Skip to main content

Chapter 6 · 10 hours

Power System Stability

IOE past exam questions

Past questions and answers

48 questions set from this chapter, 4 of them more than once. Most asked first.

  • Asked 4 times
  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks
  • 2073 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2072 Kartik · 8 marks
  • 2071 Shrawan · 6 marks

Explain the Equal area criterion (concept) to study (evaluate) the transient stability of a single machine system connected to infinite bus with proper mathematical aids and diagram.

Answer

The equal area criterion (EAC) is a graphical method to check the transient stability of a single machine connected to an infinite bus (or of two machines) without solving the swing equation step by step. It states that the system is stable if, after a disturbance, the area of accelerating energy under the power-angle curve can be balanced by an equal area of decelerating energy.

Basis

For a machine connected to an infinite bus, the swing equation (in pu, resistance and damping neglected) is

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−Pe=Pa,Pe=Pmaxsin⁡δ=EVXsin⁡δ\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e = P_a, \qquad P_e = P_{max}\sin\delta = \frac{EV}{X}\sin\delta

Multiplying both sides by 2dδdt2\dfrac{d\delta}{dt}:

2Hωs⋅2dδdtd2δdt2=2(Pm−Pe)dδdt  ⇒  ddt(dδdt)2=ωsH(Pm−Pe)dδdt\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\cdot 2\frac{d\delta}{dt}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = 2(P_m - P_e)\frac{d\delta}{dt} \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{d\delta}{dt}\right)^2 = \frac{\omega_s}{H}(P_m - P_e)\frac{d\delta}{dt}

Integrating from the initial angle δ0\delta_0 (where dδ/dt=0d\delta/dt = 0, the rotor runs at synchronous speed):

(dδdt)2=ωsH∫δ0δ(Pm−Pe) dδ\left(\frac{d\delta}{dt}\right)^2 = \frac{\omega_s}{H}\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta}(P_m - P_e)\,d\delta

For the machine to be stable, the rotor angle must stop increasing at some maximum angle, i.e. dδ/dt=0d\delta/dt = 0 at δmax\delta_{max}:

∫δ0δmax(Pm−Pe) dδ=0\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_{max}}(P_m - P_e)\,d\delta = 0

This means the area under the PaP_a–δ\delta curve must be zero: the accelerating area A1A_1 (where Pm>PeP_m > P_e) must be equal to the decelerating area A2A_2 (where Pe>PmP_e > P_m):

A1=∫δ0δc(Pm−Pe) dδ=A2=∫δcδmax(Pe−Pm) dδA_1 = \int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_c}(P_m - P_e)\,d\delta = A_2 = \int_{\delta_c}^{\delta_{max}}(P_e - P_m)\,d\delta

Power-angle diagram

 Pe
  ^          Pmax1 sin d (pre-fault)
  |           .-''-.
  |         .' .--. '.    Pmax3 sin d
  |        / .' A2 '. \   (post-fault)
 Pm-------+-+-------+--\------
  |      /|A1|        \ \
  |     / |..|.....     \ \  Pmax2 sin d
  +----+--+--+--------+--+--> d
       0  d0 dc     dmax 180
 A1: accelerating area, A2: decelerating area

Applying it to a fault (sudden disturbance)

  1. Before the fault: the machine runs at δ0\delta_0, where Pm=Pmax1sin⁡δ0P_m = P_{max1}\sin\delta_0.
  2. During the fault: the transfer reactance rises, the power curve drops to Pmax2sin⁡δP_{max2}\sin\delta (Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0 for a fault at the generator bus). Since Pm>PeP_m > P_e, the rotor accelerates and δ\delta increases. The energy gained is area A1A_1.
  3. Fault cleared at δc\delta_c: the post-fault curve Pmax3sin⁡δP_{max3}\sin\delta applies. Now Pe>PmP_e > P_m, so the rotor decelerates, but δ\delta keeps increasing until the kinetic energy is given back. This is area A2A_2.
  4. Stability test: the system is stable if A2A_2 can become equal to A1A_1 before δ\delta reaches δmax=180∘−sin⁡−1(Pm/Pmax3)\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}(P_m/P_{max3}). The rotor then swings back and oscillates about the new operating point. If the available A2<A1A_2 < A_1, the machine loses synchronism.

Critical clearing angle

The largest clearing angle for which A1=A2A_1 = A_2 just holds (with δ\delta reaching exactly δmax\delta_{max}) is the critical clearing angle:

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max} - \delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3} - P_{max2}}

For a fault at the generator terminals with no change in network (Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0, Pmax3=PmaxP_{max3} = P_{max}, δmax=π−δ0\delta_{max} = \pi - \delta_0):

δcr=cos⁡−1[(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0]\delta_{cr} = \cos^{-1}\left[(\pi - 2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0\right]

and, since Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault, the critical clearing time is

tcr=4H(δcr−δ0)ωsPmt_{cr} = \sqrt{\frac{4H(\delta_{cr} - \delta_0)}{\omega_s P_m}}

Assumptions and limitation

  • Mechanical input PmP_m constant during the transient; damping and resistance neglected.
  • Machine represented by a constant voltage behind transient reactance.
  • Valid only for one machine against an infinite bus (or two machines); for multi-machine systems, numerical solution of swing equations is needed.

Example: with Pm=1P_m = 1 pu and Pmax=2P_{max} = 2 pu, δ0=30∘\delta_0 = 30^\circ; for a terminal fault δcr=cos⁡−1[(π−1.047)(0.5)−0.866]=cos⁡−1(0.181)=79.6∘\delta_{cr} = \cos^{-1}[(\pi - 1.047)(0.5) - 0.866] = \cos^{-1}(0.181) = 79.6^\circ.

  • Asked 3 times
  • 2078 Bhadra · 4 marks
  • 2074 Chaitra · 6 marks
  • 2072 Chaitra · 6 marks

What are the techniques (methods) to improve (enhance) transient stability in power system? Describe briefly.

Answer

Transient stability depends on how far the rotor angle swings after a large disturbance. From the equal area criterion, it improves by (a) reducing the accelerating area, i.e. reducing the time or size of the power imbalance, or (b) increasing the decelerating area, i.e. raising the power transfer capability Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X. The main techniques are:

MethodHow it helps
High-speed fault clearing (fast relays, 2-3 cycle breakers)Shortens the time of acceleration, reducing area A1A_1; the most effective method
Reduction of transfer reactance (parallel lines, bundled conductors, series capacitors, low-reactance transformers)Raises Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X, giving larger decelerating area
Single-pole (independent pole) switching and auto-reclosingOnly the faulted phase is opened (most faults are L-G); power still flows on healthy phases, and the line is reclosed quickly
Fast excitation systems (high-gain static exciters, field forcing) with PSSRaises EE during the fault and after, increasing power transfer
Fast valving / turbine bypassRapidly reduces PmP_m during the fault, reducing acceleration
Braking resistorsResistors switched in at the generator bus absorb power during the fault, decelerating the rotor
Generator tripping / load sheddingRemoving some generation (or load) restores the balance of PmP_m and PeP_e
Higher inertia constant HHSlower rise of δ\delta, giving more time to clear the fault
Higher system voltage and intermediate switching stationsIncrease PmaxP_{max}; switching stations mean only a short section of line is lost
Neutral grounding through impedanceLimits earth-fault effect on power transfer during L-G faults
HVDC links and FACTS (SVC, STATCOM, TCSC)Fast control of power flow and voltage support

Short notes on the main ones

  1. Fast clearing: if the fault is cleared before the critical clearing time, the rotor gains less kinetic energy. Modern breakers clear in about 2-3 cycles.
  2. Reducing reactance: series compensation or a second circuit raises PmaxP_{max}, so for the same PmP_m the operating angle δ0\delta_0 is smaller and the stability margin larger.
  3. Single-pole reclosing: keeps two healthy phases in service, so power transfer during the dead time is not zero.
  4. Fast excitation: quickly boosting field voltage raises EE and the electrical output, absorbing the excess mechanical power.
  • Asked 2 times
  • 2080 Bhadra · 4+4 marks
  • 2070 Asar · 8 marks

What do you mean by steady state and transient stability in a power system? Explain. Also describe (discuss) the methods (techniques) of improving transient stability of a power system.

Answer

Power system stability is the ability of a power system to return to a normal (synchronous) operating condition after being subjected to a disturbance.

  • Steady state stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load (or generation). The maximum power that can be transmitted through a point without loss of synchronism under such slow changes is the steady state stability limit. For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX:
Pmax=EVX(at δ=90∘)P_{max} = \frac{EV}{X} \quad (\text{at } \delta = 90^\circ)
  • Transient stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance such as a fault, loss of a line, sudden loss of large load or generation. It is studied over the first swing (about 1 s). The maximum power that can be transmitted while the system remains stable after a specified large disturbance is the transient stability limit. It is always lower than the steady state limit and depends on the type, location and clearing time of the disturbance.

Comparison

PointSteady state stabilityTransient stability
DisturbanceSmall, gradualLarge, sudden
AnalysisLinearised (small signal), dPe/dδ>0dP_e/d\delta > 0Non-linear swing equation, equal area criterion
LimitEV/XEV/X at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circLower; depends on fault type and clearing time
Time frameContinuous operationFirst swing, about 1 s

Methods of improving transient stability

MethodHow it helps
High-speed fault clearing (fast relays, 2-3 cycle breakers)Shortens the time of acceleration, reducing area A1A_1; the most effective method
Reduction of transfer reactance (parallel lines, bundled conductors, series capacitors, low-reactance transformers)Raises Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X, giving larger decelerating area
Single-pole (independent pole) switching and auto-reclosingOnly the faulted phase is opened (most faults are L-G); power still flows on healthy phases, and the line is reclosed quickly
Fast excitation systems (high-gain static exciters, field forcing) with PSSRaises EE during the fault and after, increasing power transfer
Fast valving / turbine bypassRapidly reduces PmP_m during the fault, reducing acceleration
Braking resistorsResistors switched in at the generator bus absorb power during the fault, decelerating the rotor
Generator tripping / load sheddingRemoving some generation (or load) restores the balance of PmP_m and PeP_e
Higher inertia constant HHSlower rise of δ\delta, giving more time to clear the fault
Higher system voltage and intermediate switching stationsIncrease PmaxP_{max}; switching stations mean only a short section of line is lost
Neutral grounding through impedanceLimits earth-fault effect on power transfer during L-G faults
HVDC links and FACTS (SVC, STATCOM, TCSC)Fast control of power flow and voltage support

The most effective in practice are high-speed fault clearing with auto-reclosing, single-pole switching and fast-acting excitation.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2080 Bhadra · 8 marks
  • 2074 Chaitra · 10 marks

A three phase fault is applied at the point P as shown in figure below. Find the critical clearing angle for clearing the fault with simultaneous opening of the breakers 1 and 2. The reactance values of various components are indicated in the diagram. The generator is delivering 1.0 pu power at the instant preceding the fault. [Figure: generator |E| = 1.2 pu, reactance j0.25 to the sending bus; two parallel lines j0.5 and j0.4 between the sending and receiving buses; the j0.4 line has breakers 1 (sending end) and 2 (receiving end) and the fault P is on it near breaker 2; reactance j0.05 from the receiving bus to the infinite bus |V| = 1∠0]

Answer

Data: ∣E∣=1.2|E| = 1.2 pu, ∣V∣=1.0|V| = 1.0 pu, Pm=1.0P_m = 1.0 pu. Generator reactance j0.25, parallel lines j0.5 and j0.4, j0.05 to the infinite bus. The fault P is on the j0.4 line next to breaker 2, i.e. practically at the receiving-end bus.

1. Pre-fault (both lines in)

X1=0.25+(0.5∥0.4)+0.05=0.25+0.2222+0.05=0.5222 puPmax1=EVX1=1.2×10.5222=2.298 puδ0=sin⁡−1PmPmax1=sin⁡−112.298=25.80∘=0.4502 rad\begin{aligned} X_1 &= 0.25 + (0.5\|0.4) + 0.05 = 0.25 + 0.2222 + 0.05 = 0.5222\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max1} &= \frac{EV}{X_1} = \frac{1.2 \times 1}{0.5222} = 2.298\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{P_m}{P_{max1}} = \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2.298} = 25.80^\circ = 0.4502\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

2. During fault

The fault at P is at the receiving bus, which is the only path from the generator to the infinite bus. That bus is at zero voltage, so no power reaches the infinite bus:

Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0

3. Post-fault (j0.4 line removed by breakers 1 and 2)

X3=0.25+0.5+0.05=0.80 puPmax3=1.2×10.8=1.5 puδmax=180∘−sin⁡−111.5=180∘−41.81∘=138.19∘=2.4119 rad\begin{aligned} X_3 &= 0.25 + 0.5 + 0.05 = 0.80\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max3} &= \frac{1.2 \times 1}{0.8} = 1.5\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{1.5} = 180^\circ - 41.81^\circ = 138.19^\circ = 2.4119\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

4. Equal area criterion

 Pe
  ^           post-fault 1.5 sin(d)
  |            .--''''--.
  |         .'    A2      '.
 1|....+---+---------------+.... Pm = 1.0
  |    |A1 |                \
  |    |   |                 \
  +----+---+------------------+--> d
      d0   dc               dmax
 During fault Pe = 0, so A1 = Pm(dc - d0)

Accelerating area A1=Pm(δc−δ0)A_1 = P_m(\delta_c - \delta_0) must equal decelerating area A2=∫δcδmax(Pmax3sin⁡δ−Pm) dδA_2 = \int_{\delta_c}^{\delta_{max}}(P_{max3}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta. This gives

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max} - \delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3} - P_{max2}}

Substituting (Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0):

cos⁡δcr=1.0 (2.4119−0.4502)+1.5cos⁡138.19∘1.5=1.9617+1.5(−0.7454)1.5=1.9617−1.11801.5=0.5624δcr=cos⁡−1(0.5624)=55.78∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{1.0\,(2.4119 - 0.4502) + 1.5\cos138.19^\circ}{1.5} \\ &= \frac{1.9617 + 1.5(-0.7454)}{1.5} = \frac{1.9617 - 1.1180}{1.5} = 0.5624 \\ \delta_{cr} &= \cos^{-1}(0.5624) = 55.78^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: critical clearing angle δcr≈55.8∘\delta_{cr} \approx 55.8^\circ (initial angle 25.8°). Breakers 1 and 2 must open before the rotor swings beyond 55.8°, otherwise the machine loses synchronism.

  • 2082 Baishakh · 4+4 marks

What do you mean by steady state and transient stability and their limits in power system? Discuss the techniques for enhancing the transient stability of a power system.

Answer

Power system stability is the ability of a power system to return to a normal (synchronous) operating condition after being subjected to a disturbance.

  • Steady state stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load (or generation). The maximum power that can be transmitted through a point without loss of synchronism under such slow changes is the steady state stability limit. For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX:
Pmax=EVX(at δ=90∘)P_{max} = \frac{EV}{X} \quad (\text{at } \delta = 90^\circ)
  • Transient stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance such as a fault, loss of a line, sudden loss of large load or generation. It is studied over the first swing (about 1 s). The maximum power that can be transmitted while the system remains stable after a specified large disturbance is the transient stability limit. It is always lower than the steady state limit and depends on the type, location and clearing time of the disturbance.

Limits for a machine on an infinite bus

 Pe
  ^      steady state limit EV/X
  |          .-''-.
  |        .'      '.
  |------.'---------'.---- transient limit
  |     /             \    (lower; depends on fault)
  |    /               \
  +---+--------+--------+--> delta
      0       90       180
  • Steady state limit: Pss=EV/XP_{ss} = EV/X; operation is stable only where dPe/dδ>0dP_e/d\delta > 0, i.e. δ<90∘\delta < 90^\circ.
  • Transient limit: the largest PmP_m for which, after the given fault and clearing time, the equal area condition A1=A2A_1 = A_2 can still be met.

Techniques for enhancing transient stability

MethodHow it helps
High-speed fault clearing (fast relays, 2-3 cycle breakers)Shortens the time of acceleration, reducing area A1A_1; the most effective method
Reduction of transfer reactance (parallel lines, bundled conductors, series capacitors, low-reactance transformers)Raises Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X, giving larger decelerating area
Single-pole (independent pole) switching and auto-reclosingOnly the faulted phase is opened (most faults are L-G); power still flows on healthy phases, and the line is reclosed quickly
Fast excitation systems (high-gain static exciters, field forcing) with PSSRaises EE during the fault and after, increasing power transfer
Fast valving / turbine bypassRapidly reduces PmP_m during the fault, reducing acceleration
Braking resistorsResistors switched in at the generator bus absorb power during the fault, decelerating the rotor
Generator tripping / load sheddingRemoving some generation (or load) restores the balance of PmP_m and PeP_e
Higher inertia constant HHSlower rise of δ\delta, giving more time to clear the fault
Higher system voltage and intermediate switching stationsIncrease PmaxP_{max}; switching stations mean only a short section of line is lost
Neutral grounding through impedanceLimits earth-fault effect on power transfer during L-G faults
HVDC links and FACTS (SVC, STATCOM, TCSC)Fast control of power flow and voltage support
  • 2071 Chaitra · 8 marks

What do you mean by steady state and transient stability and their limits in a power system? Describe the factors affecting the transient stability of a power system.

Answer

Power system stability is the ability of a power system to return to a normal (synchronous) operating condition after being subjected to a disturbance.

  • Steady state stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load (or generation). The maximum power that can be transmitted through a point without loss of synchronism under such slow changes is the steady state stability limit. For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX:
Pmax=EVX(at δ=90∘)P_{max} = \frac{EV}{X} \quad (\text{at } \delta = 90^\circ)
  • Transient stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance such as a fault, loss of a line, sudden loss of large load or generation. It is studied over the first swing (about 1 s). The maximum power that can be transmitted while the system remains stable after a specified large disturbance is the transient stability limit. It is always lower than the steady state limit and depends on the type, location and clearing time of the disturbance.

The limits are shown on the power-angle curve Pe=EVXsin⁡δP_e = \frac{EV}{X}\sin\delta: the steady-state limit is its peak; the transient limit is the largest PmP_m for which the equal area condition (A1=A2A_1 = A_2) can still be satisfied after the given disturbance.

Factors affecting transient stability

FactorEffect on transient stability
Pre-fault loading (PmP_m, δ0\delta_0)Higher loading gives larger δ0\delta_0 and a smaller margin
Type of fault3-phase fault is most severe, then LLG, LL, LG
Location of faultFault near the generator bus reduces PeP_e most (close to zero)
Fault clearing timeLonger clearing increases the accelerating area; critical factor
Post-fault network reactanceHigher reactance after clearing lowers Pmax3P_{max3} and the decelerating area
Inertia constant HHLarger HH slows the rotor swing, giving more time
Generator transient reactance Xd′X_d'Lower reactance raises power transfer
Excitation level and speed of the excitation systemHigher internal emf and fast field forcing raise PmaxP_{max}
Reclosing schemeFast and single-pole reclosing restores transfer capability
Speed of governor/fast valvingQuick reduction of PmP_m reduces acceleration

From the swing equation 2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta, any factor that lowers PmaxP_{max} during or after the fault, or keeps Pm−PeP_m - P_e large for longer, makes the system less stable.

  • 2070 Chaitra · 2+4+4 marks

Define steady state and transient stability of power system. What are the methods of improving transient stability of a power system? Discuss various factors that affect power system transient stability.

Answer

Power system stability is the ability of a power system to return to a normal (synchronous) operating condition after being subjected to a disturbance.

  • Steady state stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load (or generation). The maximum power that can be transmitted through a point without loss of synchronism under such slow changes is the steady state stability limit. For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX:
Pmax=EVX(at δ=90∘)P_{max} = \frac{EV}{X} \quad (\text{at } \delta = 90^\circ)
  • Transient stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance such as a fault, loss of a line, sudden loss of large load or generation. It is studied over the first swing (about 1 s). The maximum power that can be transmitted while the system remains stable after a specified large disturbance is the transient stability limit. It is always lower than the steady state limit and depends on the type, location and clearing time of the disturbance.

Methods of improving transient stability

MethodHow it helps
High-speed fault clearing (fast relays, 2-3 cycle breakers)Shortens the time of acceleration, reducing area A1A_1; the most effective method
Reduction of transfer reactance (parallel lines, bundled conductors, series capacitors, low-reactance transformers)Raises Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X, giving larger decelerating area
Single-pole (independent pole) switching and auto-reclosingOnly the faulted phase is opened (most faults are L-G); power still flows on healthy phases, and the line is reclosed quickly
Fast excitation systems (high-gain static exciters, field forcing) with PSSRaises EE during the fault and after, increasing power transfer
Fast valving / turbine bypassRapidly reduces PmP_m during the fault, reducing acceleration
Braking resistorsResistors switched in at the generator bus absorb power during the fault, decelerating the rotor
Generator tripping / load sheddingRemoving some generation (or load) restores the balance of PmP_m and PeP_e
Higher inertia constant HHSlower rise of δ\delta, giving more time to clear the fault
Higher system voltage and intermediate switching stationsIncrease PmaxP_{max}; switching stations mean only a short section of line is lost
Neutral grounding through impedanceLimits earth-fault effect on power transfer during L-G faults
HVDC links and FACTS (SVC, STATCOM, TCSC)Fast control of power flow and voltage support

Factors affecting transient stability

FactorEffect on transient stability
Pre-fault loading (PmP_m, δ0\delta_0)Higher loading gives larger δ0\delta_0 and a smaller margin
Type of fault3-phase fault is most severe, then LLG, LL, LG
Location of faultFault near the generator bus reduces PeP_e most (close to zero)
Fault clearing timeLonger clearing increases the accelerating area; critical factor
Post-fault network reactanceHigher reactance after clearing lowers Pmax3P_{max3} and the decelerating area
Inertia constant HHLarger HH slows the rotor swing, giving more time
Generator transient reactance Xd′X_d'Lower reactance raises power transfer
Excitation level and speed of the excitation systemHigher internal emf and fast field forcing raise PmaxP_{max}
Reclosing schemeFast and single-pole reclosing restores transfer capability
Speed of governor/fast valvingQuick reduction of PmP_m reduces acceleration
  • 2082 Bhadra (new course) · 3+2 marks

Define steady state and transient stability of power system. Point out the methods of improving transient stability of a power system.

Answer

Steady state stability is the ability of a power system to remain in synchronism (return to its operating point) after small and gradual changes in load or generation. Its limit, for a machine connected to an infinite bus, is Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ.

Transient stability is the ability of a power system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance such as a short circuit, switching out of a line, or sudden loss of a large generator or load. It is judged over the first rotor swing.

Methods of improving transient stability

  1. High-speed fault clearing using fast relays and circuit breakers, reducing the accelerating area.
  2. Reducing transfer reactance by parallel lines, bundled conductors and series capacitor compensation, raising Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X.
  3. Single-pole switching and high-speed auto-reclosing, so healthy phases keep transferring power.
  4. Fast-acting excitation systems with power system stabilisers, raising the internal emf during the disturbance.
  5. Fast valving of steam turbines to cut mechanical input quickly.
  6. Braking resistors at the generator bus to absorb excess power during the fault.
  7. Generator tripping or load shedding to restore the power balance.
  8. Higher system voltage, intermediate switching stations, and FACTS devices (SVC, STATCOM, TCSC).
  • 2081 Bhadra · 3+5 marks

State and explain in brief: power system stability, steady state stability, dynamic stability, transient stability and voltage stability. Also, explain in detail how you can use equal area criterion for stability studies in the parallel transmission lines.

Answer

Definitions

  • Power system stability: the ability of a power system to stay in a state of operating equilibrium under normal conditions and to regain an acceptable equilibrium after a disturbance, with all synchronous machines remaining in synchronism.
  • Steady state stability: ability to remain in synchronism for small, gradual changes in load; limit Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ, with stable operation where dPe/dδ>0dP_e/d\delta > 0.
  • Dynamic stability: ability to remain stable for small disturbances over a longer time (several seconds to minutes) when the effects of control systems (AVR, governor, PSS) are included; it concerns damping of low-frequency oscillations.
  • Transient stability: ability to remain in synchronism after a large, sudden disturbance (fault, loss of a line, loss of a generator); judged over the first swing (about 1 s).
  • Voltage stability: ability of the system to maintain acceptable voltages at all buses after a disturbance; it is lost when reactive power demand cannot be met, leading to voltage collapse.

Equal area criterion for parallel lines

System: generator (EE, Xd′X_d') feeding an infinite bus (VV) through two parallel lines of reactance XLX_L each. A 3-phase fault occurs on one line and is cleared by opening the breakers at both ends of that line.

          +---[CB]--- X_L ---[CB]---+
 E--Xd'--(1)                       (2)--- V (inf. bus)
          +---[CB]--- X_L -x-[CB]---+
                           F

Three power-angle curves:

Pre-fault: Pe1=EVXd′+XL/2sin⁡δ=Pmax1sin⁡δDuring fault: Pe2=EVXtrsin⁡δ=Pmax2sin⁡δ(Xtr from star-delta reduction; Pmax2=0 if F is at bus 1 or 2)Post-fault: Pe3=EVXd′+XLsin⁡δ=Pmax3sin⁡δ\begin{aligned} \text{Pre-fault: } & P_{e1} = \frac{EV}{X_d' + X_L/2}\sin\delta = P_{max1}\sin\delta \\ \text{During fault: } & P_{e2} = \frac{EV}{X_{tr}}\sin\delta = P_{max2}\sin\delta \quad (X_{tr} \text{ from star-delta reduction; } P_{max2}=0 \text{ if F is at bus 1 or 2}) \\ \text{Post-fault: } & P_{e3} = \frac{EV}{X_d' + X_L}\sin\delta = P_{max3}\sin\delta \end{aligned}

with Pmax1>Pmax3>Pmax2P_{max1} > P_{max3} > P_{max2}.

Procedure:

  1. Initial angle: δ0=sin⁡−1(Pm/Pmax1)\delta_0 = \sin^{-1}(P_m/P_{max1}).
  2. During the fault, Pm>Pe2P_m > P_{e2}; the rotor accelerates from δ0\delta_0 to the clearing angle δc\delta_c. Accelerating area: A1=∫δ0δc(Pm−Pmax2sin⁡δ) dδA_1 = \int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_c}(P_m - P_{max2}\sin\delta)\,d\delta
  3. After clearing, the operating point jumps to the post-fault curve; Pe3>PmP_{e3} > P_m, the rotor decelerates. Decelerating area: A2=∫δcδ1(Pmax3sin⁡δ−Pm) dδA_2 = \int_{\delta_c}^{\delta_1}(P_{max3}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta
  4. The system is stable if A2=A1A_2 = A_1 is reached at some δ1<δmax=π−sin⁡−1(Pm/Pmax3)\delta_1 < \delta_{max} = \pi - \sin^{-1}(P_m/P_{max3}).
  5. Setting A1=A2A_1 = A_2 with δ1=δmax\delta_1 = \delta_{max} gives the critical clearing angle:
cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3} - P_{max2}}
 Pe
  ^          Pmax1 sin d (pre-fault)
  |           .-''-.
  |         .' .--. '.    Pmax3 sin d
  |        / .' A2 '. \   (post-fault)
 Pm-------+-+-------+--\------
  |      /|A1|        \ \
  |     / |..|.....     \ \  Pmax2 sin d
  +----+--+--+--------+--+--> d
       0  d0 dc     dmax 180
 A1: accelerating area, A2: decelerating area

Having two parallel lines is itself a stability aid: after one line trips, the other still carries power (Pmax3>0P_{max3} > 0), so a decelerating area exists.

  • 2075 Asoj · 6 marks

Discuss the difference between the transient stability, steady state stability and dynamic stability in power system. Also, explain the factors affecting transient stability of the system.

Answer

Difference between the three types

PointSteady state stabilityDynamic stabilityTransient stability
DisturbanceSmall, gradual load changeSmall disturbanceLarge, sudden (fault, line trip)
Controls consideredNone (constant EE, PmP_m)AVR, governor, PSS includedUsually neglected (first swing)
Time frameContinuousSeveral seconds to minutesAbout 1 s (first swing)
AnalysisLinearised, Ps=dPe/dδ>0P_s = dP_e/d\delta > 0Linearised with controls, eigenvaluesNon-linear swing equation, EAC, step-by-step
LimitEV/XEV/X at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circCan exceed steady-state limit with fast controlsLower than steady-state limit
ConcernMax power transferDamping of oscillationsLoss of synchronism in first swing

Factors affecting transient stability

FactorEffect on transient stability
Pre-fault loading (PmP_m, δ0\delta_0)Higher loading gives larger δ0\delta_0 and a smaller margin
Type of fault3-phase fault is most severe, then LLG, LL, LG
Location of faultFault near the generator bus reduces PeP_e most (close to zero)
Fault clearing timeLonger clearing increases the accelerating area; critical factor
Post-fault network reactanceHigher reactance after clearing lowers Pmax3P_{max3} and the decelerating area
Inertia constant HHLarger HH slows the rotor swing, giving more time
Generator transient reactance Xd′X_d'Lower reactance raises power transfer
Excitation level and speed of the excitation systemHigher internal emf and fast field forcing raise PmaxP_{max}
Reclosing schemeFast and single-pole reclosing restores transfer capability
Speed of governor/fast valvingQuick reduction of PmP_m reduces acceleration
  • 2068 Chaitra · 4 marks

Explain factors affecting transient stability of a power system.

Answer

Transient stability is the ability of a system to remain in synchronism after a large sudden disturbance. From the swing equation 2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta and the equal area criterion, it depends on how much the rotor accelerates during the fault and how much decelerating power is available afterwards. The main factors are:

  1. Pre-fault loading: heavier loading means a larger initial angle δ0\delta_0 and less margin.
  2. Type of fault: 3-phase faults are most severe, then LLG, LL and LG.
  3. Location of fault: a fault near the generator reduces power transfer to almost zero.
  4. Fault clearing time: the longer the fault stays, the larger the accelerating area; clearing must be faster than the critical clearing time.
  5. Network reactance during and after the fault: higher post-fault reactance (e.g. one of two lines lost) lowers PmaxP_{max}.
  6. Inertia constant HH: a larger HH slows the rotor swing.
  7. Generator internal voltage and excitation response: higher EE and fast excitation increase power transfer.
  8. Reclosing scheme: fast and single-pole reclosing restores transfer capability quickly.
  • 2079 Bhadra · 2+4+2 marks

What is stability of power system? State and explain the steady state stability and also signify the importance of synchronizing power coefficient.

Answer

Stability of a power system is its ability to remain in synchronism (all machines running at the same electrical speed) under normal operation and to return to a stable operating state after a disturbance.

Steady state stability

Steady state stability is the ability of the system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load. For a generator connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX:

Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \frac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta
 Pe
  ^          Pmax
  |        .-''-.
  |  Pm  .'  |   '.
  |----a'----|----b'.--
  |   /|     |      \
  |  / |stable  unstable
  +-+--+-----+--------+--> d
    0  d0   90       180
  • At point aa (δ0<90∘\delta_0 < 90^\circ): if load increases slightly, δ\delta increases and PeP_e also increases, matching the load. The operation is stable.
  • At point bb (δ>90∘\delta > 90^\circ): an increase in δ\delta reduces PeP_e, the rotor accelerates further and synchronism is lost.
  • If PmP_m is raised slowly, δ\delta increases until δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ, where Pe=PmaxP_e = P_{max}. This maximum is the steady state stability limit:
Pss=EVXP_{ss} = \frac{EV}{X}

Ways to raise it: increase EE (excitation) or VV, reduce XX (parallel lines, series compensation).

Synchronizing power coefficient

Synchronizing power coefficient PsP_s is the rate of change of electrical power output with rotor angle at the operating point:

Ps=∂Pe∂δ∣δ0=EVXcos⁡δ0=Pmaxcos⁡δ0  (pu power/rad)P_s = \left.\frac{\partial P_e}{\partial\delta}\right|_{\delta_0} = \frac{EV}{X}\cos\delta_0 = P_{max}\cos\delta_0\ \ \text{(pu power/rad)}

It gives the change in power that tends to pull the rotor back to synchronism for a small change in rotor angle: ΔPe=Ps Δδ\Delta P_e = P_s\,\Delta\delta. It is also called the stiffness of the coupling between the machine and the system.

Importance:

  • Stability criterion: steady state stability requires Ps>0P_s > 0, i.e. 0<δ0<90∘0 < \delta_0 < 90^\circ. At δ0=90∘\delta_0 = 90^\circ, Ps=0P_s = 0 (limit).
  • Stability margin: a larger PsP_s means a stiffer system and a larger margin.
  • Natural frequency of oscillation: fn=12πPsπf/Hf_n = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{P_s\pi f/H}, used to study rotor oscillations and damping.
  • Machines operated at light load (small δ0\delta_0) have large PsP_s and are more stable.
  • 2076 Chaitra · 6 marks

What is synchronizing power coefficient? Where it finds application?

Answer

Synchronizing power coefficient PsP_s is the rate of change of electrical power output with rotor angle at the operating point:

Ps=∂Pe∂δ∣δ0=EVXcos⁡δ0=Pmaxcos⁡δ0  (pu power/rad)P_s = \left.\frac{\partial P_e}{\partial\delta}\right|_{\delta_0} = \frac{EV}{X}\cos\delta_0 = P_{max}\cos\delta_0\ \ \text{(pu power/rad)}

It gives the change in power that tends to pull the rotor back to synchronism for a small change in rotor angle: ΔPe=Ps Δδ\Delta P_e = P_s\,\Delta\delta. It is also called the stiffness of the coupling between the machine and the system.

Derivation

For a machine connected to an infinite bus, Pe=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = P_{max}\sin\delta. If the rotor angle increases from δ0\delta_0 by Δδ\Delta\delta:

ΔPe=Pmaxsin⁡(δ0+Δδ)−Pmaxsin⁡δ0≈(Pmaxcos⁡δ0)Δδ=PsΔδ\Delta P_e = P_{max}\sin(\delta_0 + \Delta\delta) - P_{max}\sin\delta_0 \approx (P_{max}\cos\delta_0)\Delta\delta = P_s\Delta\delta

With PmP_m constant, an increase of Δδ\Delta\delta makes Pe>PmP_e > P_m when Ps>0P_s > 0; the rotor decelerates and returns to δ0\delta_0. So PsP_s acts like the spring constant of the electrical coupling.

 Ps = Pmax cos(d0)
  ^
 Pmax.
  |    '.
  |      '.
  +--------'.------> d0
  0          90 deg (Ps = 0, limit)

Applications

  1. Steady state stability check: the operating point is stable only if Ps>0P_s > 0, i.e. δ0<90∘\delta_0 < 90^\circ; the limit is Ps=0P_s = 0.
  2. Measure of stability margin/stiffness: larger PsP_s (lower loading, lower reactance, higher excitation) means a more stable machine.
  3. Natural frequency of rotor oscillation: from the linearised swing equation Md2Δδdt2+PsΔδ=0M\frac{d^2\Delta\delta}{dt^2} + P_s\Delta\delta = 0,
fn=12πPsM,M=Hπff_n = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{P_s}{M}}, \quad M = \frac{H}{\pi f}

used for small-signal (dynamic) stability studies and design of damper windings and power system stabilisers. 4. Parallel operation and synchronising of alternators: PsP_s gives the synchronising power that keeps paralleled machines in step and shares load changes. 5. Hunting analysis: used to find the period of oscillation of a machine after a small disturbance.

Example: Pmax=2P_{max} = 2 pu, Pm=1P_m = 1 pu → δ0=30∘\delta_0 = 30^\circ, Ps=2cos⁡30∘=1.732P_s = 2\cos30^\circ = 1.732 pu/rad.

  • 2083 Baishakh (new course) · 5 marks

Justify with appropriate expression that synchronizing power coefficient must be positive for a stable equilibrium power system operating condition.

Answer

Synchronizing power coefficient PsP_s is the rate of change of electrical power output with rotor angle at the operating point:

Ps=∂Pe∂δ∣δ0=EVXcos⁡δ0=Pmaxcos⁡δ0  (pu power/rad)P_s = \left.\frac{\partial P_e}{\partial\delta}\right|_{\delta_0} = \frac{EV}{X}\cos\delta_0 = P_{max}\cos\delta_0\ \ \text{(pu power/rad)}

It gives the change in power that tends to pull the rotor back to synchronism for a small change in rotor angle: ΔPe=Ps Δδ\Delta P_e = P_s\,\Delta\delta. It is also called the stiffness of the coupling between the machine and the system.

Small-signal analysis

Let the machine operate at δ0\delta_0 with Pm=Pmaxsin⁡δ0P_m = P_{max}\sin\delta_0, and let the angle change by a small amount: δ=δ0+Δδ\delta = \delta_0 + \Delta\delta. Then

Pe=Pmaxsin⁡(δ0+Δδ)≈Pmaxsin⁡δ0+(Pmaxcos⁡δ0)Δδ=Pm+PsΔδP_e = P_{max}\sin(\delta_0+\Delta\delta) \approx P_{max}\sin\delta_0 + (P_{max}\cos\delta_0)\Delta\delta = P_m + P_s\Delta\delta

Substituting in the swing equation Md2δdt2=Pm−PeM\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e (with M=H/πfM = H/\pi f):

Md2Δδdt2+Ps Δδ=0M\frac{d^2\Delta\delta}{dt^2} + P_s\,\Delta\delta = 0

The characteristic equation is Ms2+Ps=0Ms^2 + P_s = 0, so

s=±−PsMs = \pm\sqrt{-\frac{P_s}{M}}
  • Ps>0P_s > 0: roots are imaginary, s=±jωns = \pm j\omega_n with ωn=Ps/M\omega_n = \sqrt{P_s/M}. Δδ\Delta\delta oscillates with constant amplitude (and decays once damping is included). The rotor is pulled back: the operating point is stable.
  • Ps<0P_s < 0: one root is real and positive, Δδ\Delta\delta grows exponentially; the machine falls out of step: unstable.
  • Ps=0P_s = 0 (δ0=90∘\delta_0 = 90^\circ): the steady state stability limit.

The frequency of natural oscillation is

fn=12πPsM=12ππfPsH Hzf_n = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{P_s}{M}} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{\pi f P_s}{H}}\ \text{Hz}

Physical reasoning

 Pe
  ^         .-''-.
  |  Pm   .' Ps<0 '.
  |-----a'---------b.---
  |  Ps>0           \
  +-+---+-----+------+--> d
    0   d0    90    180

At point aa (δ0<90∘\delta_0 < 90^\circ, Ps>0P_s > 0) a small increase in δ\delta raises PeP_e above PmP_m, decelerating the rotor back. At point bb (δ>90∘\delta > 90^\circ, Ps<0P_s < 0) the same increase lowers PeP_e, the rotor accelerates further and synchronism is lost. Hence a positive synchronizing power coefficient is necessary for a stable equilibrium.

  • 2076 Chaitra · 6 marks

Derive the swing equation of rotor of a synchronous machine.

Answer

The swing equation describes the relative motion of the rotor (load angle δ\delta) of a synchronous machine with respect to the synchronously rotating air-gap field when the mechanical and electrical powers are not balanced.

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

  • 2076 Asoj · 6+2 marks

Derive an expression for the swing equation of a synchronous machine. Signify the importance of inertia constant in the machine.

Answer

The swing equation describes how the rotor angle δ\delta of a synchronous machine changes when the mechanical input and electrical output are not balanced.

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

Importance of the inertia constant HH

H=stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed (MJ)machine rating (MVA)H = \frac{\text{stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed (MJ)}}{\text{machine rating (MVA)}}
  1. Rate of rotor swing: from d2δdt2=πfH(Pm−Pe)\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = \frac{\pi f}{H}(P_m - P_e), a larger HH gives a smaller acceleration for the same power imbalance, so δ\delta rises more slowly after a fault.
  2. Critical clearing time: for a terminal fault tcr=4H(δcr−δ0)ωsPmt_{cr} = \sqrt{\frac{4H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\omega_s P_m}}, so tcr∝Ht_{cr} \propto \sqrt H. Higher HH allows more time for breakers to clear the fault.
  3. Narrow range: HH lies in a narrow range for each machine type (about 2-9 s), e.g. turbo-alternators 4-9 s, hydro generators 2-4 s, so typical values can be assumed when data are missing.
  4. Equivalent machine: machines swinging together can be combined: Heq=∑HiSi/SbaseH_{eq} = \sum H_i S_i / S_{base}.
  5. Frequency response: HH also decides how fast the system frequency falls after loss of generation.
  • 2075 Chaitra · 8 marks

How power system stability is classified? Derive the swing equation for the rotor angle of the synchronous machine.

Answer

Classification of power system stability

             Power system stability
       +----------------+-----------------+
  Rotor angle       Frequency          Voltage
  stability         stability          stability
   +------+                         +--------+
 Small-  Transient            Large-dist. Small-dist.
 signal  (large-dist.)
 (steady state / dynamic)
  1. Rotor angle stability: ability of synchronous machines to remain in synchronism.
    • Steady state (small-signal) stability: small, gradual changes; limit EV/XEV/X.
    • Dynamic stability: small disturbances with controllers (AVR, governor, PSS) acting; concerns damping of oscillations over several seconds.
    • Transient stability: large sudden disturbances such as faults; first swing, about 1 s.
  2. Voltage stability: ability to keep acceptable voltages at all buses; lost through lack of reactive power, leading to voltage collapse.
  3. Frequency stability: ability to maintain frequency after a large imbalance between generation and load.

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

  • 2074 Asoj · 8 marks

Derive swing equation of a synchronous machine to be applicable in the study of power system stability. What is meant by swing curve? What information is supplied by the swing curve?

Answer

The swing equation relates the rotor angle δ\delta of a synchronous machine to the difference between mechanical input and electrical output power; it is the basic equation of power system stability studies.

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

Swing curve

A swing curve is the plot of rotor angle δ\delta against time tt, obtained by solving the swing equation (usually numerically, e.g. point-by-point or Runge-Kutta method) for a given disturbance and clearing time.

 delta
  ^        unstable (fault cleared late)
  |                 /
  |              _/
  |   .--.     _/       stable: delta peaks
  |  /    \  _/         and swings back
  | /  .-. \/  .-.
  |/  /   \___/   \__
  +--+-------------------> t
  d0 tc

Information supplied by the swing curve

  1. Stable or unstable: if δ\delta reaches a maximum and then decreases (oscillates about a new value), the system is stable; if δ\delta keeps increasing, the machine loses synchronism.
  2. Maximum rotor swing δmax\delta_{max} and the margin from the critical angle.
  3. Critical clearing time: by plotting swing curves for different clearing times, the largest time that still gives a stable curve is found; this sets the required speed of relays and breakers.
  4. Frequency and damping of oscillations of the rotor after the disturbance.
  5. In multi-machine systems, relative angles between machines show which machines swing together and which separate.
  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks

What do you mean by rotor angle? Derive the swing equation for a single synchronous generator connected to infinite bus.

Answer

Rotor angle

The rotor angle (power angle or load angle) δ\delta is the angular displacement between the rotor axis (direction of the internal emf EE) and a synchronously rotating reference axis (direction of the terminal or infinite-bus voltage VV). In phasor terms it is the angle between EE and VV:

        E
       /
      /  delta
     /_________ V (reference)

For a generator connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, the power transferred depends on it: Pe=EVXsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta. Under steady operation δ\delta is constant; after a disturbance the rotor speeds up or slows down and δ\delta changes ("swings").

Swing equation for a generator connected to an infinite bus

 Turbine -> [G] E<d --- jX --- V<0 (infinite bus)
   Pm          Pe

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

  • 2068 Chaitra · 3+5 marks

Define steady-state and transient stability of a power system. Starting from the basic principle of dynamics, "Accelerating torque for a synchronous generator is given by the product of moment of inertia and the angular acceleration of the rotor" derive the swing equation of the rotor of the synchronous generator.

Answer

Definitions

  • Steady state stability: the ability of a power system to remain in synchronism when subjected to small and gradual changes in load. Its limit for a machine on an infinite bus is Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X (at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ).
  • Transient stability: the ability of a power system to remain in synchronism after a large and sudden disturbance (fault, switching out a line, loss of a generator). It is checked over the first swing, about 1 s.

Swing equation from the basic principle of dynamics

The principle states: accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration.

Derivation

Consider the rotor of a synchronous generator. Let

  • JJ = moment of inertia of rotor and turbine (kg·m²)
  • θm\theta_m = angular position of the rotor with respect to a stationary axis (mech. rad)
  • TmT_m = mechanical (shaft) torque, TeT_e = electromagnetic torque (N·m)

Step 1: Newton's law of rotation. Accelerating torque = moment of inertia × angular acceleration:

Jd2θmdt2=Ta=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = T_a = T_m - T_e

Step 2: Measure angle from a synchronously rotating frame. The rotor angle δm\delta_m is the angle of the rotor relative to a reference axis rotating at synchronous speed ωsm\omega_{sm}:

θm=ωsmt+δm  ⇒  dθmdt=ωsm+dδmdt,d2θmdt2=d2δmdt2\theta_m = \omega_{sm}t + \delta_m \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{d\theta_m}{dt} = \omega_{sm} + \frac{d\delta_m}{dt}, \quad \frac{d^2\theta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2}

so

Jd2δmdt2=Tm−TeJ\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = T_m - T_e

Step 3: Convert torque to power. Multiply by the rotor speed ωm\omega_m (power = torque × speed):

Jωmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeJ\omega_m\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

M=JωmM = J\omega_m is the angular momentum (inertia constant). Since the speed changes very little during a swing, ωm≈ωsm\omega_m \approx \omega_{sm} and MM is taken as constant:

Md2δmdt2=Pm−PeM\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

Step 4: Introduce the inertia constant HH. HH is the stored kinetic energy at synchronous speed per MVA rating SS:

H=12Jωsm2S  (MJ/MVA or s)  ⇒  M=Jωsm=2HSωsmH = \frac{\tfrac12 J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{(MJ/MVA or s)} \;\Rightarrow\; M = J\omega_{sm} = \frac{2HS}{\omega_{sm}}

Substituting and dividing by SS:

2Hωsmd2δmdt2=Pm−PeS=Pm−Pe  (pu)\frac{2H}{\omega_{sm}}\frac{d^2\delta_m}{dt^2} = \frac{P_m - P_e}{S} = P_m - P_e\ \ \text{(pu)}

Step 5: Use electrical angle. For a machine with pp poles, δ=p2δm\delta = \frac{p}{2}\delta_m and ωs=p2ωsm\omega_s = \frac{p}{2}\omega_{sm}, so δ/ωs=δm/ωsm\delta/\omega_s = \delta_m/\omega_{sm}:

2Hωsd2δdt2=Pm−PeorHπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\boxed{\frac{2H}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e

with δ\delta in electrical radians and ωs=2πf\omega_s = 2\pi f. If δ\delta is in electrical degrees, H180fd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\dfrac{H}{180f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e.

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through reactance XX, Pe=EVXsin⁡δ=Pmaxsin⁡δP_e = \dfrac{EV}{X}\sin\delta = P_{max}\sin\delta, so

Hπfd2δdt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ\frac{H}{\pi f}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta

This is the swing equation. It is a second-order non-linear differential equation; its solution δ(t)\delta(t) describes how the rotor swings after a disturbance. If damping is included, a term DdδdtD\frac{d\delta}{dt} is added on the left.

  • 2078 Kartik · 6 marks

Starting from the swing equation of the rotor of a synchronous machine connected to an infinite bus, obtain the mathematical expression representing the rotor dynamics for an incremental change in rotor angle of a synchronous machine.

Answer

For a small change in rotor angle, the swing equation can be linearised about the operating point. The result is a second-order linear differential equation that shows the rotor oscillates about δ0\delta_0 with a natural frequency set by the synchronising power coefficient and the inertia.

Swing equation

For a machine connected to an infinite bus through a total reactance XX:

Md2δdt2=Pm−Pe=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡δ,M=Hπf (pu)M\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m - P_e = P_m - P_{max}\sin\delta, \qquad M = \frac{H}{\pi f}\ \text{(pu)}

Linearising for a small change

Let the rotor angle change by a small amount Δδ\Delta\delta from the steady-state angle δ0\delta_0, with PmP_m constant:

δ=δ0+ΔδMd2(δ0+Δδ)dt2=Pm−Pmaxsin⁡(δ0+Δδ)\begin{aligned} \delta &= \delta_0 + \Delta\delta \\ M\frac{d^2(\delta_0+\Delta\delta)}{dt^2} &= P_m - P_{max}\sin(\delta_0+\Delta\delta) \end{aligned}

Expand the sine. For small Δδ\Delta\delta: cos⁡Δδ≈1\cos\Delta\delta \approx 1, sin⁡Δδ≈Δδ\sin\Delta\delta \approx \Delta\delta, so

sin⁡(δ0+Δδ)≈sin⁡δ0+Δδcos⁡δ0\sin(\delta_0+\Delta\delta) \approx \sin\delta_0 + \Delta\delta\cos\delta_0

At steady state Pm=Pmaxsin⁡δ0P_m = P_{max}\sin\delta_0 and d2δ0/dt2=0d^2\delta_0/dt^2 = 0. These terms cancel, which leaves

Md2Δδdt2+(Pmaxcos⁡δ0)Δδ=0M\frac{d^2\Delta\delta}{dt^2} + \left(P_{max}\cos\delta_0\right)\Delta\delta = 0

The term Ps=dPedδ∣δ0=Pmaxcos⁡δ0P_s = \left.\dfrac{dP_e}{d\delta}\right|_{\delta_0} = P_{max}\cos\delta_0 is the synchronising power coefficient. So:

Md2Δδdt2+Ps Δδ=0M\frac{d^2\Delta\delta}{dt^2} + P_s\,\Delta\delta = 0

Including damping

If there is damping power D dΔδdtD\,\dfrac{d\Delta\delta}{dt} (from damper windings), the equation becomes

Md2Δδdt2+DdΔδdt+Ps Δδ=0M\frac{d^2\Delta\delta}{dt^2} + D\frac{d\Delta\delta}{dt} + P_s\,\Delta\delta = 0

Its characteristic equation is Ms2+Ds+Ps=0Ms^2 + Ds + P_s = 0, which gives

ωn=PsM=πfPsH rad/s,ζ=D2MPs\omega_n = \sqrt{\frac{P_s}{M}} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi f P_s}{H}}\ \text{rad/s}, \qquad \zeta = \frac{D}{2\sqrt{M P_s}}

The damped frequency of oscillation is ωd=ωn1−ζ2\omega_d = \omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}.

Interpretation

  • If Ps>0P_s > 0 (that is, 0<δ0<90∘0 < \delta_0 < 90^\circ), the roots have negative real parts or lie on the imaginary axis. Δδ\Delta\delta then oscillates about δ0\delta_0, and the system is steady-state stable.
  • If Ps<0P_s < 0 (δ0>90∘\delta_0 > 90^\circ), one root is real and positive. Δδ\Delta\delta then grows exponentially and the machine loses synchronism.
  • The machine is most stable at small δ0\delta_0, where PsP_s is large. The limit is reached at δ0=90∘\delta_0 = 90^\circ, where Ps=0P_s = 0.
  • A larger HH lowers the frequency of the rotor oscillation; it does not change the stability limit.
  • 2082 Bhadra (new course) · 4+3 marks

Starting from the single machine swing equation, derive the expression for equivalent swing equation for multiple generators swinging together. Three generators in a power plant of 50 MVA, 100 MVA & 200 MVA have inertia constant of 6 MJ/MVA each. Compute the equivalent inertia constant at a base of 100 MVA if all units swing together.

Answer

When several machines in one plant swing together (coherent machines), they can be replaced by one equivalent machine. Its inertia constant is the MVA-weighted sum of the individual inertias, expressed on the system base.

Derivation

The swing equation of machine ii on its own rating SiS_{i} is

2Hiωsd2δidt2=Pmi−Pei(pu on Si)\frac{2H_i}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta_i}{dt^2} = P_{mi} - P_{ei}\quad \text{(pu on } S_i)

Convert it to a common system base SsysS_{sys} by multiplying both sides by Si/SsysS_i/S_{sys}:

2Hi,sysωsd2δidt2=Pmi−Pei(pu on Ssys),Hi,sys=HiSiSsys\frac{2H_{i,sys}}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta_i}{dt^2} = P_{mi} - P_{ei}\quad \text{(pu on } S_{sys}), \qquad H_{i,sys} = H_i\frac{S_i}{S_{sys}}

The machines are coherent, so they swing together: δ1=δ2=⋯=δ\delta_1 = \delta_2 = \dots = \delta. Adding the nn equations gives

2ωs(∑i=1nHi,sys)d2δdt2=∑Pmi−∑Pei2Heqωsd2δdt2=Pm−Pe\begin{aligned} \frac{2}{\omega_s}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} H_{i,sys}\right)\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= \sum P_{mi} - \sum P_{ei} \\ \frac{2H_{eq}}{\omega_s}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= P_m - P_e \end{aligned}

where

Heq=∑i=1nHi SiSsys,Pm=∑Pmi,Pe=∑PeiH_{eq} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{H_i\,S_i}{S_{sys}}, \quad P_m = \sum P_{mi}, \quad P_e = \sum P_{ei}

This is the equivalent swing equation: a single machine with inertia HeqH_{eq} and the total power of the plant.

Numerical

Given H=6H = 6 MJ/MVA for each unit, ratings 50, 100 and 200 MVA, and a base of 100 MVA:

Heq=6×50+6×100+6×200100=300+600+1200100=2100100=21 MJ/MVA\begin{aligned} H_{eq} &= \frac{6\times 50 + 6\times 100 + 6\times 200}{100} \\ &= \frac{300 + 600 + 1200}{100} = \frac{2100}{100} \\ &= 21\ \text{MJ/MVA} \end{aligned}

Check: the total stored energy is 21002100 MJ. On a 100 MVA base this gives 2100/100=212100/100 = 21 MJ/MVA.

Answer: Heq=21H_{eq} = 21 MJ/MVA on a 100 MVA base.

  • 2072 Kartik · 4 marks

What is the significance of H constant in stability of a synchronous machine?

Answer

The inertia constant HH is the kinetic energy stored in the rotor at synchronous speed, divided by the machine MVA rating:

H=stored KE at synchronous speed (MJ)machine rating (MVA)=12Jωsm2S  MJ/MVA (s)H = \frac{\text{stored KE at synchronous speed (MJ)}}{\text{machine rating (MVA)}} = \frac{\tfrac{1}{2}J\omega_{sm}^2}{S}\ \ \text{MJ/MVA (s)}

Significance in stability

  1. Appears directly in the swing equation. 2Hωsd2δdt2=Pa\dfrac{2H}{\omega_s}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_a. For a given accelerating power PaP_a (for example during a fault), the rotor acceleration is inversely proportional to HH.
  2. Slower swing and longer clearing time. With a larger HH, the rotor angle rises more slowly during a fault. For a fault with Pe=0P_e = 0, the critical clearing time is tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)/(πfPm)t_{cr} = \sqrt{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)/(\pi f P_m)}, so tcr∝Ht_{cr} \propto \sqrt{H}. A machine with a high HH gives the breakers and relays more time.
  3. Frequency of oscillation. For small disturbances, ωn=πfPs/H\omega_n = \sqrt{\pi f P_s / H}. A larger HH gives slower, smaller-frequency rotor oscillations.
  4. Narrow range of values. In MJ/MVA, HH falls in a narrow range for each machine type (about 2–4 for hydro units, 4–9 for turbo-alternators, 1–5 for synchronous motors and condensers). This makes it a convenient, near-standard data value when the actual data are missing.
  5. Equal-area criterion. The critical clearing angle does not depend on HH; it depends only on the power-angle curves. HH converts that angle into the critical clearing time.
  6. Frequency response. A larger total system inertia slows the fall in frequency after a loss of generation (lower rate of change of frequency).

In short, HH measures how strongly the rotor resists a change in speed. A higher HH improves transient stability margins in time.

  • 2069 Chaitra · 2+8 marks

What is equal area criterion for assessing the transient stability of a two machine system? Explain and justify with the help of a suitable example.

Answer

The equal area criterion (EAC) is a direct method for checking transient stability without solving the swing equation. A system is stable after a disturbance if the area representing the kinetic energy gained by the rotor (accelerating area A1A_1) can be returned as an equal decelerating area A2A_2 before the rotor angle passes the maximum allowed angle. The criterion applies to a one-machine–infinite-bus system, or to a two-machine system after it has been reduced to an equivalent single machine.

Reduction of a two-machine system

Consider two finite machines connected by a reactance XX, with internal voltages E1∠δ1E_1\angle\delta_1 and E2∠δ2E_2\angle\delta_2 (lossless network). Their swing equations are

M1d2δ1dt2=Pm1−Pe1,M2d2δ2dt2=Pm2−Pe2M_1\frac{d^2\delta_1}{dt^2} = P_{m1} - P_{e1}, \qquad M_2\frac{d^2\delta_2}{dt^2} = P_{m2} - P_{e2}

For a lossless link, Pe2=−Pe1P_{e2} = -P_{e1}. Let δ=δ1−δ2\delta = \delta_1 - \delta_2. Subtract the second equation divided by M2M_2 from the first divided by M1M_1:

d2δdt2=Pm1−Pe1M1−Pm2+Pe1M2M1M2M1+M2d2δdt2=M2Pm1−M1Pm2M1+M2−Pe1\begin{aligned} \frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= \frac{P_{m1}-P_{e1}}{M_1} - \frac{P_{m2}+P_{e1}}{M_2} \\ \frac{M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} &= \frac{M_2P_{m1}-M_1P_{m2}}{M_1+M_2} - P_{e1} \end{aligned}

So the system behaves like one machine on an infinite bus:

Meqd2δdt2=Pm,eq−Pmaxsin⁡δM_{eq}\frac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_{m,eq} - P_{max}\sin\delta

with Meq=M1M2M1+M2M_{eq} = \dfrac{M_1M_2}{M_1+M_2}, Pm,eq=M2Pm1−M1Pm2M1+M2P_{m,eq} = \dfrac{M_2P_{m1}-M_1P_{m2}}{M_1+M_2} and Pmax=E1E2XP_{max} = \dfrac{E_1E_2}{X}.

Equal area criterion

Multiply the equivalent swing equation by 2 dδdt2\,\dfrac{d\delta}{dt} and integrate:

(dδdt)2=2Meq∫δ0δ(Pm,eq−Pe) dδ\left(\frac{d\delta}{dt}\right)^2 = \frac{2}{M_{eq}}\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta}(P_{m,eq}-P_e)\,d\delta

The relative angle stops changing (dδ/dt=0d\delta/dt = 0) and the system is stable if

∫δ0δ2(Pm,eq−Pe) dδ=0    ⟹    A1=A2\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_{2}}(P_{m,eq}-P_e)\,d\delta = 0 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; A_1 = A_2

This must happen at some δ2≤δmax=180∘−sin⁡−1(Pm,eq/Pmax)\delta_2 \le \delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}(P_{m,eq}/P_{max}).

 Pe
  |          _______
  |        /    A2   \     Pmax sin(delta)
 P1 ------/----------- \------------
  |   A1 /|             \
 P0 ----/-|-             \
  |    /  |               \
  +---d0--d1-----d2--------dmax-- delta

Example (justification)

Assume two machines linked by a line, with E1=1.2E_1 = 1.2 pu, E2=1.0E_2 = 1.0 pu, X=0.6X = 0.6 pu, and H1=4H_1 = 4, H2=6H_2 = 6 MJ/MVA on a common base. The machines are initially transferring P0=0.8P_0 = 0.8 pu, and the equivalent input then rises suddenly to P1=1.4P_1 = 1.4 pu.

  • Pmax=1.2×1.00.6=2.0P_{max} = \dfrac{1.2\times 1.0}{0.6} = 2.0 pu and Heq=4×64+6=2.4H_{eq} = \dfrac{4\times 6}{4+6} = 2.4 MJ/MVA. (HeqH_{eq} affects the speed of the swing but not the angles.)
  • Initial angle: δ0=sin⁡−1(0.8/2)=23.58∘\delta_0 = \sin^{-1}(0.8/2) = 23.58^\circ.
  • New equilibrium: δ1=sin⁡−1(1.4/2)=44.43∘\delta_1 = \sin^{-1}(1.4/2) = 44.43^\circ. Limit: δmax=180∘−44.43∘=135.57∘\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 44.43^\circ = 135.57^\circ.

The accelerating area is

A1=P1(δ1−δ0)−Pmax(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ1)=0.105 pu⋅radA_1 = P_1(\delta_1-\delta_0) - P_{max}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_1) = 0.105\ \text{pu·rad}

The decelerating area available up to δmax\delta_{max} is

A2,max=Pmax(cos⁡δ1−cos⁡δmax)−P1(δmax−δ1)=0.629 pu⋅radA_{2,max} = P_{max}(\cos\delta_1-\cos\delta_{max}) - P_1(\delta_{max}-\delta_1) = 0.629\ \text{pu·rad}

Since A2,max>A1A_{2,max} > A_1, the system is stable. Setting A1=A2A_1 = A_2, that is P1(δ2−δ0)=Pmax(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ2)P_1(\delta_2-\delta_0) = P_{max}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_2), and solving numerically gives δ2=68.20∘\delta_2 = 68.20^\circ. The relative angle swings from 23.58∘23.58^\circ to 68.20∘68.20^\circ and then oscillates about 44.43∘44.43^\circ.

If the step were large enough that A1>A2,maxA_1 > A_{2,max}, the relative angle would pass δmax\delta_{max} and the machines would fall out of step. This shows how the EAC decides stability from areas alone.

  • 2071 Shrawan · 1+3 marks

What do you understand by term 'Voltage stability'? What are the assumptions made and factors affecting Transient stability study?

Answer

Voltage stability

Voltage stability is the ability of a power system to keep steady, acceptable voltages at all buses after a disturbance (load increase, line outage, etc.), starting from a given operating condition. Instability shows up as a progressive, uncontrollable fall in voltage (voltage collapse). It is mainly caused by a shortage of reactive power to support the load.

Assumptions in transient stability study (classical model)

  1. Mechanical input PmP_m is constant during the transient period, because governor action is slow.
  2. Damping and asynchronous (induction) power are neglected.
  3. Each machine is represented by a constant voltage E′E' behind its transient reactance Xd′X_d'.
  4. The rotor angle of a machine equals the angle of E′E'.
  5. Transmission line resistance and shunt capacitance are usually neglected.
  6. Loads are represented by constant impedances.
  7. Rotor speed stays close to synchronous speed, so power in pu ≈ torque in pu.

Factors affecting transient stability

  • Inertia constant HH of the machines
  • Initial loading (pre-fault rotor angle δ0\delta_0)
  • Type and location of the fault
  • Fault clearing time (relay and breaker speed)
  • Transfer reactance of the network before, during and after the fault
  • Generator internal voltage, that is, the excitation level and the speed of the excitation system
  • Use of auto-reclosing, fast valving and braking resistors
  • 2071 Shrawan · 4 marks

Explain the effect of change of excitation on the steady state stability of a synchronous generator feeding an infinite bus bar.

Answer

For a generator connected to an infinite bus, the power transferred is

Pe=E VXsin⁡δ,Pmax=EVXP_e = \frac{E\,V}{X}\sin\delta, \qquad P_{max} = \frac{EV}{X}

The steady-state stability limit is PmaxP_{max}, reached at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ. Excitation sets the internal emf EE, so it changes this limit directly.

Increase in excitation (over-excitation)

  • EE increases, so Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X increases and the power-angle curve becomes taller.
  • For the same mechanical input PmP_m, the operating angle δ=sin⁡−1(PmX/EV)\delta = \sin^{-1}(P_m X/EV) becomes smaller.
  • The synchronising power coefficient Ps=(EV/X)cos⁡δP_s = (EV/X)\cos\delta becomes larger.
  • The steady-state stability margin (Pmax−Pm)/Pmax(P_{max}-P_m)/P_{max} increases. The machine also supplies lagging reactive power to the bus.

Decrease in excitation (under-excitation)

  • EE falls, PmaxP_{max} falls, and δ\delta rises toward 90∘90^\circ for the same PmP_m.
  • PsP_s becomes small, so the machine is weakly held in synchronism.
  • If excitation is reduced too far, PmaxP_{max} drops below PmP_m and the machine pulls out of step. Under-excitation limiters guard against this.
 Pe
  |      ___  E2 > E1 (higher excitation)
  |    /     \
  |   / __    \   E1
  |  / /  \    \
 Pm-+-*---*-----\----------
  | /d2  d1      \
  +--------90------180-- delta

Effect of the AVR

A fast automatic voltage regulator raises EE when the load angle increases. This effectively holds the terminal voltage, and the practical stability limit rises above the value set by a fixed EE (dynamic stability limit). Too high an AVR gain can, however, reduce damping, which is why power system stabilisers are used.

  • 2082 Baishakh · 8 marks

A 50 Hz synchronous generator connected to infinite bus as shown in the figure below has a H constant of 5 p.u. Under normal condition (just before disturbance), the generator injects 1 p.u. real power to the infinite bus with generator excitation voltage of 1.1 p.u. and infinite bus voltage 1 p.u. Suddenly a 3-phase bolted fault occurs at the infinite bus. Compute the critical fault clearing angle and critical fault clearing time for system to be transient stable. [Figure: generator X = 10%, transformer X = 5%, two parallel lines each X = 0.8 pu, to the infinite bus]

Answer

Data: H=5H = 5 MJ/MVA, f=50f = 50 Hz, Pm=1P_m = 1 pu, E=1.1E = 1.1 pu, V=1V = 1 pu, Xg=0.10X_g = 0.10, XT=0.05X_T = 0.05, two parallel lines of 0.80.8 pu each.

Assumption: the fault is a temporary fault at the infinite bus. After it is cleared, the network is the same as before the fault.

Step 1: Pre-fault power-angle curve

X1=0.10+0.05+0.82=0.55 puPmax1=EVX1=1.1×10.55=2.0 puδ0=sin⁡−112.0=30∘=0.5236 rad\begin{aligned} X_1 &= 0.10 + 0.05 + \frac{0.8}{2} = 0.55\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max1} &= \frac{EV}{X_1} = \frac{1.1\times 1}{0.55} = 2.0\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2.0} = 30^\circ = 0.5236\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: During and after the fault

A bolted fault at the infinite bus makes V=0V = 0, so Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0 and Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault.

After clearing, Pmax3=Pmax1=2.0P_{max3} = P_{max1} = 2.0 pu. Then

δmax=180∘−δ0=150∘=2.618 rad\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \delta_0 = 150^\circ = 2.618\ \text{rad}

Step 3: Critical clearing angle (equal areas)

A1=Pm(δcr−δ0)A2=∫δcrδmax(Pmaxsin⁡δ−Pm) dδ\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0) \\ A_2 &= \int_{\delta_{cr}}^{\delta_{max}}(P_{max}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta \end{aligned}

Setting A1=A2A_1 = A_2 gives

cos⁡δcr=(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0=(3.1416−1.0472)(0.5)−0.8660=0.1812δcr=79.56∘=1.3886 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= (\pi - 2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0 \\ &= (3.1416 - 1.0472)(0.5) - 0.8660 \\ &= 0.1812 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 79.56^\circ = 1.3886\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Critical clearing time

With Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault, the swing equation is Hπfd2δdt2=Pm\dfrac{H}{\pi f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m. Integrating twice:

δ=δ0+πfPm2Ht2  ⇒  tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm\delta = \delta_0 + \frac{\pi f P_m}{2H}t^2 \;\Rightarrow\; t_{cr} = \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} tcr=2×5×(1.3886−0.5236)π×50×1=0.05507=0.2347 st_{cr} = \sqrt{\frac{2\times 5\times(1.3886-0.5236)}{\pi\times 50\times 1}} = \sqrt{0.05507} = 0.2347\ \text{s}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr=79.56∘\delta_{cr} = 79.56^\circ; critical clearing time tcr=0.235t_{cr} = 0.235 s (about 11.7 cycles).

  • 2081 Bhadra · 2+3+3 marks

A 50 Hz, 4 pole turbo generator 100 MVA, 11 kV has an inertia constant 8 MJ/MVA. (i) find the stored energy in the rotor at synchronous speed. (ii) If the mechanical input is suddenly raised to 80 MW for an electrical load of 50 MW, find rotor acceleration, neglecting mechanical and electrical losses. (iii) if acceleration calculated in part (ii) is maintained for 10 cycles, find the change in torque and rotor speed in revolutions/minute at end of this period.

Answer

Data: G=100G = 100 MVA, H=8H = 8 MJ/MVA, f=50f = 50 Hz, 4 poles. Synchronous speed Ns=120f/P=1500N_s = 120f/P = 1500 rpm.

(i) Stored energy at synchronous speed

KE=GH=100×8=800 MJKE = G H = 100 \times 8 = 800\ \text{MJ}

(ii) Rotor acceleration

Accelerating power: Pa=Pm−Pe=80−50=30P_a = P_m - P_e = 80 - 50 = 30 MW.

The inertia constant in MJ·s/elec-degree is

M=GH180f=800180×50=0.08889 MJ⋅s/elec degM = \frac{GH}{180 f} = \frac{800}{180\times 50} = 0.08889\ \text{MJ·s/elec deg}

Swing equation: M d2δdt2=PaM\,\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_a, so

α=PaM=300.08889=337.5 elec deg/s2=337.52=168.75 mech deg/s2(4 poles=2 pole pairs)=168.75×60360=28.125 rpm/s\begin{aligned} \alpha &= \frac{P_a}{M} = \frac{30}{0.08889} = 337.5\ \text{elec deg/s}^2 \\ &= \frac{337.5}{2} = 168.75\ \text{mech deg/s}^2 \quad (\text{4 poles} = 2\ \text{pole pairs}) \\ &= \frac{168.75\times 60}{360} = 28.125\ \text{rpm/s} \end{aligned}

(iii) After 10 cycles

Time: t=10/50=0.2t = 10/50 = 0.2 s. Starting from synchronous speed with constant α\alpha:

The change in torque (load) angle is

Δδ=12αt2=12×337.5×0.22=6.75 elec deg (=3.375 mech deg)\Delta\delta = \tfrac{1}{2}\alpha t^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\times 337.5\times 0.2^2 = 6.75\ \text{elec deg}\ (= 3.375\ \text{mech deg})

The rotor speed at the end of 10 cycles is

ΔN=28.125×0.2=5.625 rpmN=1500+5.625=1505.625 rpm\begin{aligned} \Delta N &= 28.125\times 0.2 = 5.625\ \text{rpm} \\ N &= 1500 + 5.625 = 1505.625\ \text{rpm} \end{aligned}

"Change in torque" is read here as the change in torque (load) angle, which is the usual form of this problem. For reference, the accelerating torque is Ta=Pa/ωsm=30×106/(2π×1500/60)=1.91×105T_a = P_a/\omega_{sm} = 30\times10^6/(2\pi\times1500/60) = 1.91\times10^5 N·m.

Answer: (i) 800 MJ; (ii) α=337.5\alpha = 337.5 elec deg/s² (28.125 rpm/s); (iii) Δδ=6.75\Delta\delta = 6.75 elec deg, speed =1505.625= 1505.625 rpm.

  • 2079 Bhadra · 8 marks

For the system shown in figure, the per unit values of different quantities are E = 1.1, V = 1, Xd' = 0.15, X1 = X2 = 0.4. The system is operating in equilibrium with Pm = 1.2 pu. Find the critical clearing angle if a 3-phase fault occurs on line-2 close to the generator. [Figure: generator E∠δ behind Xd' feeding two parallel lines X1 and X2 (each with circuit breakers at both ends) to an infinite bus V∠0; fault F at the generator end of line 2]

Answer

Data: E=1.1E = 1.1, V=1V = 1, Xd′=0.15X_d' = 0.15, X1=X2=0.4X_1 = X_2 = 0.4 pu, Pm=1.2P_m = 1.2 pu. The fault is on line 2 close to the generator and is cleared by opening line 2.

Step 1: Pre-fault (both lines in service)

XI=0.15+0.42=0.35 puPmax1=1.1×10.35=3.143 puδ0=sin⁡−11.23.143=22.45∘=0.3918 rad\begin{aligned} X_I &= 0.15 + \frac{0.4}{2} = 0.35\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max1} &= \frac{1.1\times 1}{0.35} = 3.143\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{3.143} = 22.45^\circ = 0.3918\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: During the fault

The fault is at the generator end of line 2, which is the generator-side bus. That bus is at zero voltage, so no power reaches the infinite bus: Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0.

Step 3: Post-fault (line 2 open)

XIII=0.15+0.4=0.55 puPmax3=1.10.55=2.0 puδmax=180∘−sin⁡−11.22.0=180∘−36.87∘=143.13∘=2.4981 rad\begin{aligned} X_{III} &= 0.15 + 0.4 = 0.55\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max3} &= \frac{1.1}{0.55} = 2.0\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{2.0} = 180^\circ - 36.87^\circ = 143.13^\circ = 2.4981\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Critical clearing angle

From A1=A2A_1 = A_2:

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}} cos⁡δcr=1.2(2.4981−0.3918)+2.0cos⁡143.13∘−02.0−0=2.5276−1.60002.0=0.4638δcr=62.37∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{1.2(2.4981-0.3918) + 2.0\cos 143.13^\circ - 0}{2.0 - 0} \\ &= \frac{2.5276 - 1.6000}{2.0} = 0.4638 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 62.37^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈62.37∘\delta_{cr} \approx 62.37^\circ.

  • 2078 Bhadra · 12 marks

In the power system network shown below, if the generator delivers 1 pu real power at infinite bus 2. A 3-phase bolted fault occurs at the end of the 1st transmission line. The fault is isolated by simultaneous opening of circuit breakers on the both end of the line. Find the critical fault clearing time so that transient stability of the machine is maintained. Inertia constant of the generator is 8 MJ/MVA. [Figure: generator E∠δ with X'd = 0.3 - transformer j0.2 - bus 1; two parallel lines L1 (j0.3) and L2 (j0.3) with breakers at both ends between bus 1 and bus 2; infinite bus 1∠0° at bus 2]

Answer

Assumption: the internal emf magnitude is not given in the figure, so ∣E∣=1.0|E| = 1.0 pu and f=50f = 50 Hz are assumed. The method is the same for any other EE.

Data: Xd′=0.3X_d' = 0.3, XT=0.2X_T = 0.2, L1=L2=0.3L_1 = L_2 = 0.3 pu, Pm=1P_m = 1 pu, H=8H = 8 MJ/MVA, V=1∠0∘V = 1\angle0^\circ.

Step 1: Pre-fault

XI=0.3+0.2+0.32=0.65 puPmax1=1×10.65=1.5385 puδ0=sin⁡−111.5385=40.54∘=0.7076 rad\begin{aligned} X_I &= 0.3 + 0.2 + \frac{0.3}{2} = 0.65\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max1} &= \frac{1\times1}{0.65} = 1.5385\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{1.5385} = 40.54^\circ = 0.7076\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: During the fault

The fault is at the end of line 1, either at bus 1 or at the infinite bus 2. In both cases one of the buses on the power path is at zero voltage, so Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0 and the power transferred is zero.

Step 3: Post-fault (line 1 removed)

XIII=0.3+0.2+0.3=0.8 puPmax3=10.8=1.25 puδmax=180∘−sin⁡−111.25=126.87∘=2.2143 rad\begin{aligned} X_{III} &= 0.3 + 0.2 + 0.3 = 0.8\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max3} &= \frac{1}{0.8} = 1.25\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{1.25} = 126.87^\circ = 2.2143\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Since Pmax3>PmP_{max3} > P_m, the system can be stable if the fault is cleared in time.

Step 4: Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmaxPmax3=1(2.2143−0.7076)+1.25cos⁡126.87∘1.25=1.5067−0.751.25=0.6054δcr=52.74∘=0.9206 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max}}{P_{max3}} \\ &= \frac{1(2.2143-0.7076) + 1.25\cos 126.87^\circ}{1.25} \\ &= \frac{1.5067 - 0.75}{1.25} = 0.6054 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 52.74^\circ = 0.9206\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 5: Critical clearing time

With Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault, δ=δ0+πfPm2Ht2\delta = \delta_0 + \dfrac{\pi f P_m}{2H}t^2. So

tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm=2×8×(0.9206−0.7076)π×50×1=0.147 s\begin{aligned} t_{cr} &= \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times 8\times(0.9206-0.7076)}{\pi\times 50\times 1}} \\ &= 0.147\ \text{s} \end{aligned}

Answer (with E=1.0E = 1.0 pu): δcr=52.74∘\delta_{cr} = 52.74^\circ, critical clearing time tcr≈0.147t_{cr} \approx 0.147 s (about 7.4 cycles).

  • 2078 Kartik · 10 marks

A 50 Hz generator with inertia constant 5 MJ/MVA is delivering 1 pu power to an infinite bus. When a fault occurs, the maximum power transferable reduces to 0.5 pu. The maximum power transferable before the occurrence of fault was 2 pu. The maximum power after clearance of fault is 1.5 pu. Compute the critical fault clearing angle.

Answer

Data: Pm=1P_m = 1 pu, Pmax1=2P_{max1} = 2 pu (pre-fault), Pmax2=0.5P_{max2} = 0.5 pu (during fault), Pmax3=1.5P_{max3} = 1.5 pu (post-fault), H=5H = 5 MJ/MVA, f=50f = 50 Hz. HH is not needed for the angle.

Step 1: Initial and maximum angles

δ0=sin⁡−1PmPmax1=sin⁡−112=30∘=0.5236 radδmax=180∘−sin⁡−1PmPmax3=180∘−41.81∘=138.19∘=2.4119 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{P_m}{P_{max1}} = \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2} = 30^\circ = 0.5236\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{P_m}{P_{max3}} = 180^\circ - 41.81^\circ = 138.19^\circ = 2.4119\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Equal area condition

Accelerating area (from δ0\delta_0 to δcr\delta_{cr} on curve 2) = decelerating area (from δcr\delta_{cr} to δmax\delta_{max} on curve 3):

∫δ0δcr(Pm−Pmax2sin⁡δ) dδ=∫δcrδmax(Pmax3sin⁡δ−Pm) dδ\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_{cr}}(P_m - P_{max2}\sin\delta)\,d\delta = \int_{\delta_{cr}}^{\delta_{max}}(P_{max3}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta

This gives

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}}

Step 3: Substitute

cos⁡δcr=1(2.4119−0.5236)+1.5cos⁡138.19∘−0.5cos⁡30∘1.5−0.5=1.8883−1.1180−0.43301.0=0.3372δcr=70.29∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{1(2.4119-0.5236) + 1.5\cos138.19^\circ - 0.5\cos30^\circ}{1.5-0.5} \\ &= \frac{1.8883 - 1.1180 - 0.4330}{1.0} \\ &= 0.3372 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 70.29^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈70.3∘\delta_{cr} \approx 70.3^\circ.

  • 2076 Chaitra · 10 marks

In the power system network shown below, find the rotor angle before occurrence of fault at bus 3 when the rotor was running at synchronous speed when the mechanical input to the generator is 1 p.u. Also compute the critical clearing angle. [Figure: generator with terminal voltage |Vt| = 1.08 pu and Xd' = 0.2 pu - transformer j0.1 - bus 1; two parallel lines j0.5 and j0.4 from bus 1 to bus 3; bus 3 connected directly to bus 2, the infinite bus 1∠0° pu]

Answer

Data: ∣Vt∣=1.08|V_t| = 1.08 pu, Xd′=0.2X_d' = 0.2, XT=0.1X_T = 0.1, lines j0.5∥j0.4j0.5 \parallel j0.4 between bus 1 and bus 3, bus 3 tied directly to the infinite bus 1∠0∘1\angle0^\circ, Pm=1P_m = 1 pu.

Assumption: the fault at bus 3 is a temporary fault. After it is cleared, the network is unchanged.

Step 1: Reactances

Xlines=0.5×0.40.5+0.4=0.2222 puXt-∞=0.1+0.2222=0.3222 pu  (terminal to infinite bus)\begin{aligned} X_{lines} &= \frac{0.5\times 0.4}{0.5+0.4} = 0.2222\ \text{pu} \\ X_{t\text{-}\infty} &= 0.1 + 0.2222 = 0.3222\ \text{pu}\ \ \text{(terminal to infinite bus)} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Terminal voltage angle

P=∣Vt∣∣V∣Xsin⁡θ  ⇒  sin⁡θ=1×0.32221.08×1=0.2984θ=17.36∘,Vt=1.08∠17.36∘=1.0306+j0.3222\begin{aligned} P &= \frac{|V_t||V|}{X}\sin\theta \;\Rightarrow\; \sin\theta = \frac{1\times 0.3222}{1.08\times 1} = 0.2984 \\ \theta &= 17.36^\circ, \quad V_t = 1.08\angle17.36^\circ = 1.0306 + j0.3222 \end{aligned}

Step 3: Current and internal emf

I=Vt−VjX=0.0306+j0.3222j0.3222=1.0−j0.0950=1.0046∠−5.46∘ puE′=Vt+jXd′I=(1.0306+j0.3222)+j0.2(1.0−j0.0950)=1.0499+j0.5222=1.1726∠26.45∘ pu\begin{aligned} I &= \frac{V_t - V}{jX} = \frac{0.0306 + j0.3222}{j0.3222} = 1.0 - j0.0950 = 1.0046\angle{-5.46^\circ}\ \text{pu} \\ E' &= V_t + jX_d' I = (1.0306 + j0.3222) + j0.2(1.0 - j0.0950) \\ &= 1.0499 + j0.5222 = 1.1726\angle 26.45^\circ\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Rotor angle before the fault: δ0=26.45∘\delta_0 = 26.45^\circ.

Step 4: Power-angle curves

Xtotal=0.2+0.3222=0.5222 puPmax=1.1726×10.5222=2.2455 pu\begin{aligned} X_{total} &= 0.2 + 0.3222 = 0.5222\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max} &= \frac{1.1726\times 1}{0.5222} = 2.2455\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Check: 2.2455sin⁡26.45∘=1.02.2455\sin 26.45^\circ = 1.0 pu.

During the fault, bus 3 is shorted, and it is tied directly to the infinite bus, so Pe=0P_e = 0. After clearing, Pmax3=Pmax1=2.2455P_{max3} = P_{max1} = 2.2455 pu. Then δmax=180∘−26.45∘=153.55∘\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 26.45^\circ = 153.55^\circ.

Step 5: Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0=(3.1416−0.9231)(0.4453)−0.8954=0.0926δcr=84.69∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= (\pi - 2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0 \\ &= (3.1416 - 0.9231)(0.4453) - 0.8954 \\ &= 0.0926 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 84.69^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: Initial rotor angle δ0=26.45∘\delta_0 = 26.45^\circ (E′=1.173E' = 1.173 pu); critical clearing angle δcr≈84.69∘\delta_{cr} \approx 84.69^\circ.

  • 2076 Asoj · 8 marks

Calculate the critical clearing time and critical angle if the fault is at point P for the network having inertia 5 MJ/MVA shown below. The machine is delivering 1.0 pu and both the terminal voltage and the infinite bus voltage are 1.0 pu. [Figure: generator G (j0.2) - transformer j0.1 - bus with V1 = 1.0; two parallel lines each j0.4 with breakers at both ends to the bus V2 and the infinite bus; fault P at the sending end of one line, which is opened to clear the fault]

Answer

Data: Xd′=0.2X_d' = 0.2, XT=0.1X_T = 0.1, two lines of 0.40.4 pu each, H=5H = 5 MJ/MVA, f=50f = 50 Hz (assumed), Pm=1.0P_m = 1.0 pu. V1=1.0V_1 = 1.0 pu at the bus marked in the figure (the HV bus after the transformer), and V2=1.0V_2 = 1.0 pu at the infinite bus.

Assumptions: P is at the sending end of one line, and the fault is cleared by opening that line.

Step 1: Pre-fault operating point

Reactance from V1V_1 to the infinite bus: 0.4/2=0.20.4/2 = 0.2 pu.

sin⁡θ=PXV1V2=1×0.21=0.2  ⇒  θ=11.54∘I=1∠11.54∘−1∠0∘j0.2=1.0+j0.1010 puE′=V1+j(0.2+0.1)I=(0.9798+j0.2)+j0.3(1.0+j0.1010)=0.9495+j0.5=1.0731∠27.77∘\begin{aligned} \sin\theta &= \frac{P X}{V_1V_2} = \frac{1\times 0.2}{1} = 0.2 \;\Rightarrow\; \theta = 11.54^\circ \\ I &= \frac{1\angle11.54^\circ - 1\angle0^\circ}{j0.2} = 1.0 + j0.1010\ \text{pu} \\ E' &= V_1 + j(0.2+0.1)I = (0.9798 + j0.2) + j0.3(1.0 + j0.1010) \\ &= 0.9495 + j0.5 = 1.0731\angle 27.77^\circ \end{aligned}

So δ0=27.77∘=0.4847\delta_0 = 27.77^\circ = 0.4847 rad.

Step 2: Power-angle curves

ConditionXX (pu)PmaxP_{max} (pu)
Pre-fault0.2+0.1+0.2=0.50.2+0.1+0.2 = 0.51.0731/0.5=2.1461.0731/0.5 = 2.146
During fault (P at bus)—00
Post-fault (one line)0.2+0.1+0.4=0.70.2+0.1+0.4 = 0.71.0731/0.7=1.5331.0731/0.7 = 1.533
δmax=180∘−sin⁡−111.533=139.28∘=2.4310 rad\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1}{1.533} = 139.28^\circ = 2.4310\ \text{rad}

Step 3: Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmaxPmax3=1(2.4310−0.4847)+1.533cos⁡139.28∘1.533=0.5116δcr=59.23∘=1.0337 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max}}{P_{max3}} \\ &= \frac{1(2.4310-0.4847) + 1.533\cos139.28^\circ}{1.533} \\ &= 0.5116 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 59.23^\circ = 1.0337\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Critical clearing time

With Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault:

tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm=2×5×(1.0337−0.4847)π×50×1=0.187 s\begin{aligned} t_{cr} &= \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times5\times(1.0337-0.4847)}{\pi\times50\times1}} \\ &= 0.187\ \text{s} \end{aligned}

Answer: δcr≈59.2∘\delta_{cr} \approx 59.2^\circ, tcr≈0.187t_{cr} \approx 0.187 s (about 9.3 cycles).

If "terminal voltage" is instead taken at the generator terminals (before the transformer), then E′=1.05∠28.44∘E' = 1.05\angle28.44^\circ, Pmax1=2.1P_{max1} = 2.1, Pmax3=1.5P_{max3} = 1.5, which gives δcr=57.9∘\delta_{cr} = 57.9^\circ and tcr=0.181t_{cr} = 0.181 s.

  • 2075 Chaitra · 8 marks

Find the maximum steady state power capability of a system consisting of a generator equivalent reactance of 0.4 pu connected to an infinite bus through a series reactance of 1.0 pu. The terminal voltage of the generator is held at 1.1 pu and the voltage of the infinite bus is 1.0 pu.

Answer

The steady-state limit is reached when the angle between EE and VV is 90∘90^\circ. Here ∣Vt∣|V_t|, not EE, is held constant, so first find the EE that gives ∣Vt∣=1.1|V_t| = 1.1 pu at δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ.

Data: Xg=0.4X_g = 0.4 pu, Xe=1.0X_e = 1.0 pu (series line), ∣Vt∣=1.1|V_t| = 1.1 pu, V=1.0∠0∘V = 1.0\angle0^\circ pu. Total X=1.4X = 1.4 pu.

Step 1: Terminal voltage in terms of EE

At the limit, E=E∠90∘=jEE = E\angle 90^\circ = jE. The current is I=(jE−1)/(j1.4)I = (jE - 1)/(j1.4). Then

Vt=V+jXeI=1+1.01.4(jE−1)=(1−11.4)+jE1.4=0.2857+j0.7143E\begin{aligned} V_t &= V + jX_eI = 1 + \frac{1.0}{1.4}(jE - 1) \\ &= \left(1 - \frac{1}{1.4}\right) + j\frac{E}{1.4} = 0.2857 + j0.7143E \end{aligned}

Step 2: Impose ∣Vt∣=1.1|V_t| = 1.1

0.28572+(0.7143E)2=1.120.7143E=1.21−0.0816=1.0622E=1.4871 pu\begin{aligned} 0.2857^2 + (0.7143E)^2 &= 1.1^2 \\ 0.7143E &= \sqrt{1.21 - 0.0816} = 1.0622 \\ E &= 1.4871\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Vt=0.2857+j1.0622=1.1∠74.95∘V_t = 0.2857 + j1.0622 = 1.1\angle74.95^\circ.

Step 3: Maximum power

Pmax=EVX=1.4871×1.01.4=1.062 puP_{max} = \frac{EV}{X} = \frac{1.4871\times 1.0}{1.4} = 1.062\ \text{pu}

(Equivalently, Pmax=∣Vt∣ ∣V∣sin⁡θ/Xe=1.1×1×sin⁡74.95∘/1.0=1.062P_{max} = |V_t|\,|V|\sin\theta/X_e = 1.1\times1\times\sin74.95^\circ/1.0 = 1.062 pu.)

Answer: Maximum steady-state power ≈ 1.062 pu (with E=1.487E = 1.487 pu, Vt=1.1∠74.95∘V_t = 1.1\angle74.95^\circ).

If EE were simply taken as 1.1 pu, the result would be 1.1/1.4=0.7861.1/1.4 = 0.786 pu. Holding VtV_t by the AVR raises the limit considerably.

  • 2075 Asoj · 10 marks

The power system shown below is operating initially at power angle δ = 20°. Calculate the power delivered to the infinite bus at normal operation. If a 3-phase to ground fault occurs at bus (1) and fault is cleared when the power angle δ reaches 45°, determine whether system come back to stable or not? If yes, calculate the maximum δ-swing angle. [Figure: generator E = 1.2 pu∠δ, j0.25 pu to bus (1); two parallel lines each j0.5 pu (breakers at both ends) from bus (1) to bus (2), the infinite bus V = 1 pu∠0°]

Answer

Data: E=1.2E = 1.2 pu, V=1V = 1 pu, Xd′=0.25X_d' = 0.25, two lines of 0.50.5 pu each, δ0=20∘\delta_0 = 20^\circ.

Assumption: the bus fault is temporary, so after clearing both lines are in service and the post-fault curve equals the pre-fault curve.

Step 1: Normal operation

X=0.25+0.52=0.5 pu,Pmax=1.2×10.5=2.4 puPe=2.4sin⁡20∘=0.8208 pu=Pm\begin{aligned} X &= 0.25 + \frac{0.5}{2} = 0.5\ \text{pu}, \qquad P_{max} = \frac{1.2\times1}{0.5} = 2.4\ \text{pu} \\ P_e &= 2.4\sin20^\circ = 0.8208\ \text{pu} = P_m \end{aligned}

Power delivered at normal operation: 0.821 pu.

Step 2: During the fault

A 3-phase fault at bus (1) puts the line-side voltage at zero, so Pe=0P_e = 0. The rotor accelerates from 20∘20^\circ to 45∘45^\circ.

A1=Pm(δc−δ0)=0.8208×(0.7854−0.3491)=0.3582 pu⋅radA_1 = P_m(\delta_c - \delta_0) = 0.8208\times(0.7854 - 0.3491) = 0.3582\ \text{pu·rad}

Step 3: Area available after clearing

δmax=180∘−20∘=160∘=2.7925 rad\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 20^\circ = 160^\circ = 2.7925\ \text{rad} A2,max=Pmax(cos⁡45∘−cos⁡160∘)−Pm(δmax−δc)=2.4(0.7071+0.9397)−0.8208(2.7925−0.7854)=2.3048 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_{2,max} &= P_{max}(\cos45^\circ - \cos160^\circ) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_c) \\ &= 2.4(0.7071 + 0.9397) - 0.8208(2.7925 - 0.7854) \\ &= 2.3048\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Since A2,max=2.305>A1=0.358A_{2,max} = 2.305 > A_1 = 0.358, the system is stable.

Step 4: Maximum swing angle δ1\delta_1

Set A2=A1A_2 = A_1:

2.4(cos⁡45∘−cos⁡δ1)−0.8208(δ1−0.7854)=0.35822.4(\cos45^\circ - \cos\delta_1) - 0.8208(\delta_1 - 0.7854) = 0.3582

Solving by trial (or numerically): δ1=1.1060\delta_1 = 1.1060 rad.

Answer: Power delivered = 0.821 pu; the system is stable; maximum swing δmax≈63.4∘\delta_{max} \approx 63.4^\circ.

For reference, the critical clearing angle for this case is cos⁡−1[(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0]=95.97∘\cos^{-1}[(\pi-2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0] = 95.97^\circ, so clearing at 45∘45^\circ leaves a wide margin.

  • 2074 Asoj · 8 marks

A generator is delivering 0.9 pu to an infinite bus through a purely reactive transmission line. Maximum power that could be delivered is 1.5 pu. A fault occurs such that maximum electrical power output reduces to 0.5 pu. When the fault is cleared, the maximum power that can be delivered is 1.2 pu. Determine the critical clearing angle using equal area criterion.

Answer

Data: Pm=0.9P_m = 0.9 pu, Pmax1=1.5P_{max1} = 1.5 pu (pre-fault), Pmax2=0.5P_{max2} = 0.5 pu (during fault), Pmax3=1.2P_{max3} = 1.2 pu (post-fault). The line is purely reactive, so there are no losses.

Step 1: Angles

δ0=sin⁡−10.91.5=36.87∘=0.6435 radδmax=180∘−sin⁡−10.91.2=180∘−48.59∘=131.41∘=2.2935 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{0.9}{1.5} = 36.87^\circ = 0.6435\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{0.9}{1.2} = 180^\circ - 48.59^\circ = 131.41^\circ = 2.2935\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Equal area criterion

∫δ0δcr(Pm−Pmax2sin⁡δ) dδ=∫δcrδmax(Pmax3sin⁡δ−Pm) dδ\int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_{cr}}(P_m - P_{max2}\sin\delta)\,d\delta = \int_{\delta_{cr}}^{\delta_{max}}(P_{max3}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta ⇒ cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\Rightarrow\ \cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}}

Step 3: Substitute

cos⁡δcr=0.9(2.2935−0.6435)+1.2cos⁡131.41∘−0.5cos⁡36.87∘1.2−0.5=1.4850−0.7937−0.40000.7=0.4161δcr=65.41∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{0.9(2.2935-0.6435) + 1.2\cos131.41^\circ - 0.5\cos36.87^\circ}{1.2-0.5} \\ &= \frac{1.4850 - 0.7937 - 0.4000}{0.7} \\ &= 0.4161 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 65.41^\circ \end{aligned}
 Pe
 1.5 |     ___ I (pre)
 1.2 |   /  _ \__ III (post)
 0.9 |--*--|----\--------- Pm
 0.5 | / A1| A2  \  II (fault)
     +--d0-dcr----dmax---- delta

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈65.4∘\delta_{cr} \approx 65.4^\circ.

  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks

For a synchronous generator connected to infinite bus as shown in figure below, compute the value of series capacitor so that the power angle at steady state could be limited to 30° for generator supplying power of 1 p.u. [Figure: generator 6.6 kV, 50 MVA, 0.3 p.u (Y grounded) - transformer 6.6/132 kV, 50 MVA, 0.1 p.u - line j0.3 - series capacitor −jXc - line j0.3 - 132 kV infinite bus]

Answer

Assumptions: the generator internal emf is not given, so ∣E∣=1.0|E| = 1.0 pu is assumed, with infinite bus voltage ∣V∣=1.0|V| = 1.0 pu. The base is 50 MVA, 132 kV on the line side.

Data (pu on 50 MVA): Xg=0.3X_g = 0.3, XT=0.1X_T = 0.1, line sections 0.3+0.30.3 + 0.3, series capacitor −jXC-jX_C.

Step 1: Required total reactance

P=EVXsin⁡δ1.0=1×1Xsin⁡30∘  ⇒  X=0.5 pu\begin{aligned} P &= \frac{EV}{X}\sin\delta \\ 1.0 &= \frac{1\times1}{X}\sin30^\circ \;\Rightarrow\; X = 0.5\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Capacitor reactance

Uncompensated reactance: 0.3+0.1+0.3+0.3=1.00.3 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 0.3 = 1.0 pu. So

XC=1.0−0.5=0.5 puX_C = 1.0 - 0.5 = 0.5\ \text{pu}

Without the capacitor, sin⁡δ=1.0\sin\delta = 1.0, giving δ=90∘\delta = 90^\circ, which is right at the limit. The capacitor is therefore essential.

Step 3: Actual value

Zbase=(132)250=348.48 ΩXC=0.5×348.48=174.24 ΩC=12πfXC=12π×50×174.24=18.27 μF\begin{aligned} Z_{base} &= \frac{(132)^2}{50} = 348.48\ \Omega \\ X_C &= 0.5\times 348.48 = 174.24\ \Omega \\ C &= \frac{1}{2\pi f X_C} = \frac{1}{2\pi\times50\times174.24} = 18.27\ \mu\text{F} \end{aligned}

Answer: XC=0.5X_C = 0.5 pu = 174.24 Ω per phase, i.e. C≈18.27 μC \approx 18.27\ \muF per phase (50% compensation of the total reactance).

  • 2073 Chaitra · 8 marks

A balanced 3-phase fault occurs at the middle point of line 2 when power transfer is 1.5 pu in the system shown in the figure below. Given: E = 1.2, V = 1, X'd = 0.2, X1 = X2 = 0.4 pu. i) Determine whether the system is stable for a sustained fault. ii) The fault is cleared at δ = 60°. Is the system stable? If so find the maximum rotor swing iii) Find the critical clearing angle. [Figure: generator E∠δ behind X'd feeding two parallel lines X1 and X2 (circuit breakers at both ends) to the infinite bus V∠0; fault F at the middle of line 2]

Answer

Data: E=1.2E = 1.2, V=1V = 1, Xd′=0.2X_d' = 0.2, X1=X2=0.4X_1 = X_2 = 0.4 pu, Pm=1.5P_m = 1.5 pu.

Power-angle curves

Pre-fault:

XI=0.2+0.2=0.4 pu  ⇒  Pmax1=1.20.4=3.0 pu,δ0=sin⁡−11.53.0=30∘X_I = 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.4\ \text{pu} \;\Rightarrow\; P_{max1} = \frac{1.2}{0.4} = 3.0\ \text{pu}, \qquad \delta_0 = \sin^{-1}\frac{1.5}{3.0} = 30^\circ

During the fault (midpoint of line 2): the network is a star with EE to node A: 0.20.2; A to VV: 0.40.4 (line 1); A to ground: 0.20.2 (half of line 2). The other half of line 2, from the fault to VV, only shunts the infinite bus. Star-delta conversion gives the transfer reactance:

XII=0.2×0.4+0.4×0.2+0.2×0.20.2=0.200.2=1.0 puPmax2=1.21.0=1.2 pu\begin{aligned} X_{II} &= \frac{0.2\times0.4 + 0.4\times0.2 + 0.2\times0.2}{0.2} = \frac{0.20}{0.2} = 1.0\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max2} &= \frac{1.2}{1.0} = 1.2\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Post-fault (line 2 open):

XIII=0.2+0.4=0.6 pu  ⇒  Pmax3=2.0 pu,δmax=180∘−sin⁡−10.75=131.41∘X_{III} = 0.2 + 0.4 = 0.6\ \text{pu} \;\Rightarrow\; P_{max3} = 2.0\ \text{pu}, \qquad \delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}0.75 = 131.41^\circ

(i) Sustained fault

During the fault, Pmax2=1.2<Pm=1.5P_{max2} = 1.2 < P_m = 1.5. The electrical output can never equal the input, so the rotor keeps accelerating and no decelerating area exists. The system is unstable for a sustained fault.

(ii) Fault cleared at δc=60∘\delta_c = 60^\circ

Accelerating area:

A1=Pm(δc−δ0)−Pmax2(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δc)=1.5(1.0472−0.5236)−1.2(0.8660−0.5)=0.3462 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_c-\delta_0) - P_{max2}(\cos\delta_0 - \cos\delta_c) \\ &= 1.5(1.0472-0.5236) - 1.2(0.8660-0.5) = 0.3462\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Decelerating area available:

A2,max=Pmax3(cos⁡δc−cos⁡δmax)−Pm(δmax−δc)=2.0(0.5+0.6614)−1.5(2.2935−1.0472)=0.4534 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_{2,max} &= P_{max3}(\cos\delta_c - \cos\delta_{max}) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_c) \\ &= 2.0(0.5 + 0.6614) - 1.5(2.2935 - 1.0472) = 0.4534\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Since A2,max>A1A_{2,max} > A_1, the system is stable. For the maximum swing δ1\delta_1, set 2.0(cos⁡60∘−cos⁡δ1)−1.5(δ1−1.0472)=0.34622.0(\cos60^\circ - \cos\delta_1) - 1.5(\delta_1 - 1.0472) = 0.3462. Solving numerically gives δ1=105.89∘\delta_1 = 105.89^\circ.

(iii) Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2=1.5(2.2935−0.5236)+2.0(−0.6614)−1.2(0.8660)2.0−1.2=0.3660δcr=68.53∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}} \\ &= \frac{1.5(2.2935-0.5236) + 2.0(-0.6614) - 1.2(0.8660)}{2.0-1.2} \\ &= 0.3660 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 68.53^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: (i) unstable for a sustained fault; (ii) stable, maximum swing ≈ 105.9°; (iii) δcr≈68.5∘\delta_{cr} \approx 68.5^\circ.

  • 2072 Kartik · 8 marks

A synchronous machine is connected to an infinite bus and the following condition exists during normal operation and the following relationship is valid during that period: Pe = 2.1 sinδ, Pm = 1.0 pu. Following a three phase symmetrical fault at the bus of synchronous generator, and fault is cleared at δ = 30°. Check the stability. Calculate the maximum fault clearing angle so as to maintain synchronism.

Answer

Data: Pe=2.1sin⁡δP_e = 2.1\sin\delta (normal and, assuming a temporary fault, also post-fault), Pm=1.0P_m = 1.0 pu. The fault is at the generator bus, so Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault.

Step 1: Initial and maximum angles

δ0=sin⁡−11.02.1=28.44∘=0.4963 radδmax=180∘−28.44∘=151.56∘\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.0}{2.1} = 28.44^\circ = 0.4963\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - 28.44^\circ = 151.56^\circ \end{aligned}

Step 2: Stability check for clearing at 30∘30^\circ

A1=Pm(δc−δ0)=1.0(0.5236−0.4963)=0.0273 pu⋅radA2,max=2.1(cos⁡30∘−cos⁡151.56∘)−1.0(2.6453−0.5236)=1.5436 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_c - \delta_0) = 1.0(0.5236 - 0.4963) = 0.0273\ \text{pu·rad} \\ A_{2,max} &= 2.1(\cos30^\circ - \cos151.56^\circ) - 1.0(2.6453 - 0.5236) = 1.5436\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Since A2,max≫A1A_{2,max} \gg A_1, the system is stable. Clearing occurs only 1.56∘1.56^\circ after the fault.

Step 3: Maximum (critical) clearing angle

With Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0 and Pmax3=Pmax1P_{max3} = P_{max1}:

cos⁡δcr=(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0=(3.1416−0.9926)(0.4762)−0.8793=0.1440δcr=81.72∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= (\pi - 2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0 \\ &= (3.1416 - 0.9926)(0.4762) - 0.8793 \\ &= 0.1440 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 81.72^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: Stable when cleared at 30°; maximum (critical) clearing angle ≈ 81.7°.

  • 2072 Chaitra · 12 marks

A generator is operating at rated voltage and is connected to infinite bus at 50 Hz with power transfer of 1.0 pu. A three-phase fault occurs and it is cleared after some time. Power angle (Pe-δ) curves for the pre-fault condition, during fault and after the fault is cleared is shown in figure below. Use equal area criterion to check whether the system is stable or not. If the system is stable, determine critical clearing angle. [Figure: Pe-δ curves: Curve-I (pre-fault) with peak 1.8 pu; Curve-III (post-fault) with peak 1.3 pu; Curve-II (during fault) with peak 0.4 pu; Pm = 1.0 pu]

Answer

Data from the curves: Pm=1.0P_m = 1.0 pu, pre-fault Pmax1=1.8P_{max1} = 1.8 pu, during fault Pmax2=0.4P_{max2} = 0.4 pu, post-fault Pmax3=1.3P_{max3} = 1.3 pu.

Step 1: Can the system be stable?

δ0=sin⁡−11.01.8=33.75∘=0.5890 radδmax=180∘−sin⁡−11.01.3=180∘−50.28∘=129.72∘=2.2640 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.0}{1.8} = 33.75^\circ = 0.5890\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1.0}{1.3} = 180^\circ - 50.28^\circ = 129.72^\circ = 2.2640\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

During the fault, Pmax2=0.4<PmP_{max2} = 0.4 < P_m, so the rotor accelerates. After clearing, Pmax3=1.3>PmP_{max3} = 1.3 > P_m, so a decelerating area exists. The system is stable if the fault is cleared before the critical clearing angle, where A1=A2A_1 = A_2.

Step 2: Critical clearing angle

Equating the accelerating area A1A_1 (on curve II, from δ0\delta_0 to δcr\delta_{cr}) with the decelerating area A2A_2 (on curve III, from δcr\delta_{cr} to δmax\delta_{max}):

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2\cos\delta_{cr} = \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}} cos⁡δcr=1.0(2.2640−0.5890)+1.3cos⁡129.72∘−0.4cos⁡33.75∘1.3−0.4=1.6750−0.8307−0.33260.9=0.5685δcr=55.35∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{1.0(2.2640-0.5890) + 1.3\cos129.72^\circ - 0.4\cos33.75^\circ}{1.3-0.4} \\ &= \frac{1.6750 - 0.8307 - 0.3326}{0.9} \\ &= 0.5685 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 55.35^\circ \end{aligned}
 Pe
 1.8 |      ____ I
 1.3 |    /  __ \__ III
 1.0 |---*--|----\---\---- Pm
 0.4 |  / A1| A2  \   \ II
     +--d0--dcr---dmax---- delta
       33.75 55.35 129.72

Answer: The system is stable if the fault is cleared at an angle below the critical clearing angle δcr≈55.35∘\delta_{cr} \approx 55.35^\circ; if clearing is later, it loses synchronism.

  • 2071 Shrawan · 6 marks

The power system shown in figure below is operating in steady state with which the generator delivering 1.5 p.u power to the infinite bus. The circuit breaker A suddenly opens and remain open. Find (i) whether the system remains stable or not. (ii) Angle to which the rotor swings. [Figure: generator E' = 1.2 p.u, X'd = 0.2 p.u; two parallel lines, the upper with X1 = 0.4 p.u and the lower with circuit breakers A and B; infinite bus E = 1.0 p.u]

Answer

Data: E′=1.2E' = 1.2 pu, V=1.0V = 1.0 pu, Xd′=0.2X_d' = 0.2 pu, X1=0.4X_1 = 0.4 pu, Pm=1.5P_m = 1.5 pu.

Assumption: the lower line's reactance is not marked, so it is taken equal to the upper line (0.40.4 pu). Opening breaker A disconnects the lower line.

Step 1: Before and after opening

Before: XI=0.2+0.42=0.4,Pmax1=1.20.4=3.0 pu,δ0=sin⁡−11.53.0=30∘After: XII=0.2+0.4=0.6,Pmax2=1.20.6=2.0 pu\begin{aligned} \text{Before: } X_I &= 0.2 + \frac{0.4}{2} = 0.4,\quad P_{max1} = \frac{1.2}{0.4} = 3.0\ \text{pu},\quad \delta_0 = \sin^{-1}\frac{1.5}{3.0} = 30^\circ \\ \text{After: } X_{II} &= 0.2 + 0.4 = 0.6,\quad P_{max2} = \frac{1.2}{0.6} = 2.0\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

New equilibrium: δ1=sin⁡−1(1.5/2.0)=48.59∘\delta_1 = \sin^{-1}(1.5/2.0) = 48.59^\circ. Limit: δmax=180∘−48.59∘=131.41∘\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 48.59^\circ = 131.41^\circ.

Step 2: (i) Stability check

Accelerating area (from 30∘30^\circ to 48.59∘48.59^\circ):

A1=Pm(δ1−δ0)−Pmax2(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ1)=1.5(0.8481−0.5236)−2.0(0.8660−0.6614)=0.0775 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_1-\delta_0) - P_{max2}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_1) \\ &= 1.5(0.8481 - 0.5236) - 2.0(0.8660 - 0.6614) = 0.0775\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Maximum decelerating area (from 48.59∘48.59^\circ to 131.41∘131.41^\circ):

A2,max=Pmax2(cos⁡δ1−cos⁡δmax)−Pm(δmax−δ1)=2.0(0.6614+0.6614)−1.5(2.2935−0.8481)=0.4775 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_{2,max} &= P_{max2}(\cos\delta_1-\cos\delta_{max}) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_1) \\ &= 2.0(0.6614+0.6614) - 1.5(2.2935-0.8481) = 0.4775\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Since A2,max>A1A_{2,max} > A_1, the system remains stable.

Step 3: (ii) Maximum rotor swing δ2\delta_2

From A1=A2A_1 = A_2, the net area from δ0\delta_0 to δ2\delta_2 is zero:

∫δ0δ2(Pm−2.0sin⁡δ) dδ=01.5(δ2−0.5236)−2.0(0.8660−cos⁡δ2)=0\begin{aligned} \int_{\delta_0}^{\delta_2}(P_m - 2.0\sin\delta)\,d\delta &= 0 \\ 1.5(\delta_2 - 0.5236) - 2.0(0.8660 - \cos\delta_2) &= 0 \end{aligned}

Solving by trial: δ2=1.2196\delta_2 = 1.2196 rad.

Answer: (i) stable; (ii) the rotor swings to about 69.9° and then oscillates about the new equilibrium of 48.6°.

  • 2071 Chaitra · 12 marks

For the system shown in figure, the numerical values for different quantities are: E = 1.04 pu, V = 1 pu, Xs = 0.2 pu, and reactances of each line is 0.4 pu. The generator is delivering a power of 1.2 pu to the infinite bus. If a 3-phase short circuit fault occurs at the mid point of one the transmission lines, perform the following: a) If the fault is cleared (switching out of the faulted line) when power angle is 60°, check whether the system is stable or not; b) Determine the critical clearing angle. [Figure: generator 50 MVA, E∠δ, Xs = 0.2; two parallel lines Line-1 (X = 0.4) and Line-2 (X = 0.4) with breakers at both ends; infinite bus V∠0°]

Answer

Data: E=1.04E = 1.04, V=1V = 1, Xs=0.2X_s = 0.2, each line 0.40.4 pu, Pm=1.2P_m = 1.2 pu. The fault is at the midpoint of one line and is cleared by opening that line.

Power-angle curves

ConditionTransfer XX (pu)Pmax=EV/XP_{max} = EV/X (pu)
Pre-fault0.2+0.4/2=0.40.2 + 0.4/2 = 0.42.600
During fault1.0 (star-delta)1.040
Post-fault0.2+0.4=0.60.2 + 0.4 = 0.61.733

Transfer reactance during the fault. Star at node A: EE–A 0.20.2, A–VV 0.40.4 (healthy line), A–ground 0.20.2 (half of the faulted line):

XII=0.2(0.4)+0.4(0.2)+0.2(0.2)0.2=1.0 puX_{II} = \frac{0.2(0.4) + 0.4(0.2) + 0.2(0.2)}{0.2} = 1.0\ \text{pu}

Angles:

δ0=sin⁡−11.22.6=27.49∘=0.4797 radδmax=180∘−sin⁡−11.21.733=136.19∘=2.3769 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{2.6} = 27.49^\circ = 0.4797\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{1.733} = 136.19^\circ = 2.3769\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

(a) Fault cleared at δc=60∘\delta_c = 60^\circ (1.0472 rad)

A1=Pm(δc−δ0)−Pmax2(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δc)=1.2(1.0472−0.4797)−1.04(0.8871−0.5)=0.2784 pu⋅radA2,max=Pmax3(cos⁡δc−cos⁡δmax)−Pm(δmax−δc)=1.7333(0.5+0.7215)−1.2(2.3769−1.0472)=0.5218 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_c-\delta_0) - P_{max2}(\cos\delta_0 - \cos\delta_c) \\ &= 1.2(1.0472-0.4797) - 1.04(0.8871-0.5) = 0.2784\ \text{pu·rad} \\ A_{2,max} &= P_{max3}(\cos\delta_c - \cos\delta_{max}) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_c) \\ &= 1.7333(0.5+0.7215) - 1.2(2.3769-1.0472) = 0.5218\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Since A2,max>A1A_{2,max} > A_1, the system is stable. Equating the areas gives a maximum rotor swing of about 94.3∘94.3^\circ.

(b) Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmax−Pmax2cos⁡δ0Pmax3−Pmax2=1.2(2.3769−0.4797)+1.7333(−0.7215)−1.04(0.8871)1.7333−1.04=2.2766−1.2506−0.92260.6933=0.1489δcr=81.44∘\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max} - P_{max2}\cos\delta_0}{P_{max3}-P_{max2}} \\ &= \frac{1.2(2.3769-0.4797) + 1.7333(-0.7215) - 1.04(0.8871)}{1.7333-1.04} \\ &= \frac{2.2766 - 1.2506 - 0.9226}{0.6933} = 0.1489 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 81.44^\circ \end{aligned}

Answer: (a) stable when cleared at 60° (maximum swing ≈ 94.3°); (b) critical clearing angle ≈ 81.4°.

  • 2070 Asar · 4 marks

A 2 pole, 50 Hz, 11.5 kV turbo generator has a rating of 100 MW, power factor 0.85 lagging. Calculate the inertia constant in MJ/MVA on a base of 500 MVA and its momentum in MJ-sec/elec-degree.

Answer

Assumption: the paper does not give the rotor inertia. The standard version of this problem uses a moment of inertia of J=10,000J = 10{,}000 kg·m², and that value is assumed here.

Step 1: Rating and speed

S=Ppf=1000.85=117.65 MVANs=120fP=120×502=3000 rpmωsm=2π×300060=314.16 rad/s\begin{aligned} S &= \frac{P}{\text{pf}} = \frac{100}{0.85} = 117.65\ \text{MVA} \\ N_s &= \frac{120f}{P} = \frac{120\times50}{2} = 3000\ \text{rpm} \\ \omega_{sm} &= \frac{2\pi\times3000}{60} = 314.16\ \text{rad/s} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Stored kinetic energy

KE=12Jωsm2=12×104×(314.16)2=493.48×106 J=493.48 MJKE = \tfrac{1}{2}J\omega_{sm}^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\times10^4\times(314.16)^2 = 493.48\times10^6\ \text{J} = 493.48\ \text{MJ}

Step 3: Inertia constant

On the machine's own rating: H=493.48/117.65=4.19H = 493.48/117.65 = 4.19 MJ/MVA.

On a 500 MVA base:

H500=493.48500=0.987 MJ/MVAH_{500} = \frac{493.48}{500} = 0.987\ \text{MJ/MVA}

Step 4: Angular momentum

M=GH180f=KE180f=493.48180×50=0.0548 MJ⋅s/elec degM = \frac{GH}{180f} = \frac{KE}{180f} = \frac{493.48}{180\times50} = 0.0548\ \text{MJ·s/elec deg}

In per unit on the 500 MVA base, this is 0.0548/500=1.097×10−40.0548/500 = 1.097\times10^{-4} pu·s/elec deg.

Answer: H=0.987H = 0.987 MJ/MVA on 500 MVA (4.19 MJ/MVA on its own 117.65 MVA rating); M=0.0548M = 0.0548 MJ·s/elec deg.

  • 2070 Asar · 8 marks

For the system shown in figure below, the numerical values for different quantities are: E = 1.2 pu, V = 1 pu, Xs = 0.2 pu and reactance of each line is 0.4 pu. Initially the generator is delivering a power of 1.5 pu. If one of the double circuit lines is now tripped out, using equal area criteria determine whether the system would be able to maintain its stability or not. [Figure: generator E∠δ - double circuit line, each circuit X = j0.4 p.u with circuit breakers at both ends - infinite bus V∠0°]

Answer

Data: E=1.2E = 1.2 pu, V=1V = 1 pu, Xs=0.2X_s = 0.2 pu, each line 0.40.4 pu, Pm=1.5P_m = 1.5 pu.

Step 1: Power-angle curves

Both lines: XI=0.2+0.42=0.4 pu,Pmax1=1.2×10.4=3.0 puOne line: XII=0.2+0.4=0.6 pu,Pmax2=1.20.6=2.0 pu\begin{aligned} \text{Both lines: } X_I &= 0.2 + \frac{0.4}{2} = 0.4\ \text{pu}, \quad P_{max1} = \frac{1.2\times1}{0.4} = 3.0\ \text{pu} \\ \text{One line: } X_{II} &= 0.2 + 0.4 = 0.6\ \text{pu}, \quad P_{max2} = \frac{1.2}{0.6} = 2.0\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Angles

δ0=sin⁡−11.53.0=30∘=0.5236 radδ1=sin⁡−11.52.0=48.59∘=0.8481 rad  (new equilibrium)δmax=180∘−48.59∘=131.41∘=2.2935 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.5}{3.0} = 30^\circ = 0.5236\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_1 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.5}{2.0} = 48.59^\circ = 0.8481\ \text{rad}\ \ \text{(new equilibrium)} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - 48.59^\circ = 131.41^\circ = 2.2935\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

When the line trips, PeP_e drops to 2.0sin⁡30∘=1.0<Pm2.0\sin30^\circ = 1.0 < P_m, so the rotor accelerates.

Step 3: Equal areas

Accelerating area, from δ0\delta_0 to δ1\delta_1:

A1=Pm(δ1−δ0)−Pmax2(cos⁡δ0−cos⁡δ1)=1.5(0.8481−0.5236)−2.0(0.8660−0.6614)=0.4868−0.4092=0.0775 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_1 &= P_m(\delta_1-\delta_0) - P_{max2}(\cos\delta_0-\cos\delta_1) \\ &= 1.5(0.8481-0.5236) - 2.0(0.8660-0.6614) \\ &= 0.4868 - 0.4092 = 0.0775\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}

Maximum decelerating area, from δ1\delta_1 to δmax\delta_{max}:

A2,max=Pmax2(cos⁡δ1−cos⁡δmax)−Pm(δmax−δ1)=2.0(0.6614+0.6614)−1.5(2.2935−0.8481)=2.6458−2.1681=0.4775 pu⋅rad\begin{aligned} A_{2,max} &= P_{max2}(\cos\delta_1-\cos\delta_{max}) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_1) \\ &= 2.0(0.6614+0.6614) - 1.5(2.2935-0.8481) \\ &= 2.6458 - 2.1681 = 0.4775\ \text{pu·rad} \end{aligned}
 Pe
 3.0 |      ___ before (3 sin d)
 2.0 |    /  _ \__ after (2 sin d)
 1.5 |---/-*-----\----\---- Pm
     |  /A1| A2   \    \
     +-30--48.6--69.9--131.4 delta

Step 4: Result

A2,max=0.4775>A1=0.0775A_{2,max} = 0.4775 > A_1 = 0.0775, so the system is stable and keeps synchronism.

Equating A1=A2A_1 = A_2, that is 1.5(δ2−0.5236)=2.0(0.8660−cos⁡δ2)1.5(\delta_2-0.5236) = 2.0(0.8660-\cos\delta_2), gives a maximum swing of δ2=69.88∘\delta_2 = 69.88^\circ. The rotor then settles at 48.59∘48.59^\circ.

Answer: Stable; the rotor swings to about 69.9° and settles at 48.6°.

  • 2070 Chaitra · 10 marks

The figure below shows the generator connected to infinite bus using parallel transmission line. The generator is rated for 50 Hz and H constant of 2 pu. In steady state, the generator delivers a power of 1.2 pu to the infinite bus. A sudden 3 phase to ground fault occurs in one of the line near infinite bus as shown in figure. Determine the critical clearing angle and critical clearing time before which fault must be cleared so that system remains in stable state. [Figure: generator E = 1 p.u with j0.05 pu; two parallel lines j0.2 pu each to the infinite bus V = 1 p.u; fault on one line near the infinite bus]

Answer

Data: E=1E = 1 pu, V=1V = 1 pu, Xg=0.05X_g = 0.05 pu, two lines of 0.20.2 pu each, Pm=1.2P_m = 1.2 pu, H=2H = 2 MJ/MVA, f=50f = 50 Hz.

Assumptions: the fault is at the infinite-bus end of one line, so the generator cannot deliver power during the fault (Pe=0P_e = 0). The fault is cleared by opening the faulted line.

Step 1: Pre-fault

XI=0.05+0.22=0.15 pu,Pmax1=1×10.15=6.667 puδ0=sin⁡−11.26.667=10.37∘=0.1810 rad\begin{aligned} X_I &= 0.05 + \frac{0.2}{2} = 0.15\ \text{pu}, \qquad P_{max1} = \frac{1\times1}{0.15} = 6.667\ \text{pu} \\ \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{6.667} = 10.37^\circ = 0.1810\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: During and after the fault

  • During the fault: Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0.
  • After the fault (one line): XIII=0.05+0.2=0.25X_{III} = 0.05 + 0.2 = 0.25 pu, so Pmax3=4.0P_{max3} = 4.0 pu.
δmax=180∘−sin⁡−11.24.0=180∘−17.46∘=162.54∘=2.8369 rad\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - \sin^{-1}\frac{1.2}{4.0} = 180^\circ - 17.46^\circ = 162.54^\circ = 2.8369\ \text{rad}

Step 3: Critical clearing angle

cos⁡δcr=Pm(δmax−δ0)+Pmax3cos⁡δmaxPmax3=1.2(2.8369−0.1810)+4.0cos⁡162.54∘4.0=3.1871−3.81584.0=−0.1572δcr=99.04∘=1.7286 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= \frac{P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_0) + P_{max3}\cos\delta_{max}}{P_{max3}} \\ &= \frac{1.2(2.8369-0.1810) + 4.0\cos162.54^\circ}{4.0} \\ &= \frac{3.1871 - 3.8158}{4.0} = -0.1572 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 99.04^\circ = 1.7286\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Critical clearing time

With Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault, δ=δ0+πfPm2Ht2\delta = \delta_0 + \dfrac{\pi f P_m}{2H}t^2. So

tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm=2×2×(1.7286−0.1810)π×50×1.2=0.03284=0.181 s\begin{aligned} t_{cr} &= \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times2\times(1.7286-0.1810)}{\pi\times50\times1.2}} \\ &= \sqrt{0.03284} = 0.181\ \text{s} \end{aligned}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈99.04∘\delta_{cr} \approx 99.04^\circ; critical clearing time tcr≈0.181t_{cr} \approx 0.181 s (about 9 cycles).

  • 2069 Chaitra · 5+5 marks

A transmission line connecting a generator to an infinite bus has a series reactance of 0.8 p.u. Assuming the sending and receiving end voltage are at 1 p.u. each compute the following: i. Power angle if the line delivers a 1 p.u. power to infinite bus ii. Series compensation required to bring the power angle to 30°.

Answer

For a lossless line, P=VSVRXsin⁡δP = \dfrac{V_SV_R}{X}\sin\delta. Series capacitors reduce the net reactance XX. For the same power, this reduces δ\delta and raises the stability margin.

Data: XL=0.8X_L = 0.8 pu, VS=VR=1V_S = V_R = 1 pu, P=1P = 1 pu.

(i) Power angle without compensation

sin⁡δ=PXLVSVR=1×0.81×1=0.8δ=sin⁡−10.8=53.13∘\begin{aligned} \sin\delta &= \frac{PX_L}{V_SV_R} = \frac{1\times0.8}{1\times1} = 0.8 \\ \delta &= \sin^{-1}0.8 = 53.13^\circ \end{aligned}

(ii) Series compensation for δ=30∘\delta = 30^\circ

The net reactance needed is

Xnet=VSVRsin⁡30∘P=1×1×0.51=0.5 puX_{net} = \frac{V_SV_R\sin30^\circ}{P} = \frac{1\times1\times0.5}{1} = 0.5\ \text{pu}

So the series capacitor must have

XC=XL−Xnet=0.8−0.5=0.3 puX_C = X_L - X_{net} = 0.8 - 0.5 = 0.3\ \text{pu} Degree of compensation=XCXL×100=0.30.8×100=37.5%\text{Degree of compensation} = \frac{X_C}{X_L}\times100 = \frac{0.3}{0.8}\times100 = 37.5\%

Effect on stability

QuantityUncompensatedCompensated
Net XX (pu)0.80.5
PmaxP_{max} (pu)1.252.0
δ\delta for 1 pu53.13°30°
Steady-state margin20%50%

Answer: (i) δ=53.13∘\delta = 53.13^\circ; (ii) series capacitive reactance XC=0.3X_C = 0.3 pu, i.e. 37.5% series compensation.

  • 2068 Chaitra · 8 marks

A 3-phase, 50 Hz generator is connected to an infinite bus via transmission line. The inertia constant of the generator is 6 MJ/MVA and mechanical power input is 1.0 pu. The maximum power that can be delivered by generator is 2.0 pu. A 3-phase fault occurs at the infinite bus. Determine the critical clearing angle and critical clearing time.

Answer

Data: f=50f = 50 Hz, H=6H = 6 MJ/MVA, Pm=1.0P_m = 1.0 pu, Pmax=2.0P_{max} = 2.0 pu.

Assumption: the fault is at the infinite bus and is temporary, so Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault. After clearing, the original curve Pe=2sin⁡δP_e = 2\sin\delta is restored.

Step 1: Initial and maximum angles

δ0=sin⁡−11.02.0=30∘=0.5236 radδmax=180∘−30∘=150∘=2.6180 rad\begin{aligned} \delta_0 &= \sin^{-1}\frac{1.0}{2.0} = 30^\circ = 0.5236\ \text{rad} \\ \delta_{max} &= 180^\circ - 30^\circ = 150^\circ = 2.6180\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Critical clearing angle

Accelerating area:

A1=Pm(δcr−δ0)A_1 = P_m(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)

Decelerating area:

A2=∫δcrδmax(Pmaxsin⁡δ−Pm) dδ=Pmax(cos⁡δcr−cos⁡δmax)−Pm(δmax−δcr)A_2 = \int_{\delta_{cr}}^{\delta_{max}}(P_{max}\sin\delta - P_m)\,d\delta = P_{max}(\cos\delta_{cr}-\cos\delta_{max}) - P_m(\delta_{max}-\delta_{cr})

Setting A1=A2A_1 = A_2 with Pm=Pmaxsin⁡δ0P_m = P_{max}\sin\delta_0 and δmax=π−δ0\delta_{max} = \pi - \delta_0:

cos⁡δcr=(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0=(3.1416−1.0472)(0.5)−0.8660=0.1812δcr=79.56∘=1.3886 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= (\pi - 2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0 \\ &= (3.1416 - 1.0472)(0.5) - 0.8660 \\ &= 0.1812 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 79.56^\circ = 1.3886\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 3: Critical clearing time

During the fault the swing equation is Hπfd2δdt2=Pm\dfrac{H}{\pi f}\dfrac{d^2\delta}{dt^2} = P_m. Integrating twice from rest at δ0\delta_0:

δ=δ0+πfPm2Ht2\delta = \delta_0 + \frac{\pi f P_m}{2H}t^2 tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm=2×6×(1.3886−0.5236)π×50×1.0=0.06608=0.257 s\begin{aligned} t_{cr} &= \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times6\times(1.3886-0.5236)}{\pi\times50\times1.0}} \\ &= \sqrt{0.06608} = 0.257\ \text{s} \end{aligned}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈79.56∘\delta_{cr} \approx 79.56^\circ; critical clearing time tcr≈0.257t_{cr} \approx 0.257 s (about 12.9 cycles).

  • 2083 Baishakh (new course) · 4+3 marks

A 60 Hz synchronous generator has inertia constant H = 5 MJ/MVA and a direct axis transient reactance Xd' = 0.3 p.u. connected to an infinite bus V = 1∠0°. The generator has internal emf E' = 1.17∠26.387° p.u. and Pe = 0.8 p.u. The reactance of transformer and both transmission line are in p.u. A temporary 3-phase fault occurs at the sending end of the line at point 'F'. When the fault is cleared, both the lines is intact. Determine the critical clearing angle and the critical clearing time. [Figure: generator E' = 1.17∠26.387°, Xd' = 0.3 - transformer Xt = 0.2 - bus 1; two parallel lines Xl = 0.3 each (breakers at both ends) from bus 1 to bus 2, the infinite bus V = 1∠0°; fault F at bus 1 (sending end)]

Answer

Data: f=60f = 60 Hz, H=5H = 5 MJ/MVA, Xd′=0.3X_d' = 0.3, Xt=0.2X_t = 0.2, Xl=0.3X_l = 0.3 (each of two lines), E′=1.17∠26.387∘E' = 1.17\angle26.387^\circ, V=1∠0∘V = 1\angle0^\circ, Pm=Pe=0.8P_m = P_e = 0.8 pu.

Step 1: Pre-fault power-angle curve

X=0.3+0.2+0.32=0.65 puPmax=1.17×10.65=1.8 pu\begin{aligned} X &= 0.3 + 0.2 + \frac{0.3}{2} = 0.65\ \text{pu} \\ P_{max} &= \frac{1.17\times1}{0.65} = 1.8\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}

Check: 1.8sin⁡26.387∘=0.81.8\sin26.387^\circ = 0.8 pu, so δ0=26.387∘=0.4605\delta_0 = 26.387^\circ = 0.4605 rad.

Step 2: During and after the fault

  • The fault is at the sending end (bus 1), whose voltage becomes zero. So Pe=0P_e = 0 during the fault.
  • The fault is temporary and both lines stay intact after clearing, so the post-fault curve is the same as before: Pe=1.8sin⁡δP_e = 1.8\sin\delta.
δmax=180∘−26.387∘=153.613∘=2.6811 rad\delta_{max} = 180^\circ - 26.387^\circ = 153.613^\circ = 2.6811\ \text{rad}

Step 3: Critical clearing angle

From the equal area criterion, with Pmax2=0P_{max2} = 0 and Pmax3=Pmax1P_{max3} = P_{max1}:

cos⁡δcr=(π−2δ0)sin⁡δ0−cos⁡δ0=(2.2205)(0.4444)−0.8958=0.0911δcr=84.78∘=1.4796 rad\begin{aligned} \cos\delta_{cr} &= (\pi-2\delta_0)\sin\delta_0 - \cos\delta_0 \\ &= (2.2205)(0.4444) - 0.8958 \\ &= 0.0911 \\ \delta_{cr} &= 84.78^\circ = 1.4796\ \text{rad} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Critical clearing time

With Pe=0P_e = 0, δ=δ0+πfPm2Ht2\delta = \delta_0 + \dfrac{\pi f P_m}{2H}t^2:

tcr=2H(δcr−δ0)πfPm=2×5×(1.4796−0.4605)π×60×0.8=0.06758=0.260 s\begin{aligned} t_{cr} &= \sqrt{\frac{2H(\delta_{cr}-\delta_0)}{\pi f P_m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times5\times(1.4796-0.4605)}{\pi\times60\times0.8}} \\ &= \sqrt{0.06758} = 0.260\ \text{s} \end{aligned}

Answer: Critical clearing angle δcr≈84.78∘\delta_{cr} \approx 84.78^\circ; critical clearing time tcr≈0.26t_{cr} \approx 0.26 s (about 15.6 cycles at 60 Hz).

Questions from Old Question Collection (EE 605) (Scanned IOE EE 605 exam papers from 2069 Chaitra to 2082 Baishakh), Question bank (ioesolutions, retyped) (Watermarked scans of EE 605 papers from 2068 Chaitra to 2073 Shrawan) and 2080 course papers (ENEE 252) (New course ENEE 252 papers: 2082 Bhadra and 2083 Baishakh). Answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.

Chapter titles and hours from the IOE syllabus ↗