- Asked 3/21
- 2074 Magh · 5+3 marks
- 2071 Magh · 5+3 marks
- 2070 Bhadra · 5+3 marks
Unit generator-transformer schemes
Short answer
Unit scheme: one generator per GSU; LV fault level lower; transformer fault affects only that unit; each transformer runs at full load, idle transformer can be disconnected. Grouped scheme: two generators share one GSU via LV bus; LV fault level higher; transformer fault stops both units; single large transformer gives lower total losses at full load but no-load loss remains when one unit runs, and switchyard cost is lower.
Explain any two scheme of unit generator transformer combination used in power plant on the basis of fault level, maintenance outage and efficiency. Also draw the single line diagram for both of the scheme.
In a power plant, the generator is connected to the grid through a step-up transformer. Two common schemes are (1) the unit scheme, one generator to one transformer, and (2) the grouped (combined) scheme, two generators to one transformer.
Scheme 1: Unit connection (one generator – one transformer)
G1 G2
| |
GCB GCB
|---UAT |---UAT
GSU1 GSU2
| |
HV CB HV CB
| |
===================== HV bus
- Fault level: a fault on the generator bus is fed by one generator plus the grid through one GSU impedance; LV fault level is lower, so GCB and bus duct ratings are smaller.
- Maintenance outage: a GSU fault or maintenance takes out only its own unit; other units keep running. Each unit is independent.
- Efficiency: each transformer runs close to full load when its unit runs; when a unit is off, its transformer can be disconnected, so no-load losses are saved. But total no-load and load loss of several small transformers is higher than one large transformer, and cost is higher.
- Reliability: highest; widely used for large units.
Scheme 2: Grouped connection (two generators – one transformer)
G1 G2
| |
GCB1 GCB2
| |
================ LV (11 kV) bus
|---- Station transformer
GSU (2 x unit rating)
|
HV CB
|
================ HV bus
- Fault level: a fault on the LV bus is fed by both generators plus the grid, so the LV fault level is much higher; GCBs and bus need higher breaking capacity.
- Maintenance outage: a GSU fault or maintenance takes out both units, so energy loss is larger. A generator can be taken out by its own GCB while the other runs.
- Efficiency: one large transformer has lower cost per MVA and lower total losses at full load; but when only one unit runs (dry season), the transformer runs at half load and its full no-load loss remains.
- Cost: fewer transformers, HV breakers and bays, so cheaper and smaller switchyard; common for small and medium hydro in Nepal.
Comparison
| Basis | Unit scheme | Grouped scheme |
|---|---|---|
| LV fault level | Lower | Higher |
| GCB rating | Smaller | Larger |
| Outage on transformer fault | One unit | Both units |
| Transformer losses | Higher total, but idle transformer can be switched off | Lower at full load; no-load loss always present |
| Switchyard cost | Higher (more bays) | Lower |
| Flexibility | High | Lower |
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Design: 260 m head plant, generator lead · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 5×
- Design: 550 m head plant, transformer quotation · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Design: 245 m head plant, standby generator · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 14×
- Design: 230 m head plant, 20 km line · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 14×
- Design: 230 m head plant, 55 km line · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 12×
- Design: 250 m head plant, 35 km line · Power Plant Design, chapter 4 · asked 12×
- Reactance diagram: 90 MVA generator (15%), two motors · Power System Analysis I, chapter 3 · asked 2×
- Reactance diagram: 90 MVA generator (25%), two motors · Power System Analysis I, chapter 3 · asked 2×
- Fault at both ends of a 50 Ω line · Power System Analysis II, chapter 3
- Fault level at end of two 200 km lines · Power System Analysis II, chapter 3 · asked 2×