Skip to main content

Design steps of axially loaded brick column

Short answer

Assume column size, compute effective height (0.75H if fully restrained), ensure slenderness ratio ≤12, obtain basic compressive stress fb, apply stress reduction factor ks, area reduction factor ka (0.7+1.5A for A<0.2 m²), and shape factor kp, then check σ = P/A ≤ fb·ks·ka·kp. A column differs from a wall: SR limit 12 vs 27, uses greater slenderness of two directions, area reduction normally applies, and design treats the whole section, not per metre length.

Explain in detail the design steps of an axially loaded brick masonry column. How does it differ from the design of an axially loaded brick masonry wall?

Design steps for an axially loaded brick masonry column (IS 1905)

  1. Assume column size (least dimension not less than about 200 to 230 mm and area as needed) and unit and mortar grade.
  2. Loads: find axial load PP from roof or floor, add self weight of column.
  3. Effective height (cl. 4.3.2): actual height for the direction in which it is laterally supported, twice the height for an unsupported direction; 0.75H0.75H if fully restrained at both ends (Table 4).
  4. Slenderness ratio SR=hef/tSR = h_{ef}/t in each principal direction; take the greater. It must not exceed 12 for a column (Table 7).
  5. Basic compressive stress fbf_b for the unit strength and mortar grade (Table 8).
  6. Factors: stress reduction factor ksk_s from Table 9 for SRSR and e=0e=0; area reduction factor ka=0.7+1.5Ak_a=0.7+1.5A when A<0.2A<0.2 m2^2; shape factor kpk_p for the unit height-to-width ratio (Table 10).
  7. Permissible stress fc=fbkskakpf_c=f_bk_sk_ak_p.
  8. Check: σ=P/A≤fc\sigma = P/A \le f_c. If not satisfied, increase size or unit/mortar strength and repeat.
  9. Detail: stagger joints, use header courses, tie to beam or slab, avoid chases.

Difference from an axially loaded wall

PointColumnWall
Slenderness limitSR≤12SR\le12 (Table 7)SR≤27SR\le27 for cement mortar (20 for lime mortar)
Slenderness ratioGreater of the two directions, hef/th_{ef}/tLesser of hef/th_{ef}/t and Lef/tL_{ef}/t (horizontal stiffening by cross walls)
Effective lengthNot usedUsed; depends on cross walls, piers or buttresses
Area reduction factor kak_aUsually applies (A<0.2A<0.2 m2^2)Normally 1.0 (analysed per metre run, 0.2 m2^2 or more)
Design unitWhole sectionPer metre length of wall
Effective thicknessActual thickness of columnActual thickness; stiffening coefficient where piers or cross walls (Table 6)
Effective heightBased on lateral support in both directionsBased on top and bottom restraint (Table 4)

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure chapter 8 questions →