- Asked 3/20
- 2077 Chaitra · 10 marks
- 2073 Magh · 6 marks
- 2070 Bhadra · 8 marks
Neutral earthing and insulation level
Short answer
Effective (solid) earthing limits healthy-phase voltage during earth faults to about 80% of line voltage, allowing lower-rated surge arresters and a reduced BIL. This permits fewer insulator discs, smaller clearances, and cost savings of 15–20% for lines 132 kV and above.
Discuss the role of system (neutral) earthing in the selection of overhead line insulation level.
System (neutral) earthing is the connection of the star point of generators/transformers to earth, either solidly or through a resistance/reactance. It decides how high the voltage of the healthy phases rises during an earth fault, and so it decides the rating of surge arresters and the insulation level (BIL) of the line and equipment.
Earthing coefficient
- Isolated (ungrounded) neutral: healthy phases rise to the full line voltage, (100%). Arcing grounds can produce transients as high as 5–6 pu.
- Effectively (solidly) earthed: and ; the healthy-phase voltage rises to only about 0.8 of the line voltage, (80%).
- Resistance/reactance earthed: in between.
Effect on surge arrester rating
Arrester rated voltage (times a small margin):
- 220 kV, kV: effectively earthed → kV arrester (≈"80% arrester"); isolated neutral → 245 kV arrester ("100% arrester").
- A lower-rated arrester has a lower protective (residual) level.
Effect on insulation level (BIL)
- BIL protection ratio × arrester protective level (protection ratio about 1.2–1.4).
- With effective earthing the protective level is about 20% lower, so a reduced BIL can be chosen. Example for 220 kV: full insulation 1050 kV, reduced 950 or 900 kV (850 kV in some practice).
- Power-frequency withstand voltages and switching over-voltages (which also depend on the phase-to-earth voltage) are lower too.
Effect on overhead line insulation
- Fewer discs per string, shorter cross-arms, smaller clearances, shorter towers and a narrower right-of-way. The saving can be 15–20% of insulation cost at 132 kV and above.
- With an isolated neutral, the insulation must be designed for full line voltage to earth and for arcing-ground surges; this is acceptable only at low voltages (≤ 33 kV), where insulation is cheap.
| Earthing | Arrester | Insulation level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated | ≈1.0 | 100% | Full |
| Resistance/reactance | 0.8–1.0 | 85–100% | Full |
| Effective (solid) | ≤0.8 | 80% | Reduced |
Practice
- 132 kV and above: neutrals are effectively (solidly) earthed so that reduced insulation can be used; this is standard in Nepal and India.
- 11 kV and 33 kV distribution: often resistance or solid earthing; insulation is cheap, so full insulation is common.
- Effective earthing also gives fast, selective earth-fault relaying and avoids arcing grounds, but it causes high earth-fault current and possible interference with communication lines.
Thus neutral earthing directly lowers or raises the voltage stress on insulation and is a key input to insulation coordination and to the number of discs chosen for an overhead line.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- T/F: impulse withstand and neutral earthing · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3
- Criteria for distribution line route selection · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 7 · asked 3×
- Conductor selection, 220 kV line for 200 MW · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4
- Single vs double earth wire selection · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3
- Underground vs overhead distribution systems · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 5 · asked 4×
- Fault at load end of overhead line · Power System Analysis II, chapter 3
- Line currents with isolated and grounded neutral · Power System Analysis II, chapter 4
- Voltage rise at cable–overhead line junction · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 3 · asked 2×
- Star system with three loads, neutral current · Basic Electrical Engineering, chapter 8
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 3 questions →