- 2069 Bhadra · 8 marks
Guide bund design, 4000 m3/s, d 0.1 mm
Short answer
Lacey waterway W=300m. Upstream shank 375m, downstream tail 75m, curved head radius 150m (120°). Pitching thickness 1.0m. Normal scour R=9.07m. Apron at shank: length 12.91m, launched thickness 1.43m (laid 2.13m). At nose: length 19.71m, same thickness.
Following hydraulic data near a proposed bridge site are obtained. Maximum discharge = 4000 m³/s; Highest flood level = 205.0 m; River bed level = 200.00 m; Average diameter of river bed material = 0.1 mm. Design the following components of a guide bund and neatly sketch it. (i) Length of guide bund (ii) Thickness of pitching of the slope (iii) Length of launching apron (iv) thickness of launching apron.
Data and design basis
- Silt factor (Lacey):
- Flood depth above bed: m
- Design discharge for scour/apron: m³/s
1. Waterway and length of guide bund
Lacey's regime waterway: m. Adopt m. Length of guide bund (Garg): upstream shank to , downstream tail to . Adopt
Curved heads: upstream radius m with sweep to (adopt ); downstream radius m with sweep about . Arc length of upstream head m, so total length on the upstream side m.
2. Thickness of stone pitching
Adopt m (pitching on the river side slope 2:1, over a 0.15 to 0.3 m graded filter).
3. Scour depth and launching apron
Lacey's normal scour depth:
Maximum scour below HFL: at the upstream nose, at the shank (straight portion). The apron must launch to the slope , so its horizontal width is and, when launched, it covers a slope length with thickness .
| Portion | Scour factor | Scour depth below HFL | Depth below bed | Apron length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nose (u/s curved head) | 2.0R | 18.14 m | 13.14 m | 19.71 m |
| Shank (straight) | 1.5R | 13.61 m | 8.61 m | 12.91 m |
Thickness: pitching m, so the launched apron thickness is m. Equating volumes per metre, the thickness as laid over width is m (about ).
Summary
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Lacey waterway | 300.42 m (adopt 300 m) |
| Length of guide bund (u/s) | 375 m; d/s tail 75 m |
| Pitching thickness | 0.95 m |
| Apron at shank: width / thickness | 12.91 m / 1.43 m launched (2.13 m laid) |
| Apron at nose: width / thickness | 19.71 m / 1.43 m launched (2.13 m laid) |
Sketches
Plan of guide bunds:
U/S D/S
bridge / weir axis
Shank (straight) |
________________________________ | ___
/ 1.0-1.5 W upstream \ | / \ tail
\________________________________/=|=\___/ 0.25 W
curved head |
R, sweep 120 deg <-- waterway W -->
________________________________ | ___
/ \ | / \
\________________________________/=|=\___/
Section at the shank (straight portion):
top width 6 m
___________ <- HFL + 1.5 m
/ \
HFL ---/-------------\--- 2:1 slopes
/ pitching t \
bed__/__ filter ______ \___
\_ launching apron _/ (launches at 2:1)
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Guide bank design, 4000 m3/s, d 0.40 mm · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6
- Guide bund design, 4000 m3/s, f 1.1 · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Guide bund: length, curved head, apron; 4500 m3/s · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Gabion guide bund and apron, 3000 m3/s · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Guide bund with plan, section, nose; 2500 m3/s · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6
- Bell's waterway and guide bund, 7500 m3/s · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 6
- Slope-area flood discharge, Marin River at Kusuntar · Engineering Hydrology, chapter 4
- Bridge site factors; river bank protection structures · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 5
- Return period of 350 m3/s design flood by Gumbel · Engineering Hydrology, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Gumbel design flood for highway bridge, 4% risk · Engineering Hydrology, chapter 6
All Irrigation and Drainage Engineering chapter 6 questions →