Skip to main content

Studies in reconnaissance, pre-feasibility, feasibility

Short answer

Reconnaissance: desk study, site visit, regional hydrology, rough layout, environmental screening. Pre-feasibility: moderate surveys, site hydrology, geophysics, alternative layouts, scoping. Feasibility: detailed surveys, long-term hydrology with floods/sediment, drilling, optimized design, complete IEE/EIA and financial analysis.

Highlight the major studies and investigations carried out during reconnaissance, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies (list the minimum checklist for these studies).

Hydropower studies are done in stages so that money is spent in steps and weak projects are dropped early. Each stage gives more detail and less uncertainty (cost accuracy about ±30-40% at reconnaissance, ±20-25% at pre-feasibility, ±10-15% at feasibility).

1. Reconnaissance study

Purpose: to identify possible sites and find if the project is worth further study.

  • Desk study: topographic maps (1:25,000/1:50,000), satellite images, geological maps.
  • Rapid site visit: access, river and valley shape, rough geology.
  • Hydrology: use of nearby station data and regional methods (e.g. WECS-DHM method, MIP) to get mean flow.
  • Rough layout, installed capacity, energy and rough cost estimate.
  • Quick check of environment and social issues; ranking of sites.

2. Pre-feasibility study

Purpose: to compare layout options and choose the best one.

  • Topographic survey of the headworks and powerhouse areas (1:2,000-1:5,000), river cross-sections.
  • Hydrology: at least 1 year of gauging if possible; flow duration curve, floods (design flood 100 yr), sediment.
  • Geology: surface mapping, geophysical survey (seismic refraction/resistivity), a few drill holes.
  • Alternative layouts and capacities; selection of the best.
  • Cost estimate (±20-25%), preliminary economic analysis (B/C, IRR), preliminary environment study (scoping).
  • Access road and transmission line options.

3. Feasibility study

Purpose: to prove the technical, economic and environmental viability so that the investor and lender can decide.

  • Detailed topographic survey (1:500-1:1000 for structures).
  • Hydrology: long term flow series, FDC, 100-year and 1000-year flood, GLOF, sediment load.
  • Geology: detailed mapping, drilling at all structures, tunnel and test adits, construction material survey and laboratory tests.
  • Optimisation of capacity; layout design of headworks, desander, canal/tunnel, forebay, penstock and powerhouse; selection of turbines and equipment.
  • Bill of quantities and cost estimate (±10-15%), construction schedule and plan.
  • Financial and economic analysis (NPV, B/C, IRR, sensitivity).
  • Complete IEE/EIA, resettlement plan, and risk assessment.

Minimum checklist

ItemReconPre-FSFS
Maps and surveyExisting mapsModerate surveyDetailed survey
HydrologyRegionalSite gauging, floodsLong series, floods, sediment
GeologyDesk and visitMapping, geophysicsDrilling, tests
LayoutSingleAlternativesFinal optimised
CostRough±20-25%±10-15%
EnvironmentScreeningScopingIEE/EIA

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Hydropower Engineering chapter 2 questions →