- 2080 Bhadra · 3+5 marks
Blocking and non-blocking switching
Short answer
A blocking switch may deny a call between free ports when no internal path is available; a non-blocking switch never does. A three‑stage space switch becomes non‑blocking with k ≥ 2n−1 middle arrays; a TST digital switch is non‑blocking when internal time slots l ≥ 2c−1. E.g., with E1 links (c=32), l ≥ 63 slots ensures non‑blocking operation.
What is blocking and non-blocking switching system? At which condition digital switch work as no blocking? Explain with example.
Blocking and non-blocking switching
- A blocking switch is one in which a call between a free input and a free output may still fail because no free internal path exists (internal links are busy with other calls). Multistage networks with too few middle-stage paths are blocking. Blocking probability is the chance that such a call is lost.
- A non-blocking switch is one in which any free input can always be connected to any free output, whatever other calls are in progress. A single-stage crossbar is non-blocking but needs crosspoints.
| Point | Blocking | Non-blocking |
|---|---|---|
| Internal path | May not be free | Always free |
| Crosspoints / hardware | Fewer | More |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Grade of service | Small loss allowed | Zero internal loss |
| Typical use | Local exchanges with light traffic | Trunk/transit switches |
Condition for a digital switch to be non-blocking
(a) Space-division three-stage (Clos) network. With inputs per first-stage array and middle arrays, the worst case is: the calling input's array already has busy inputs using different middle arrays, and the called output's array has busy outputs using other middle arrays. One more middle array is needed:
(b) TST digital switch. Each incoming link has time slots, and the time-multiplexed space stage has internal time slots. By the same reasoning (with time slots in place of middle arrays):
So a TST switch is non-blocking when the space stage runs at about twice the slot rate of the external links (time expansion).
(c) STS digital switch. With incoming TDM links and centre-stage TSIs: .
(d) Single time switch (TSI). It is always non-blocking provided the memory is fast enough: .
Example
A TST switch has E1 links with slots. For non-blocking operation, , so practical designs use 64 internal slots. With only (no expansion), and link occupancy 0.9 E, blocking probability is
Hence the time expansion to is what makes the switch non-blocking.
For a space switch example: , needs middle arrays for non-blocking operation.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Digital exchange principles; non-blocking 3-stage · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Strictly non-blocking 3-stage condition · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- TST time slots for non-blocking operation · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Digital switching system and its functions · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Multistage switching and TST blocking · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Multistage switching and STS blocking · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Analog and digital system block diagrams; linear and non-linear distortion · Communication Systems, chapter 1
- Dipole potential; no work along bisector · Engineering Physics, chapter 7
- Causality condition for CT LTI system · Signals and Systems, chapter 5
- T/F: switching surge ratio vs system voltage · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3 · asked 4×