After two G-S iterations: V2 = 1.030∠1.93° pu, Q2 = 0.1798 pu; V3 = 0.989∠-2.48° pu. With flat start, Q2 is computed each iteration and V2 magnitude reset to 1.03 pu. Slack bus power is determined from final voltages and Y-bus.
Perform the two iteration of Gauss-Seidal load flow analysis for the data table given below to find the unknown variables of the buses. Line impedance of each line is (0.02+j0.11) pu. All data are in per unit and have usual meanings.
Bus no.
PG
QG
PL
QL
Bus voltage
Configuration
1
?
?
1.0
0.5
1.03∠0
1-2
2
1.5
?
0.5
0
1.03
2-3
3
0.0
0
1.2
0.5
?
3-1
Bus 1 is the slack bus, bus 2 a PV (generator) bus and bus 3 a PQ (load) bus. Lines 1-2, 2-3 and 3-1 each have z=0.020+j0.110 pu (no shunt admittance given). Gauss-Seidel is used with no acceleration factor and no Q-limits (none are given).
For the PV bus, Q2 is calculated first, then V2 is found and its magnitude reset to 1.03 pu, keeping the new angle. Bus 3 uses the newest V2.
Iteration 1
k=1∑3Y2kVkQ2(1)=0.0480−j0.2640=−Im{V2∗∑kY2kVk}=0.2719puV2(1)V2∗P2−jQ2∑k=2Y2kVkV2(1)δ2=Y221[V2∗P2−jQ2−Y21V1−Y23V3]=1.03001.0000−j0.2719=0.9709−j0.2640=−3.2480+j17.8640=3.2000−j17.6000(0.9709−j0.2640)−(−3.2480+j17.8640)=1.0392+j0.0508=2.7962∘⇒V2(1)=1.0300∠2.7962∘=1.0288+j0.0502(magnitude reset to 1.03)V3(1)V3∗P3−jQ3∑k=3Y3kVkV3(1)=Y331[V3∗P3−jQ3−Y31V1−Y32V2]=1.0000−1.2000+j0.5000=−1.2000+j0.5000=−3.7362+j18.0368=3.2000−j17.6000(−1.2000+j0.5000)−(−3.7362+j18.0368)=0.9899−j0.0359=0.9905∠−2.0757∘pu
Iteration 2
k=1∑3Y2kVkQ2(2)=1.2603−j0.1132=−Im{V2∗∑kY2kVk}=0.1798puV2(2)V2∗P2−jQ2∑k=2Y2kVkV2(2)δ2=Y221[V2∗P2−jQ2−Y21V1−Y23V3]=1.0288−j0.05021.0000−j0.1798=0.9782−j0.1270=−2.9161+j17.8324=3.2000−j17.6000(0.9782−j0.1270)−(−2.9161+j17.8324)=1.0267+j0.0346=1.9298∘⇒V2(2)=1.0300∠1.9298∘=1.0294+j0.0347(magnitude reset to 1.03)V3(2)V3∗P3−jQ3∑k=3Y3kVkV3(2)=Y331[V3∗P3−jQ3−Y31V1−Y32V2]=0.9899+j0.0359−1.2000+j0.5000=−1.1924+j0.5483=−3.6003+j18.0674=3.2000−j17.6000(−1.1924+j0.5483)−(−3.6003+j18.0674)=0.9876−j0.0428=0.9886∠−2.4788∘pu
Total loss = sum of the calculated net injections at all buses (equal to the sum of all line losses):
Bus
Pi (pu)
Qi (pu)
1
0.1439
0.3761
2
1.0773
0.2251
3
-1.2011
-0.4906
Sum
0.0201
0.1106
PlossQloss=∑Pi=0.0201pu=∑Qi=0.1106pu
Unknown
Value
V2
1.0300∠1.9298∘ pu
QG2=Q2+QL2
0.1798 pu
V3
0.9886∠−2.4788∘ pu
PG1
1.1439 pu
QG1
0.8761 pu
Note: QG2=0.1798 pu is the value used in the 2nd iteration (found from the 1st-iteration voltages). Recomputing Q2 from the final voltages gives 0.2251 pu (see the table above). The two differ because Gauss-Seidel has not yet converged.
Answer: after two iterations V2=1.0300∠1.9298∘ pu, V3=0.9886∠−2.4788∘ pu, QG2=0.1798 pu, PG1=1.1439 pu, QG1=0.8761 pu, and real power loss ≈0.0201 pu.