- 2082 Chaitra · 10 marks
Best installed capacity at 10% interest
Short answer
Best installed capacity is 400 kW, maximizing net annual benefit at $43,373. Firm energy is 0.569 GWh, secondary energy 1.533 GWh, total energy 2.102 GWh, plant factor 60%. Determined by comparing incremental benefit and cost across capacity levels using capital recovery factor and O&M.
The monthly power output (in kW) for a proposed hydropower plant is given below. The interest rate is 10%, energy price is US 800/kW, annual operation and maintenance cost is 2.5% of variable cost, and the economic life of the project is 40 years. Determine the best-installed capacity, firm energy, secondary energy, total energy, and plant factor.
| Month | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power (kW) | 80 | 65 | 95 | 200 | 320 | 400 | 510 | 650 | 560 | 270 | 140 | 110 |
The best (optimum) installed capacity is the capacity at which the net annual benefit (value of energy sold minus annual cost of the capacity) is maximum. Equivalently, the last increment of capacity added should earn at least as much as it costs.
Data and assumptions
- Each month is taken as h.
- Energy price = 40 $/MWh = 0.04 $/kWh.
- Capital recovery factor (10%, 40 years):
- Annual cost per kW of capacity = capital charge + O&M:
Power duration (descending order)
650, 560, 510, 400, 320, 270, 200, 140, 110, 95, 80, 65 kW. A capacity produces in each month.
Annual energy for capacity : kWh.
Benefit–cost table
| Capacity (kW) | Energy (kWh/yr) | Benefit ($) | Cost ($) | Net ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 569,400 | 22,776 | 6,618 | 16,159 |
| 140 | 1,073,100 | 42,924 | 14,253 | 28,671 |
| 200 | 1,379,700 | 55,188 | 20,362 | 34,827 |
| 270 | 1,686,300 | 67,452 | 27,488 | 39,964 |
| 320 | 1,868,800 | 74,752 | 32,578 | 42,174 |
| 400 | 2,102,400 | 84,096 | 40,723 | 43,373 |
| 510 | 2,343,300 | 93,732 | 51,922 | 41,810 |
| 560 | 2,416,300 | 96,652 | 57,012 | 39,640 |
| 650 | 2,482,000 | 99,280 | 66,175 | 33,105 |
Benefit = ; Cost = .
Incremental check: going from 320 to 400 kW adds 80 kW (cost $8,145) and 233,600 kWh (benefit $9,344): worth it. Going from 400 to 510 kW adds 110 kW (cost $11,199) but only 240,900 kWh (benefit $9,636): not worth it. A kW is worth installing only if it runs at least of the year (about 3.5 months); the 400–510 kW band runs only 3 months.
Results
- Best installed capacity = 400 kW (maximum net benefit $43,373/yr).
- Firm energy (minimum power 65 kW available all year):
- Total energy at 400 kW = 2,102,400 kWh = 2.102 GWh.
- Secondary energy = 2,102,400 − 569,400 = 1,533,000 kWh = 1.533 GWh.
- Plant factor:
Answer: Installed capacity = 400 kW; firm energy = 0.569 GWh; secondary energy = 1.533 GWh; total energy = 2.102 GWh; plant factor = 60%.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Best installed capacity at 12% interest · Hydro Power, chapter 3
- RoR best installed capacity (NRs, 45 years) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 3
- RoR best installed capacity (USD 1200 million) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 3
- RoR best installed capacity (USD 2795 million) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 3
- Optimize capacity by marginal cost-benefit · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 3