Skip to main content

Engineer opens confidential salary file

Short answer

Ramesh acted unethically by breaching confidentiality and accessing the computer without permission, a possible violation of company policy and the Electronic Transactions Act. Sudhir should calmly discuss the matter privately, issue a proportionate warning, secure the computer, and review the pay policy if unfairness exists.

Engineer Ramesh Shrestha was working with the contractor in the mega construction project (say construction of multi-dimensional underground business complex in Kathmandu). You were given responsibility to control quality of work in the site. The construction company had maintained confidentiality of the incentives and salary of employees and the state of quality of work as a management tools. One day, Ramesh happen to come to the office of executive engineer Sudhir, from site. Er. Sudhir was not in his office. While waiting for Er. Sudhir, Er. Ramesh went through the computer of executive engineer. He opened entire confidential file of incentives and salaries of employees in the computer. He found differences in the level of salaries and incentives to different employees. In the mean time Er. Sudhir came to his room and found Ramesh looking confidential file on the computer. Sudhir was not happy with Ramesh for this act. How do you judge the conduct of Ramesh in the ethical ground? How should Sudhir react with Ramesh for this behavior?

Judgement of Ramesh's conduct

Ramesh was an engineer working for the contractor at the site. He had no work-related reason to read the salary and incentive file, and he entered the executive engineer's computer without permission while waiting. His conduct is unethical.

  • Breach of confidentiality and trust: the company had declared salary data confidential. Engineers must respect the confidentiality of the employer's information; the Nepal Engineering Council code of conduct calls for loyalty and faithful service. Opening the file out of curiosity is a misuse of an opportunity.
  • Unauthorised access: using another person's computer and opening files without permission violates company policy, and it may be an offence under the Electronic Transactions Act 2063 (unauthorised access to computer data).
  • Harm: such information can cause jealousy, demands, quarrels and loss of morale, and damage the trust between management and staff.
  • Mitigating points: he did not copy or spread the data (as far as the case says), the computer was left open, and he may be genuinely worried about fairness in pay. But these do not justify his act. If he felt the pay was unfair, the right step was to raise it with management.

How Sudhir should react

  1. Stay calm and talk to Ramesh in private, not in front of others. Ask what he saw and why.
  2. Make Ramesh understand that the act was wrong, and ask him to keep what he saw confidential. Ask for his assurance that no copy or disclosure was made.
  3. Follow the company's disciplinary procedure in a proportionate way: a written warning or a record in his file for a first mistake of this sort, not a harsh dismissal unless it is repeated or data has been leaked.
  4. Fix the weakness: lock the computer and protect confidential files with passwords and access rights, since leaving the computer open was also Sudhir's own failure.
  5. Review the pay and incentive policy. If real unfairness exists, correct it or explain the principles to the staff, because secrecy often produces such curiosity.
  6. Remember that the confidentiality of the "state of quality of work" must not be used to hide defects that affect safety; any quality problem should be reported to the client.

Both should keep the matter professional, and avoid revenge or gossip.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

Related questions

All Engineering Professional Practice chapter 7 questions →