- 2079 Bhadra · 6+2 marks
Butterworth LPF prototype and π-section microstrip
Short answer
Butterworth LPF using insertion loss method: PLR=1+(ω/ωc)^(2N), N determined from stopband attenuation. Impedance/frequency scaling yields C1=C3=1.59 pF, L2=7.96 nH for 50 Ω, 2 GHz. Microstrip π-section: high-Z (120 Ω) line for L2 (βl=47.75°, 11.81 mm), low-Z (20 Ω) for C1,C3 (βl=22.92°, 5.05 mm) on εr=4.2, h=1.58 mm.
How is a low pass filter prototype based on Butterworth approximation designed using insertion loss method? Implement a low pass filter π section using microstrips.
In the insertion loss method, the filter response is defined by the power loss ratio:
PLR = P_available / P_delivered = 1 / (1 − |Γ(ω)|²)
IL (dB) = 10 log PLR
A physically realisable PLR must be a ratio of even polynomials in ω, so the designer chooses a polynomial that gives the wanted response.
Butterworth (maximally flat) LPF prototype design
- Choose the response: PLR = 1 + k²(ω/ωc)^(2N). With k = 1, the cut-off ωc is the 3 dB point. The response is as flat as possible at ω = 0 (first 2N−1 derivatives are zero) and falls at 20N dB/decade beyond ωc.
- Find the order N from the required stopband loss. Example spec: at least 15 dB at 2fc.
N ≥ log10(10^(A/10) − 1) / (2·log10(ω/ωc))
= log10(10^1.5 − 1) / (2·log10 2) = 2.47 → N = 3
Check: IL(2fc) = 10 log(1 + 2^6) = 18.13 dB ≥ 15 dB
- Read the element values for source R = 1 Ω, ωc = 1 rad/s from the Butterworth table, or gk = 2 sin[(2k−1)π/2N]. For N = 3: g1 = 1, g2 = 2, g3 = 1, g4 = 1 (load).
- Scale impedance and frequency (R0 = 50 Ω, fc = 2 GHz assumed): C = g/(ωc·R0), L = g·R0/ωc.
- Convert to distributed form (Richards/Kuroda or stepped-impedance) and simulate.
π-section (shunt C – series L – shunt C)
C1 = C3 = 1/(2π·2×10⁹·50) = 1.5915 pF
L2 = 2·50/(2π·2×10⁹) = 7.9577 nH
Microstrip (stepped-impedance) implementation
High-Z lines act as series inductors, low-Z lines as shunt capacitors: βl = g·Zℓ/R0 for a capacitor, βl = g·R0/Zh for an inductor. Assumed substrate εr = 4.2, h = 1.58 mm, Zℓ = 20 Ω, Zh = 120 Ω (widths from microstrip design formulas, λg at 2 GHz):
| Element | Line Z | βl | Length | Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 (g = 1) | 20 Ω | 22.92° | 5.05 mm | 11.27 mm |
| L2 (g = 2) | 120 Ω | 47.75° | 11.81 mm | 0.43 mm |
| C3 (g = 1) | 20 Ω | 22.92° | 5.05 mm | 11.27 mm |
50Ω ____ ____ 50Ω
======| |=======| |======
| C1 | L2 | C3 |
|____| thin |____|
wide line wide
Feed lines are 50 Ω (3.13 mm). Since βl of L2 is slightly above 45°, the response is checked by simulation and lengths are fine-tuned.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Butterworth/Chebyshev LPF and double π-section · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Insertion loss method and microstrip LPF · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Insertion loss design of given LC ladder filter · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Butterworth LPF prototyping by insertion loss · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Why insertion loss; double-section shunt-arm LPF · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- LPF prototype conversion and second order HPF · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Matched filter approximation using RC low pass filter · Communication Systems, chapter 9 · asked 2×
- Matched filter approximation using ideal LPF · Communication Systems, chapter 9 · asked 2×
- Characteristics of Butterworth approximation · Filter Design, chapter 2
- RC low pass filter operation · Basic Electronics Engineering, chapter 1 · asked 5×