Skip to main content

EAC for a two machine system

Short answer

For a two-machine system, subtract individual swing equations to get an equivalent single machine with Meq = M1M2/(M1+M2). Stability holds if accelerating area equals decelerating area before delta_max = 180 deg - arcsin(Pm/Pmax). In the example, Pmax = 2 pu, delta0 = 23.58 deg, delta1 = 44.43 deg, A1 = 0.105, A2max = 0.629, so the system is stable with delta2 = 68.20 deg.

What is equal area criterion for assessing the transient stability of a two machine system? Explain and justify with the help of a suitable example.

The equal area criterion (EAC) is a direct method for checking transient stability without solving the swing equation. A system is stable after a disturbance if the area representing the kinetic energy gained by the rotor (accelerating area A1A_1) can be returned as an equal decelerating area A2A_2 before the rotor angle passes the maximum allowed angle. The criterion applies to a one-machine–infinite-bus system, or to a two-machine system after it has been reduced to an equivalent single machine.

Reduction of a two-machine system

Consider two finite machines connected by a reactance XX, with internal voltages E1∠δ1E_1\angle\delta_1 and E2∠δ2E_2\angle\delta_2 (lossless network). Their swing equations are

M1d2δ1dt2=Pm1−Pe1,M2d2δ2dt2=Pm2−Pe2M_1\frac{d^2\delta_1}{dt^2} = P_{m1} - P_{e1}, \qquad M_2\frac{d^2\delta_2}{dt^2} = P_{m2} - P_{e2}

For a lossless link, Pe2=−Pe1P_{e2} = -P_{e1}. Let δ=δ1−δ2\delta = \delta_1 - \delta_2. Subtract the second equation divided by M2M_2 from the first divided by M1M_1:

d2δdt2=Pm1−Pe1M1−Pm2+Pe1M2M1M2M1+M2d2δdt2=M2Pm1−M1Pm2M1+M2−Pe1\begin{aligned} \frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= \frac{P_{m1}-P_{e1}}{M_1} - \frac{P_{m2}+P_{e1}}{M_2} \\ \frac{M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= \frac{M_2P_{m1}-M_1P_{m2}}{M_1+M_2} - P_{e1} \end{aligned}

So the system behaves like one machine on an infinite bus:

Meqd2δdt2=Pm,eq−Pmaxsin⁡δM_{eq}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_{m,eq} - P_{max}\sin\delta

with Meq=M1M2M1+M2M_{eq} = \dfrac{M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}, Pm,eq=M2Pm1−M1Pm2M1+M2P_{m,eq} = \dfrac{M_2P_{m1}-M_1P_{m2}}{M_1+M_2} and Pmax=E1E2XP_{max} = \dfrac{E_1E_2}{X}.

Equal area criterion

Multiply the equivalent swing equation by 2 dδdt2\,\dfrac{d\delta}{dt} and integrate:

(dδdt)2=2Meq∫δ0δ(Pm,eq−Pe) dδ\left(\frac{d\delta}{dt}\right)^2 = \frac{2}{M_{eq}}\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta}(P_{m,eq}-P_e)\,d\delta

The relative angle stops changing (dδ/dt=0d\delta/dt = 0) and the system is stable if

∫δ0δ2(Pm,eq−Pe) dδ=0    ⟹    A1=A2\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_{2}}(P_{m,eq}-P_e)\,d\delta = 0 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; A_1 = A_2

This must happen at some δ2≤δmax=180∘−sin⁡−1(Pm,eq/Pmax)\delta_2 \le \delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}(P_{m,eq}/P_{max}).

 Pe
  |          _______
  |        /    A2   \     Pmax sin(delta)
 P1 ------/----------- \------------
  |   A1 /|             \
 P0 ----/-|-             \
  |    /  |               \
  +---d0--d1-----d2--------dmax-- delta

Example (justification)

Assume two machines linked by a line, with E1=1.2E_1 = 1.2 pu, E2=1.0E_2 = 1.0 pu, X=0.6X = 0.6 pu, and H1=4H_1 = 4, H2=6H_2 = 6 MJ/MVA on a common base. The machines are initially transferring P0=0.8P_0 = 0.8 pu, and the equivalent input then rises suddenly to P1=1.4P_1 = 1.4 pu.

  • Pmax=1.2×1.00.6=2.0P_{max} = \dfrac{1.2\times 1.0}{0.6} = 2.0 pu and Heq=4×64+6=2.4H_{eq} = \dfrac{4\times 6}{4+6} = 2.4 MJ/MVA. (HeqH_{eq} affects the speed of the swing but not the angles.)
  • Initial angle: δ0=sin⁡−1(0.8/2)=23.58∘\delta_0 = \sin^{-1}(0.8/2) = 23.58^\circ.
  • New equilibrium: δ1=sin⁡−1(1.4/2)=44.43∘\delta_1 = \sin^{-1}(1.4/2) = 44.43^\circ. Limit: δmax=180∘−44.43∘=135.57∘\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 44.43^\circ = 135.57^\circ.

The accelerating area is

A1=P1(δ1−δ0)−Pmax(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ1)=0.105 pu⋅radA_1 = P_1(\delta_1-\delta_0) - P_{max}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_1) = 0.105\ \text{pu·rad}

The decelerating area available up to δmax\delta_{max} is

A2,max=Pmax(cos⁡δ1−cos⁡δmax)−P1(δmax−δ1)=0.629 pu⋅radA_{2,max} = P_{max}(\cos\delta_1-\cos\delta_{max}) - P_1(\delta_{max}-\delta_1) = 0.629\ \text{pu·rad}

Since A2,max>A1A_{2,max} > A_1, the system is stable. Setting A1=A2A_1 = A_2, that is P1(δ2−δ0)=Pmax(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ2)P_1(\delta_2-\delta_0) = P_{max}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_2), and solving numerically gives δ2=68.20∘\delta_2 = 68.20^\circ. The relative angle swings from 23.58∘23.58^\circ to 68.20∘68.20^\circ and then oscillates about 44.43∘44.43^\circ.

If the step were large enough that A1>A2,maxA_1 > A_{2,max}, the relative angle would pass δmax\delta_{max} and the machines would fall out of step. This shows how the EAC decides stability from areas alone.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5

All Power System Analysis II chapter 6 questions →