- Year not given
Slippery floor injures consultant engineers
Short answer
Principal blame lies with sub-contractor Hari for building the floor contrary to design and with the main contractor for defective work and unsafe site control. Shyam Lal shares blame for recommending Hari and failing to supervise; Ram Lal's blame depends on his supervisory duties. Contributory negligence of the injured may reduce compensation.
Both Mr. Shyam Lal and Ram Lal, consultant engineers, slipped on the floor of the building during their inspection visit, which was under construction, causing serious injury. During investigation it was revealed that the floor was not constructed as per design and specification making it slippery. The flooring work was subcontracted to Mr. Hari on Mr. Shyam Lal's recommendation. Who is to blame? Give reasons.
Facts
Two consultant engineers, Shyam Lal and Ram Lal, slipped and were seriously injured on a floor that was built differently from the design and specification, so it was slippery. The flooring work was subcontracted to Mr. Hari on Shyam Lal's recommendation.
Analysis of responsibility
| Party | Reason |
|---|---|
| Mr. Hari (sub-contractor) | Directly built the floor not as per design and specification (wrong finish or materials). Primary fault for the defective work. |
| Main contractor | Responsible under the contract for all sub-contracted work, for quality control, and for a safe site. The sub-contractor's default is the contractor's default towards the client. As the occupier controlling the site, it also owes a duty of care to visitors. |
| Shyam Lal | Recommended the sub-contractor. A consultant should not select or push a sub-contractor for the contractor, since this is the contractor's choice with the client's approval. If he had any relation or interest with Hari, it is a conflict of interest. He also failed to check the flooring work as supervisor, though it was his duty. He bears a share of the blame, mainly for lack of supervision and the inappropriate recommendation. |
| Ram Lal | If he was also responsible for supervision, there was a failure to detect and reject the wrong work earlier. If he is only a visitor, he is simply a victim. |
| Injured engineers themselves | Contributory negligence if they went on a wet or unfinished floor without care or protective footwear, or ignored warning signs. This reduces the compensation, but does not remove the contractor's liability. |
Apportioning the blame
The principal blame is on the sub-contractor Hari and the main contractor, who are liable in contract and in tort (negligence and occupier's liability) and may have to pay compensation for the injuries. Shyam Lal shares the blame to the extent that he recommended the sub-contractor and neglected supervision; the part of Ram Lal depends on his duties. Any contributory negligence of the injured should be assessed separately.
Lessons
- Do not recommend or impose sub-contractors, and declare any relationship.
- Inspect and approve the work stage by stage, and reject non-conforming work before the finish is complete.
- The contractor should provide a safe site, warning signs and personal protective equipment, and insure the workers and visitors.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Building near river bank; stop construction? · Engineering Professional Practice, chapter 7
- Unpaid sub-contractor beaten by labourers · Engineering Professional Practice, chapter 7
- Engineers arrested for fake degrees · Engineering Professional Practice, chapter 7
- Bheri river suspension bridge collapse · Engineering Professional Practice, chapter 7
- Role of Nepal Engineers' Association · Engineering Professional Practice, chapter 3
- Consultant and quality of construction works · Construction Management, chapter 1
- Research article on engineers in nation-building · Communication English, chapter 10
- Need for insurance during construction · Construction Management, chapter 11
- Construction of cement floor · Building Technology, chapter 7