- Asked 3/26
- 2081 Chaitra · 1+5 marks
Vertical curve, -3.5% and +0.5%, 3268 m
Short answer
A parabola gives constant rate of grade change for smooth riding and simple offsets. For e = 1 m, L = 200 m; BVC at 1680 m (RL 3270.5 m), EVC at 1880 m (RL 3267.5 m). Curve RLs computed via tangent-offset equation; at IP chainage 1780 m, RL = 3268 m.
Why vertical curves are generally used parabolic curve? The elevation and chainage of intersection point are 3267 and 1+780 km. A grade of -3.5% meets another grade of 0.5%. Field condition requires that the vertical curve should pass through a point of elevation 3268 m at chainage 1+780 km. Compute a suitable equal tangent vertical curve and full station elevations. Use parabolic equation. The peg interval is 30 m.
Why a parabola?
A parabola is used for vertical curves because it gives a constant rate of change of grade along the curve, so the change in slope is uniform and the ride is smooth. Its equation is simple (), offsets from the tangents vary as the square of the distance and are very easy to compute, the curve is symmetrical about the IP for equal tangents, and a circle and a parabola are almost identical for the very flat curves used on roads.
Computation
Chainage of IP km m.
An equal-tangent parabolic vertical curve is set out. Because the curve passes through the given level at the IP chainage, the vertical gap between the IP and the curve there is the mid-ordinate of the curve.
Step 1: Length of the curve
The curve is a sag curve, so the curve lies above the IP:
For an equal-tangent parabola, (grades in %), hence
Step 2: BVC, EVC and their levels
The curve is a sag (valley) curve with equal tangent lengths m.
Step 3: RL of curve points
Using the tangent-offset form of the parabola ( measured from BVC, grades in %):
with , , m, so the offset is and pegs are taken at multiples of 30 m.
| Chainage (m) | x from BVC (m) | Tangent RL (m) | Offset y (m) | Curve RL (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1680 | 0 | 3270.500 | 0.000 | 3270.500 |
| 1710 | 30 | 3269.450 | +0.090 | 3269.540 |
| 1740 | 60 | 3268.400 | +0.360 | 3268.760 |
| 1770 | 90 | 3267.350 | +0.810 | 3268.160 |
| 1800 | 120 | 3266.300 | +1.440 | 3267.740 |
| 1830 | 150 | 3265.250 | +2.250 | 3267.500 |
| 1860 | 180 | 3264.200 | +3.240 | 3267.440 |
| 1880 | 200 | 3263.500 | +4.000 | 3267.500 |
Check: the last curve RL (3267.5 m) equals the RL of EVC (3267.5 m), and the curve at the IP chainage lies 1 m above the IP, at RL 3268 m.
Step 4: Lowest point
At the lowest point the grade is zero, so m from BVC.
- Chainage = 1680 + 175 = 1855 m
- RL = 3270.5 + (-3.5/100)(175) + (4)(175)²/(200 × 200) = 3267.438 m
Answer: m, BVC at 1680 m (RL 3270.5 m), EVC at 1880 m (RL 3267.5 m); curve levels as tabulated.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Vertical curve +1.25% and +4.75%, 1518.30 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve +1.25% and +4.75%, 1267.70 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Vertical curve +3.5% and -0.5%, 1266 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 8×
- Vertical curve +0.5% and -3.5%, 1266 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 9×
- Vertical curve -3.5% and +5%, 1268 m at 780 · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Vertical curve -3.5% and -0.5%, 1268 m · Surveying II, chapter 6
- Vertical curve -2.5% and +3.5%, 1268.50 m · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 9×
- Vertical curve +3.5% and -2.75%, 30 m pegs · Surveying II, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Vertical curve +4% and -3%, through given point · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3
- Vertical curve chainage and elevations, R 8000 m · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3
- Vertical curve, -3% and 1.5% at chainage 2000 · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3
- Vertical curve with 300 m grade sections · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 3