- 2075 Chaitra · 8 marks
EVA; earthquake monasteries reconstruction project
Short answer
Using uniform 20% planned progress, PV=1400.58, EV=1664.70, AC=1396.20 Rs million; SV=264.12, CV=268.50, SPI=1.189, CPI=1.192. The project is ahead of schedule and under budget, with EAC=5873.40 Rs million and forecast duration 25.2 months.
Perform EVA on the basis of the following given information of the "Earthquake Affected Monasteries Reconstruction Project" (EMRP), which was monitored after 6 months of its implementation. State controlling statements on the basis of your evaluation.
| Description (Budget/Plan) | Standard information | Description (monitored) | Monitored progress (completed) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Number of monasteries to be reconstructed | 753 units | 1. Reconstructed monasteries | 179 units |
| 2. Reconstruction project to be completed in | 30 months | 2. Average expended reconstruction cost per unit | Rs 7.8 millions |
| 3. Average reconstruction cost per unit | Rs 9.3 millions |
EVA is carried out in Rs million. Planned progress is taken as uniform over 30 months.
Data
- BAC = 753 x 9.3 = Rs 7,002.90 million
- Planned progress after 6 months = 6/30 = 20 %
- Completed = 179 units; actual average cost = Rs 7.8 million/unit
(All values are in Rs million; planned units after 6 months = 150.6, completed = 179.)
Calculation
Comment
- Schedule: SV is positive and SPI = 1.189, so the project is ahead of schedule. The work done is 118.9 % of the planned work (179 units against 150.6 planned). At this rate the project will take about 25.2 months instead of the planned 30 months (about 4.8 months early).
- Cost: CV is positive and CPI = 1.192, so the project is under budget. Each Rs 1 spent gives Rs 1.19 of work.
- Forecast: if the present cost trend continues, the final cost will be Rs 5,873.40 million against the budget of Rs 7,002.90 million (variance at completion = Rs 1,129.50 million saving).
Answer: SV = Rs 264.12 million, CV = Rs 268.50 million, SPI = 1.189, CPI = 1.192; the project is ahead of schedule and under budget.
Controlling statements
- The project is about 18.9 % ahead of schedule, and it earns about 19.2 % more value per rupee than budgeted (actual unit cost Rs 7.8 million against Rs 9.3 million, about 16 % lower). The present work method is good and should be continued.
- Check that quality and structural (earthquake-resistant) safety have not been reduced to save time and cost.
- Keep the same crew and material supply, and update the forecast regularly, because later reconstruction in remote hill areas may be harder.
- Keep the saving as a contingency for price rises and the monsoon.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- EVA and S-curve; Rs 30,00,000, 24 months · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- EVA; 60 days, 25% work, 50% budget spent · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- Cost control; EVA 15 houses in 3 months · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- Monitoring, evaluation, controlling and life cycle · Project Engineering, chapter 1
- Evaluation vs controlling; elements of control · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- Short note: Monitoring, evaluation, controlling · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- Manage and perform project work · ICT Project Management, chapter 7
- Standard forms and evaluation criteria · ICT Project Management, chapter 13
- Maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction; evaluation methods · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 4
- EVA numerical with bar schedule (A to F) · Construction Management, chapter 7