- 2071 Magh · 8 marks
Copper saving in auto transformer
Short answer
For same rating and current density, copper weight is proportional to ampere-turns. For an autotransformer W_auto = (1-K)W_two, so copper saving is K times the two-winding copper. Thus saving is largest when K is near unity, where only a small fraction of power is transformed inductively.
Prove with suitable assumption that copper saving in auto transformer is significant when the transformation ratio is nearly equal to unity.
An autotransformer has a single winding, part of which is common to both primary and secondary. Power is transferred partly by conduction and partly by induction, so it needs less copper than a two-winding transformer of the same rating.
Assumptions
- Same rating (same , , , ) for both transformers.
- Same current density in all sections, so copper weight ∝ (current × number of turns) of each section (length ∝ turns, cross-section ∝ current).
- No-load current and losses are neglected, so .
- Step-down case with .
I1
o------>----+ A
S section AB: (N1-N2) turns,
V1 S current I1
+---------+---> I2 o
S B |
S section BC: N2 turns, V2
S current (I2 - I1)
S |
o-----------+ C ------+---------o
Two-winding transformer
Primary: turns carrying ; secondary: turns carrying .
Autotransformer
- Section AB has turns carrying .
- Section BC has turns carrying .
Ratio of copper weights
Using and :
Therefore
Significance when K is near unity
The saving is times the copper of the two-winding transformer, so it grows as :
| K = V2/V1 | Copper in auto (× W_tw) | Saving |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.9 | 10% |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 50% |
| 0.8 | 0.2 | 80% |
| 0.95 | 0.05 | 95% |
Physically, when the common section BC carries only the small difference , and section AB has very few turns, so very little copper is needed. Only the fraction of the power is transformed inductively; the rest is conducted directly.
Hence autotransformers are economical when the voltage ratio is close to 1 (e.g. 400/440 V, 220/132 kV interconnection, variacs, starting of induction motors), but not for large ratios, where saving is small and the lack of electrical isolation is a safety risk.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Equivalent impedance and copper loss of 50 kVA transformer · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2
- Full-load and half-load efficiency of 100 kVA transformer · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2
- All-day efficiency of 150 kVA transformer · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2
- Full-load efficiency of 500 kVA transformer · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2
- Efficiencies of 120 kVA Y/Y transformer · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2
- Transformer no-load and load operation, constant core flux · Electrical Machines I, chapter 2 · asked 5×
- Copper saving in auto-transformer · Electrical Machines, chapter 2
- Auto transformer merits and Cu saving · Electrical Machines, chapter 2
- CT secondary open; auto transformer economy · Electrical Machines, chapter 2
- Copper saving in an autotransformer · Electrical Machine, chapter 2 · asked 2×