- Asked 9/26
- 2078 Poush
Vertical curve -2.5% and +3.5%, 1268.50 m
Short answer
The 200 m equal-tangent parabolic sag curve has its lowest point at chainage 763.33 m, RL 1268.458 m. Elevations at 30 m stations from PVC (RL 1269.500 m) are computed; the curve passes through IP at chainage 780 m at RL 1268.500 m.
A grade of (-) 2.5% meets another grade of 3.5%. The elevation and chainage of IP are 1267 m and 780 m respectively. Field condition requires that the vertical curve should pass through a point of elevation 1268.50 m at a chainage 780.0 m. Compute a suitable equal tangent vertical curve including full stations elevation, take peg interval = 30 m.
Data: , (a valley or sag curve), IP at chainage 780.00 m, RL 1267.00 m. The curve passes through RL 1268.50 m at chainage 780 m (above the IP, as it must for a sag curve).
Length of the curve
m, and for an equal tangent parabolic curve :
Elements
- PVC chainage m; PVT chainage m
- RL of PVC m; RL of PVT m
- per m
Levels at full stations (30 m pegs)
| Chainage (m) | x from PVC (m) | Tangent level (m) | Offset (m) | Curve level (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 680.00 | 0.00 | 1269.500 | 0.000 | 1269.500 |
| 690.00 | 10.00 | 1269.250 | +0.015 | 1269.265 |
| 720.00 | 40.00 | 1268.500 | +0.240 | 1268.740 |
| 750.00 | 70.00 | 1267.750 | +0.735 | 1268.485 |
| 780.00 | 100.00 | 1267.000 | +1.500 | 1268.500 |
| 810.00 | 130.00 | 1266.250 | +2.535 | 1268.785 |
| 840.00 | 160.00 | 1265.500 | +3.840 | 1269.340 |
| 870.00 | 190.00 | 1264.750 | +5.415 | 1270.165 |
| 880.00 | 200.00 | 1264.500 | +6.000 | 1270.500 |
Lowest point
Chainage m and RL m.
Check: level at chainage 780 m (x = 100 m) m = 1268.500 m as required.
Answer: L = 200 m; lowest point at chainage 763.33 m, RL 1268.458 m.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Vertical curve +0.5% and -3.5%, 1266 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 9×
- Vertical curve +3.5% and -2.75%, 30 m pegs · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve +3.5% and -0.5%, 1266 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 8×
- Vertical curve 5% and 3%, 1474.50 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve -3.5% and +0.5%, IP 1300 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 5×
- Vertical curve (-)3% and (-)35%, IP 2477 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 6×
- Vertical curve -3.5% and +5%, 1268 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Vertical curve +1.25% and +4.75%, 1518.30 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve +1.25% and +4.75%, 1267.70 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Vertical curve -3.5% and -0.5%, 1268 m · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve, -3.5% and +0.5%, 3268 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Vertical curve 180 m, -3.5% then +4.5%, IP 2450 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Vertical curve +4% and -3%, through given point · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3
- Vertical curve chainage and elevations, R 8000 m · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3