- 2070 Chaitra · 2+2+4 marks
ST and TS drawbacks solved by STS
Short answer
Two-stage TS and ST networks suffer high blocking because the space stage must use a fixed slot. STS solves this by adding k centre TSIs: input space sends the sample in its original slot to any free TSI, TSI changes the slot, output space connects. Blocking becomes [1-(1-p')^2]^k, and if k≥2N-1 it is non-blocking.
What are the drawbacks of ST and TS switch and how are they solved by STS switch? Explain.
Drawbacks of ST and TS switches
A TS switch has a time stage followed by a space stage; an ST switch has a space stage followed by a time stage. Both are two-stage and give only one possible path for each connection, so they block heavily.
- TS drawback: the input TSI moves the sample from slot to the wanted output slot on its own highway, and then the space stage must connect the highway to the output highway in slot . If another input highway already uses slot to reach the same output highway, the call is blocked, even though both A and B are free.
- ST drawback: the space stage must connect input highway to output highway in the input slot . If slot is already used on output highway by a call from another input, the call is blocked. The output TSI could change the slot afterwards, but it never receives the sample.
TS: [T] -> [S] S must use slot j (fixed)
ST: [S] -> [T] S must use slot i (fixed)
=> one path only, blocking = P(that slot busy)
How STS solves this
An STS switch has an input space stage, a middle stage of TSIs and an output space stage.
HW1 -->+------+ [TSI 1] +------+--> HW1
HW2 -->|N x k |->[TSI 2]->|k x N |--> HW2
HWN -->+------+ [TSI k] +------+--> HWN
- In input slot , the input S stage can send the sample to any free centre TSI (one with a free link in slot ).
- TSI changes the slot from to .
- In slot , the output S stage connects TSI to output highway .
- The call is blocked only if all centre TSIs are busy in slot or slot .
So there are now alternative paths instead of one. Using a Lee graph with internal link occupancy :
For and : , compared with about for a single path. With the STS switch becomes strictly non-blocking.
(TST solves the same problem using internal time slots as alternative paths, and is usually cheaper.)
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Time and space switch drawbacks · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Short note: ST switch · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Space switch and two-stage S-T drawbacks · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Time switch and two-stage T-S network · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Space switch and why TST is used · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Multistage switching; TST vs STS · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- IPv4 drawbacks solved by IPv6 · Computer Networks and Security, chapter 7 · asked 2×