- Asked 2/23
- 2073 Magh · 5 marks
- 2068 Magh · 4 marks
Reactive power compensation and its benefits
Short answer
Reactive power compensation involves adding devices that supply or absorb reactive power locally to maintain bus voltages and minimize reactive flow. Benefits: improved voltage profile, reduced losses, higher power factor, increased transfer capacity, enhanced stability, voltage stability, released generator capacity, and economic savings.
What is meant by reactive power compensation in an electric power system? List out its benefits to the system.
Reactive power compensation is the control of reactive power flow in a power system by adding devices that supply reactive power (capacitors, over-excited synchronous condensers, STATCOM in capacitive mode) or absorb it (reactors, under-excited condensers, SVC in inductive mode). The aim is to keep bus voltages within limits and to reduce reactive power flow through lines.
Reactive power does no useful work but is needed for magnetic and electric fields of motors, transformers and lines. If it is carried over long distances it causes voltage drop and losses. Compensation supplies it close to where it is needed.
Main types:
- Shunt compensation: capacitors or reactors connected in parallel at buses.
- Series compensation: capacitors connected in series with the line to cancel part of its reactance.
- Dynamic compensation: synchronous condensers, SVC, STATCOM.
Benefits to the system
- Better voltage profile: voltage drop is reduced; overvoltage at light load (Ferranti effect) is controlled.
- Lower losses: line current falls, so losses in lines and transformers fall.
- Improved power factor, avoiding low-p.f. penalties for consumers.
- More transmission capacity: the same line and transformers can carry more active power (MW) because less of their rating is used by Mvar.
- Higher stability limit: series capacitors reduce in , and shunt devices hold voltage up, improving steady-state and transient stability.
- Voltage stability: prevents voltage collapse under heavy loading or contingencies.
- Released generation capacity: generators supply less Mvar and can deliver more MW.
- Economic saving: lower losses, deferred investment in new lines and equipment.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Need and methods of reactive power compensation · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Compensation does not reduce load reactive demand · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- Reactive power flow between machines via j10 Ω · Power System Analysis I, chapter 3
- Line as source and sink of reactive power, effects · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- Reactive power proportional to voltage drop · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- Vs from P+jQ and reactive power flow direction · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- Power angle and series compensation · Power System Analysis II, chapter 6
- Effects of real and reactive power mismatch · Power System Analysis II, chapter 1 · asked 4×
- T/F: HVDC converter reactive power need · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 1
- Role of interconnection and reactive power control · Power System Analysis II, chapter 1