- 2068 Bhadra (old course) · 1+3 marks
True/false: cross-arm length and string efficiency
Short answer
TRUE. Increasing cross-arm length reduces pin-to-tower shunt capacitance C1, lowering the ratio m=C1/C, making voltage distribution more uniform and thus raising string efficiency.
State whether the following statement is TRUE or FALSE. Also give the justification: Increasing the cross-arm length, string efficiency can be increased.
TRUE.
Justification
String efficiency is
Unequal voltage distribution, and hence low efficiency, is caused by the shunt capacitance between each link pin and the earthed tower or cross-arm. The ratio
(shunt to self capacitance) decides the unevenness. As decreases, the voltage across the units becomes more uniform and the efficiency rises. For example, for a 3-disc string:
| String efficiency | |
|---|---|
| 0.2 | ≈ 78% |
| 0.1 | ≈ 87% |
| 0.05 | ≈ 93% |
Increasing the cross-arm length places the string farther from the tower body. The pin-to-tower capacitance falls, so falls and the string efficiency increases.
Limitation: a much longer cross-arm makes the tower heavier, costlier and wider, so it is used only within practical limits. Other methods, such as capacitance (static) grading and guard rings, are also used.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- True/false: cables suppress switching overvoltage · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 3
- True/false: load rejection raises terminal voltage · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 3
- True/false: protective ratio and grounding · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 4
- Voltage distribution of 3-unit string with guard ring · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 5
- True/False: air gap length and cost · Electric Machine Design, chapter 5
- True/false: higher forward gain reduces disturbance · Control Systems, chapter 1
- True/false: derivative controllers always used with others · Control Systems, chapter 7 · asked 3×
- True/false: CT secondary kept open · Electrical Machine, chapter 2