Skip to main content

Francis design (150 m, 25 m³/s)

Short answer

Power = 0.82×9.81×25×150 = 30,166 kW. Schweiger-Gregory specific speed is 101.5, giving 300 rpm (20 poles), runner diameter ≈ 2.42 m, and Thoma setting Hs ≤ 3.68 m above tailwater; lower setting is used in practice.

Design the specific speed, turbine diameter and setting of a Francis turbine of a hydropower project having net head of 150 m and design discharge of 25 cumec. Take turbine efficiency as 82% (81% in the 2070 Chaitra paper).

Power

P=ηγQH=0.82×9.81×25×150=30,166 kWP = \eta \gamma Q H = 0.82 \times 9.81 \times 25 \times 150 = 30{,}166\ \text{kW}

(With η=0.81\eta = 0.81: P=29,798P = 29{,}798 kW.) One unit is adopted.

Specific speed

For Francis turbines, an empirical (Schweiger and Gregory) relation in metric units (kW, m, rpm) is

Ns=3763H0.854+49.4=37631500.854+49.4=101.5N_s = \frac{3763}{H^{0.854}} + 49.4 = \frac{3763}{150^{0.854}} + 49.4 = 101.5

Speed from Ns=NPH5/4N_s = \dfrac{N\sqrt{P}}{H^{5/4}}:

N=101.5×1501.2530166=306.9 rpmN = \frac{101.5 \times 150^{1.25}}{\sqrt{30166}} = 306.9\ \text{rpm}

Synchronous speed for 50 Hz is N=6000/pN = 6000/p rpm. Nearest value: p=20p = 20 poles, N=300N = 300 rpm. Actual specific speed Ns=300301661501.25=99.3N_s = \dfrac{300\sqrt{30166}}{150^{1.25}} = 99.3 (98.7 for η=0.81\eta=0.81).

Runner diameter

Peripheral velocity u=Ku2gHu = K_u\sqrt{2gH} with Ku=0.7K_u = 0.7 (typical 0.6 to 0.9 for this NsN_s):

u=0.72×9.81×150=37.97 m/su = 0.7\sqrt{2 \times 9.81 \times 150} = 37.97\ \text{m/s} D=60uπN=60×37.97π×300=2.42 mD = \frac{60u}{\pi N} = \frac{60 \times 37.97}{\pi \times 300} = 2.42\ \text{m}

Setting (Thoma cavitation coefficient)

σc=0.0432(Ns100)2=0.0432(0.993)2=0.0426\sigma_c = 0.0432\left(\frac{N_s}{100}\right)^2 = 0.0432(0.993)^2 = 0.0426

Assume sea-level site: Hatm=10.3H_{atm} = 10.3 m, Hv=0.24H_v = 0.24 m.

Hs=Hatm−Hv−σcH=10.3−0.24−0.0426×150=3.68 mH_s = H_{atm} - H_v - \sigma_c H = 10.3 - 0.24 - 0.0426 \times 150 = 3.68\ \text{m}

This is the highest permissible position of the runner outlet above tailwater level. A lower setting (a safety margin of 1 to 2 m, or lower for a higher site elevation) is adopted in practice. At higher elevation reduce HatmH_{atm} by about 1 m per 900 m.

Answer: Ns≈99N_s \approx 99 (target 101.5); N=300N = 300 rpm; D≈2.42D \approx 2.42 m; Hs≤3.7H_s \le 3.7 m above tailwater level (practically set lower).

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Hydropower Engineering chapter 7 questions →