Skip to main content

T/F: 765 kV stability limit vs thermal limit

Short answer

FALSE. For a 765 kV line the transient stability limit is less than the thermal limit because EHV lines are long and stability-limited; thermal capacity is very high (4000–6000 MW) while stability limit is only about 1–1.5 × SIL (around 2250–3375 MW).

State whether the following statement is TRUE or FALSE. Justify your answer with a brief explanation: For a 765 kV line transient stability limit is more than the thermal limit.

FALSE. For a 765 kV line the transient stability limit is less than the thermal limit (for practical line lengths).

  • Thermal limit depends on conductor area; a 765 kV line uses 4–6 sub-conductor bundles, so its thermal capacity is very large (about 4000–6000 MW, i.e. 2–3 × SIL).
  • The SIL of a 765 kV line is about 7652/260≈2250765^2/260 \approx 2250 MW. Because EHV lines are long (300–600 km), the power limited by stability/voltage drop is only about 1–1.5 × SIL.
  • Hence in EHV/UHV lines power transfer is stability-limited, not thermally limited; only short lines (< 80 km) are thermally limited.

That is why series compensation and FACTS are used on such lines: they raise the stability limit toward the thermal limit.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 2 questions →