Skip to main content

Pressurized vs non-pressurized intakes

Short answer

Non-pressurized intakes lead to free-surface canals/tunnels; pressurized intakes lead to pressure conduits and are fully submerged. Pressurized intakes require greater submergence, anti-vortex devices, and air vents; non-pressurized are simpler and cheaper. Pressurized intakes have a bell-mouth transition and service/emergency gates in a shaft.

Differentiate between pressurized and non-pressurized intakes in a RoR system.

A non-pressurized (free-surface) intake leads water into a canal or a free-surface tunnel, so the flow has a free surface. A pressurized intake leads water into a pressure tunnel or penstock, so the opening is fully submerged below the minimum water level and the conduit runs full.

PointNon-pressurized intakePressurized intake
Flow in the conduitOpen channel flow with a free surfaceClosed conduit under pressure
Typical useRoR plants taking water to a settling basin and open canal or free-flow tunnelStorage plants, or RoR with a pressure headrace tunnel
Intake openingOrifice/side opening with sill; may be partially submergedAlways fully submerged below minimum operating level
Vortex and air entryNot criticalCritical: needs enough submergence, anti-vortex devices and an air vent
Water level variationSmall (weir pond is nearly constant)Large (reservoir drawdown)
TransitionShort, to the canal widthLong bell-mouth from rectangular to circular tunnel
GateRegulating gate or stop-log at the entranceService gate (and emergency gate) in a gate shaft
Trash rackModerate size, can be raked from the topLarge, inclined, with trash-rake machine
SedimentGravel trap and settling basin followSediment excluded by a high sill
CostCheaper, simpleMore costly, since structure is deeper and heavier

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Hydropower Engineering chapter 5 questions →