- 2076 Bhadra · 8+2 marks
Butterworth/Chebyshev LPF and double π-section
Short answer
Insertion loss method uses PLR = 1/(1−|Γ|²). Butterworth: PLR = 1+k²(ω/ωc)^2N, gk = 2 sin[(2k−1)π/2N]. Chebyshev: PLR = 1+k²TN², with ripple formulas. Double π (N=5) at 2 GHz, 50 Ω: Butterworth C1=C5=0.984 pF, L2=L4=6.438 nH, C3=3.183 pF; Chebyshev 0.5 dB: C1=C5=2.715 pF, L2=L4=4.893 nH, C3=4.044 pF. Microstrip: shunt C as low-Z lines, series L as high-Z lines.
How is a low pass filter prototype based on Butterworth and Chebyshev approximations designed using insertion loss method? Implement a low pass filter double π-sections using microstrips.
In the insertion loss method, the filter response is defined by the power loss ratio:
PLR = P_available / P_delivered = 1 / (1 − |Γ(ω)|²)
IL (dB) = 10 log PLR
A physically realisable PLR must be a ratio of even polynomials in ω, so the designer chooses a polynomial that gives the wanted response.
Prototype design steps (both responses)
- Specify fc, R0, ripple Lr (Chebyshev) and stopband attenuation.
- Choose PLR and find the order N.
- Get prototype values g1 … gN+1 (R0 = 1 Ω, ωc = 1 rad/s).
- Scale: L = g·R0/ωc, C = g/(R0·ωc).
- Realise with microstrip lines and simulate.
Butterworth (maximally flat)
PLR = 1 + k²(ω/ωc)^(2N)
gk = 2 sin[(2k − 1)π/(2N)]
Flat passband, monotonic roll-off of 20N dB/decade.
Chebyshev (equal ripple)
PLR = 1 + k²·TN²(ω/ωc), TN = Chebyshev polynomial
k² = 10^(Lr/10) − 1 (ripple Lr dB)
β = ln[coth(Lr/17.37)], γ = sinh[β/(2N)]
g1 = 2a1/γ, gk = 4a(k−1)ak / [b(k−1)g(k−1)]
ak = sin[(2k−1)π/2N], bk = γ² + sin²(kπ/N)
Ripple in the passband, but a sharper cut-off for the same N. For odd N, g(N+1) = 1.
Double π-section (N = 5) values
A double π-section is C–L–C–L–C (two π sections sharing the middle C). Assume fc = 2 GHz, R0 = 50 Ω, ripple 0.5 dB.
| k | Butterworth gk | C or L | Chebyshev 0.5 dB gk | C or L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.618 | 0.984 pF | 1.7058 | 2.715 pF |
| 2 | 1.618 | 6.438 nH | 1.2296 | 4.893 nH |
| 3 | 2.000 | 3.183 pF | 2.5409 | 4.044 pF |
| 4 | 1.618 | 6.438 nH | 1.2296 | 4.893 nH |
| 5 | 0.618 | 0.984 pF | 1.7058 | 2.715 pF |
Microstrip implementation (stepped impedance, Chebyshev)
Shunt C → low-Z line (20 Ω), βl = g·Zℓ/R0; series L → high-Z line (120 Ω), βl = g·R0/Zh. Assumed εr = 4.2, h = 1.58 mm.
| Element | Z | βl | Length | Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1, C5 | 20 Ω | 39.09° | 8.61 mm | 11.27 mm |
| L2, L4 | 120 Ω | 29.35° | 7.26 mm | 0.43 mm |
| C3 | 20 Ω | 58.23° | 12.83 mm | 11.27 mm |
(For the Butterworth version: C1 = C5 → 14.16°, L2 = L4 → 38.63°, C3 → 45.84°.)
50Ω ____ ______ ____ 50Ω
====| |------| |------| |====
| C1 | L2 | C3 | L4 | C5 |
|____| thin |______| thin |____|
The middle capacitor line is long (βl > 45°), so in practice it is split or tuned in simulation, and step discontinuities are included.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Butterworth LPF prototype and π-section microstrip · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Why insertion loss; double-section shunt-arm LPF · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- LPF prototype conversion and second order HPF · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Butterworth LPF prototyping by insertion loss · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- S-parameters and Butterworth/Chebyshev filter responses · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 3
- Insertion loss design of given LC ladder filter · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- 5th order Butterworth LPF with first-order and MFB sections · Filter Design, chapter 8
- RC low pass filter operation · Basic Electronics Engineering, chapter 1 · asked 5×
- Impulse response of ideal low pass filter · Signals and Systems, chapter 5 · asked 5×
- Matched filter approximation using RC low pass filter · Communication Systems, chapter 9 · asked 2×