- 2073 Shrawan · 4+4+2 marks
Gravity dam stability with seismic load
Short answer
Overturning FS=1.83 (safe). Sliding friction alone FS=1.04, shear-friction factor SFF=3.50 (safe). Maximum vertical stress 641 kN/m², principal stress 1051 kN/m², both within allowable limits; no tension. Dam is stable.
Check the stability of the dam against overturning, sliding and material failure (stresses) with respect to the worst location, assuming that in addition to self weight, 25% of the mass of the dam will act as a horizontal component (from the upstream side), whereas 15% acts as an upward vertical component as seismic load and will act at the CG of the section. Assume the unit weight of concrete as 24 kN/m³, allowable compressive stress in foundation and concrete as 2,500 kN/m² and 3,000 kN/m², angle of friction between concrete and foundation as 36° and unit shear resistance between foundation and dam as 700 kN/m². [Figure: dam with crest width 6.0 m, top level 150.0, water level 135.0, base level 100.0; upstream face with slope 0.1 : 1; downstream slope 0.8 : 1; points A (heel) and B (toe).]
Data and assumptions
- Base RL 100, crest RL 150: height 50 m. Water RL 135: m. Crest width 6 m. U/s face slope 0.1 : 1 (leaning inwards going up), so the heel A is at and the u/s edge of the crest at ; d/s slope 0.8 : 1, so the toe B is at m. Base m.
- The base (section A-B) is the worst location: it carries the largest load and moment.
- kN/m³, kN/m³. No tail water. Hydrostatic thrust and uplift (full, triangular, no drainage: kN/m² at the heel to zero at the toe) act together with the seismic loads.
- Seismic: horizontal force from the upstream side (towards the downstream) and vertical force upward, both at the centre of gravity (CG).
6 m
+----+ RL150
/ |
/ | RL135 ~~ water
/ |
A(heel) \___________ B(toe)
0.1:1 0.8:1 B = 51 m
Self-weight and CG
Area m². kN/m. CG: m from the heel ( m from the toe), m.
Seismic: kN/m; kN/m (upward), so the effective weight kN/m.
Forces
| Force | Magnitude (kN/m) | Arm from toe (m) | Moment about toe (kN·m/m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effective weight 0.85W | 29,070 | 31.95 | 928,710 |
| Water over the u/s slope | 601 | 49.83 | 29,943 |
| ΣM_R | 958,653 | ||
| Water thrust | 6,009 | 11.67 (height) | 70,101 |
| Uplift (upward) | 8,755 | 34.00 | 297,684 |
| Seismic | 8,550 | 18.42 (height) | 157,500 |
| ΣM_O | 525,285 |
kN/m; kN/m.
Overturning
This is above 1.5 (a value of 1.1-1.5 is adequate for the seismic case), so the dam is safe against overturning.
Sliding
Friction coefficient ; shear resistance kN/m².
Friction alone is just above 1. Including the shear resistance of the foundation contact, , which is well above the minimum usually required for loading with earthquake, so the section is safe in sliding.
Material failure (stresses on the base)
m from the toe; m m (no tension).
Both are compressive and less than the allowable 2500 kN/m² (foundation).
Major principal stress at the toe (no tail water, ):
so the concrete is also safe.
Conclusion: the dam is safe against overturning (), sliding () and material failure (maximum vertical stress 641 kN/m² < 2500 kN/m², principal stress 1051 kN/m² < 3000 kN/m², no tension).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Gravity dam stability: flotation, overturning, sliding · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam forces and stability checks (2081 Baishakh) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stresses with drainage gallery uplift · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stresses, principal stress, FOS (2079) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stability (SG 2.4, RL 0-70) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stability and shear stress at toe (2081) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Sliding and overturning check of gravity dam · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Overturning and sliding check with shear strength · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Elementary profile and 40 m gravity dam stability · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Stability checks of 50 m trapezoidal dam · Hydro Power, chapter 4