0.34947=95.38 %\eta_2 = \frac{1}{3\times 0.34947} = 95.38\ \%

Answer: Without the larger guard ring capacitance the discs carry 31.00 %, 30.30 % and 38.69 % of VV, and the string efficiency is 86.14 %. With 0.3C at the lower pin the voltages become 32.63 %, 32.42 % and 34.95 % of VV, and the efficiency rises to 95.38 %. The guard ring takes stress off the line-end disc.

(For comparison, with no line capacitance at all the same string would carry 26.0 %, 31.3 % and 42.7 %, giving an efficiency of 78.0 %.)

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power System Analysis I chapter 2 questions →