Skip to main content

Identify LC lossless function; Foster-I and Cauer-I

Short answer

Z2(s) is valid LC because its poles and zeros alternate, with a pole at s=0 and zero at s=∞, and degrees differ by 1. Foster-I: series 2 F, then parallel 0.025 H with 10 F, and 0.0444 H with 2.5 F. Cauer-I: shunt 1 F, series 0.25 H, shunt 0.889 F, series 2.25 H, shunt 0.111 F.

Which of the following is an LC lossless function and why? Pick one of the valid LC lossless functions and realize it using Foster-I and Cauer-I form. a) Z1(s) = s(s²+4)(s²+6)/((s²+3)(s²+9)) b) Z2(s) = (s²+3)(s²+6)/(s(s²+4)(s²+9)) c) Z3(s) = (s²+4)(s²+6)/(s(s²+3)(s²+9)) d) Z4(s) = (s²+3)(s²+6)/((s²+4)(s²+9))

Checking the functions

An LC function must be an even/odd (or odd/even) ratio with simple poles and zeros on the jωj\omega axis that alternate, and it must have a pole or zero at both s=0s=0 and s=∞s=\infty (degrees differ by exactly 1).

FunctionCritical frequencies in order (ω\omega)Result
Z1Z_1z 0, p 1.732, z 2, z 2.449, p 3, p ∞Two zeros (2, 2.449) adjacent → not LC
Z2Z_2p 0, z 1.732, p 2, z 2.449, p 3, z ∞Alternate; odd/even form; degrees 4 and 5 → valid LC
Z3Z_3p 0, p 1.732, z 2, z 2.449, p 3Adjacent poles and zeros → not LC
Z4Z_4z 1.732, p 2, z 2.449, p 3Even/even, equal degrees, neither pole nor zero at 00 or ∞\infty → not LC

So Z2(s)=(s2+3)(s2+6)s(s2+4)(s2+9)=s4+9s2+18s5+13s3+36sZ_2(s) = \dfrac{(s^2+3)(s^2+6)}{s(s^2+4)(s^2+9)} = \dfrac{s^4+9s^2+18}{s^5+13s^3+36s} is realized.

Foster-I realization

Expand Z(s)Z(s) in partial fractions (each term is an impedance; the elements are in series):

k0=[s Z(s)]s=0=122k2=[(s2+4) Z(s)s]s2=−4=1102k3=[(s2+9) Z(s)s]s2=−9=25\begin{aligned} k_0 &= \left[s\,Z(s)\right]_{s=0} = \frac{1}{2} \\ 2k_{2} &= \left[\frac{(s^2+4)\,Z(s)}{s}\right]_{s^2=-4} = \frac{1}{10} \\ 2k_{3} &= \left[\frac{(s^2+9)\,Z(s)}{s}\right]_{s^2=-9} = \frac{2}{5} \end{aligned} Z(s)=12s+s10(s2+4)+2s5(s2+9)Z(s) = \frac{1}{2 s} + \frac{s}{10 \left(s^{2} + 4\right)} + \frac{2 s}{5 \left(s^{2} + 9\right)}
TermRuleElement value
C1C_1 (series, pole at 0)1/k01/k_02 F
L2∥C2L_2 \parallel C_2 (tank, ω2=4\omega^2=4)C=1/2kC=1/2k, L=2k/ω2L=2k/\omega^2C2C_2 = 10 F, L2L_2 = 1/40 H (≈ 0.025 H)
L3∥C3L_3 \parallel C_3 (tank, ω2=9\omega^2=9)C=1/2kC=1/2k, L=2k/ω2L=2k/\omega^2C3C_3 = 5/2 F (≈ 2.5 F), L3L_3 = 2/45 H (≈ 0.04444 H)
o--[C1]--[L2||C2]--[L3||C3]--o

Cauer-I realization

Z(s)Z(s) has a zero at s=∞s=\infty, so Y(s)=1/Z(s)Y(s)=1/Z(s) has a pole at infinity and the first element is a shunt capacitor. Divide repeatedly with polynomials in descending powers (continued fraction about s=∞s=\infty), inverting the remainder each time:

  1. Y1(s)=s5+13s3+36ss4+9s2+18Y_1(s) = \frac{s^{5} + 13 s^{3} + 36 s}{s^{4} + 9 s^{2} + 18} → quotient ss gives shunt C1C_1 = 1 F; remainder 2s(2s2+9)(s2+3)(s2+6)\frac{2 s \left(2 s^{2} + 9\right)}{\left(s^{2} + 3\right) \left(s^{2} + 6\right)}.
  2. Z2(s)=s4+9s2+184s3+18sZ_2(s) = \frac{s^{4} + 9 s^{2} + 18}{4 s^{3} + 18 s} → quotient s4\frac{s}{4} gives series L2L_2 = 1/4 H (≈ 0.25 H); remainder 9(s2+4)4s(2s2+9)\frac{9 \left(s^{2} + 4\right)}{4 s \left(2 s^{2} + 9\right)}.
  3. Y3(s)=8s3+36s9s2+36Y_3(s) = \frac{8 s^{3} + 36 s}{9 s^{2} + 36} → quotient 8s9\frac{8 s}{9} gives shunt C3C_3 = 8/9 F (≈ 0.8889 F); remainder 4s9(s2+4)\frac{4 s}{9 \left(s^{2} + 4\right)}.
  4. Z4(s)=9s2+364sZ_4(s) = \frac{9 s^{2} + 36}{4 s} → quotient 9s4\frac{9 s}{4} gives series L4L_4 = 9/4 H (≈ 2.25 H); remainder 9s\frac{9}{s}.
  5. Y5(s)=s9Y_5(s) = \frac{s}{9} → quotient s9\frac{s}{9} gives shunt C5C_5 = 1/9 F (≈ 0.1111 F); remainder 00.
ElementPositionValue
C1C_1shunt1 F
L2L_2series1/4 H (≈ 0.25 H)
C3C_3shunt8/9 F (≈ 0.8889 F)
L4L_4series9/4 H (≈ 2.25 H)
C5C_5shunt1/9 F (≈ 0.1111 F)
o----+---[L2]----+---[L4]----+
     |           |           |
   [C1]        [C3]        [C5]
     |           |           |
o----+-----------+-----------+

Both networks have five reactive elements, the minimum (canonical) number for this fifth-order function.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5

All Filter Design chapter 4 questions →