- 2067 Mangsir (old course) · 4+2 marks
Kelvin's law and its modified form
Short answer
Kelvin's law: the most economical conductor size makes the annual variable cost of conductor (interest & depreciation) equal the annual cost of energy losses. Above 33 kV a modified form is used because tower and insulator costs depend on conductor size, corona sets a minimum size, loads vary, and future costs are uncertain.
State and prove the Kelvin's law for most economical size of the conductor? Also discuss why this method is used in modified form for a line above 33 kV?
Kelvin's law: the most economical conductor size is the one for which the annual cost of energy lost in the conductor equals the annual interest and depreciation on the part of the capital cost that varies with conductor size.
Proof
Let be the conductor cross-section.
- The capital cost of the line is . Here is the part that does not depend on size (towers, insulators, erection, approximately) and is the conductor cost. The annual charge at a rate (interest + depreciation) is
- The resistance is , so the annual energy loss is , where is the equivalent full-load hours, and its cost is
- The total annual cost is
- For minimum cost:
Also , so this is a minimum.
So the variable annual capital charge equals the annual cost of losses, which proves the law. The economical size is .
Why a modified form is used above 33 kV
Kelvin's simple law has several limits:
- It assumes the tower, insulator and erection costs do not depend on conductor size. At high voltage these costs dominate, and they do depend on conductor weight, diameter and sag.
- It ignores technical limits. Above 33 kV the minimum size is often set by corona (minimum diameter), by voltage regulation and stability, or by the thermal rating, not by economics.
- It assumes a constant load and constant interest and energy rates. Real loads vary, so the loss load factor must be used.
- It is hard to know the exact interest rate, depreciation and future energy price.
Hence for lines above 33 kV a modified Kelvin's law is used. The total annual cost of the whole line (towers + conductors + insulators + losses) is computed for several standard conductors that already meet the corona, thermal and regulation requirements. The conductor with the least total annual cost is then chosen.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Kelvin's law and its limitations · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 2×
- Most economical conductor from cost data · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Most economical conductor, five options (Rs 7.2) · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Most economical conductor, five options (Rs 9) · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Most economical span, double circuit line · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 6×
- Most economical span from sag table · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 2×
- Peterson coil for 33 kV 60 km line · Switchgear and Protection, chapter 5 · asked 6×
- 8 km line receiving 15000 kVA at 33 kV · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- 33 kV, 15 MW line: efficiency and regulation · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- 12 km 33 kV line: losses, zero-regulation capacitor · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 4 questions →