- Asked 2/26
- 2066 Magh (old course) · 8 marks
Vertical curve 180 m, -3.5% then +4.5%, IP 2450
Short answer
The 180 m parabolic sag curve has BVC at chainage 2360 m RL 903.150 m and EVC at 2540 m RL 904.050 m. The lowest point occurs at 78.75 m from BVC (chainage 2438.75 m) with RL 901.772 m. RLs at 20 m intervals are obtained by adding grade line elevation and offset.
A down grade of 3.5% is followed by an upgrade of 4.5%. The reduced level and chainage of IP are 900.00 m and 2450.00 m respectively. A vertical parabolic curve 180 m long is to be introduced to connect the two grades. The pegs are to be fixed at 20 m intervals. Calculate the RLs of curve points including lowest point.
A parabolic vertical curve of the given length is set out by the tangent-offset method.
Step 1: Given data
, , m, change of grade . Mid-ordinate m.
Step 2: BVC, EVC and their levels
The curve is a sag (valley) curve with equal tangent lengths m.
Step 3: RL of curve points
Using the tangent-offset form of the parabola ( measured from BVC, grades in %):
with , , m, so the offset is and pegs are taken at multiples of 20 m.
| Chainage (m) | x from BVC (m) | Tangent RL (m) | Offset y (m) | Curve RL (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2360 | 0 | 903.150 | 0.000 | 903.150 |
| 2380 | 20 | 902.450 | +0.089 | 902.539 |
| 2400 | 40 | 901.750 | +0.356 | 902.106 |
| 2420 | 60 | 901.050 | +0.800 | 901.850 |
| 2440 | 80 | 900.350 | +1.422 | 901.772 |
| 2460 | 100 | 899.650 | +2.222 | 901.872 |
| 2480 | 120 | 898.950 | +3.200 | 902.150 |
| 2500 | 140 | 898.250 | +4.356 | 902.606 |
| 2520 | 160 | 897.550 | +5.689 | 903.239 |
| 2540 | 180 | 896.850 | +7.200 | 904.050 |
Check: the last curve RL (904.05 m) equals the RL of EVC (904.05 m), and the curve at the IP chainage lies 1.8 m above the IP, at RL 901.8 m.
Step 4: Lowest point
At the lowest point the grade is zero, so m from BVC.
- Chainage = 2360 + 78.75 = 2438.75 m
- RL = 903.15 + (-3.5/100)(78.75) + (8)(78.75)²/(200 × 180) = 901.772 m
Answer: m, BVC at 2360 m (RL 903.15 m), EVC at 2540 m (RL 904.05 m); curve levels as tabulated.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Vertical curve 180 m, -4.5% then +3.5%, IP 450 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Vertical curve -2% and +3%, IP 2600, 0.5% per 20 m · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve +0.5% and -0.7%, IP RL 350.750 · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve +3.5% and -2.75%, 30 m pegs · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve -0.7% and +0.5%, IP RL 650 · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve -0.5% and +0.7%, IP RL 500 · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve -1% and +0.5% by parabolic method · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 2×