Skip to main content

Capacitor size, feeder with three equal loads

Short answer

The optimal capacitor size is the resistance-weighted average of reactive power flows in the relieved sections. With each section R = 1 Ω and flows 180, 120, 60 kVAR, Q_c = 120 kVAR.

For an 11 kV radial primary distribution feeder shown in figure below, determine the size of the capacitor (kVAR) at the stated location in the feeder to achieve the maximum loss reduction. For simplifying the analysis assumes voltage at each node is 1 p.u. Justify your answer with a valid logic.

[Figure: radial feeder from a 0.5 MVA, 33/11 kV source substation S through three sections each of impedance 1+j2 Ω to three successive nodes; each node supplies 100 kVA at 0.8 p.f. lag through a distribution transformer. The capacitor is placed at the last (third) node.]

Method (optimum single capacitor)

With all node voltages taken as 1 p.u., the reactive current in a section equals its reactive power flow QiQ_i (p.u.). A shunt capacitor QcQ_c at the end node reduces the reactive flow in every section between the source and that node from QiQ_i to (Qi−Qc)(Q_i - Q_c). The loss reduction is

ΔPL=∑iRi[Qi2−(Qi−Qc)2]=∑iRi(2QiQc−Qc2)\begin{aligned} \Delta P_L &= \sum_i R_i\left[Q_i^2-(Q_i-Q_c)^2\right] = \sum_i R_i\left(2Q_iQ_c-Q_c^2\right) \end{aligned}

For maximum loss reduction, d(ΔPL)dQc=∑iRi(2Qi−2Qc)=0\dfrac{d(\Delta P_L)}{dQ_c} = \sum_i R_i(2Q_i-2Q_c)=0, so

Qc,opt=∑iRiQi∑iRiQ_{c,opt} = \frac{\sum_i R_iQ_i}{\sum_i R_i}

i.e. the optimum capacitor equals the resistance-weighted average of the reactive flows in the sections it relieves. The ratio does not depend on whether RR is in ohms or p.u., so kVAR can be used directly.

 S --(1+j2)-- N1 --(1+j2)-- N2 --(1+j2)-- N3
               |             |             |
            100 kVA       100 kVA       100 kVA
            0.8 lag       0.8 lag       0.8 lag [Qc]

Reactive flows

Each load: Q=100×0.6=60Q = 100 \times 0.6 = 60 kVAR.

SectionR (Ω)Q flow (kVAR)R × Q
S–N11180180
N1–N21120120
N2–N316060
Total3360

Optimum capacitor

Qc=180+120+603=120 kVARQ_c = \frac{180+120+60}{3} = 120\ \text{kVAR}

Justification

  • With V=1V=1 p.u., the reactive current in each section is proportional to its reactive flow, so the loss due to reactive current in a section is R(Q−Qc)2R(Q-Q_c)^2.
  • If QcQ_c were only 60 kVAR (just the local load), sections S–N1 and N1–N2 would still carry 120 and 60 kVAR. If QcQ_c were 180 kVAR, section N2–N3 would carry 120 kVAR leading (and N1–N2 60 kVAR leading), raising their losses.
  • 120 kVAR is the value at which the extra loss in the over-compensated last section exactly balances the saving in the upstream sections (dΔP/dQc=0d\Delta P/dQ_c=0). With equal resistances it is simply the average of the section flows.
  • The result equals 2/3 of the total reactive load (2/3 × 180 = 120 kVAR). This matches the size given by the "2/3 rule", but that rule is for a uniformly distributed reactive load and places the capacitor at 2/3 of the feeder length; here the size follows from the derivation above for a capacitor at the last node.

Answer: 120 kVAR at the third node.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 7 questions →