- 2080 Asoj · 10 marks
Stability of trapezoidal gravity dam (RL 250 m)
Short answer
For the dam (H=50 m, base 40 m, top 6 m, tailwater 10 m, drainage gallery 10 m from u/s, γc=24 kN/m3, γw=9.81 kN/m3, μ=0.7 assumed): FS overturning = 1.76 (safe); FS sliding = 1.16 (safe); eccentricity e = 3.77 m within middle-third, no tension; toe compressive stress = 760.6 kN/m2, principal stress = 1066.9 kN/m2 exceed permissible 300 kN/m2, crushing failure (if 3000 kN/m2 intended, safe).
Check the stability of a trapezoidal concrete gravity dam having maximum reservoir level of 250.0 m, base level of 200.0 m, tail water elevation of 210.0 m, base width of 40 m, top width of 6 m, location of drainage gallery 10 m from u/s face. Take sp. wt and permissible compressive strength of the dam material are 24 kN/m³ and 300 kN/m², respectively.
The dam is checked for full reservoir against overturning, sliding, tension and compression (crushing), per metre length.
Data and assumptions
- Upstream water depth m; tailwater depth m.
- Dam height is not given, so the crest is taken at the maximum reservoir level: m.
- Upstream face vertical; top width 6 m; downstream face slopes straight from the crest to the toe, so .
- kN/m³, kN/m³. Coefficient of friction (not given) assumed .
- Uplift with drainage gallery (IS 6512 rule): heel , at gallery , toe .
Uplift intensities: heel kN/m²; gallery kN/m²; toe kN/m².
6 m
+--+ El. 250 (crest = MRL)
| |\
P1 |W1| \ W2 50 m
-> | | \
| | \ ~~ TW El. 210 (10 m)
heel+--+----\ toe El. 200
<10>|<- 30 ->
gallery B = 40 m
Forces and moments about the toe
| Force | Value (kN) | Arm (m) | Moment (kN·m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| W1 = 6×50×24 | 7,200 ↓ | 37.000 | +266,400 |
| W2 = ½×34×50×24 | 20,400 ↓ | 22.667 | +462,400 |
| Tailwater wedge = ½×6.8×10×9.81 | 333.5 ↓ | 2.267 | +756 |
| P1 = ½×9.81×50² | 12,262.5 → | 16.667 | −204,375 |
| P2 = ½×9.81×10² | 490.5 ← | 3.333 | +1,635 |
| U1 = 228.9×10 | 2,289 ↑ | 35.000 | −80,115 |
| U2 = ½×261.6×10 | 1,308 ↑ | 36.667 | −47,960 |
| U3 = 98.1×30 | 2,943 ↑ | 15.000 | −44,145 |
| U4 = ½×130.8×30 | 1,962 ↑ | 20.000 | −39,240 |
(i) Overturning
(ii) Sliding
(iii) Tension
The resultant is within the middle third, so no tension.
(iv) Compression
Major principal stress at the toe ( kN/m²):
These exceed the permissible 300 kN/m², so the dam fails in crushing as the data stand.
Answer: FS overturning = 1.76 (safe); FS sliding = 1.16 (safe, μ = 0.7 assumed); e = 3.77 m < B/6 (no tension); toe stress 760.6 kN/m² and principal stress 1066.9 kN/m² > 300 kN/m² (unsafe in compression). A permissible strength of 300 kN/m² is very low for concrete; if 3000 kN/m² was intended, the dam is safe in all four checks.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Hydrostatic thrust and uplift with drainage gallery · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Stability of gravity dam (crest 1530 m) · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Elementary profile and 40 m gravity dam stability · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Stability checks of 50 m trapezoidal dam · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Uplift force with and without drainage gallery · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Sliding and overturning check of gravity dam · Hydro Power, chapter 4
- Base width of 20 m high trapezoidal gravity dam · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stresses with drainage gallery uplift · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stability (SG 2.4, RL 0-70) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Gravity dam stability and shear stress at toe (2081) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4