- 2078 Kartik · 16 marks
Conductor selection, 100 MW 70 km 132 kV
Short answer
The line requires a minimum 486 A thermal rating, ≥94% efficiency, and ≤12% regulation. ACSR Goat meets thermal limit but fails regulation; Sheep and Bison are marginal. ACSR Deer (30/4.27+7/4.27 mm) satisfies all criteria with 643 A rating, 96.08% efficiency, and 11.65% regulation.
For 3 phase 50 Hz transmission line to deliver 100 MW of power over 70 km, 132 kV single circuit line has been decided to design. Suggest the suitable conductor which meets following technical criterion. (i) Satisfy the thermal limit. (ii) Efficiency of line not to be less than 94% (iii) Voltage regulation of line not to be greater than 12%. Use conductor table attached. Assume the ambient temperature and maximum allowable temperature same as mentioned in conductor table.
[Given ACSR conductor table:]
| Code name | Aluminium No./mm | Steel No./mm | Approx. overall diameter (mm) | Aluminium area (mm²) | Steel area (mm²) | Total area (mm²) | Approx. weight (kg/km) | Nominal breaking load (kN) | Nominal DC resistance at 20°C (Ω/km) | Current rating (A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mole | 6/1.50 | 1/1.50 | 4.50 | 10.6 | 1.77 | 12.4 | 42.8 | 4.14 | 2.7027 | 66 |
| Squirrel | 6/2.11 | 1/2.11 | 6.33 | 21.0 | 3.50 | 24.5 | 84.7 | 7.87 | 1.3659 | 101 |
| Fox | 6/2.79 | 1/2.79 | 8.37 | 36.7 | 6.11 | 42.8 | 148.1 | 13.21 | 0.7812 | 142 |
| Mink | 6/3.66 | 1/3.66 | 10.98 | 63.1 | 10.50 | 73.6 | 254.9 | 21.87 | 0.4540 | 199 |
| Skunk | 12/2.59 | 7/2.59 | 12.95 | 63.2 | 36.90 | 100.1 | 463.0 | 52.79 | 0.4568 | 206 |
| Beaver | 6/3.99 | 1/3.99 | 11.97 | 75.0 | 12.50 | 87.5 | 302.9 | 25.76 | 0.3820 | 221 |
| Racoon | 6/4.09 | 1/4.09 | 12.27 | 78.8 | 13.10 | 91.9 | 318.3 | 27.06 | 0.3635 | 228 |
| Otter | 6/4.22 | 1/4.22 | 12.66 | 83.9 | 14.00 | 97.9 | 338.8 | 28.81 | 0.3415 | 237 |
| Cat | 6/4.50 | 1/4.50 | 13.50 | 95.4 | 15.90 | 111.3 | 385.3 | 32.76 | 0.3003 | 256 |
| Hare | 6/4.72 | 1/4.72 | 14.16 | 105.0 | 17.50 | 122.5 | 423.8 | 36.04 | 0.2730 | 271 |
| Coyote | 26/2.54 | 7/1.91 | 15.89 | 131.7 | 20.10 | 151.8 | 520.7 | 45.88 | 0.2192 | 311 |
| Cougar | 18/3.05 | 1/3.05 | 15.25 | 131.5 | 7.31 | 138.8 | 418.8 | 29.74 | 0.2188 | 308 |
| Tiger | 30/2.36 | 7/2.36 | 16.52 | 131.2 | 30.60 | 161.8 | 602.2 | 57.87 | 0.2202 | 313 |
| Lion | 30/3.18 | 7/3.18 | 22.26 | 238.3 | 55.60 | 293.9 | 1093.4 | 100.47 | 0.1213 | 450 |
| Bear | 30/3.35 | 7/3.35 | 23.45 | 264.4 | 61.70 | 326.1 | 1213.4 | 111.50 | 0.1093 | 480 |
| Goat | 30/3.71 | 7/3.71 | 25.97 | 324.3 | 75.70 | 400.0 | 1488.2 | 135.13 | 0.0891 | 543 |
| Sheep | 30/3.99 | 7/3.99 | 27.93 | 375.1 | 87.50 | 462.6 | 1721.3 | 156.30 | 0.0771 | 592 |
| Antelope | 54/2.97 | 7/2.97 | 26.73 | 374.1 | 48.50 | 422.6 | 1413.8 | 118.88 | 0.0773 | 586 |
| Bison | 54/3.00 | 7/3.00 | 27.00 | 381.7 | 49.50 | 431.2 | 1442.5 | 121.30 | 0.0758 | 593 |
| Deer | 30/4.27 | 7/4.27 | 29.89 | 429.6 | 100.20 | 529.8 | 1971.4 | 179.00 | 0.0673 | 643 |
| Elk | 30/4.50 | 7/4.50 | 31.50 | 477.1 | 111.30 | 588.4 | 2189.5 | 198.80 | 0.0606 | 684 |
| Camel | 54/3.35 | 7/3.35 | 30.15 | 476.0 | 61.70 | 537.7 | 1798.8 | 146.40 | 0.0608 | 677 |
| Moose | 54/3.53 | 7/3.53 | 31.77 | 528.5 | 69.50 | 597.0 | 1997.3 | 159.92 | 0.0547 | 720 |
Note: current ratings are based on wind velocity of 0.6 m/s, solar heat radiation of 1200 W/m², ambient temperature of 50°C and conductor temperature of 80°C.
The conductor must pass three checks: the thermal limit, efficiency ≥ 94% and regulation ≤ 12%. The smallest standard ACSR that passes all three is chosen.
Assumptions (not given in the question):
- Power factor 0.9 lagging.
- Equivalent spacing m, typical for a 132 kV single-circuit tower.
- Resistance at 80 °C: .
- GMR .
- 70 km is treated as a medium line using the nominal-π model.
- Ambient 50 °C and conductor 80 °C, as in the table, so the tabulated current rating is used directly.
(i) Thermal limit
The rating must be at least 486 A. Bear (480 A) and smaller conductors are rejected. Goat (543 A) is the smallest conductor that passes.
Line constants (per km)
For Deer ( mm, cm):
- /km
- /km
- S/km
(ii) and (iii) Efficiency and regulation
For each conductor:
- , ,
- , , with kV
- and
| Conductor | (A) | Thermal OK? | (Ω/km) | (Ω/km) | η (%) | VR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 480 | No | 0.1355 | 0.3962 | 93.78 | 13.98 |
| Goat | 543 | Yes | 0.1105 | 0.3898 | 94.87 | 12.88 |
| Sheep | 592 | Yes | 0.0956 | 0.3852 | 95.53 | 12.21 |
| Bison | 593 | Yes | 0.0940 | 0.3873 | 95.60 | 12.20 |
| Deer | 643 | Yes | 0.0835 | 0.3809 | 96.08 | 11.65 |
For Deer: kV (line), loss = 4.081 MW, so and .
Selection
- Goat passes the thermal and efficiency checks but fails regulation (12.88% > 12%).
- Sheep and Bison are marginal, at about 12.2%.
- Deer passes all three: rating 643 A > 486 A, η = 96.08% > 94%, VR = 11.65% < 12%.
Answer: ACSR Deer (30/4.27 + 7/4.27 mm) is the suitable conductor.
If a smaller spacing (about 4 m) is used, Sheep and Bison would just meet the 12% limit (VR about 11.9%), and they could be compared with Deer on cost.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Conductor selection, 100 MW 80 km, no corona · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4
- Conductor selection, 220 kV line for 200 MW · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4
- Initial line design for 200 MW over 120 km · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 2
- Air clearances, 220 kV line for 200 MW · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4
- Empirical formula; voltage for 150 MW over 100 km · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 2
- Insulator discs per string, 180 MW over 200 km · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3
- Nominal-T 100 km line, 50 MVA at 132 kV · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- Nominal-T 100 km line, 20 MW at 110 kV · Power System Analysis I, chapter 5
- Capacitor for zero regulation, 70 km 220 kV line · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
- 70 km, 40 MW line: regulation and zero-regulation pf · Power System Analysis I, chapter 6
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 4 questions →