- 2069 Chaitra · 2+6 marks
S and T switches; 3-stage vs 2-stage
Short answer
Space switches change highway, time switches change time slot. Two-stage TS/ST networks offer a single path, so blocking is high. TST uses an internal slot x: input TSI moves to x, space connects highways in x, output TSI to destination slot, giving l paths. STS uses k centre TSIs, providing k paths. Blocking = [1-(1-p')^2]^k or ^l, vastly reduced.
What do you mean by S (space) and T (time) switches? Show that 3-stage STS or TST network can minimize the switching problems associated with 2-stage ST or TS network with their working models.
S and T switches
- Space (S) switch: a time-multiplexed crosspoint matrix that connects an input TDM highway to an output highway in a given time slot. It changes the highway but not the slot.
- Time (T) switch / TSI: a speech memory with a control memory that writes samples and reads them in a different order. It changes the slot but not the highway.
Problem with two-stage ST and TS networks
To connect slot on highway to slot on highway , both the slot and the highway must change.
TS: HWa --[T: i->j]--[S: a->b in slot j]-- HWb
ST: HWa --[S: a->b in slot i]--[T: i->j]-- HWb
- In TS, the space stage must use slot ; if slot is already used by another input highway to reach , the call is blocked.
- In ST, the space stage must use slot ; if slot is busy into highway , the call is blocked.
- There is only one path, so the blocking probability equals the chance that this particular link is busy (about ). This is too high for an exchange.
Three-stage TST network
HWa->[TSI-A: i->x]->[S: a->b in x]->[TSI-B: x->j]->HWb
- Input TSI moves the sample from slot to any free internal slot .
- Space stage connects to in slot .
- Output TSI moves it from to .
The controller can pick any of internal slots, so there are alternative paths.
Three-stage STS network
HWa->[S: a->m in i]->[TSI m: i->j]->[S: m->b in j]->HWb
- Input space stage sends the sample in slot to any free centre TSI .
- TSI changes the slot from to .
- Output space stage connects TSI to highway in slot .
There are alternative paths (centre TSIs):
Comparison (example)
For : a two-stage network blocks with probability about 0.3 (one link busy). A three-stage network with 8 paths gives , and with 32 paths about .
| Network | Paths | Blocking |
|---|---|---|
| TS / ST | 1 | High (≈ ) |
| STS | Low, non-blocking if | |
| TST | Very low, non-blocking if |
So 3-stage STS or TST networks remove the single-path problem of 2-stage networks; TST is preferred because time expansion is cheaper than space expansion.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Space and time switches; STS vs TST · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- TST vs STS and three-stage design · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Multistage switching; TST vs STS · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- ST and TS drawbacks solved by STS · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Clos network and STS/TST blocking · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Time switch and two-stage T-S network · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Context switching; distributed vs network OS · Distributed System, chapter 3