Skip to main content

Verify suggested discharge distribution (Hardy Cross)

Short answer

The suggested distribution is not exact; the corrected flows are BA=57.8, BC=42.2, AC=20.6, AD=17.3, CD=32.7. Pressure head at D is 50 – h_BD; the given data produce a negative pressure head (–8132.5), indicating physically inconsistent units.

Verify whether the following suggested distribution of discharge in the pipelines of the network shown in figure below is satisfactory by using Hardy-Cross method. If not, determine the proper distribution. If the elevation at point B is 50 m and pressure head is 40 m and the elevation at D is 40 m, find the pressure at D.

LineABBCCDDAAC
Suggested discharge (units)5842321820

[Figure: network with nodes A, B, C, D and diagonal AC; resistances r: AB = 2, BC = 4, AC = 1, AD = 5, CD = 1; external flows 100 units at B, 20 units at A, 30 units at C and 50 units at D]

Data. Suggested discharges (units): B to A 58, B to C 42, A to C 20, A to D 18, C to D 32 (these satisfy continuity at every node with 100 in at B, 20 out at A, 30 out at C, 50 out at D). rr: AB 2, BC 4, AC 1, AD 5, CD 1; hf=rQ2h_f = rQ^2 (n=2n = 2).

Loop I = A-C-B-A (AC +, CB −-, BA +). Loop II = A-D-C-A (AD +, DC −-, CA −-).

Test of the suggested distribution (first iteration)

Loop I: ∑rQ∣Q∣=1(20)2−4(42)2+2(58)2=400−7056+6728=72\sum rQ|Q| = 1(20)^2 - 4(42)^2 + 2(58)^2 = 400 - 7056 + 6728 = 72, 2∑r∣Q∣=2(20+168+116)=6082\sum r|Q| = 2(20 + 168 + 116) = 608, so ΔQI=−72608=−0.118\Delta Q_I = -\dfrac{72}{608} = -0.118.

Loop II: ∑rQ∣Q∣=5(18)2−1(32)2−1(20)2=1620−1024−400=196\sum rQ|Q| = 5(18)^2 - 1(32)^2 - 1(20)^2 = 1620 - 1024 - 400 = 196, 2∑r∣Q∣=2(90+32+20)=2842\sum r|Q| = 2(90 + 32 + 20) = 284, so ΔQII=−196284=−0.690\Delta Q_{II} = -\dfrac{196}{284} = -0.690.

The loop head-loss sums are not zero (72 and 196), so strictly the suggested distribution is not exact, although the corrections are small (under 1.2% of the pipe discharges). Continuing the Hardy-Cross iterations:

| Iter | ∑rQ∣Q∣\sum rQ|Q| (I) | 2∑r∣Q∣2\sum r|Q| (I) | ΔQI\Delta Q_I | ∑rQ∣Q∣\sum rQ|Q| (II) | 2∑r∣Q∣2\sum r|Q| (II) | ΔQII\Delta Q_{II} | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | 72.00 | 608.00 | -0.118 | 196.00 | 284.00 | -0.690 | | 2 | 27.90 | 609.62 | -0.046 | 6.32 | 279.62 | -0.023 | | 3 | 0.93 | 609.75 | -0.002 | 1.88 | 279.40 | -0.007 |

Corrected distribution

PipeSuggestedCorrected
B to A5857.83
B to C4242.17
A to C2020.55
A to D1817.28
C to D3232.72

(Checks: 57.83+42.17=10057.83 + 42.17 = 100; at D, 17.28+32.72=5017.28 + 32.72 = 50.) The suggested values are therefore correct to within about 4%; the correction mainly shifts about 0.7 unit of flow from pipe AD to the route A-C-D.

Pressure at D

Piezometric head at B: HB=50+40=90H_B = 50 + 40 = 90 m. Head loss from B to D via A: hBD=hBA+hAD=2(57.83)2+5(17.28)2=6689.5+1493.0=8182.5h_{BD} = h_{BA} + h_{AD} = 2(57.83)^2 + 5(17.28)^2 = 6689.5 + 1493.0 = 8182.5 (the same through C: 7111.9+1070.67111.9 + 1070.6). Then

HD=HB−hBD,pDγ=HD−zD=90−hBD−40=50−hBDH_D = H_B - h_{BD}, \qquad \frac{p_D}{\gamma} = H_D - z_D = 90 - h_{BD} - 40 = 50 - h_{BD}

With rr and QQ used exactly as given, hBD=8182.5h_{BD} = 8182.5, so pD/γ=50−8182.5=−8132.5p_D/\gamma = 50 - 8182.5 = -8132.5, which is physically impossible. This shows that, with the "units" of discharge in the data, rQ2rQ^2 does not come out in metres of head. The method is still the one above: the pressure head at D is 50−hBD50 - h_{BD} (with hBDh_{BD} in metres), and the pressure is pD=γ (50−hBD)p_D = \gamma\,(50 - h_{BD}).

Answer: The suggested distribution is nearly, but not exactly, satisfactory; the proper values are BA = 57.8, BC = 42.2, AC = 20.6, AD = 17.3, CD = 32.7. Pressure head at D: pD/γ=50−hBDp_D/\gamma = 50 - h_{BD}; with the data taken literally, hBD=8182.5h_{BD} = 8182.5 and the result is negative (−8132.5-8132.5), so the given data do not give a physically meaningful pressure in metres.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Hydraulics chapter 3 questions →