Skip to main content

Generator and load complex power conventions

Short answer

Complex power is S=VI*; for a generator current leaves the terminal so S is delivered, for a load current enters so S is absorbed. If the conjugate is not used, V*I gives P but reverses the sign of Q, while VI depends on the chosen reference angle and is physically meaningless.

How are generator and load complex powers expressed? What will happen if the convention of taking the conjugate of current is not followed? Explain with necessary derivation.

Generator and load complex power

Complex power is always written as S=VI∗=P+jQS = VI^* = P + jQ. What it means depends on the assumed current direction.

  • Generator (source) convention: the current leaves the + terminal. SG=VI∗S_G = VI^* is the power delivered. For an over-excited generator supplying a lagging load, PG>0P_G > 0 and QG>0Q_G > 0.
  • Load convention: the current enters the + terminal. SL=VI∗S_L = VI^* is the power absorbed. For an inductive load Z=R+jXZ = R + jX: SL=∣I∣2Z=PL+jQLS_L = |I|^2Z = P_L + jQ_L with QL>0Q_L > 0.

At any bus, the net injected power is Si=SGi−SLi=ViIi∗S_i = S_{Gi} - S_{Li} = V_iI_i^*. This is the form used in load-flow studies.

If the conjugate is not taken

Let V=∣V∣∠θvV = |V|\angle\theta_v, I=∣I∣∠θiI = |I|\angle\theta_i and ϕ=θv−θi\phi = \theta_v - \theta_i.

Case 1: S=V∗IS = V^*I

V∗I=∣V∣∣I∣∠(θi−θv)=∣V∣∣I∣cos⁡ϕ−j∣V∣∣I∣sin⁡ϕ=P−jQV^*I = |V||I|\angle(\theta_i - \theta_v) = |V||I|\cos\phi - j|V||I|\sin\phi = P - jQ

P is correct, but the sign of Q is reversed. An inductive (lagging) load would show negative Q, as if it were supplying vars like a capacitor. Generators and loads would then disagree with the standard convention used in meters, capability charts and load-flow programs. The power triangle would also become the mirror image of the impedance triangle (S=∣I∣2(R−jX)S = |I|^2(R - jX)).

Case 2: S=VIS = VI (no conjugate at all)

VI=∣V∣∣I∣∠(θv+θi)VI = |V||I|\angle(\theta_v + \theta_i)

The angle now depends on the sum of the phase angles. If the reference is changed by α\alpha, then VIVI becomes ∣V∣∣I∣∠(θv+θi+2α)|V||I|\angle(\theta_v + \theta_i + 2\alpha). So P and Q would change just because a different phasor was chosen as reference, which is physically meaningless. Taking the conjugate makes S depend only on the difference θv−θi\theta_v - \theta_i, which is independent of the reference.

Example: V=100∠30∘V = 100\angle30^\circ V and I=10∠0∘I = 10\angle0^\circ A (lagging by 30°).

  • VI∗=1000∠30∘=866+j500VI^* = 1000\angle30^\circ = 866 + j500 VA. Correct: an inductive load absorbs 500 var.
  • V∗I=866−j500V^*I = 866 - j500 VA. Wrong sign of Q.
  • VI=1000∠30∘VI = 1000\angle30^\circ here, but with V as reference (V=100∠0∘V = 100\angle0^\circ, I=10∠−30∘I = 10\angle-30^\circ) it becomes 1000∠−30∘1000\angle-30^\circ. The result changes with the reference.

So the conjugate of current must be taken to get a unique, reference-independent S with the standard sign of Q.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power System Analysis I chapter 3 questions →