- 2067 Mangsir (old course) · 6 marks
Capacitor size, feeder with three equal loads
Short answer
The optimal capacitor size is the resistance-weighted average of reactive power flows in the relieved sections. With each section R = 1 Ω and flows 180, 120, 60 kVAR, Q_c = 120 kVAR.
For an 11 kV radial primary distribution feeder shown in figure below, determine the size of the capacitor (kVAR) at the stated location in the feeder to achieve the maximum loss reduction. For simplifying the analysis assumes voltage at each node is 1 p.u. Justify your answer with a valid logic.
[Figure: radial feeder from a 0.5 MVA, 33/11 kV source substation S through three sections each of impedance 1+j2 Ω to three successive nodes; each node supplies 100 kVA at 0.8 p.f. lag through a distribution transformer. The capacitor is placed at the last (third) node.]
Method (optimum single capacitor)
With all node voltages taken as 1 p.u., the reactive current in a section equals its reactive power flow (p.u.). A shunt capacitor at the end node reduces the reactive flow in every section between the source and that node from to . The loss reduction is
For maximum loss reduction, , so
i.e. the optimum capacitor equals the resistance-weighted average of the reactive flows in the sections it relieves. The ratio does not depend on whether is in ohms or p.u., so kVAR can be used directly.
S --(1+j2)-- N1 --(1+j2)-- N2 --(1+j2)-- N3
| | |
100 kVA 100 kVA 100 kVA
0.8 lag 0.8 lag 0.8 lag [Qc]
Reactive flows
Each load: kVAR.
| Section | R (Ω) | Q flow (kVAR) | R × Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| S–N1 | 1 | 180 | 180 |
| N1–N2 | 1 | 120 | 120 |
| N2–N3 | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Total | 3 | 360 |
Optimum capacitor
Justification
- With p.u., the reactive current in each section is proportional to its reactive flow, so the loss due to reactive current in a section is .
- If were only 60 kVAR (just the local load), sections S–N1 and N1–N2 would still carry 120 and 60 kVAR. If were 180 kVAR, section N2–N3 would carry 120 kVAR leading (and N1–N2 60 kVAR leading), raising their losses.
- 120 kVAR is the value at which the extra loss in the over-compensated last section exactly balances the saving in the upstream sections (). With equal resistances it is simply the average of the section flows.
- The result equals 2/3 of the total reactive load (2/3 × 180 = 120 kVAR). This matches the size given by the "2/3 rule", but that rule is for a uniformly distributed reactive load and places the capacitor at 2/3 of the feeder length; here the size follows from the derivation above for a capacitor at the last node.
Answer: 120 kVAR at the third node.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Capacitor size, four-node 11 kV feeder · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size for maximum loss reduction (variant) · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size for maximum loss reduction · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Capacitor size, feeder with 500 kVA end load · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 5×
- Loss and drop, 15 km 11 kV feeder · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 2×
- Power loss, 10 km 11 kV UDL feeder · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 2×
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 7 questions →