Skip to main content

300 km line: short line vs nominal-π

Short answer

Short line: V_S=251.33 kV, I_S=164.0 A, pf=0.7455 lag, P_S=53.23 MW. Nominal-π: V_S=238.07 kV, I_S=128.1 A, pf=0.9881 lead, P_S=52.21 MW.

A 50 Hz transmission line 300 km long has a total series impedance of 40 + j125 ohms and a total shunt admittance of 10⁻³ mho. The receiving-end load is 50 MW at 220 kV with 0.8 lagging power factor. Find the sending-end voltage, current, power and power factor using: (i) short line approximation (ii) nominal-π method.

Given: Z=40+j125=131.24∠72.26∘ ΩZ = 40 + j125 = 131.24\angle 72.26^\circ\ \Omega, Y=j10−3Y = j10^{-3} S (totals), load 50 MW at 220 kV, 0.8 p.f. lagging. Per-phase working.

VR=2203=127.02∠0∘ kVIR=50×1063×220×103×0.8=164.02∠−36.87∘=131.22−j98.41 A\begin{aligned} V_R &= \frac{220}{\sqrt3} = 127.02\angle 0^\circ\ \text{kV} \\ I_R &= \frac{50\times10^6}{\sqrt3\times220\times10^3\times0.8} = 164.02\angle -36.87^\circ = 131.22 - j98.41\ \text{A} \end{aligned}

PR=50P_R = 50 MW, QR=37.5Q_R = 37.5 Mvar.

(i) Short-line approximation (A=D=1A = D = 1, B=ZB = Z, C=0C = 0)

IS=IR=164.0∠−36.87∘ AZIR=(40+j125)(131.22−j98.41)=17,550+j12,466 VVS=VR+ZIR=144,567+j12,466=145.10∠4.93∘ kV/phaseVS(L)=3×145.10=251.33 kV\begin{aligned} I_S &= I_R = 164.0\angle -36.87^\circ\ \text{A} \\ ZI_R &= (40 + j125)(131.22 - j98.41) = 17{,}550 + j12{,}466\ \text{V} \\ V_S &= V_R + ZI_R = 144{,}567 + j12{,}466 = 145.10\angle 4.93^\circ\ \text{kV/phase} \\ V_{S(L)} &= \sqrt3\times145.10 = 251.33\ \text{kV} \end{aligned}

p.f. =cos⁡(4.93∘+36.87∘)=cos⁡41.80∘=0.7455= \cos(4.93^\circ + 36.87^\circ) = \cos 41.80^\circ = 0.7455 lagging

PS=3VSIScos⁡ϕS=3×145.10×103×164.02×0.7455=53.23 MWP_S = 3V_SI_S\cos\phi_S = 3\times145.10\times10^3\times164.02\times0.7455 = 53.23\ \text{MW}

(ii) Nominal-Π method

ZY=(40+j125)(j10−3)=−0.125+j0.04A=D=1+ZY2=0.9375+j0.02=0.9377∠1.22∘B=Z=131.24∠72.26∘ ΩC=Y(1+ZY4)=−1.0×10−5+j9.6875×10−4=9.688×10−4∠90.59∘ S\begin{aligned} ZY &= (40 + j125)(j10^{-3}) = -0.125 + j0.04 \\ A = D &= 1 + \frac{ZY}{2} = 0.9375 + j0.02 = 0.9377\angle 1.22^\circ \\ B &= Z = 131.24\angle 72.26^\circ\ \Omega \\ C &= Y\left(1 + \frac{ZY}{4}\right) = -1.0\times10^{-5} + j9.6875\times10^{-4} = 9.688\times10^{-4}\angle 90.59^\circ\ \text{S} \end{aligned} VS=AVR+BIR=(119,080+j2540)+(17,550+j12,466)=136,630+j15,006=137.45∠6.27∘ kV/phaseVS(L)=238.07 kVIS=CVR+DIR=(−1.27+j123.05)+(124.98−j89.64)=123.71+j33.41=128.1∠15.11∘ A\begin{aligned} V_S &= AV_R + BI_R = (119{,}080 + j2540) + (17{,}550 + j12{,}466) \\ &= 136{,}630 + j15{,}006 = 137.45\angle 6.27^\circ\ \text{kV/phase} \\ V_{S(L)} &= 238.07\ \text{kV} \\ I_S &= CV_R + DI_R = (-1.27 + j123.05) + (124.98 - j89.64) \\ &= 123.71 + j33.41 = 128.1\angle 15.11^\circ\ \text{A} \end{aligned}

p.f. =cos⁡(6.27∘−15.11∘)=cos⁡8.85∘=0.9881= \cos(6.27^\circ - 15.11^\circ) = \cos 8.85^\circ = 0.9881 leading (current leads voltage)

PS=3×137.45×103×128.1×0.9881=52.21 MWP_S = 3\times137.45\times10^3\times128.1\times0.9881 = 52.21\ \text{MW}

Comparison

QuantityShort lineNominal-Π
VSV_S (line)251.33 kV238.07 kV
ISI_S164.0 A128.1 A
Sending p.f.0.7455 lag0.9881 lead
PSP_S53.23 MW52.21 MW
Efficiency93.94 %95.76 %

The short-line model ignores about 123 A of charging current, so for a 300 km line it badly overestimates VSV_S and ISI_S. The nominal-Π (or better, the exact long-line) model must be used.

Answer: (i) VS=251.33V_S = 251.33 kV, IS=164.0I_S = 164.0 A, p.f. 0.7455 lag, PS=53.23P_S = 53.23 MW. (ii) VS=238.07V_S = 238.07 kV, IS=128.1I_S = 128.1 A, p.f. 0.9881 lead, PS=52.21P_S = 52.21 MW.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power System Analysis I chapter 5 questions →