Skip to main content

Stability of cantilever wall, 8.6 m

Short answer

Overturning factor 2.42 and bearing capacity are safe with eccentricity within the middle third. Sliding safety factor is only 1.12, so a shear key is needed to reach the required 1.5.

Check different stability conditions for the given retaining wall. Assume appropriate value where necessary. [Figure: cantilever retaining wall, stem height 8.6 m, top width 0.4 m, backfill sloping at 10∘10^\circ with c=0c = 0, ϕ=32∘\phi = 32^\circ, γ=18 kN/m3\gamma = 18\ \text{kN/m}^3; base slab total width 4.7 m, base slab thickness 0.6 m, toe 0.8 m, embedment 1.5 m, stem inclined at 84∘84^\circ at the base. Dimensions as read from the scan.]

Assumptions (figure read from the scan): stem height 8.6 m, top width 0.4 m, front face vertical, back face inclined at 84∘84^\circ to the horizontal, so the stem thickness at the base is 0.4+8.6/tan⁡84∘=1.300.4 + 8.6/\tan84^\circ = 1.30 m. Base slab 0.6 m thick and 4.7 m wide, toe 0.8 m, so heel =4.7−0.8−1.30=2.60= 4.7-0.8-1.30 = 2.60 m. Concrete 24 kN/m3^3; backfill γ=18\gamma=18, ϕ=32∘\phi=32^\circ, c=0c=0, sloping at β=10∘\beta=10^\circ; foundation soil taken the same; base friction δ=23ϕ\delta = \tfrac23\phi. Rankine active thrust on a vertical plane through the heel, parallel to the slope.

1. Active thrust

Height of the plane: H′=9.2+(4.7−1.2)tan⁡10∘=9.82H' = 9.2 + (4.7-1.2)\tan10^\circ = 9.82 m.

Ka=cos⁡β cos⁡β−cos⁡2β−cos⁡2ϕcos⁡β+cos⁡2β−cos⁡2ϕ=0.3210K_a = \cos\beta\,\frac{\cos\beta-\sqrt{\cos^2\beta-\cos^2\phi}}{\cos\beta+\sqrt{\cos^2\beta-\cos^2\phi}} = 0.3210 Pa=12KaγH′2=0.5×0.3210×18×9.822=278.4 kN/mP_a = \tfrac12K_a\gamma H'^2 = 0.5\times0.3210\times18\times9.82^2 = 278.4\ \text{kN/m}

at H′/3=3.27H'/3 = 3.27 m above the base: Ph=274.2P_h = 274.2, Pv=48.3P_v = 48.3 kN/m (acting at the heel end, x=4.7x=4.7 m).

2. Vertical loads (about the toe)

PartForce (kN/m)Arm (m)Moment
Stem rectangle 0.4 x 8.6 x 2482.61.0082.6
Stem triangle93.31.50140.0
Base slab 4.7 x 0.6 x 2467.72.35159.0
Soil on heel and above back face (27.29 m2^2 x 18)491.33.181562.0
PvP_v48.34.70227.2
Total783.12170.8

Mo=Ph×H′/3=274.2×3.27=897.2M_o = P_h\times H'/3 = 274.2\times3.27 = 897.2 kN m/m.

3. Stability checks

  • Overturning: FSot=2170.8/897.2=2.42FS_{ot} = 2170.8/897.2 = 2.42 (>2). Safe.
  • Sliding: μ=tan⁡21.3∘=0.391\mu=\tan21.3^\circ = 0.391,
FSs=783.1×0.391274.2=1.12 (<1.5)FS_s = \frac{783.1\times0.391}{274.2} = 1.12\ (<1.5)

Not safe. The passive pressure on the 1.5 m embedment (Pp=12KpγD2=65.9P_p = \tfrac12K_p\gamma D^2 = 65.9 kN/m with Kp=3.25K_p=3.25) gives FSs=1.36FS_s = 1.36, still below 1.5, so a shear key under the stem (or a wider/longer heel) is required.

  • Base pressure: xˉ=(2170.8−897.2)/783.1=1.626\bar x = (2170.8-897.2)/783.1 = 1.626 m, e=2.35−1.626=0.724e = 2.35-1.626 = 0.724 m <B/6=0.783< B/6 = 0.783 m (no tension).
qmax=321 kN/m2 (toe),qmin=13 kN/m2 (heel)q_{max} = 321\ \text{kN/m}^2\ (\text{toe}),\qquad q_{min} = 13\ \text{kN/m}^2\ (\text{heel})
  • Bearing capacity (Vesic, ϕ=32∘\phi=32^\circ: Nq=23.18N_q=23.18, Nγ=30.21N_\gamma=30.21, B′=4.7−2e=3.25B' = 4.7-2e = 3.25 m, Df=1.5D_f=1.5 m): qu=γDfNq+12γB′Nγ=1510q_u = \gamma D_fN_q + \tfrac12\gamma B'N_\gamma = 1510 kN/m2^2; FSb=1510/321=4.7FS_b = 1510/321 = 4.7 (>3). Safe.
  • Overall stability: check a deep slip circle with Bishop's method (FS≥1.5FS\ge1.5) if soft soil lies below.

Answer: overturning (FS=2.42FS = 2.42), eccentricity and bearing are safe, but sliding (FS=1.12FS = 1.12) is not; add a shear key.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5

All Foundation Engineering chapter 3 questions →