Skip to main content

Tower top potential and discs against back-flashover

Short answer

Zeq = 31.75 Ω gives tower-top potential 1587.3 kV (2000 kV ignoring ground wires, 1694.9 kV with one). Insulator voltage is (1-0.2)×1587.3 = 1270 kV; dividing by wet FOV 80 kV/disc requires 16 discs to prevent back-flashover.

A tower of a 735 kV line has a 40 Ω footing resistance and two ground wires each with Zg = 500 Ω. The lightning stroke surge impedance is Zs = 400 Ω. For Is = 50 kA, crest, calculate: (i) The tower top potential (a) considering all impedances, (b) neglecting the ground wire and stroke surge impedances, and (c) considering only one ground wire and stroke surge impedance (ii) The minimum number of standard (dry FOV 125 kV, rain FOV 80 kV) discs required to prevent back-flashover in the insulator string in case (a) of above if the coupling factor between the line and ground conductors is 0.2.

When lightning strikes the tower top, the stroke current IsI_s divides between all the paths that meet at the tower top. These paths are in parallel: the stroke channel itself (surge impedance ZsZ_s), the tower footing resistance RR, and the ground wires (surge impedance ZgZ_g each). So the tower-top potential is

Vt=IsZeq,1Zeq=1Zs+1R+nZgV_t = I_s Z_{eq}, \qquad \frac{1}{Z_{eq}} = \frac{1}{Z_s} + \frac{1}{R} + \frac{n}{Z_g}

where nn is the number of ground wires. (Tower inductance and travel time in the tower are neglected.)

Data: R=40 ΩR = 40\ \Omega, Zg=500 ΩZ_g = 500\ \Omega (each), Zs=400 ΩZ_s = 400\ \Omega, Is=50I_s = 50 kA.

(i)(a) Considering all impedances (two ground wires)

1Zeq=1400+140+2500=0.0025+0.025+0.004=0.0315 SZeq=31.75 ΩVt=50×31.75=1587.3 kV\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{Z_{eq}} &= \frac{1}{400} + \frac{1}{40} + \frac{2}{500} \\ &= 0.0025 + 0.025 + 0.004 = 0.0315\ \text{S} \\ Z_{eq} &= 31.75\ \Omega \\ V_t &= 50 \times 31.75 = 1587.3\ \text{kV} \end{aligned}

(i)(b) Neglecting ground wires and stroke impedance

Only the footing resistance carries the current:

Vt=IsR=50×40=2000 kVV_t = I_s R = 50 \times 40 = 2000\ \text{kV}

(i)(c) One ground wire and stroke impedance

1Zeq=1400+140+1500=0.0295 SZeq=33.90 ΩVt=50×33.90=1694.9 kV\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{Z_{eq}} &= \frac{1}{400} + \frac{1}{40} + \frac{1}{500} = 0.0295\ \text{S} \\ Z_{eq} &= 33.90\ \Omega \\ V_t &= 50 \times 33.90 = 1694.9\ \text{kV} \end{aligned}
CaseZeqZ_{eq} (Ω\Omega)VtV_t (kV)
(a) all impedances31.751587.3
(b) footing R only40.002000.0
(c) one ground wire33.901694.9

The ground wires and the stroke channel take part of the current, so they lower the tower-top potential. The footing resistance is the largest single factor.

(ii) Voltage across the insulator string, case (a)

The surge on the ground wire induces a voltage KVtK V_t on the phase conductor through the coupling factor KK. The conductor rises with the tower, so the insulator string sees only the difference:

Vins=Vt−KVt=(1−K)Vt=(1−0.2)×1587.3=1269.8 kV≈1270 kV\begin{aligned} V_{ins} &= V_t - K V_t = (1 - K) V_t \\ &= (1 - 0.2) \times 1587.3 \\ &= 1269.8\ \text{kV} \approx 1270\ \text{kV} \end{aligned}

If this exceeds the flashover voltage of the string, a back-flashover occurs from the tower (at high potential) to the conductor.

Number of discs to prevent back-flashover

Lightning strokes normally come with rain, so the wet (rain) flashover voltage of 80 kV per disc is used (the conservative choice):

n=VinsVrain=1269.880=15.87n=16 discs (rounded up)\begin{aligned} n &= \frac{V_{ins}}{V_{rain}} = \frac{1269.8}{80} = 15.87 \\ n &= 16\ \text{discs (rounded up)} \end{aligned}

If dry conditions are assumed: 1269.8/125=10.161269.8/125 = 10.16, so 11 discs. Since a thunderstorm is wet, the higher number is chosen.

Answer: VtV_t = 1587.3 kV, 2000 kV and 1694.9 kV for (a), (b), (c); insulator voltage = 1269.8 kV; minimum 16 standard discs (rain FOV basis).

Note: the textbook method ignores the power-frequency voltage of the conductor and assumes the per-disc flashover values add linearly. In practice the string would be checked against its impulse flashover level and the footing resistance would be reduced.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All High Voltage Engineering chapter 3 questions →