- Asked 5/20
- 2077 Chaitra · 6 marks
- 2074 Magh · 8 marks
Capacitor size for maximum loss reduction
Short answer
Optimum capacitor size is the weighted average of section reactive flows: Qc = ΣRiQi/ΣRi = 0.2027 p.u. = 202.7 kVAR. Place a standard 200 kVAR bank at node C to maximize loss reduction.
For the 11 kV primary distribution network shown below, determine the size (kVAR) of the capacitor to be placed at the location shown in diagram to achieve maximum loss reduction. For simplicity of analysis assume voltage at each node is 1 p.u. All impedances are in p.u. at 1000 kVA.
[Figure: radial feeder from a 1000 kVA, 33/11 kV source substation S to node A through impedance 1+j2, A to node B through 2+j3, B to node C through 3+j4. Loads through distribution transformers: 100 kVA at 0.8 p.f. lag at A, 150 kVA at 0.9 p.f. lag at B, 200 kVA at 0.6 p.f. lag at C. The capacitor is placed at node C.]
A shunt capacitor supplies reactive power locally, reducing the reactive current in every section upstream of it. The optimum size minimises the total loss.
Assumptions: all node voltages = 1 p.u. (given), so section current magnitude² = in p.u.; base 1000 kVA; transformer impedances neglected.
Step 1: Loads in p.u.
| Node | S (p.u.) | p.f. | P (p.u.) | Q (p.u.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.10 | 0.8 | 0.0800 | 0.10 × 0.6 = 0.0600 |
| B | 0.15 | 0.9 | 0.1350 | 0.15 × 0.4359 = 0.0654 |
| C | 0.20 | 0.6 | 0.1200 | 0.20 × 0.8 = 0.1600 |
Step 2: Section flows
| Section | R (p.u.) | P (p.u.) | Q (p.u.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S–A | 1 | 0.335 | 0.2854 |
| A–B | 2 | 0.255 | 0.2254 |
| B–C | 3 | 0.120 | 0.1600 |
Step 3: Loss as a function of capacitor size
With capacitor at C, the reactive flow in every section reduces by :
For maximum loss reduction:
Step 4: Check of loss reduction (p.u.)
| Section | Loss before | Loss after |
|---|---|---|
| S–A | 0.1937 | 0.1191 |
| A–B | 0.2316 | 0.1311 |
| B–C | 0.1200 | 0.0487 |
| Total | 0.5453 | 0.2988 |
Loss falls from 0.545 p.u. to 0.299 p.u., a reduction of about 45%. (The given impedances are very large, so the absolute p.u. losses are only for comparison.)
Note: the optimum (0.203 p.u.) is larger than the reactive load at C (0.16 p.u.) because upstream sections also carry the reactive power of A and B; the result is a weighted average of section reactive flows.
Answer: Capacitor size ≈ 203 kVAR at node C (a standard 200 kVAR bank would be used).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Capacitor size for maximum loss reduction (variant) · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size, four-node 11 kV feeder · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size, feeder with 500 kVA end load · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size, feeder with three equal loads · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 7 questions →