Skip to main content

Ideal and RC filtering of white noise

Short answer

Ideal low-pass filtering of white noise yields a sinc autocorrelation R(τ)=N₀B sinc(2Bτ) with zeros at τ=k/(2B), so samples at Nyquist rate are uncorrelated. Practical RC filtering produces an always-positive exponential autocorrelation R(τ)=(N₀/(4RC))e^{-|τ|/RC} with no zero crossings, indicating correlated samples for all τ.

Explain and compare ideal and practical RC filtering of white noise with respect to change in autocorrelation function.

White noise (SW(f)=N0/2S_W(f)=N_0/2, RW(τ)=N02δ(τ)R_W(\tau)=\frac{N_0}{2}\delta(\tau)) has infinite power and zero correlation time. Passing it through a filter H(f)H(f) gives SY(f)=∣H(f)∣2N02S_Y(f)=\lvert H(f)\rvert^2\frac{N_0}{2} and RY(τ)=F−1{SY(f)}R_Y(\tau)=\mathcal{F}^{-1}\{S_Y(f)\}: the noise becomes band-limited (coloured) and its samples become correlated.

Ideal low-pass filtering

Ideal LPF, gain 1 for ∣f∣≤B\lvert f\rvert\le B, zero elsewhere:

SY(f)={N02,∣f∣≤B0,otherwiseS_Y(f)=\begin{cases}\frac{N_0}{2}, & \lvert f\rvert\le B\\ 0, & \text{otherwise}\end{cases} RY(τ)=∫−BBN02ej2πfτdf=N02⋅sin⁡2πBτπτ=N0B sin⁡2πBτ2πBτ\begin{aligned} R_Y(\tau) &= \int_{-B}^{B}\frac{N_0}{2}e^{j2\pi f\tau}df=\frac{N_0}{2}\cdot\frac{\sin2\pi B\tau}{\pi\tau} \\ &= N_0B\,\frac{\sin2\pi B\tau}{2\pi B\tau} \end{aligned}
  • Power RY(0)=N0BR_Y(0)=N_0B.
  • RY(τ)R_Y(\tau) is a sinc with zeros at τ=±k2B\tau=\pm\frac{k}{2B}, k=1,2,…k=1,2,\dots: samples taken at the Nyquist rate 2B2B are uncorrelated (independent if Gaussian).
  • It oscillates (takes negative values) and decays slowly as 1/τ1/\tau.

Practical RC low-pass filtering

H(f)=11+j2πfRCH(f)=\frac{1}{1+j2\pi fRC}, so

SY(f)=N0/21+(2πfRC)2S_Y(f)=\frac{N_0/2}{1+(2\pi fRC)^2}

Using the pair e−a∣τ∣↔2aa2+(2πf)2e^{-a\lvert\tau\rvert}\leftrightarrow\frac{2a}{a^2+(2\pi f)^2} with a=1/RCa=1/RC:

RY(τ)=N04RC e−∣τ∣/RCR_Y(\tau)=\frac{N_0}{4RC}\,e^{-\lvert\tau\rvert/RC}
  • Power RY(0)=N04RCR_Y(0)=\frac{N_0}{4RC}, i.e. NEB =14RC=π2f3dB=\frac{1}{4RC}=\frac\pi2f_{3dB}.
  • RY(τ)R_Y(\tau) is a decaying exponential: always positive, never exactly zero, falls to 1/e1/e at τ=RC\tau=RC. Correlation time ≈RC\approx RC.
 R(tau)  ideal LPF: sinc         RC LPF: exponential
   N0B .                     N0/4RC .
      / \                          /|\
  .  /   \  .                     / | \
 -.-/-----\-.-- tau          ----'--+--'---- tau
   -1/2B  1/2B                 -RC  0  RC

Comparison

PointIdeal LPF (bandwidth BB)RC LPF (f3dB=1/2πRCf_{3dB}=1/2\pi RC)
Output PSDFlat up to BB, sharp cut-offLorentzian, gradual roll-off
AutocorrelationN0B sinc(2Bτ)N_0B\,\text{sinc}(2B\tau)N04RCe−∣τ∣/RC\frac{N_0}{4RC}e^{-\lvert\tau\rvert/RC}
Output noise powerN0BN_0BN0/4RC=N0⋅π2f3dBN_0/4RC=N_0\cdot\frac\pi2f_{3dB}
Zero crossings of R(τ)R(\tau)At τ=k/2B\tau=k/2BNone
Sign of R(τ)R(\tau)Positive and negativeAlways positive
Decay of R(τ)R(\tau)Slow, ∝1/τ\propto1/\tauFast, exponential
RealisableNo (non-causal)Yes

In both cases a narrower bandwidth gives a wider autocorrelation (longer correlation time) and less noise power.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Communication Systems chapter 9 questions →