- Asked 2/21
- 2074 Ashwin · 8 marks
- 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks
Settling basin 8 m³/s, 0.3 mm, 90% trap
Short answer
Use Camp velocity v=44√0.30=0.241 m/s, depth 3.5 m, width 9.48 m split into 2 chambers of 5 m. Turbulence gives w'=0.023 m/s and length 36.7 m; for 90% trap efficiency multiply by 2.303, giving 84.5 m, adopted 85 m. Basin: 2 chambers, each 5 m x 85 m x 3.5 m.
With considering turbulent effect, design a settling basin to remove the sediment size greater than 0.3 mm diameter. Assume the design discharge of the basin is 8 m³/s and trap efficiency as 90%.
Given: design discharge m³/s; particles of size mm to be trapped, fall velocity cm/s m/s (assumed for 0.3 mm quartz at about 20 °C, after Rouse). The required trap efficiency is 90%, and turbulence is considered.
Step 1: Horizontal velocity (Camp)
For mm, with (v in cm/s, d in mm):
This is within the usual 0.1-0.4 m/s range, so deposited sediment is not re-suspended.
Step 2: Cross-section and width
Assume a flow depth m in the settling zone (sediment storage is extra).
Provide chambers so that one can be flushed while the other works: m each, adopt 5.0 m.
Step 3: Length without turbulence
Step 4: Effect of turbulence
Turbulence reduces the effective fall velocity: , with .
For a trap efficiency of 90% (Vetter's relation ), the length is multiplied by :
(This is conservative; Vetter's relation with the still-water fall velocity alone would give m.)
Adopted dimensions
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Flow velocity | 0.241 m/s |
| Settling depth | 3.5 m (plus about 1.0 m sediment storage in the hopper) |
| Number of chambers | 2 |
| Width of each chamber | 5.0 m |
| Length of settling zone | 85 m |
| Length/width ratio | 17.0 |
| Inlet transition | gradual, with guide vanes (side slope not steeper than about 1:5) |
Total volume of water in the basin m³.
PLAN (flushing gates at the downstream end)
inlet settling chambers outlet
canal transition +=================+ transition
=====> \ / | chamber 1 | \ /===> to
/ guide \ +-----------------+ / weir \ headrace
=====> \ vanes / | chamber 2 | \ /
/ \ +=================+ / \
trash- | | flush gates
rack v v --> flushing channel --> river
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
inlet settling zone (depth H) outlet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WL
\ ---> ---> ---> ---> ---> ---> |
\ ______________________________________ | weir
\/ sediment storage / hopper slope 1:30 \__|__ to headrace
flush gate -> flushing channel -> river
Flushing arrangement: the floor of each chamber slopes at about 1:30-1:50 to a longitudinal flushing channel with a flushing gate at the downstream end. A flushing velocity of at least 3 m/s is kept in the channel. The chamber to be flushed is closed at the inlet, drained and flushed to the river, while the other chamber continues to supply the plant.
Answer: 2 chambers, each about 5.0 m wide x 85 m long x 3.5 m deep (settling zone), with m/s.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Settling basin trap efficiency (Camp's diagram) · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5
- Settling basin with Hazen coefficient and sediment depth · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5
- Settling basin 6 m³/s, 0.25 mm, depth 3 m · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5
- Settling basin 40 m³/s, 0.15 mm · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5 · asked 4×
- Settling basin 60 m³/s, 0.15 mm, head 300 m · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5 · asked 2×
- Continuous flushing settling basin, 95% efficiency · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 5
- Settling basin design for 0.25 mm sediment · Hydro Power, chapter 5
- Settling basin design for 0.15 mm particles · Hydro Power, chapter 5
- Settling basin design for 0.2 mm particles · Hydro Power, chapter 5