Skip to main content

Peak loss and voltage drop for LT feeder options

Short answer

Option III (3 feeders × 2 km) gives the lowest peak power loss (11.94%) and voltage drop (13.41%). All options exceed typical LT limits; practical solutions include larger conductor, additional transformer, or extending a higher voltage closer.

A particular load center has a peak demand of 50 kW at power factor of 0.8 lagging. Compute % peak power loss and voltage drop in 3 phase LT feeder configuration with rated transformer of 11/0.4 kV.

OptionFeeder configuration
I4 feeders each of length 3 km
II2 feeders each of 4 km
III3 feeders each of 2 km

Impedance per phase = (1.1 + j0.25) Ω/km. Assume uniformly distributed load along feeders.

Assumptions: load is shared equally among the feeders of each option and uniformly distributed along each feeder; LT line voltage = 400 V (transformer secondary); cos⁡ϕ=0.8\cos\phi = 0.8, sin⁡ϕ=0.6\sin\phi = 0.6; z=1.1+j0.25z = 1.1 + j0.25 Ω/km per phase.

Formulae (uniformly distributed load)

I=Pf3×400×0.8Ploss=n×I2R(R=1.1 l)ΔVL=3 I(Rcos⁡ϕ+Xsin⁡ϕ)2\begin{aligned} I &= \frac{P_f}{\sqrt{3} \times 400 \times 0.8} \\ P_{loss} &= n \times I^2 R \quad (R = 1.1\,l) \\ \Delta V_L &= \frac{\sqrt{3}\, I (R\cos\phi + X\sin\phi)}{2} \end{aligned}

where nn = number of feeders, Pf=50/nP_f = 50/n kW per feeder, ll = feeder length.

Option I: 4 feeders × 3 km

Pf=12.5 kW,I=12,5003(400)(0.8)=22.553 AR=3.3 Ω,X=0.75 Ω,Rcos⁡ϕ+Xsin⁡ϕ=3.09 ΩPloss=4×22.5532×3.3=6713.9 W⇒13.43%ΔV=3(22.553)(3.09)2=60.35 V⇒15.09%\begin{aligned} P_f &= 12.5 \text{ kW}, \quad I = \frac{12{,}500}{\sqrt{3}(400)(0.8)} = 22.553 \text{ A} \\ R &= 3.3\ \Omega, \quad X = 0.75\ \Omega, \quad R\cos\phi + X\sin\phi = 3.09\ \Omega \\ P_{loss} &= 4 \times 22.553^2 \times 3.3 = 6713.9 \text{ W} \Rightarrow 13.43\% \\ \Delta V &= \frac{\sqrt{3}(22.553)(3.09)}{2} = 60.35 \text{ V} \Rightarrow 15.09\% \end{aligned}

Option II: 2 feeders × 4 km

Pf=25 kW,I=45.105 AR=4.4 Ω,X=1.0 Ω,Rcos⁡ϕ+Xsin⁡ϕ=4.12 ΩPloss=2×45.1052×4.4=17,903.6 W⇒35.81%ΔV=3(45.105)(4.12)2=160.94 V⇒40.23%\begin{aligned} P_f &= 25 \text{ kW}, \quad I = 45.105 \text{ A} \\ R &= 4.4\ \Omega, \quad X = 1.0\ \Omega, \quad R\cos\phi + X\sin\phi = 4.12\ \Omega \\ P_{loss} &= 2 \times 45.105^2 \times 4.4 = 17{,}903.6 \text{ W} \Rightarrow 35.81\% \\ \Delta V &= \frac{\sqrt{3}(45.105)(4.12)}{2} = 160.94 \text{ V} \Rightarrow 40.23\% \end{aligned}

Option III: 3 feeders × 2 km

Pf=16.667 kW,I=30.070 AR=2.2 Ω,X=0.5 Ω,Rcos⁡ϕ+Xsin⁡ϕ=2.06 ΩPloss=3×30.0702×2.2=5967.9 W⇒11.94%ΔV=3(30.070)(2.06)2=53.65 V⇒13.41%\begin{aligned} P_f &= 16.667 \text{ kW}, \quad I = 30.070 \text{ A} \\ R &= 2.2\ \Omega, \quad X = 0.5\ \Omega, \quad R\cos\phi + X\sin\phi = 2.06\ \Omega \\ P_{loss} &= 3 \times 30.070^2 \times 2.2 = 5967.9 \text{ W} \Rightarrow 11.94\% \\ \Delta V &= \frac{\sqrt{3}(30.070)(2.06)}{2} = 53.65 \text{ V} \Rightarrow 13.41\% \end{aligned}

Summary

OptionFeedersI per feeder (A)Peak loss (W)% lossΔV (V)% ΔV
I4 × 3 km22.556713.913.4360.3515.09
II2 × 4 km45.1117,903.635.81160.9440.23
III3 × 2 km30.075967.911.9453.6513.41

Answer: Option III (3 feeders × 2 km) gives the lowest peak loss (11.94%) and voltage drop (13.41%); option II is the worst. All options exceed the usual LT voltage drop limit (about 5–10%), so in practice the area should be split with an additional transformer, a larger conductor, or a higher voltage (11 kV) brought closer to the loads.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 7 questions →