Skip to main content

Vertical curve, -3.5% and +0.5%, 3268 m

Short answer

A parabola gives constant rate of grade change for smooth riding and simple offsets. For e = 1 m, L = 200 m; BVC at 1680 m (RL 3270.5 m), EVC at 1880 m (RL 3267.5 m). Curve RLs computed via tangent-offset equation; at IP chainage 1780 m, RL = 3268 m.

Why vertical curves are generally used parabolic curve? The elevation and chainage of intersection point are 3267 and 1+780 km. A grade of -3.5% meets another grade of 0.5%. Field condition requires that the vertical curve should pass through a point of elevation 3268 m at chainage 1+780 km. Compute a suitable equal tangent vertical curve and full station elevations. Use parabolic equation. The peg interval is 30 m.

Why a parabola?

A parabola is used for vertical curves because it gives a constant rate of change of grade along the curve, so the change in slope is uniform and the ride is smooth. Its equation is simple (y=ax2+bxy = ax^2 + bx), offsets from the tangents vary as the square of the distance and are very easy to compute, the curve is symmetrical about the IP for equal tangents, and a circle and a parabola are almost identical for the very flat curves used on roads.

Computation

Chainage of IP =1+780= 1+780 km =1780= 1780 m.

An equal-tangent parabolic vertical curve is set out. Because the curve passes through the given level at the IP chainage, the vertical gap between the IP and the curve there is the mid-ordinate ee of the curve.

Step 1: Length of the curve

The curve is a sag curve, so the curve lies above the IP:

e=3268−3267=1 m ⇒ ∣e∣=1 me = 3268 - 3267 = 1\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ |e| = 1\ \text{m}

For an equal-tangent parabola, e=L ∣g2−g1∣800e = \dfrac{L\,|g_2-g_1|}{800} (grades in %), hence

L=800 e∣g2−g1∣=800×1∣0.5−(−3.5)∣=8004=200 mL = \frac{800\,e}{|g_2-g_1|} = \frac{800\times 1}{|0.5-(-3.5)|} = \frac{800}{4} = 200\ \text{m}

Step 2: BVC, EVC and their levels

The curve is a sag (valley) curve with equal tangent lengths L/2=100L/2 = 100 m.

Ch. of BVC=1780−100=1680 mCh. of EVC=1780+100=1880 mRL of BVC=3267−(−3.5)100×100=3270.5 mRL of EVC=3267+(0.5)100×100=3267.5 m\begin{aligned} \text{Ch. of BVC} &= 1780 - 100 = 1680\ \text{m}\\ \text{Ch. of EVC} &= 1780 + 100 = 1880\ \text{m}\\ \text{RL of BVC} &= 3267 - \frac{(-3.5)}{100}\times 100 = 3270.5\ \text{m}\\ \text{RL of EVC} &= 3267 + \frac{(0.5)}{100}\times 100 = 3267.5\ \text{m} \end{aligned}

Step 3: RL of curve points

Using the tangent-offset form of the parabola (xx measured from BVC, grades in %):

yx=RLBVC+g1x100+(g2−g1)x2200Ly_x = \text{RL}_{BVC} + \frac{g_1 x}{100} + \frac{(g_2-g_1)x^2}{200L}

with g1=−3.5%g_1 = -3.5\%, g2=0.5%g_2 = 0.5\%, L=200L = 200 m, so the offset is y=(4)x2200×200y = \frac{(4)x^2}{200\times 200} and pegs are taken at multiples of 30 m.

Chainage (m)x from BVC (m)Tangent RL (m)Offset y (m)Curve RL (m)
168003270.5000.0003270.500
1710303269.450+0.0903269.540
1740603268.400+0.3603268.760
1770903267.350+0.8103268.160
18001203266.300+1.4403267.740
18301503265.250+2.2503267.500
18601803264.200+3.2403267.440
18802003263.500+4.0003267.500

Check: the last curve RL (3267.5 m) equals the RL of EVC (3267.5 m), and the curve at the IP chainage lies 1 m above the IP, at RL 3268 m.

Step 4: Lowest point

At the lowest point the grade is zero, so x=−g1Lg2−g1=3.5×2004=175x = \dfrac{-g_1 L}{g_2-g_1} = \dfrac{3.5\times 200}{4} = 175 m from BVC.

  • Chainage = 1680 + 175 = 1855 m
  • RL = 3270.5 + (-3.5/100)(175) + (4)(175)²/(200 × 200) = 3267.438 m

Answer: L=200L = 200 m, BVC at 1680 m (RL 3270.5 m), EVC at 1880 m (RL 3267.5 m); curve levels as tabulated.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Surveying II chapter 6 questions →