Skip to main content

LT feeder options: loss and voltage drop, 50 kW

Short answer

For uniformly distributed load, per-feeder current and length determine loss (∝ I²l) and drop (∝ Il). Option I (4 feeders × 2 km): 8.95% peak power loss, 10.06% max voltage drop. Option II (2 feeders × 4 km): 35.81% loss, 40.23% drop.

A particular load center has a peak demand of 50 kW at a power factor of 0.8 lagging. For the following two cases of 3 phase LT feeder configuration at distribution transformer, compute the % peak power loss and maximum percentage voltage drop in LT. Option I: 4 feeders each of length 2 km. Option II: 2 feeders each of length 4 km. The resistance and reactance per phase of LT conductors are 1.1 Ω/km and 0.25 Ω/km. Assume uniformly distributed load along the feeders. The distribution transformer is rated 11/0.4 kV.

Formulas (uniformly distributed load, 3-phase)

For each feeder of length ll carrying sending-end current II:

PL=3⋅13I2rl=I2rlVD,ph=12I(rcos⁡ϕ+xsin⁡ϕ) l%VD=VD,phVL/3×100\begin{aligned} P_L &= 3\cdot\frac13 I^2 r l = I^2 r l\\ V_{D,ph} &= \frac12 I(r\cos\phi + x\sin\phi)\,l\\ \%V_D &= \frac{V_{D,ph}}{V_L/\sqrt3}\times100 \end{aligned}

The peak load is shared equally between the feeders.

Given: P=50P = 50 kW, p.f. 0.8 (sin⁡ϕ=0.6\sin\phi = 0.6), VL=400V_L = 400 V (secondary of 11/0.4 kV), r=1.1 Ωr = 1.1\ \Omega/km, x=0.25 Ωx = 0.25\ \Omega/km. rcos⁡ϕ+xsin⁡ϕ=1.1(0.8)+0.25(0.6)=1.03 Ωr\cos\phi + x\sin\phi = 1.1(0.8) + 0.25(0.6) = 1.03\ \Omega/km.

Option I: 4 feeders × 2 km

Pfeeder=50/4=12.5 kW,I=12 5003×400×0.8=22.55 APL=4×(22.552×1.1×2)=4×1118.98=4475.9 W%PL=4475.950 000×100=8.95 %VD,ph=12×22.55×1.03×2=23.23 V%VD=23.23230.94×100=10.06 %\begin{aligned} P_{feeder} &= 50/4 = 12.5\ \text{kW},\quad I = \frac{12\,500}{\sqrt3\times400\times0.8} = 22.55\ \text{A}\\ P_L &= 4\times(22.55^2\times1.1\times2) = 4\times1118.98 = 4475.9\ \text{W}\\ \%P_L &= \frac{4475.9}{50\,000}\times100 = 8.95\ \%\\ V_{D,ph} &= \frac12\times22.55\times1.03\times2 = 23.23\ \text{V}\\ \%V_D &= \frac{23.23}{230.94}\times100 = 10.06\ \% \end{aligned}

Option II: 2 feeders × 4 km

Pfeeder=25 kW,I=25 0003×400×0.8=45.11 APL=2×(45.112×1.1×4)=2×8951.8=17 903.6 W%PL=17 903.650 000×100=35.81 %VD,ph=12×45.11×1.03×4=92.92 V%VD=92.92230.94×100=40.23 %\begin{aligned} P_{feeder} &= 25\ \text{kW},\quad I = \frac{25\,000}{\sqrt3\times400\times0.8} = 45.11\ \text{A}\\ P_L &= 2\times(45.11^2\times1.1\times4) = 2\times8951.8 = 17\,903.6\ \text{W}\\ \%P_L &= \frac{17\,903.6}{50\,000}\times100 = 35.81\ \%\\ V_{D,ph} &= \frac12\times45.11\times1.03\times4 = 92.92\ \text{V}\\ \%V_D &= \frac{92.92}{230.94}\times100 = 40.23\ \% \end{aligned}

Comparison

OptionI per feeder% peak loss% max drop
I: 4 × 2 km22.55 A8.95 %10.06 %
II: 2 × 4 km45.11 A35.81 %40.23 %

Going from option I to option II doubles both the current and the length of each feeder. The loss per feeder (∝I2l\propto I^2 l) rises 8 times, and with half as many feeders the total loss rises 4 times; the drop (∝Il\propto I l) rises 4 times. Option I is clearly better, but even it exceeds the usual LT drop limit (about 5–8 %), suggesting a bigger conductor or more feeders/transformers.

Answer: Option I: 8.95 % loss, 10.06 % drop; Option II: 35.81 % loss, 40.23 % drop.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 7 questions →