Skip to main content

Chapter 6 · 14 hours

Semiconductors

IOE past exam questions

Past questions and answers

79 questions set from this chapter, 22 of them more than once. Most asked first.

  • Asked 9 times
  • 2082 Kartik (new course) · 5 marks
  • 2081 Bhadra · 1+5 marks
  • 2081 Baisakh · 8 marks
  • 2079 Bhadra · 8 marks
  • 2076 Asoj · 10 marks
  • 2075 Asoj · 8 marks
  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks
  • 2068 Shrawan · 8 marks
  • 2068 Baisakh · 10 marks

Explain the diffusion process in semiconductor and derive the Einstein relationship.

Answer

Diffusion is the net flow of carriers from a region of high concentration to a region of low concentration, caused by their random thermal motion. It needs no electric field; only a concentration gradient.

Diffusion process

Consider electrons with concentration n(x)n(x) falling with xx. Each carrier moves randomly, but more carriers cross a plane from the crowded side than from the sparse side, so there is a net flux towards lower concentration.

  n(x)
   |\
   | \      net electron flow -->
   |  \     electron current  <--
   |   `-._
   |       `--.___
   +--------------- x

By Fick's law, the particle flux is proportional to the gradient:

Γe=−Dedndx,Γh=−Dhdpdx\Gamma_e = -D_e \frac{dn}{dx}, \qquad \Gamma_h = -D_h \frac{dp}{dx}

where DeD_e, DhD_h are diffusion coefficients (cm2^2/s). Since electrons carry charge −e-e and holes +e+e, the diffusion current densities are

JD,e=eDedndx,JD,h=−eDhdpdxJ_{D,e} = e D_e \frac{dn}{dx}, \qquad J_{D,h} = -e D_h \frac{dp}{dx}

With an electric field EE also present, the total currents are

Je=enμeE+eDedndxJh=epμhE−eDhdpdx\begin{aligned} J_e &= e n \mu_e E + e D_e \frac{dn}{dx} \\ J_h &= e p \mu_h E - e D_h \frac{dp}{dx} \end{aligned}

Einstein relation

Consider an n-type semiconductor with non-uniform doping, so nn varies with xx, in equilibrium (no applied voltage).

  1. Electrons diffuse from high to low nn, leaving positive donor ions behind. This builds an internal field EE that drives a drift current opposing diffusion.
  2. In equilibrium, the Fermi level EFE_F is flat and the net current is zero:
Je=enμeE+eDedndx=0(1)J_e = e n \mu_e E + e D_e \frac{dn}{dx} = 0 \quad (1)
  1. The bands bend, since Ec−EFE_c - E_F changes with xx. For a non-degenerate semiconductor:
n(x)=Ncexp⁡[−Ec(x)−EFkT]n(x) = N_c \exp\left[-\frac{E_c(x) - E_F}{kT}\right] dndx=−nkTdEcdx(2)\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{n}{kT}\frac{dE_c}{dx} \quad (2)
  1. The electron potential energy is Ec=const−eV(x)E_c = \text{const} - eV(x), and E=−dV/dxE = -dV/dx, so
dEcdx=−edVdx=eE(3)\frac{dE_c}{dx} = -e\frac{dV}{dx} = eE \quad (3)
  1. From (2) and (3): dndx=−neEkT\dfrac{dn}{dx} = -\dfrac{neE}{kT}. Put this in (1):
enμeE−eDeneEkT=0μe=eDekTDeμe=kTe\begin{aligned} e n \mu_e E - e D_e \frac{neE}{kT} &= 0 \\ \mu_e &= \frac{e D_e}{kT} \\ \frac{D_e}{\mu_e} &= \frac{kT}{e} \end{aligned}

The same steps for holes give Dh/μh=kT/eD_h/\mu_h = kT/e. So

Deμe=Dhμh=kTe\frac{D_e}{\mu_e} = \frac{D_h}{\mu_h} = \frac{kT}{e}

This is the Einstein relation. At 300 K, kT/e=0.0259kT/e = 0.0259 V. For Si with μe=1350\mu_e = 1350 cm2^2/Vs, De=0.0259×1350=35D_e = 0.0259 \times 1350 = 35 cm2^2/s. It links diffusion (random motion) and drift (field-driven motion), since both arise from the same scattering processes.

  • Asked 5 times
  • 2080 Baisakh · 4 marks
  • 2078 Bhadra · 4 marks
  • 2074 Chaitra · 6 marks
  • 2071 Chaitra · 4 marks
  • 2069 Asar · 4 marks

Differentiate between non-degenerate and degenerate semiconductors.

Answer

A non-degenerate semiconductor has a carrier concentration much smaller than the effective density of states (n≪Ncn \ll N_c, p≪Nvp \ll N_v), so the Fermi level lies in the band gap at least a few kTkT from the band edges. A degenerate semiconductor is so heavily doped (above about 101910^{19} cm−3^{-3} in Si) that the Fermi level enters the conduction band (n+^+) or valence band (p+^+), and it behaves more like a metal.

   Non-degenerate n        Degenerate n+
  ---------- Ec          ~~~~~~~~~~ EF
  - - - - -  Ed          ---------- Ec
  .......... EF          ////////// impurity band
                          merged with CB
  ---------- Ev          ---------- Ev
PointNon-degenerateDegenerate
Doping levelLight/moderate (Nd≪NcN_d \ll N_c)Very heavy (Nd≳NcN_d \gtrsim N_c, about 101910^{19} to 102010^{20} cm−3^{-3})
Fermi levelIn the gap, more than about 3kT3kT from band edgeInside CB (n+^+) or VB (p+^+)
StatisticsBoltzmann approximation validFull Fermi-Dirac needed
np=ni2np = n_i^2HoldsDoes not hold
Impurity levelsDiscrete, isolated donor/acceptor levelsOverlap into an impurity band merging with the band
Band gapNormalSlightly reduced (band-gap narrowing)
BehaviourSemiconducting; conductivity rises with TMetal-like; weak temperature dependence
UsesOrdinary diodes, transistorsTunnel diodes, laser diodes, ohmic contacts
  • Asked 4 times
  • 2081 Baisakh · 6 marks
  • 2070 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2070 Asar · 6 marks
  • 2069 Chaitra · 6 marks

Derive the Einstein relationship showing the relation between electron diffusion co-efficient in n-type semiconductor and electron mobility.

Answer

The Einstein relation links the diffusion coefficient and drift mobility of a carrier: De/μe=kT/eD_e/\mu_e = kT/e. It is derived by noting that, in equilibrium, drift and diffusion currents in a non-uniformly doped sample cancel.

Setup

Take an n-type semiconductor whose donor concentration falls with xx, in thermal equilibrium (no applied voltage).

 Ec  \__
        \___
            \_______         (band bends)
 EF ---------------------   (flat in equilibrium)

 n high              n low
   diffusion of e- ---->
   drift of e-     <----  (due to built-in E)
  • Electrons diffuse towards low nn, leaving positive donor ions behind.
  • This creates an internal electric field EE, which drives electrons back by drift.
  • In equilibrium the net electron current is zero:
Je=enμeE+eDedndx=0(1)J_e = e n \mu_e E + e D_e \frac{dn}{dx} = 0 \quad (1)

Electron concentration and band bending

For a non-degenerate semiconductor,

n(x)=Ncexp⁡[−Ec(x)−EFkT]n(x) = N_c \exp\left[-\frac{E_c(x) - E_F}{kT}\right]

Since EFE_F is constant,

dndx=−nkTdEcdx(2)\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{n}{kT}\frac{dE_c}{dx} \quad (2)

The conduction band edge follows the electron potential energy, Ec(x)=const−eV(x)E_c(x) = \text{const} - eV(x). With E=−dV/dxE = -dV/dx:

dEcdx=eE(3)\frac{dE_c}{dx} = eE \quad (3)

From (2) and (3):

dndx=−neEkT(4)\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{n e E}{kT} \quad (4)

Result

Substitute (4) in (1):

enμeE−eDeneEkT=0μe=eDekTDeμe=kTe\begin{aligned} e n \mu_e E - e D_e \frac{n e E}{kT} &= 0 \\ \mu_e &= \frac{e D_e}{kT} \\ \frac{D_e}{\mu_e} &= \frac{kT}{e} \end{aligned}

This is the Einstein relation for electrons. A similar result holds for holes: Dh/μh=kT/eD_h/\mu_h = kT/e.

At 300 K, kT/e≈25.9kT/e \approx 25.9 mV. For Si, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1} gives De≈35D_e \approx 35 cm2^2/s. Thus, once mobility is measured (e.g. from Hall and conductivity data), the diffusion coefficient follows directly.

  • Asked 4 times
  • 2079 Bhadra · 6 marks
  • 2078 Bhadra · 8 marks
  • 2076 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2071 Chaitra · 6 marks

Given that the density of states related effective masses of electrons and holes in Si are approximately 1.08mₑ and 0.60mₑ respectively and the electron and hole drift mobilities at room temperature are 1350 and 450 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively. Calculate the intrinsic concentration and intrinsic resistivity of Si. The energy band gap for Si is 1.10eV. (T = 300K)

Answer

In an intrinsic semiconductor, n=p=nin = p = n_i with

ni=NcNv exp⁡(−Eg2kT),Nc=2(2πme∗kTh2)3/2,Nv=2(2πmh∗kTh2)3/2n_i = \sqrt{N_c N_v}\,\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right), \quad N_c = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_e^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}, \quad N_v = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_h^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}

Data: me∗=1.08mem_e^* = 1.08m_e, mh∗=0.60mem_h^* = 0.60m_e, me=9.109×10−31m_e = 9.109\times10^{-31} kg, k=1.381×10−23k = 1.381\times10^{-23} J/K, h=6.626×10−34h = 6.626\times10^{-34} J s, T=300T = 300 K, Eg=1.10E_g = 1.10 eV, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1}. Then kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV.

Effective densities of states

Nc=2[2π(1.08×9.109×10−31)(1.381×10−23)(300)(6.626×10−34)2]3/2=2.82×1025 m−3=2.82×1019 cm−3Nv=Nc(0.601.08)3/2=1.17×1019 cm−3\begin{aligned} N_c &= 2\left[\frac{2\pi (1.08 \times 9.109\times10^{-31})(1.381\times10^{-23})(300)}{(6.626\times10^{-34})^2}\right]^{3/2} \\ &= 2.82\times10^{25}\ \text{m}^{-3} = 2.82\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ N_v &= N_c\left(\frac{0.60}{1.08}\right)^{3/2} = 1.17\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Intrinsic concentration

Eg2kT=1.102×0.02586=21.27NcNv=2.82×1019×1.17×1019=1.813×1019 cm−3ni=1.813×1019×e−21.27=1.813×1019×5.80×10−10=1.05×1010 cm−3\begin{aligned} \frac{E_g}{2kT} &= \frac{1.10}{2 \times 0.02586} = 21.27 \\ \sqrt{N_c N_v} &= \sqrt{2.82\times10^{19} \times 1.17\times10^{19}} = 1.813\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ n_i &= 1.813\times10^{19} \times e^{-21.27} \\ &= 1.813\times10^{19} \times 5.80\times10^{-10} \\ &= 1.05\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Intrinsic resistivity

σi=eni(μe+μh)=1.602×10−19×1.052×1010×(1350+450)=3.03×10−6 Ω−1cm−1ρi=1σi=3.30×105 Ω cm\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= e n_i (\mu_e + \mu_h) \\ &= 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 1.052\times10^{10} \times (1350 + 450) \\ &= 3.03\times10^{-6}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ \rho_i &= \frac{1}{\sigma_i} = 3.30\times10^{5}\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \end{aligned}

Answer: ni≈1.05×1010n_i \approx 1.05\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}; ρi≈3.3×105\rho_i \approx 3.3\times10^{5} Ω\Omega cm (3.3×1033.3\times10^{3} Ω\Omega m).

  • Asked 4 times
  • 2078 Bhadra · 4+4 marks
  • 2075 Asoj · 8 marks
  • 2074 Chaitra · 10 marks
  • 2072 Chaitra · 8 marks

Derive the expression of a built-in potential and depletion width of a pn junction with necessary diagrams.

Answer

Built-in potential

Consider an abrupt pn junction with acceptor concentration NaN_a on the p-side and donor concentration NdN_d on the n-side. Assumptions: abrupt junction, full ionisation, non-degenerate doping, depletion approximation (no free carriers in the depletion region), equilibrium.

When the two sides are joined, holes diffuse from p to n and electrons from n to p. They leave behind uncovered negative acceptor ions on the p-side and positive donor ions on the n-side. These form a space charge (depletion) region whose field opposes further diffusion. In equilibrium the Fermi level is constant through the junction and the bands bend by eV0eV_0.

        p-side  |  depletion  |  n-side
                | -Wp  0  +Wn |
  Ec ___________
                \_____________
  EF ............................. (flat)
  Ev ___________   eV0
                \_____________

In equilibrium, carrier concentrations at the two ends of the depletion region follow the Boltzmann factor:

pp0pn0=exp⁡(eV0kT)\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}} = \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right)

With pp0=Nap_{p0} = N_a and pn0=ni2/Ndp_{n0} = n_i^2/N_d:

NaNdni2=exp⁡(eV0kT)V0=kTeln⁡(NaNdni2)\begin{aligned} \frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2} &= \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right) \\ V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\left(\frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2}\right) \end{aligned}

(The same result follows from eV0=EFn−EFpeV_0 = E_{Fn} - E_{Fp} before contact, using EFn−EFi=kTln⁡(Nd/ni)E_{Fn} - E_{Fi} = kT\ln(N_d/n_i) and EFi−EFp=kTln⁡(Na/ni)E_{Fi} - E_{Fp} = kT\ln(N_a/n_i).)

Depletion width

Charge density: ρ=−eNa\rho = -eN_a for −Wp<x<0-W_p < x < 0 and ρ=+eNd\rho = +eN_d for 0<x<Wn0 < x < W_n.

  rho
  +eNd     +-----+
           |     |
 ---+------+-----+--- x
 -Wp|   0        Wn
    +------+
  -eNa
  1. Charge neutrality:
NaWp=NdWnN_a W_p = N_d W_n
  1. Poisson's equation: dEdx=ρε\dfrac{dE}{dx} = \dfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon}, with ε=ε0εr\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r. Integrating from −Wp-W_p (where E=0E = 0) gives a field that is maximum at the junction:
E0=−eNdWnε=−eNaWpεE_0 = -\frac{eN_d W_n}{\varepsilon} = -\frac{eN_a W_p}{\varepsilon}
  1. Potential: V0V_0 is the area under the triangular field plot:
V0=−12E0W=eNdWnW2ε,W=Wn+WpV_0 = -\frac{1}{2}E_0 W = \frac{eN_d W_n W}{2\varepsilon}, \quad W = W_n + W_p
  1. From neutrality, Wn=NaWNa+NdW_n = \dfrac{N_a W}{N_a + N_d}. Substituting:
V0=eNaNdW22ε(Na+Nd)W=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{e N_a N_d W^2}{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d)} \\ W &= \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d) V_0}{e N_a N_d}} \end{aligned}
   E(x)
  ---+-----------+---- x
  -Wp \         / Wn
       \       /
        \     /
         \   /
          \ /
          -E0

The depletion region extends mostly into the lightly doped side (Wn/Wp=Na/NdW_n/W_p = N_a/N_d). With reverse bias VrV_r, replace V0V_0 by V0+VrV_0 + V_r.

  • Asked 4 times
  • 2082 Kartik (new course) · 4 marks
  • 2075 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2074 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks

Calculate the resistance of pure silicon cubic crystal of 1cm³ at room temperature. What will be the resistance of the cubic when it is doped with 1 arsenic in 10⁹ silicon atoms and 1 boron atom per billion silicon atoms? Atomic concentration of silicon is 5×10²² cm⁻³, ni = 1.45×10¹⁰ cm⁻³.

Answer

Resistance of a cube with side L=1L = 1 cm: R=ρL/A=ρ×1 cm1 cm2R = \rho L/A = \rho \times \dfrac{1\ \text{cm}}{1\ \text{cm}^2}, so RR in Ω\Omega equals ρ\rho in Ω\Omega cm.

Data: ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, NSi=5×1022N_{Si} = 5\times10^{22} cm−3^{-3}, e=1.602×10−19e = 1.602\times10^{-19} C. Assumed room-temperature mobilities for Si: μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1} (at such low doping, impurity scattering is negligible).

(a) Pure silicon

σ=eni(μe+μh)=1.602×10−19×1.45×1010×1800=4.18×10−6 Ω−1cm−1R=1σ=2.39×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e n_i(\mu_e + \mu_h) \\ &= 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 1.45\times10^{10} \times 1800 \\ &= 4.18\times10^{-6}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R &= \frac{1}{\sigma} = 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

(b) Doped with 1 As per 10910^9 Si atoms

Arsenic is a donor:

Nd=5×1022109=5×1013 cm−3≫nin≈Nd=5×1013 cm−3p=ni2n=(1.45×1010)25×1013=4.2×106 cm−3 (negligible)σ=enμe=1.602×10−19×5×1013×1350=1.081×10−2 Ω−1cm−1R=1σ=92.5 Ω\begin{aligned} N_d &= \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^9} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \gg n_i \\ n &\approx N_d = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ p &= \frac{n_i^2}{n} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{5\times10^{13}} = 4.2\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \ (\text{negligible}) \\ \sigma &= e n\mu_e = 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 5\times10^{13} \times 1350 \\ &= 1.081\times10^{-2}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R &= \frac{1}{\sigma} = 92.5\ \Omega \end{aligned}

(c) Also doped with 1 B per billion Si atoms

Boron is an acceptor: Na=5×1013N_a = 5\times10^{13} cm−3^{-3} =Nd= N_d.

The acceptors capture all the electrons given by the donors (full compensation). The net doping Nd−Na=0N_d - N_a = 0, so the crystal behaves as intrinsic: n=p=nin = p = n_i.

R≈2.39×105 ΩR \approx 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega

Answer: Pure Si: R=2.39×105R = 2.39\times10^{5} Ω\Omega. With 1 As per 10910^9: R=92.5R = 92.5 Ω\Omega. With 1 As and 1 B per 10910^9: compensated, RR returns to about 2.39×1052.39\times10^{5} Ω\Omega.

  • Asked 4 times
  • 2081 Chaitra (new course) · 4 marks
  • 2075 Asoj · 8 marks
  • 2073 Chaitra · 6 marks
  • 2068 Baisakh · 10 marks

Explain how donor dopants contribute electrons in conduction band in n-type extrinsic semiconductor. Also prove that σ = neμₑ where symbols have their usual meanings.

Answer

Donor dopants in n-type silicon

An n-type semiconductor is made by adding a small amount of a pentavalent (group V) impurity such as P, As or Sb to Si or Ge.

  1. The donor atom replaces a Si atom in the lattice. Four of its five valence electrons form covalent bonds with the four neighbouring Si atoms.
  2. The fifth electron has no bond to join. It stays only weakly bound to the positive donor ion, like the electron in a hydrogen atom but in a medium of high permittivity (εr=11.9\varepsilon_r = 11.9) and with a small effective mass.
  3. Its binding (ionisation) energy is therefore tiny, about 0.045 eV for P in Si (hydrogen model: Eb=13.6 me∗/meεr2E_b = 13.6\,\frac{m_e^*/m_e}{\varepsilon_r^2} eV).
  4. In the band diagram this electron occupies a donor level EdE_d just below EcE_c (about 0.05 eV).
  5. At room temperature kT=0.026kT = 0.026 eV is enough to ionise almost every donor, so each donor gives one electron to the conduction band and becomes a fixed positive ion D+D^+. Hence n≈Ndn \approx N_d.
  6. By the mass action law np=ni2np = n_i^2, the hole concentration falls far below nin_i, so electrons are the majority carriers.
            Ec ----------------------
                 e-  e-  e-   (free)
            Ed  - + - + - + -  ~0.05 eV
                (ionised donors)

            EF  .......... (near Ec)

            Ev ----------------------
     Si -- Si -- Si
     |     |     |
     Si -- P+ -- Si    e- (5th electron,
     |     |     |         loosely bound)
     Si -- Si -- Si

Proof of σ=neμe\sigma = ne\mu_e

Consider a bar of n-type material of cross-section AA, with electron concentration nn, in an electric field EE.

  1. The field accelerates electrons, but collisions with the lattice limit them to an average drift velocity vdv_d opposite to EE. The drift mobility is defined as
μe=vdE  ⇒  vd=μeE\mu_e = \frac{v_d}{E} \;\Rightarrow\; v_d = \mu_e E

(From the Drude model, vd=eτme∗Ev_d = \frac{e\tau}{m_e^*}E, so μe=eτme∗\mu_e = \frac{e\tau}{m_e^*}, where τ\tau is the mean free time.)

  1. In time Δt\Delta t, electrons travel vdΔtv_d\Delta t. All electrons in the volume AvdΔtA v_d \Delta t cross a given section. Charge crossing:
ΔQ=e n A vd Δt\Delta Q = e\,n\,A\,v_d\,\Delta t
  1. Current density:
J=ΔQA Δt=nevd=neμeEJ = \frac{\Delta Q}{A\,\Delta t} = n e v_d = n e \mu_e E
  1. Ohm's law in point form is J=σEJ = \sigma E. Comparing:
σ=neμe\sigma = n e \mu_e

If holes are also present, their contribution adds: σ=e(nμe+pμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h). In n-type material n≫pn \gg p, so σ≈neμe≈Ndeμe\sigma \approx ne\mu_e \approx N_d e\mu_e.

Example: Si with Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350 cm2^2/Vs gives σ=1016×1.602×10−19×1350=2.16\sigma = 10^{16}\times1.602\times10^{-19}\times1350 = 2.16 S/cm.

  • Asked 3 times
  • 2081 Bhadra · 6 marks
  • 2081 Baisakh · 6 marks
  • 2069 Asar · 6 marks

A heavily doped p side with acceptor concentration of 10¹⁸ cm⁻³ is connected to n-side with donor concentration of 10¹⁶ cm⁻³. Calculate the built-in potential and depletion width in n-side and p-side and overall depletion width of pn junction. The intrinsic concentration is 1.45×10¹⁰ cm⁻³ and temperature is 300 K.

Answer

Formulas (abrupt junction, depletion approximation):

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2,W=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd,Wn=NaWNa+Nd,Wp=NdWNa+NdV_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}, \quad W = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}}, \quad W_n = \frac{N_a W}{N_a+N_d}, \quad W_p = \frac{N_d W}{N_a+N_d}

Constants: kT/e=0.02586kT/e = 0.02586 V at 300 K, e=1.602×10−19e = 1.602\times10^{-19} C, ε=εrε0=11.9×8.854×10−14=1.054×10−12\varepsilon = \varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0 = 11.9 \times 8.854\times10^{-14} = 1.054\times10^{-12} F/cm (silicon assumed).

Given: Na=1018N_a = 10^{18} cm−3^{-3}, Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3}, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, T=300T = 300 K.

Built-in potential

NaNdni2=1018×1016(1.45×1010)2=4.76×1013V0=0.02586×ln⁡(4.76×1013)=0.02586×31.49=0.814 V\begin{aligned} \frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} &= \frac{10^{18}\times10^{16}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2} = 4.76\times10^{13} \\ V_0 &= 0.02586 \times \ln(4.76\times10^{13}) = 0.02586 \times 31.49 \\ &= 0.814\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

Total depletion width

W=2×1.054×10−12×(1018+1016)×0.8141.602×10−19×1018×1016=3.29×10−5 cm=0.329 μm\begin{aligned} W &= \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 1.054\times10^{-12} \times (10^{18}+10^{16}) \times 0.814}{1.602\times10^{-19} \times 10^{18} \times 10^{16}}} \\ &= 3.29\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm} = 0.329\ \mu\text{m} \end{aligned}

Width on each side

Wn=NaNa+NdW=10181.01×1018×0.329=0.326 μmWp=NdNa+NdW=10161.01×1018×0.329=3.26×10−3 μm=3.26 nm\begin{aligned} W_n &= \frac{N_a}{N_a+N_d}W = \frac{10^{18}}{1.01\times10^{18}} \times 0.329 = 0.326\ \mu\text{m} \\ W_p &= \frac{N_d}{N_a+N_d}W = \frac{10^{16}}{1.01\times10^{18}} \times 0.329 = 3.26\times10^{-3}\ \mu\text{m} = 3.26\ \text{nm} \end{aligned}

Check: NaWp=1018×3.26×10−7=3.26×1011N_aW_p = 10^{18}\times3.26\times10^{-7} = 3.26\times10^{11} cm−2^{-2} =NdWn= N_dW_n. Since this is a p+^+n junction, almost all the depletion region lies in the lightly doped n-side. (The peak field is E0=eNdWn/ε=4.95×104E_0 = eN_dW_n/\varepsilon = 4.95\times10^4 V/cm.)

Answer: V0=0.814V_0 = 0.814 V; Wn=0.326W_n = 0.326 μ\mum; Wp=3.26W_p = 3.26 nm; W=0.329W = 0.329 μ\mum.

  • Asked 3 times
  • 2080 Baisakh · 8 marks
  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks
  • 2070 Asar · 8 marks

A heavily doped N-side with donor concentration of 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ and P-side with acceptor concentration of 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ are connected. Find (i) Built in potential (V₀) (ii) Depletion width (W₀, Wn and Wp) (iii) Electric field at metallurgical junction (E₀)

Answer

Formulas (abrupt junction, depletion approximation):

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2,W=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd,Wn=NaWNa+Nd,Wp=NdWNa+NdV_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}, \quad W = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}}, \quad W_n = \frac{N_a W}{N_a+N_d}, \quad W_p = \frac{N_d W}{N_a+N_d}

Constants: kT/e=0.02586kT/e = 0.02586 V at 300 K, e=1.602×10−19e = 1.602\times10^{-19} C, ε=εrε0=11.9×8.854×10−14=1.054×10−12\varepsilon = \varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0 = 11.9 \times 8.854\times10^{-14} = 1.054\times10^{-12} F/cm (silicon assumed).

Given: Nd=1017N_d = 10^{17} cm−3^{-3} (n-side), Na=1016N_a = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3} (p-side). nin_i and TT are not given; assume silicon at 300 K with ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}.

(i) Built-in potential

NaNdni2=1016×1017(1.45×1010)2=4.76×1012V0=0.02586×ln⁡(4.76×1012)=0.02586×29.19=0.755 V\begin{aligned} \frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} &= \frac{10^{16}\times10^{17}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2} = 4.76\times10^{12} \\ V_0 &= 0.02586 \times \ln(4.76\times10^{12}) = 0.02586 \times 29.19 \\ &= 0.755\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

(ii) Depletion widths

W0=2×1.054×10−12×(1016+1017)×0.7551.602×10−19×1016×1017=3.30×10−5 cm=0.330 μmWn=NaNa+NdW0=10161.1×1017×0.3305=0.0300 μmWp=NdNa+NdW0=10171.1×1017×0.3305=0.300 μm\begin{aligned} W_0 &= \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 1.054\times10^{-12} \times (10^{16}+10^{17}) \times 0.755}{1.602\times10^{-19} \times 10^{16} \times 10^{17}}} \\ &= 3.30\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm} = 0.330\ \mu\text{m} \\ W_n &= \frac{N_a}{N_a+N_d}W_0 = \frac{10^{16}}{1.1\times10^{17}} \times 0.3305 = 0.0300\ \mu\text{m} \\ W_p &= \frac{N_d}{N_a+N_d}W_0 = \frac{10^{17}}{1.1\times10^{17}} \times 0.3305 = 0.300\ \mu\text{m} \end{aligned}

The depletion region lies mostly in the lightly doped p-side.

(iii) Field at the metallurgical junction

∣E0∣=eNdWnε=1.602×10−19×1017×3.005×10−61.054×10−12=4.57×104 V/cm=4.57 MV/m\begin{aligned} |E_0| &= \frac{eN_dW_n}{\varepsilon} = \frac{1.602\times10^{-19} \times 10^{17} \times 3.005\times10^{-6}}{1.054\times10^{-12}} \\ &= 4.57\times10^{4}\ \text{V/cm} = 4.57\ \text{MV/m} \end{aligned}

It points from the n-side to the p-side (E0=−4.57×104E_0 = -4.57\times10^4 V/cm if xx is measured from p to n). Check: 12∣E0∣W0=0.5×4.57×104×3.305×10−5=0.755\frac{1}{2}|E_0|W_0 = 0.5 \times 4.57\times10^4 \times 3.305\times10^{-5} = 0.755 V =V0= V_0.

Answer: V0=0.755V_0 = 0.755 V; W0=0.330W_0 = 0.330 μ\mum, Wn=0.030W_n = 0.030 μ\mum, Wp=0.300W_p = 0.300 μ\mum; ∣E0∣=4.57×104|E_0| = 4.57\times10^4 V/cm.

  • Asked 3 times
  • 2079 Bhadra · 5 marks
  • 2076 Chaitra · 4 marks
  • 2073 Chaitra · 6 marks

Explain the importance of Fermi energy level in semiconductor.

Answer

The Fermi level EFE_F is the energy at which the probability of occupation by an electron is exactly one half, from the Fermi-Dirac function

f(E)=11+exp⁡(E−EFkT)f(E) = \frac{1}{1 + \exp\left(\dfrac{E - E_F}{kT}\right)}

In a semiconductor it usually lies in the band gap, where there are no states, but it still fixes how many electrons and holes are present.

Importance

  1. Sets carrier concentrations. For a non-degenerate semiconductor:
n=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFkT],p=Nvexp⁡[−EF−EvkT]n = N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c - E_F}{kT}\right], \qquad p = N_v\exp\left[-\frac{E_F - E_v}{kT}\right]

The closer EFE_F is to EcE_c, the more electrons; the closer to EvE_v, the more holes.

  1. Shows the type of semiconductor.
 Intrinsic       n-type          p-type
 --- Ec          --- Ec          --- Ec
                 ... EF
 ... EF = EFi    (near Ec)
 (mid-gap)                       ... EF
 --- Ev          --- Ev          --- Ev  (near Ev)
  • Intrinsic: EFiE_{Fi} near mid-gap, EFi=Ec+Ev2+34kTln⁡mh∗me∗E_{Fi} = \frac{E_c+E_v}{2} + \frac{3}{4}kT\ln\frac{m_h^*}{m_e^*}.
  • n-type: EF−EFi=kTln⁡(Nd/ni)E_F - E_{Fi} = kT\ln(N_d/n_i), above mid-gap.
  • p-type: EFi−EF=kTln⁡(Na/ni)E_{Fi} - E_F = kT\ln(N_a/n_i), below mid-gap.
  1. Measures doping. The shift of EFE_F from EFiE_{Fi} tells the doping level; heavy doping pushes EFE_F into a band (degenerate semiconductor).

  2. Constant in equilibrium. In any system in thermal equilibrium, EFE_F is the same everywhere. This rule gives band bending, the built-in potential of a pn junction (eV0=EFn−EFpeV_0 = E_{Fn} - E_{Fp} before contact) and metal-semiconductor contact potentials.

  3. Applied voltage. An applied voltage VV separates the Fermi levels on the two sides by eVeV. dEF/dx=0dE_F/dx = 0 means no net current; a gradient in EFE_F drives current.

  4. Temperature behaviour. As TT rises, EFE_F of an extrinsic semiconductor moves towards mid-gap, showing the change to intrinsic behaviour.

  5. Work function. EFE_F fixes the work function Φ=Evac−EF\Phi = E_{vac} - E_F, which decides contact behaviour (ohmic or Schottky).

  • Asked 3 times
  • 2081 Chaitra (new course) · 3 marks
  • 2076 Asoj · 4 marks
  • 2070 Asar · 4 marks

An n-type semiconductor doped with 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ phosphorus atoms has been doped with 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ boron atoms. Calculate the electron and hole concentrations in the semiconductor.

Answer

When both donors and acceptors are present, they compensate each other and the larger one decides the type.

Given: Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3} (P), Na=1017N_a = 10^{17} cm−3^{-3} (B). Assume Si at 300 K, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, full ionisation.

Since Na>NdN_a > N_d, the sample becomes p-type. The donors' electrons fill 101610^{16} acceptors; the rest of the acceptors create holes.

p=Na−Nd=1017−1016=9×1016 cm−3n=ni2p=(1.45×1010)29×1016=2.34×103 cm−3\begin{aligned} p &= N_a - N_d = 10^{17} - 10^{16} = 9\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ n &= \frac{n_i^2}{p} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{9\times10^{16}} = 2.34\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Answer: p=9×1016p = 9\times10^{16} cm−3^{-3}, n≈2.3×103n \approx 2.3\times10^{3} cm−3^{-3} (the sample is now p-type).

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2079 Bhadra · 6 marks
  • 2073 Chaitra · 6 marks

Explain how does temperature affects the formation of carrier concentration in semiconductor.

Answer

The carrier concentration in a semiconductor depends strongly on temperature because carriers are created thermally, either by ionising impurities or by breaking covalent bonds across the band gap.

Intrinsic semiconductor

Electron-hole pairs are created when thermal energy lifts electrons across EgE_g:

ni=NcNv exp⁡(−Eg2kT),Nc,Nv∝T3/2n_i = \sqrt{N_cN_v}\,\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right), \quad N_c, N_v \propto T^{3/2}

so ni∝T3/2e−Eg/2kTn_i \propto T^{3/2}e^{-E_g/2kT}. The exponential dominates: for Si, nin_i roughly doubles for every 8 to 10 K rise near room temperature.

Extrinsic (n-type) semiconductor

A plot of ln⁡n\ln n against 1/T1/T shows three regions:

  1. Low temperature (ionisation or freeze-out region): only some donors are ionised.
n=(12NcNd)1/2exp⁡(−ΔE2kT),ΔE=Ec−Edn = \left(\frac{1}{2}N_cN_d\right)^{1/2}\exp\left(-\frac{\Delta E}{2kT}\right), \quad \Delta E = E_c - E_d
  1. Medium temperature (extrinsic or saturation region): all donors are ionised, n≈Ndn \approx N_d, nearly constant. This range (about 150 K to 500 K for Si with Nd=1015N_d = 10^{15} cm−3^{-3}) is where devices work.

  2. High temperature (intrinsic region): thermal generation across EgE_g exceeds NdN_d; n≈nin \approx n_i and the material behaves as intrinsic. The changeover temperature TiT_i is where ni≈Ndn_i \approx N_d.

 ln n
   |        ionisation   extrinsic    intrinsic
   |          region      region       region
   |                                    /
   |                                   / slope
   |          ___________________     /  -Eg/2k
   |        /                    \__/
   |       / slope -ΔE/2k   n = Nd
   |      /
   +------|------------------|----------- 1/T
         1/Ts               1/Ti
   (high T at left, low T at right)

Fermi level

As TT rises, EFE_F moves from near EdE_d (low TT) towards mid-gap (high TT), because the extrinsic carriers become a smaller fraction of the total.

The upper limit of device operation is set by TiT_i; wide band gap materials (GaAs, SiC) have higher TiT_i and can work at higher temperatures.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2078 Kartik · 6 marks
  • 2071 Chaitra · 6 marks

In doped semiconductors, show that the carrier concentration and drift mobility both are highly dependent on temperature with necessary diagrams.

Answer

In a doped semiconductor, conductivity σ=e(nμe+pμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h). Both factors, the carrier concentration and the drift mobility, change with temperature.

Carrier concentration vs temperature

For n-type doping NdN_d:

  1. Ionisation region (low T): n=(12NcNd)1/2exp⁡(−ΔE/2kT)n = \left(\tfrac{1}{2}N_cN_d\right)^{1/2}\exp(-\Delta E/2kT); nn rises as more donors ionise.
  2. Extrinsic region: all donors ionised, n≈Ndn \approx N_d (constant).
  3. Intrinsic region (high T): n≈ni∝T3/2exp⁡(−Eg/2kT)n \approx n_i \propto T^{3/2}\exp(-E_g/2kT); rises steeply.
 ln n
   |        ionisation   extrinsic    intrinsic
   |          region      region       region
   |                                    /
   |                                   / slope
   |          ___________________     /  -Eg/2k
   |        /                    \__/
   |       / slope -ΔE/2k   n = Nd
   |      /
   +------|------------------|----------- 1/T
         1/Ts               1/Ti
   (high T at left, low T at right)

Drift mobility vs temperature

Mobility μ=eτ/m∗\mu = e\tau/m^* depends on the mean time between scattering events. Two scattering processes dominate:

  1. Lattice (phonon) scattering: atomic vibrations grow with TT, so τ\tau falls:
μL∝T−3/2\mu_L \propto T^{-3/2}
  1. Ionised impurity scattering: a slow carrier is deflected more by charged dopant ions; faster (hotter) carriers are deflected less:
μI∝T3/2NI\mu_I \propto \frac{T^{3/2}}{N_I}

where NIN_I is the ionised impurity concentration.

  1. Matthiessen's rule combines them:
1μ=1μL+1μI\frac{1}{\mu} = \frac{1}{\mu_L} + \frac{1}{\mu_I}

At low TT, impurity scattering controls μ\mu (rises with TT); at high TT, lattice scattering controls it (falls with TT). So μ\mu has a peak, and heavier doping lowers the curve and shifts the peak to higher TT.

  log μ
    |         .-''-.          lightly doped
    |       /       `-.
    |     /    .--.    `-.
    |   /    /     `-.    `-. ~T^-3/2
    |  /   /  heavily  `-.
    | /  /    doped       `-.
    |/ / ~T^3/2
    +--------------------------- log T

Result

Conductivity follows mainly nn: rises at low TT, roughly flat (falling slightly with μ\mu) in the extrinsic range, then rises sharply in the intrinsic range. So both carrier concentration and mobility are strongly temperature dependent, and device behaviour must account for both.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2078 Bhadra · 4 marks
  • 2071 Shrawan · 4 marks

What is minority charge suppression in extrinsic semiconductor?

Answer

Minority carrier suppression is the reduction of the minority carrier concentration far below nin_i when a semiconductor is doped. Adding donors increases electrons and at the same time decreases holes (and vice versa for acceptors).

Reason

In thermal equilibrium, the mass action law holds for a non-degenerate semiconductor:

np=ni2np = n_i^2

ni2n_i^2 depends only on the material and temperature, not on doping. So if doping raises the majority concentration, the minority concentration must fall in proportion. Physically, the large number of electrons increases the recombination rate with holes, so fewer holes survive.

Example

Si at 300 K, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, doped with Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3}:

n≈Nd=1016 cm−3p=ni2n=(1.45×1010)21016=2.1×104 cm−3\begin{aligned} n &\approx N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ p &= \frac{n_i^2}{n} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{10^{16}} = 2.1\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

The hole concentration falls from 1.45×10101.45\times10^{10} to 2.1×1042.1\times10^4 cm−3^{-3}, nearly a million times smaller.

Consequences

  • Conductivity is due almost entirely to majority carriers: σ≈eNdμe\sigma \approx eN_d\mu_e.
  • Minority carriers, though few, control pn junction reverse saturation current and transistor action.
  • Asked 2 times
  • 2076 Chaitra · 8 marks
  • 2072 Kartik · 10 marks

What is PN junction? Derive the relation for built in potential and depletion layer of a PN junction.

Answer

A pn junction is the boundary formed inside a single semiconductor crystal when one region is doped p-type (acceptors, NaN_a) and the adjacent region n-type (donors, NdN_d). It is the basic structure of diodes, BJTs, solar cells and LEDs.

   p-type           |           n-type
 + + + + +   - - |+ +   - - - - -
 + + + + +   - - |+ +   - - - - -
 holes (+)    depletion    electrons (-)
              region W
            <----E----

When formed, holes diffuse from p to n and electrons from n to p and recombine near the junction. This leaves a depletion region of fixed negative acceptor ions (p-side) and positive donor ions (n-side) with a built-in field from n to p, which stops further net diffusion.

Built-in potential

Consider an abrupt pn junction with acceptor concentration NaN_a on the p-side and donor concentration NdN_d on the n-side. Assumptions: abrupt junction, full ionisation, non-degenerate doping, depletion approximation (no free carriers in the depletion region), equilibrium.

When the two sides are joined, holes diffuse from p to n and electrons from n to p. They leave behind uncovered negative acceptor ions on the p-side and positive donor ions on the n-side. These form a space charge (depletion) region whose field opposes further diffusion. In equilibrium the Fermi level is constant through the junction and the bands bend by eV0eV_0.

        p-side  |  depletion  |  n-side
                | -Wp  0  +Wn |
  Ec ___________
                \_____________
  EF ............................. (flat)
  Ev ___________   eV0
                \_____________

In equilibrium, carrier concentrations at the two ends of the depletion region follow the Boltzmann factor:

pp0pn0=exp⁡(eV0kT)\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}} = \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right)

With pp0=Nap_{p0} = N_a and pn0=ni2/Ndp_{n0} = n_i^2/N_d:

NaNdni2=exp⁡(eV0kT)V0=kTeln⁡(NaNdni2)\begin{aligned} \frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2} &= \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right) \\ V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\left(\frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2}\right) \end{aligned}

(The same result follows from eV0=EFn−EFpeV_0 = E_{Fn} - E_{Fp} before contact, using EFn−EFi=kTln⁡(Nd/ni)E_{Fn} - E_{Fi} = kT\ln(N_d/n_i) and EFi−EFp=kTln⁡(Na/ni)E_{Fi} - E_{Fp} = kT\ln(N_a/n_i).)

Depletion width

Charge density: ρ=−eNa\rho = -eN_a for −Wp<x<0-W_p < x < 0 and ρ=+eNd\rho = +eN_d for 0<x<Wn0 < x < W_n.

  rho
  +eNd     +-----+
           |     |
 ---+------+-----+--- x
 -Wp|   0        Wn
    +------+
  -eNa
  1. Charge neutrality:
NaWp=NdWnN_a W_p = N_d W_n
  1. Poisson's equation: dEdx=ρε\dfrac{dE}{dx} = \dfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon}, with ε=ε0εr\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r. Integrating from −Wp-W_p (where E=0E = 0) gives a field that is maximum at the junction:
E0=−eNdWnε=−eNaWpεE_0 = -\frac{eN_d W_n}{\varepsilon} = -\frac{eN_a W_p}{\varepsilon}
  1. Potential: V0V_0 is the area under the triangular field plot:
V0=−12E0W=eNdWnW2ε,W=Wn+WpV_0 = -\frac{1}{2}E_0 W = \frac{eN_d W_n W}{2\varepsilon}, \quad W = W_n + W_p
  1. From neutrality, Wn=NaWNa+NdW_n = \dfrac{N_a W}{N_a + N_d}. Substituting:
V0=eNaNdW22ε(Na+Nd)W=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{e N_a N_d W^2}{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d)} \\ W &= \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d) V_0}{e N_a N_d}} \end{aligned}
   E(x)
  ---+-----------+---- x
  -Wp \         / Wn
       \       /
        \     /
         \   /
          \ /
          -E0

The depletion region extends mostly into the lightly doped side (Wn/Wp=Na/NdW_n/W_p = N_a/N_d). With reverse bias VrV_r, replace V0V_0 by V0+VrV_0 + V_r.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2075 Chaitra · 10 marks
  • 2072 Chaitra · 10 marks

How band bending occurs in semiconductors? Derive Einstein relationship.

Answer

Band bending

Band bending is the change of the energy band edges (EcE_c, EvE_v) with position inside a semiconductor. It happens whenever there is an electric field or a space charge, for example in a non-uniformly doped sample, at a pn junction, or at a metal-semiconductor contact or surface.

How it occurs:

  1. In thermal equilibrium the Fermi level is constant throughout the material.
  2. If doping varies with position (say NdN_d falls with xx), the gap Ec−EFE_c - E_F must be smaller where doping is high and larger where it is low, because n=Ncexp⁡[−(Ec−EF)/kT]n = N_c\exp[-(E_c - E_F)/kT].
  3. Electrons diffuse from high to low concentration, leaving positive donor ions. This space charge sets up an internal field EE and a potential V(x)V(x).
  4. The electron potential energy is −eV(x)-eV(x), so all bands shift by −eV(x)-eV(x): they bend. The slope gives the field:
E=1edEcdxE = \frac{1}{e}\frac{dE_c}{dx}
 high Nd                    low Nd
 Ec  \___
         \____
              \__________  Ec
 EF ------------------------  (flat)
 Ev  \___
         \____
              \__________  Ev
      ---> e- diffuse
      <--- e- drift (built-in E)

Electrons roll "downhill" in energy; holes float "uphill". At a pn junction the total bending equals eV0eV_0.

Einstein relation

In the sample above, in equilibrium, the electron current is zero:

Je=enμeE+eDedndx=0(1)J_e = en\mu_eE + eD_e\frac{dn}{dx} = 0 \quad (1)

With constant EFE_F:

dndx=−nkTdEcdx=−neEkT(2)\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{n}{kT}\frac{dE_c}{dx} = -\frac{neE}{kT} \quad (2)

Substituting (2) in (1):

enμeE−eDeneEkT=0Deμe=kTe\begin{aligned} en\mu_eE - eD_e\frac{neE}{kT} &= 0 \\ \frac{D_e}{\mu_e} &= \frac{kT}{e} \end{aligned}

Similarly for holes, Dh/μh=kT/eD_h/\mu_h = kT/e. This is the Einstein relation. At 300 K, kT/e=25.9kT/e = 25.9 mV, so for Si electrons (μe=1350\mu_e = 1350 cm2^2/Vs), De≈35D_e \approx 35 cm2^2/s.

It shows that drift and diffusion are linked: both depend on the same random thermal motion and scattering of carriers.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2075 Chaitra · 6 marks
  • 2071 Shrawan · 8 marks

A pn junction semiconductor has resistivity of 5Ω cm. If mobility of holes is 450 cm²/Vs, and electron mobility is three times the mobility of holes at room temperature, find i) Built in potential ii) Depletion width that lies in n-region and p-region respectively iii) Built in electric field at x=0.

Answer

Assumptions: silicon at 300 K; both the p-side and the n-side have resistivity 5 Ω\Omega cm; ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, εr=11.9\varepsilon_r = 11.9, kT/e=0.02586kT/e = 0.02586 V; abrupt junction, full ionisation.

Given: μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2/Vs, μe=3μh=1350\mu_e = 3\mu_h = 1350 cm2^2/Vs.

Doping levels from resistivity

Majority carriers dominate, so ρ=1/(eNμ)\rho = 1/(eN\mu):

Na=1ρeμh=15×1.602×10−19×450=2.77×1015 cm−3Nd=1ρeμe=15×1.602×10−19×1350=9.25×1014 cm−3\begin{aligned} N_a &= \frac{1}{\rho e\mu_h} = \frac{1}{5 \times 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 450} = 2.77\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ N_d &= \frac{1}{\rho e\mu_e} = \frac{1}{5 \times 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 1350} = 9.25\times10^{14}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

(i) Built-in potential

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2=0.02586ln⁡2.77×1015×9.25×1014(1.45×1010)2=0.02586×23.22=0.601 V\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} = 0.02586 \ln\frac{2.77\times10^{15} \times 9.25\times10^{14}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2} \\ &= 0.02586 \times 23.22 = 0.601\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

(ii) Depletion widths

With ε=11.9×8.854×10−14=1.054×10−12\varepsilon = 11.9 \times 8.854\times10^{-14} = 1.054\times10^{-12} F/cm:

W=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd=2×1.054×10−12×3.70×1015×0.6011.602×10−19×2.77×1015×9.25×1014=1.067×10−4 cm=1.067 μmWn=NaNa+NdW=0.75×1.067=0.800 μmWp=NdNa+NdW=0.25×1.067=0.267 μm\begin{aligned} W &= \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 1.054\times10^{-12} \times 3.70\times10^{15} \times 0.601}{1.602\times10^{-19} \times 2.77\times10^{15} \times 9.25\times10^{14}}} \\ &= 1.067\times10^{-4}\ \text{cm} = 1.067\ \mu\text{m} \\ W_n &= \frac{N_a}{N_a+N_d}W = 0.75 \times 1.067 = 0.800\ \mu\text{m} \\ W_p &= \frac{N_d}{N_a+N_d}W = 0.25 \times 1.067 = 0.267\ \mu\text{m} \end{aligned}

(iii) Built-in field at x=0x = 0

∣E0∣=eNdWnε=1.602×10−19×9.25×1014×8.00×10−51.054×10−12=1.13×104 V/cm\begin{aligned} |E_0| &= \frac{eN_dW_n}{\varepsilon} = \frac{1.602\times10^{-19} \times 9.25\times10^{14} \times 8.00\times10^{-5}}{1.054\times10^{-12}} \\ &= 1.13\times10^{4}\ \text{V/cm} \end{aligned}

It is directed from n to p. Check: 12∣E0∣W=0.5×1.126×104×1.067×10−4=0.601\frac{1}{2}|E_0|W = 0.5 \times 1.126\times10^4 \times 1.067\times10^{-4} = 0.601 V.

Answer: V0=0.601V_0 = 0.601 V; Wn=0.800W_n = 0.800 μ\mum, Wp=0.267W_p = 0.267 μ\mum (W=1.07W = 1.07 μ\mum); ∣E0∣=1.13×104|E_0| = 1.13\times10^4 V/cm.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2074 Asoj · 6 marks
  • 2068 Chaitra · 6 marks

Explain how carrier concentration of an n-type extrinsic semiconductor depends on temperature with necessary diagram and graphs.

Answer

In an n-type semiconductor (donor concentration NdN_d, donor level ΔE=Ec−Ed\Delta E = E_c - E_d below the conduction band), the electron concentration changes with temperature through three distinct regions. A plot of ln⁡n\ln n against 1/T1/T shows them clearly.

 ln n
   |        ionisation   extrinsic    intrinsic
   |          region      region       region
   |                                    /
   |                                   / slope
   |          ___________________     /  -Eg/2k
   |        /                    \__/
   |       / slope -ΔE/2k   n = Nd
   |      /
   +------|------------------|----------- 1/T
         1/Ts               1/Ti
   (high T at left, low T at right)
  n
    |                          /
    |                         /  intrinsic
    |        ________________/
 Nd |      /   extrinsic (n = Nd)
    |     /
    |    / ionisation
    |___/________________________ T
       ~100K   Ts         Ti (~500K for Si)

1. Ionisation (freeze-out) region: low T

At very low TT, electrons are bound to donors. As TT rises, donors ionise:

n=(12NcNd)1/2exp⁡(−ΔE2kT)n = \left(\frac{1}{2}N_cN_d\right)^{1/2}\exp\left(-\frac{\Delta E}{2kT}\right)

Slope of ln⁡n\ln n vs 1/T1/T is −ΔE/2k-\Delta E/2k. EFE_F lies between EdE_d and EcE_c.

2. Extrinsic (saturation) region: medium T

Above TsT_s almost all donors are ionised, and intrinsic generation is still small:

n≈Ndn \approx N_d

The concentration stays nearly constant. EF=Ec−kTln⁡(Nc/Nd)E_F = E_c - kT\ln(N_c/N_d) moves slowly towards mid-gap. Devices are designed to operate here (about 150 K to 450 K for Si with Nd=1015N_d = 10^{15} cm−3^{-3}).

3. Intrinsic region: high T

Above TiT_i, electrons excited across the band gap outnumber those from donors:

n≈ni=NcNvexp⁡(−Eg2kT)n \approx n_i = \sqrt{N_cN_v}\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right)

Slope is −Eg/2k-E_g/2k, much steeper. EFE_F approaches EFiE_{Fi} (mid-gap) and n≈pn \approx p; the material loses its n-type character.

Fermi level vs temperature

  E
 Ec |-------------------------
    | EF near Ed
    |   \_
    |     `-._
 Ei |---------`-.__________ (EF -> Ei)
    |
 Ev |-------------------------  T

Summary: nn rises exponentially, flattens at NdN_d, then rises again exponentially at high TT. TiT_i increases with doping and with band gap.

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2073 Chaitra · 6 marks
  • 2072 Chaitra · 6 marks

Present a comparison between Si and GaAs semiconductors with the help of their basic properties and E-k diagram.

Answer

Silicon is an elemental, indirect band gap semiconductor used in almost all integrated circuits. Gallium arsenide is a III-V compound, direct band gap semiconductor used for optoelectronic and high-frequency devices.

Basic properties

Property (300 K)SiGaAs
TypeElemental (group IV)Compound (III-V)
Crystal structureDiamondZinc blende
Lattice constant0.543 nm0.565 nm
Band gap EgE_g1.12 eV1.42 eV
Band gap typeIndirectDirect
Electron mobilityabout 1350 cm2^2/Vsabout 8500 cm2^2/Vs
Hole mobilityabout 450 cm2^2/Vsabout 400 cm2^2/Vs
Electron effective mass1.08me1.08m_e (dos)0.067me0.067m_e
Intrinsic nin_iabout 101010^{10} cm−3^{-3}about 2×1062\times10^6 cm−3^{-3}
Relative permittivity11.913.1
Native oxideStable SiO2_2None useful
Light emissionVery poorEfficient (LEDs, lasers)
Cost and processingCheap, matureCostly, brittle
Main usesICs, CMOS, power devices, solar cellsMicrowave/RF ICs, LEDs, laser diodes, high-speed devices

E-k diagrams

     Si (indirect)          GaAs (direct)
  E                       E
  |      \   /  CB        |    \   /  CB
  |       \_/             |     \_/
  |        ^ min at k0    |      | min at k=0
  |   Eg  /  (phonon)     |   Eg | photon
  |    /\                 |     /\
  |   /  \   VB           |    /  \  VB
  +---0----k0---- k       +-----0------ k
  • Si: CB minimum at k0≠0k_0 \ne 0, VB maximum at k=0k = 0. A transition needs a phonon for momentum, so light emission is poor.
  • GaAs: CB minimum and VB maximum both at k=0k = 0. Electrons drop directly and emit photons (λ≈1.24/1.42=0.87\lambda \approx 1.24/1.42 = 0.87 μ\mum). Sharp CB curvature gives small me∗=0.067mem_e^* = 0.067m_e and high mobility.
  • Asked 2 times
  • 2081 Chaitra (new course) · 4 marks
  • 2073 Chaitra · 8 marks

The density of states related effective masses of electrons and holes in silicon are approximately 1.08mₑ and 0.56mₑ respectively. The electron and hole drift mobilities at room temperature are 1350 and 450cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively. Calculate intrinsic concentration and intrinsic resistivity of silicon. The energy band gap for silicon is 1.1ev.

Answer

For an intrinsic semiconductor,

ni=NcNvexp⁡(−Eg2kT),Nc,v=2(2πme,h∗kTh2)3/2n_i = \sqrt{N_cN_v}\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right), \quad N_{c,v} = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m^*_{e,h}kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}

Data: me∗=1.08mem_e^* = 1.08m_e, mh∗=0.56mem_h^* = 0.56m_e, Eg=1.1E_g = 1.1 eV, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1}. Take T=300T = 300 K (room temperature), kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV, me=9.109×10−31m_e = 9.109\times10^{-31} kg, h=6.626×10−34h = 6.626\times10^{-34} J s, k=1.381×10−23k = 1.381\times10^{-23} J/K.

Effective densities of states

Nc=2[2π×1.08×9.109×10−31×1.381×10−23×300(6.626×10−34)2]3/2=2.82×1025 m−3=2.82×1019 cm−3Nv=Nc(0.561.08)3/2=1.05×1019 cm−3\begin{aligned} N_c &= 2\left[\frac{2\pi \times 1.08 \times 9.109\times10^{-31} \times 1.381\times10^{-23} \times 300}{(6.626\times10^{-34})^2}\right]^{3/2} \\ &= 2.82\times10^{25}\ \text{m}^{-3} = 2.82\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ N_v &= N_c\left(\frac{0.56}{1.08}\right)^{3/2} = 1.05\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Intrinsic concentration

NcNv=2.82×1019×1.05×1019=1.72×1019 cm−3Eg2kT=1.12×0.02586=21.27,e−21.27=5.80×10−10ni=1.72×1019×5.80×10−10=9.99×109 cm−3\begin{aligned} \sqrt{N_cN_v} &= \sqrt{2.82\times10^{19}\times1.05\times10^{19}} = 1.72\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ \frac{E_g}{2kT} &= \frac{1.1}{2\times0.02586} = 21.27, \quad e^{-21.27} = 5.80\times10^{-10} \\ n_i &= 1.72\times10^{19}\times5.80\times10^{-10} = 9.99\times10^{9}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Intrinsic resistivity

σi=eni(μe+μh)=1.602×10−19×9.99×109×1800=2.88×10−6 Ω−1cm−1ρi=1σi=3.47×105 Ω cm\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h) = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times9.99\times10^{9}\times1800 \\ &= 2.88\times10^{-6}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ \rho_i &= \frac{1}{\sigma_i} = 3.47\times10^{5}\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \end{aligned}

Answer: ni≈1.0×1010n_i \approx 1.0\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}; ρi≈3.47×105\rho_i \approx 3.47\times10^{5} Ω\Omega cm (3.47×1033.47\times10^{3} Ω\Omega m).

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2069 Asar · 6 marks
  • 2068 Shrawan · 8 marks

An n type silicon wafer is uniformly doped with 10¹⁶ antimoney atoms per cm³. Where will be the Fermi level compared to its intrinsic Fermi level? Where will Fermi level be shifted if the sample is further doped with 2×10¹⁷ boron atoms per cm³?

Answer

For a non-degenerate semiconductor, the Fermi level shift from the intrinsic level is

EF−EFi=kTln⁡nni (n-type),EFi−EF=kTln⁡pni (p-type)E_F - E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i} \ (\text{n-type}), \qquad E_{Fi} - E_F = kT\ln\frac{p}{n_i} \ (\text{p-type})

Assume: T=300T = 300 K, kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, full ionisation.

(a) Doped with 101610^{16} Sb cm−3^{-3}

Sb is a donor, so n=Nd=1016n = N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3}.

EF−EFi=0.02586ln⁡10161.45×1010=0.02586×13.44=0.348 eV\begin{aligned} E_F - E_{Fi} &= 0.02586\ln\frac{10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.02586\times13.44 = 0.348\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

EFE_F is 0.348 eV above EFiE_{Fi}.

(b) Further doped with 2×10172\times10^{17} B cm−3^{-3}

B is an acceptor. Since Na>NdN_a > N_d, the sample becomes p-type:

p=Na−Nd=2×1017−1016=1.9×1017 cm−3EFi−EF=0.02586ln⁡1.9×10171.45×1010=0.02586×16.39=0.424 eV\begin{aligned} p &= N_a - N_d = 2\times10^{17} - 10^{16} = 1.9\times10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ E_{Fi} - E_F &= 0.02586\ln\frac{1.9\times10^{17}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.02586\times16.39 = 0.424\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

EFE_F is now 0.424 eV below EFiE_{Fi}; it has moved down by 0.348+0.424=0.7720.348 + 0.424 = 0.772 eV.

 Ec ---------------------------
     EF (a) ....  0.348 eV above
 Ei - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     EF (b) ....  0.424 eV below
 Ev ---------------------------

Answer: (a) EF−EFi=+0.348E_F - E_{Fi} = +0.348 eV; (b) EF−EFi=−0.424E_F - E_{Fi} = -0.424 eV (p-type).

  • Asked 2 times
  • 2081 Chaitra (new course) · 5 marks
  • 2069 Chaitra · 6 marks

Derive the relation for finding built in potential of PN junction taking necessary assumptions.

Answer

The built-in potential V0V_0 is the potential difference across the depletion region of a pn junction in equilibrium. It balances the diffusion of carriers.

Assumptions

  1. Abrupt (step) junction: NaN_a on the p-side, NdN_d on the n-side, uniform.
  2. All dopants ionised: pp0=Nap_{p0} = N_a, nn0=Ndn_{n0} = N_d.
  3. Non-degenerate doping, so Boltzmann statistics and np=ni2np = n_i^2 hold.
  4. Thermal equilibrium, no applied voltage: EFE_F is constant through the device.
  5. Depletion region free of mobile carriers.

Derivation (using the Fermi level)

Before contact, measured from the intrinsic level:

EFn−EFi=kTln⁡Ndni,EFi−EFp=kTln⁡NaniE_{Fn} - E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{N_d}{n_i}, \qquad E_{Fi} - E_{Fp} = kT\ln\frac{N_a}{n_i}
   before contact             after contact
  p          n              p    |W|    n
 --Ec      --Ec           --Ec__
           ..EFn                 \___  Ec
 - Ei -    - Ei -     EF ...............
 ..EFp                     Ev__     eV0
 --Ev      --Ev                \___  Ev

On contact, electrons flow from n to p (and holes from p to n) until the Fermi levels line up. The bands on the n-side drop by eV0eV_0 relative to the p-side, where

eV0=EFn−EFp=kTln⁡Ndni+kTln⁡NaniV0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2\begin{aligned} eV_0 &= E_{Fn} - E_{Fp} = kT\ln\frac{N_d}{n_i} + kT\ln\frac{N_a}{n_i} \\ V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} \end{aligned}

Check using the Boltzmann relation

Hole concentrations on the two sides differ by the barrier eV0eV_0:

pp0pn0=exp⁡(eV0kT),pn0=ni2Nd\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}} = \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right), \quad p_{n0} = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} NaNdni2=exp⁡(eV0kT)  ⇒  V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} = \exp\left(\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right) \;\Rightarrow\; V_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}

Example: Si, Na=1017N_a = 10^{17}, Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16} cm−3^{-3}, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}: V0=0.02586ln⁡(4.76×1012)=0.755V_0 = 0.02586\ln(4.76\times10^{12}) = 0.755 V.

  • 2081 Bhadra · 2+2 marks

Differentiate between degenerate and non-degenerate semiconductors. Also write the difference between direct and indirect bandgap semiconductor with examples.

Answer

Degenerate vs non-degenerate

PointNon-degenerateDegenerate
DopingLight/moderate (≪Nc\ll N_c)Very heavy (≳1019\gtrsim 10^{19} cm−3^{-3} in Si)
Fermi levelIn the gap, a few kTkT from band edgesInside CB (n+^+) or VB (p+^+)
StatisticsBoltzmann; np=ni2np = n_i^2 holdsFermi-Dirac; np=ni2np = n_i^2 fails
BehaviourSemiconductor-likeMetal-like

Direct vs indirect band gap

PointDirectIndirect
Band edges in E-kCB min and VB max at same kkAt different kk
TransitionPhoton onlyNeeds photon plus phonon
Light emissionEfficientVery poor
ExamplesGaAs, InP, GaNSi, Ge, GaP
UseLEDs, lasersICs, transistors, solar cells
  • 2081 Bhadra · 6 marks

Calculate the resistance of pure silicon cubic crystal of 1cm³ at room temperature (27°C). What will be its new resistance if it is doped with 1 arsenic in 10⁶ silicon atoms. The atomic concentration of silicon is 5×10²² cm⁻³.

Answer

Assume: Si at 300 K, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350 and μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1}. A 1 cm3^3 cube has L=1L = 1 cm and A=1A = 1 cm2^2, so RR (in Ω\Omega) =ρ= \rho (in Ω\Omega cm).

Pure silicon

σi=eni(μe+μh)=1.602×10−19×1.45×1010×(1350+450)=4.18×10−6 Ω−1cm−1R=ρLA=1σi×1 cm1 cm2=2.39×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h) = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times1.45\times10^{10}\times(1350+450) \\ &= 4.18\times10^{-6}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R &= \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{1}{\sigma_i}\times\frac{1\ \text{cm}}{1\ \text{cm}^2} = 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Doped with 1 As in 10610^6 Si atoms

Arsenic is a donor:

Nd=5×1022106=5×1016 cm−3,n≈Ndp=ni2Nd=(1.45×1010)25×1016=4.2×103 cm−3 (negligible)σ=eNdμe=1.602×10−19×5×1016×1350=10.81 Ω−1cm−1R=110.81=0.0925 Ω\begin{aligned} N_d &= \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^6} = 5\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, \quad n \approx N_d \\ p &= \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{5\times10^{16}} = 4.2\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\ (\text{negligible}) \\ \sigma &= eN_d\mu_e = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times5\times10^{16}\times1350 = 10.81\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R &= \frac{1}{10.81} = 0.0925\ \Omega \end{aligned}

The resistance falls by a factor of about 2.6×1062.6\times10^{6}. (At this doping, impurity scattering lowers μe\mu_e to roughly 1000 cm2^2/Vs in practice, giving about 0.12 Ω\Omega; the textbook answer uses the pure-Si mobility.)

Answer: Pure Si: R=2.39×105R = 2.39\times10^{5} Ω\Omega. Doped: R≈0.0925R \approx 0.0925 Ω\Omega.

  • 2081 Baisakh · 6 marks

An n-type Si wafer has been doped uniformly with 10¹⁵ Arsenic atoms per cm³. Calculate its resistance and the position of the Fermi energy with respect to the intrinsic Fermi energy level EFi at 27°C. If this sample is further doped with 10²² Boron atoms per cm³, what will be change in its resistance?

Answer

Assume: Si at 300 K (27∘27^\circC), kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1}. Sample size is not given, so take a 1 cm cube: RR (Ω\Omega) =ρ= \rho (Ω\Omega cm).

Resistance with 101510^{15} As cm−3^{-3}

n≈Nd=1015 cm−3,p=ni2n=2.1×105 cm−3 (negligible)σ=eNdμe=1.602×10−19×1015×1350=0.216 Ω−1cm−1ρ=4.62 Ω cm  ⇒  R=4.62 Ω\begin{aligned} n &\approx N_d = 10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, \quad p = \frac{n_i^2}{n} = 2.1\times10^{5}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\ (\text{negligible}) \\ \sigma &= eN_d\mu_e = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times10^{15}\times1350 = 0.216\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ \rho &= 4.62\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \;\Rightarrow\; R = 4.62\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Fermi level

EF−EFi=kTln⁡Ndni=0.02586ln⁡10151.45×1010=0.02586×11.14=0.288 eV\begin{aligned} E_F - E_{Fi} &= kT\ln\frac{N_d}{n_i} = 0.02586\ln\frac{10^{15}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.02586\times11.14 = 0.288\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

EFE_F is 0.288 eV above EFiE_{Fi}.

Further doped with 102210^{22} B cm−3^{-3}

Na≫NdN_a \gg N_d, so the sample becomes strongly p-type: p=Na−Nd≈1022p = N_a - N_d \approx 10^{22} cm−3^{-3}.

σ=epμh=1.602×10−19×1022×450=7.21×105 Ω−1cm−1ρ=1.39×10−6 Ω cm  ⇒  R=1.39×10−6 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= ep\mu_h = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times10^{22}\times450 = 7.21\times10^{5}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ \rho &= 1.39\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \;\Rightarrow\; R = 1.39\times10^{-6}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

The resistance falls by a factor of 4.62/1.39×10−6≈3.3×1064.62/1.39\times10^{-6} \approx 3.3\times10^{6}.

Note: 102210^{22} cm−3^{-3} is 20% of all Si atoms, so the material would be heavily degenerate and the real hole mobility far below 450 cm2^2/Vs; the figure above follows the simple model as asked. (If the intended value is 101710^{17} cm−3^{-3}, then p=9.9×1016p = 9.9\times10^{16} cm−3^{-3} and R=0.140R = 0.140 Ω\Omega.)

Answer: R=4.62R = 4.62 Ω\Omega, EF−EFi=0.288E_F - E_{Fi} = 0.288 eV; after boron doping, p-type with R≈1.39×10−6R \approx 1.39\times10^{-6} Ω\Omega.

  • 2080 Bhadra · 8 marks

Differentiate between non-degenerate and degenerate semiconductor. Compare between Si and GaAs semiconductor with their respective E-K curves.

Answer

Non-degenerate vs degenerate semiconductor

A non-degenerate semiconductor is moderately doped (n≪Ncn \ll N_c), so EFE_F lies inside the band gap; a degenerate one is so heavily doped (about 101910^{19} cm−3^{-3} or more in Si) that EFE_F enters the conduction or valence band.

PointNon-degenerateDegenerate
DopingNd≪NcN_d \ll N_cNd≳NcN_d \gtrsim N_c
Fermi levelIn gap, over 3kT3kT from band edgesInside CB (n+^+) or VB (p+^+)
StatisticsBoltzmann; np=ni2np = n_i^2Fermi-Dirac; np≠ni2np \ne n_i^2
Impurity levelsDiscreteMerge into an impurity band
BehaviourSemiconductorMetal-like, weak T dependence
UsesNormal diodes, transistorsTunnel diodes, lasers, ohmic contacts

Comparison of Si and GaAs

PropertySiGaAs
Band gap1.12 eV, indirect1.42 eV, direct
Electron mobilityabout 1350 cm2^2/Vsabout 8500 cm2^2/Vs
Electron effective mass1.08me1.08m_e (dos)0.067me0.067m_e
nin_i at 300 Kabout 101010^{10} cm−3^{-3}about 2×1062\times10^{6} cm−3^{-3}
StructureDiamondZinc blende
Native oxideSiO2_2None useful
UseICs, power devices, solar cellsLEDs, lasers, microwave ICs

E-k curves

     Si (indirect)          GaAs (direct)
  E                       E
  |      \   /  CB        |    \   /  CB
  |       \_/             |     \_/
  |        ^ min at k0    |      | min at k=0
  |   Eg  /  (phonon)     |   Eg | photon
  |    /\                 |     /\
  |   /  \   VB           |    /  \  VB
  +---0----k0---- k       +-----0------ k
  • Si: CB minimum at k0≠0k_0 \ne 0, VB maximum at k=0k = 0. A transition needs a phonon for momentum, so light emission is poor.
  • GaAs: CB minimum and VB maximum both at k=0k = 0. Electrons drop directly and emit photons (λ≈1.24/1.42=0.87\lambda \approx 1.24/1.42 = 0.87 μ\mum). Sharp CB curvature gives small me∗=0.067mem_e^* = 0.067m_e and high mobility.
  • 2080 Bhadra · 8 marks

Find the resistance of a cubic pure Si-Crystals at 300K. If this silicon sample is doped with Sb (one Sb in 10⁹ Si-atoms), what will be the new change in its resistance? Take atomic concentration = 5×10²² cm⁻³.

Answer

Assume: 1 cm cube (L=1L = 1 cm, A=1A = 1 cm2^2), ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450\mu_h = 450 cm2^2V−1^{-1}s−1^{-1} at 300 K.

Pure silicon

σi=eni(μe+μh)=1.602×10−19×1.45×1010×(1350+450)=4.18×10−6 Ω−1cm−1R=ρLA=1σi×1 cm1 cm2=2.39×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h) = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times1.45\times10^{10}\times(1350+450) \\ &= 4.18\times10^{-6}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R &= \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{1}{\sigma_i}\times\frac{1\ \text{cm}}{1\ \text{cm}^2} = 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Doped with 1 Sb per 10910^9 Si atoms

Sb is a donor:

Nd=5×1022109=5×1013 cm−3,n≈Ndp=ni2Nd=4.2×106 cm−3 (negligible)σ=eNdμe=1.602×10−19×5×1013×1350=1.081×10−2 Ω−1cm−1R′=1σ=92.5 Ω\begin{aligned} N_d &= \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^9} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, \quad n \approx N_d \\ p &= \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} = 4.2\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\ (\text{negligible}) \\ \sigma &= eN_d\mu_e = 1.602\times10^{-19}\times5\times10^{13}\times1350 = 1.081\times10^{-2}\ \Omega^{-1}\text{cm}^{-1} \\ R' &= \frac{1}{\sigma} = 92.5\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Change in resistance

ΔR=2.39×105−92.5≈2.39×105 Ω (decrease),RR′=2586\Delta R = 2.39\times10^{5} - 92.5 \approx 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \ (\text{decrease}), \qquad \frac{R}{R'} = 2586

Answer: Pure Si: 2.39×1052.39\times10^{5} Ω\Omega; doped: 92.5 Ω\Omega. Resistance drops by about 2.39×1052.39\times10^5 Ω\Omega (about 2600 times), even though only one atom in a billion is replaced.

  • 2080 Bhadra · 6 marks

An n-type Si wafer has been doped uniformly with 10¹⁵ Arsenic atoms per cm³. Calculate the position of the Fermi energy level with respect to the intrinsic Fermi energy level EFi at 27 °C. If this sample is further doped with 2×10¹⁶ Boron atoms per cm³, where will the Fermi level be shifted?

Answer

For non-degenerate Si,

EF−EFi=kTln⁡nni,EFi−EF=kTln⁡pniE_F - E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i}, \qquad E_{Fi} - E_F = kT\ln\frac{p}{n_i}

Assume: T=300T = 300 K (27∘27^\circC), kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV, ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm−3^{-3}, full ionisation.

With 101510^{15} As cm−3^{-3}

n=Nd=1015 cm−3EF−EFi=0.02586ln⁡10151.45×1010=0.02586×11.14=0.288 eV\begin{aligned} n &= N_d = 10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ E_F - E_{Fi} &= 0.02586\ln\frac{10^{15}}{1.45\times10^{10}} = 0.02586\times11.14 \\ &= 0.288\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

EFE_F is 0.288 eV above EFiE_{Fi}.

After adding 2×10162\times10^{16} B cm−3^{-3}

Na>NdN_a > N_d, so the sample is now p-type:

p=Na−Nd=2×1016−1015=1.9×1016 cm−3EFi−EF=0.02586ln⁡1.9×10161.45×1010=0.02586×14.09=0.364 eV\begin{aligned} p &= N_a - N_d = 2\times10^{16} - 10^{15} = 1.9\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \\ E_{Fi} - E_F &= 0.02586\ln\frac{1.9\times10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}} = 0.02586\times14.09 \\ &= 0.364\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

EFE_F is 0.364 eV below EFiE_{Fi}, so it has shifted down by 0.288+0.364=0.6520.288 + 0.364 = 0.652 eV.

 Ec ---------------------------
     EF (As only) .. +0.288 eV
 Ei - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     EF (As + B)  .. -0.364 eV
 Ev ---------------------------

Answer: EF−EFi=0.288E_F - E_{Fi} = 0.288 eV (n-type); after boron, EF−EFi=−0.364E_F - E_{Fi} = -0.364 eV (p-type).

  • 2080 Baisakh · 8 marks

An n-type silicon wafer is uniformly doped with 10¹⁷ antimoney per cm³. Where will the Fermi level compared to its intrinsic Fermi level? Where will the Fermi level be shifted if the sample is further doped with 2×10¹⁶ atoms per cm³?

Answer

Antimony (group V) is a donor, so the wafer is n-type and the Fermi level EFnE_{Fn} lies above the intrinsic level EFiE_{Fi}. For a non-degenerate semiconductor n=ni e(EFn−EFi)/kTn = n_i\,e^{(E_{Fn}-E_{Fi})/kT}, so

EFn−EFi=kTln⁡nniE_{Fn}-E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i}

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

Case 1: Nd=1017 cm−3N_d = 10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3} antimony

At room temperature all donors are ionised and Nd≫niN_d \gg n_i, so n≈Nd=1017 cm−3n \approx N_d = 10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

EFn−EFi=0.02585ln⁡10171.45×1010=0.02585×15.75=0.407 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{17}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.02585\times15.75 = 0.407\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Answer: the Fermi level is 0.407 eV above EFiE_{Fi}.

Case 2: further doped with 2×1016 cm−32\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} atoms

The type of the second dopant is not printed; the usual reading is that it is an acceptor (e.g. boron), Na=2×1016 cm−3N_a = 2\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}. The acceptors capture an equal number of the donated electrons (compensation):

n=Nd−Na=1017−2×1016=8×1016 cm−3n = N_d - N_a = 10^{17} - 2\times10^{16} = 8\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} EFn−EFi=0.02585ln⁡8×10161.45×1010=0.401 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= 0.02585\ln\frac{8\times10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.401\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Answer: the Fermi level is still above EFiE_{Fi}, now 0.401 eV above it, i.e. it moves down by about 0.006 eV towards EFiE_{Fi}. The sample stays n-type because Nd>NaN_d > N_a.

(If the extra 2×10162\times10^{16} atoms were more antimony, n=1.2×1017n = 1.2\times10^{17} and EF−EFi=0.412E_F - E_{Fi} = 0.412 eV, a shift of 0.005 eV upward.)

 Ec ---------------------------
 EFn ......... (0.407 eV) 1st
 EFn ......... (0.401 eV) 2nd
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Ev ---------------------------
  • 2079 Bhadra · 6 marks

Calculate the resistance of pure silicone cubic crystal of 8 cm³ at room temperature. What will be the resistance of the cube when it is doped with 1 arsenic in 5 × 10⁹ Si atom? Take atomic concentration of Si is 5 × 10²² cm⁻³.

Answer

The cube volume is 8 cm³, so each side is L=2L = 2 cm and the face area is A=4 cm2A = 4\ \text{cm}^2. For a cube

R=ρLA=ρL=ρ2 cmR = \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{\rho}{L} = \frac{\rho}{2\ \text{cm}}

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

Pure (intrinsic) silicon

σi=nie(μe+μh)=1.45×1010×1.6×10−19×1800=4.176×10−6 S cm−1ρi=1/σi=2.395×105 Ω cmRi=2.395×1052=1.197×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= n_i e(\mu_e+\mu_h) \\ &= 1.45\times10^{10}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\times1800 \\ &= 4.176\times10^{-6}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho_i &= 1/\sigma_i = 2.395\times10^{5}\ \Omega\,\text{cm}\\ R_i &= \frac{2.395\times10^{5}}{2} = 1.197\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Doped with 1 As per 5×1095\times10^9 Si atoms

Arsenic is a donor:

Nd=5×10225×109=1013 cm−3N_d = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{5\times10^{9}} = 10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Since Nd≫niN_d \gg n_i, n≈Nd=1013 cm−3n \approx N_d = 10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3} and p=ni2/Nd=2.1×107 cm−3p = n_i^2/N_d = 2.1\times10^{7}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (negligible).

σ=e(nμe+pμh)≈eNdμe=1.6×10−19×1013×1350=2.16×10−3 S cm−1ρ=463 Ω cmR=4632=231.5 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) \approx eN_d\mu_e \\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{13}\times1350 \\ &= 2.16\times10^{-3}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 463\ \Omega\,\text{cm}\\ R &= \frac{463}{2} = 231.5\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Answer: pure cube R≈1.20×105 ΩR \approx 1.20\times10^{5}\ \Omega; doped cube R≈231.5 ΩR \approx 231.5\ \Omega — about 517 times smaller, even though only one atom in five billion was replaced.

  • 2078 Kartik · 6 marks

In an n-type semiconductor, the Fermi level lies 0.5eV below the conduction band at 300 K, if the temperature is increased to 310 K, find the new position of Fermi level.

Answer

In an n-type semiconductor (non-degenerate, all donors ionised)

n=Nc e−(Ec−EF)/kT  ⇒  Ec−EF=kTln⁡NcNdn = N_c\,e^{-(E_c-E_F)/kT} \;\Rightarrow\; E_c - E_F = kT\ln\frac{N_c}{N_d}

In the extrinsic range n=Ndn = N_d is fixed. If the small change of NcN_c with temperature is neglected, ln⁡(Nc/Nd)\ln(N_c/N_d) is constant, so Ec−EF∝TE_c-E_F \propto T.

Calculation

(Ec−EF)310(Ec−EF)300=310300(Ec−EF)310=0.5×310300=0.5167 eV\begin{aligned} \frac{(E_c-E_F)_{310}}{(E_c-E_F)_{300}} &= \frac{310}{300}\\ (E_c-E_F)_{310} &= 0.5\times\frac{310}{300} \\ &= 0.5167\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Answer: at 310 K the Fermi level lies about 0.517 eV below the conduction band edge, i.e. it moves down by about 0.017 eV, towards the middle of the gap.

More exact check (including Nc∝T3/2N_c \propto T^{3/2})

(Ec−EF)310=310300(0.5)+k(310)32ln⁡310300=0.5167+0.0013=0.518 eV\begin{aligned} (E_c-E_F)_{310} &= \frac{310}{300}(0.5) + k(310)\tfrac{3}{2}\ln\frac{310}{300}\\ &= 0.5167 + 0.0013 = 0.518\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

The difference is only about 1 meV, so the simple answer is acceptable.

Physical meaning

As temperature rises, more electrons can be thermally excited across the gap and the material moves towards intrinsic behaviour, so the Fermi level drops from near EcE_c towards EFiE_{Fi} (mid-gap).

  • 2078 Kartik · 6 marks

Find the resistance of a cubic pure silicon crystal. Find the resistance when the Si-crystal is doped with one Arsenic atom in 10⁹ Silicon atoms. If the sample is further doped with 10¹⁴ Boron atoms what will be the new resistance?

Answer

The size of the cube is not stated; take the usual 1 cm³ cube (L = 1 cm, A = 1 cm²), so R=ρL/AR = \rho L/A is numerically equal to ρ\rho. The boron dose is taken as 101410^{14} atoms per cm³. Atomic concentration of Si = 5×1022 cm−35\times10^{22}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

(a) Pure silicon

σi=nie(μe+μh)=1.45×1010×1.6×10−19×1800=4.176×10−6 S cm−1Ri=1/σi=2.39×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= n_ie(\mu_e+\mu_h) = 1.45\times10^{10}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\times1800\\ &= 4.176\times10^{-6}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R_i &= 1/\sigma_i = 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

(b) 1 As in 10910^9 Si atoms

Nd=5×1022109=5×1013 cm−3,n≈Nd,p=ni2Nd=4.2×106 cm−3N_d = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^9} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, \quad n \approx N_d,\quad p = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} = 4.2\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3} σ≈eNdμe=1.6×10−19×5×1013×1350=1.08×10−2 S cm−1R=92.6 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &\approx eN_d\mu_e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times5\times10^{13}\times1350\\ &= 1.08\times10^{-2}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R &= 92.6\ \Omega \end{aligned}

(c) Further doped with 101410^{14} boron cm⁻³

Boron is an acceptor. Since Na>NdN_a > N_d the sample becomes p-type (compensated):

p=Na−Nd=1014−5×1013=5×1013 cm−3,n=ni2p=4.2×106 cm−3p = N_a - N_d = 10^{14} - 5\times10^{13} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\quad n = \frac{n_i^2}{p} = 4.2\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3} σ≈epμh=1.6×10−19×5×1013×450=3.6×10−3 S cm−1R=277.8 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &\approx ep\mu_h = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times5\times10^{13}\times450\\ &= 3.6\times10^{-3}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R &= 277.8\ \Omega \end{aligned}
SampleCarriers (cm⁻³)R (Ω)
Pure Sin=p=1.45×1010n=p=1.45\times10^{10}2.39×1052.39\times10^{5}
As dopedn=5×1013n = 5\times10^{13}92.6
As + Bp=5×1013p = 5\times10^{13}277.8

Answer: Rpure≈2.39×105 ΩR_{pure} \approx 2.39\times10^5\ \Omega, RAs≈92.6 ΩR_{As} \approx 92.6\ \Omega, RAs+B≈277.8 ΩR_{As+B} \approx 277.8\ \Omega. The resistance rises after boron doping because the carrier number is the same but holes have a lower mobility than electrons.

  • 2078 Kartik · 4 marks

Differentiate between direct and indirect band gap semiconductors with examples.

Answer

A semiconductor is direct band gap if the minimum of the conduction band and the maximum of the valence band occur at the same crystal momentum k; it is indirect band gap if they occur at different k values.

   Direct (GaAs)          Indirect (Si)
  E                      E
  |   \   /  CB          |        \   /  CB
  |    \_/               |         \_/
  |     |  hv            |  ___      ^
  |    /^\               | /   \  phonon
  |   /   \  VB          |/     \ needed
  +---------- k          +------------ k
      same k              k(max) != k(min)

Comparison

PointDirect band gapIndirect band gap
Band edgesCB min and VB max at same kAt different k
TransitionElectron drops straight downNeeds a change in momentum
Third particleNot neededPhonon (lattice vibration) needed
RecombinationRadiative: energy out as photonMostly non-radiative: energy out as heat
Recombination rateHigh, short lifetime (ns)Low, long lifetime (µs–ms)
Light emissionEfficientVery poor
Absorption edgeSharp, strongGradual, weak
UsesLEDs, laser diodes, photodetectorsDiodes, transistors, ICs, solar cells
ExamplesGaAs (1.42 eV), InP, GaN, CdSSi (1.1 eV), Ge (0.66 eV), GaP

Key point

In a direct gap material an electron at the bottom of the CB can recombine with a hole at the top of the VB and give out a photon of energy hν≈Egh\nu \approx E_g while conserving momentum. In an indirect material the photon carries almost no momentum, so a phonon must take part; this three-body process is unlikely, which is why silicon cannot be used to make efficient LEDs or lasers.

  • 2078 Bhadra · 8 marks

In a pure germanium of 50g, 5μg of Arsenic is thoroughly mixed in molten form. The density of germanium is 5.46 gcm⁻³ and atomic weight of Arsenic is 74.92 gmol⁻¹. Find the total resistance of a wire of such n-type material having length of 1cm and cross-sectional area of 2.25 × 10⁻⁴cm². Take mobility of electrons in germanium = 3600 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹.

Answer

Arsenic is a donor; each As atom gives one free electron. Find the donor concentration from the masses, then the conductivity and resistance.

Given: mass of Ge = 50 g, density 5.46 g cm⁻³; mass of As = 5 µg = 5×10−65\times10^{-6} g, M = 74.92 g mol⁻¹; μe=3600 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e = 3600\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}; L = 1 cm; A=2.25×10−4 cm2A = 2.25\times10^{-4}\ \text{cm}^2; NA=6.022×1023N_A = 6.022\times10^{23}.

Step 1: Volume of germanium

V=mρ=505.46=9.158 cm3V = \frac{m}{\rho} = \frac{50}{5.46} = 9.158\ \text{cm}^3

(The tiny mass of As does not change the volume.)

Step 2: Number of As atoms

NAs=5×10−674.92×6.022×1023=4.019×1016N_{As} = \frac{5\times10^{-6}}{74.92}\times6.022\times10^{23} = 4.019\times10^{16}

Step 3: Donor (electron) concentration

Nd=4.019×10169.158=4.389×1015 cm−3N_d = \frac{4.019\times10^{16}}{9.158} = 4.389\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

All donors are ionised at room temperature and Nd≫ni(Ge)≈2.4×1013N_d \gg n_i(\text{Ge}) \approx 2.4\times10^{13}, so n≈Ndn \approx N_d and the hole contribution is negligible.

Step 4: Conductivity and resistivity

σ=eNdμe=1.6×10−19×4.389×1015×3600=2.528 S cm−1ρ=1/σ=0.3956 Ω cm\begin{aligned} \sigma &= eN_d\mu_e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times4.389\times10^{15}\times3600\\ &= 2.528\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 1/\sigma = 0.3956\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \end{aligned}

Step 5: Resistance of the wire

R=ρLA=0.3956×12.25×10−4=1758 Ω\begin{aligned} R &= \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{0.3956\times1}{2.25\times10^{-4}}\\ &= 1758\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Answer: Nd≈4.39×1015 cm−3N_d \approx 4.39\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, ρ≈0.396 Ω\rho \approx 0.396\ \Omega cm, and the wire resistance R≈1.76 kΩR \approx 1.76\ \text{k}\Omega.

  • 2076 Chaitra · 4 marks

Explain how does the band bends in semiconductor.

Answer

Band bending is the curving of the energy bands (EcE_c, EvE_v, EFiE_{Fi}) with position inside a semiconductor. It happens wherever there is an electric field, i.e. wherever the electrostatic potential V(x)V(x) changes with position.

Why the bands bend

The energy of an electron at a point is its band energy plus its potential energy −eV(x)-eV(x):

Ec(x)=Ec0−eV(x)E_c(x) = E_{c0} - eV(x)

The field is E=−dV/dx\mathcal{E} = -dV/dx, so

E=1edEcdx\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{e}\frac{dE_c}{dx}
  • Where E=0\mathcal{E} = 0 the bands are flat.
  • Where a field exists, all three levels shift by the same amount, so the band gap EgE_g stays constant but the bands tilt or curve.
  • An electron "rolls down" the conduction band and a hole "floats up" the valence band.

Common cases

  1. Applied voltage on a uniform bar: the field is uniform, so the bands tilt in a straight line. The Fermi level is no longer flat; current flows.
  2. pn junction (equilibrium): electrons diffuse to the p side and holes to the n side, leaving fixed ion charges. These create a built-in field. Because the Fermi level must be the same throughout in equilibrium, the bands bend in the depletion region by eV0eV_0.
  3. Non-uniform doping, metal–semiconductor contact, surface charges: each creates a local space charge and field, so the bands bend near that region.
 n side            p side
 Ec ----\
         \__________ Ec
 EF ------------------- EF (flat)
 Ev ----\
         \__________ Ev
       |<-W->|  depletion region
   bending = eV0

Key rule

In equilibrium the Fermi level is flat; any difference in doping is accommodated by bending of EcE_c and EvE_v. The amount of bending equals ee times the potential difference across the region.

  • 2076 Chaitra · 4 marks

Describe the Direct and indirect recombination process between an electron and hole in semiconductor with necessary diagrams.

Answer

Recombination is the process in which a conduction band electron falls into an empty state (hole) in the valence band, so a free electron–hole pair disappears. It balances thermal generation in equilibrium.

1. Direct (band-to-band) recombination

The electron at the bottom of the CB falls straight into a hole at the top of the VB. Energy ≈Eg\approx E_g is given out as a photon (hν=Egh\nu = E_g).

  • Possible only when CB minimum and VB maximum are at the same k (direct band gap: GaAs, InP).
  • Rate is proportional to both concentrations: R=BnpR = Bnp.
  • Fast; used in LEDs and lasers.
 Ec ----- e ---------
          |
          |  photon hv = Eg  ~~>
          v
 Ev ----- h ---------

2. Indirect recombination (through recombination centres)

In indirect materials (Si, Ge) direct transition is very unlikely because momentum must also change. Instead recombination takes place through a recombination centre – an impurity (Au, Fe) or crystal defect – that creates a localised level ErE_r deep in the gap.

Steps:

  1. The centre captures a conduction electron; energy is given to lattice vibrations (phonons).
  2. The trapped electron then drops into the valence band and fills a hole (or the centre captures a hole).
  3. The centre is empty again and ready for the next event.
 Ec ----- e ---------
          | (phonons)
 Er  ...  * ......... recombination centre
          | (phonons)
 Ev ----- h ---------

The energy is released mainly as heat in small steps. Minority carrier lifetime is set by the centre density: τ=1/(CrNr)\tau = 1/(C_r N_r) approximately.

Comparison

PointDirectIndirect
PathCB → VB straightCB → centre → VB
Energy given asPhoton (light)Phonons (heat)
MaterialsGaAs, InPSi, Ge
LifetimeShort (ns)Longer, set by impurities
  • 2076 Chaitra · 4 marks

Find the resistance of p-n junction Germanium diode if temperature is 27°C and I₀ = 1μA for an applied forward bias of 0.2 Volt.

Answer

The diode current is given by the Shockley diode equation

I=I0(eV/ηVT−1)I = I_0\left(e^{V/\eta V_T}-1\right)

with η=1\eta = 1 for germanium and VT=kT/eV_T = kT/e.

Given: T=27∘C=300T = 27^\circ\text{C} = 300 K, I0=1 μAI_0 = 1\ \mu\text{A}, V=0.2V = 0.2 V.

VT=kTe=1.38×10−23×3001.6×10−19=0.02585 VV_T = \frac{kT}{e} = \frac{1.38\times10^{-23}\times300}{1.6\times10^{-19}} = 0.02585\ \text{V}

Forward current

VVT=0.20.02585=7.737e7.737=2291.5I=10−6(2291.5−1)=2.29×10−3 A=2.29 mA\begin{aligned} \frac{V}{V_T} &= \frac{0.2}{0.02585} = 7.737\\ e^{7.737} &= 2291.5\\ I &= 10^{-6}(2291.5-1) = 2.29\times10^{-3}\ \text{A} = 2.29\ \text{mA} \end{aligned}

Static (DC) resistance

RDC=VI=0.22.29×10−3=87.3 ΩR_{DC} = \frac{V}{I} = \frac{0.2}{2.29\times10^{-3}} = 87.3\ \Omega

Dynamic (AC) resistance

rd=dVdI=ηVTI+I0=0.025852.29×10−3+10−6=11.3 Ω\begin{aligned} r_d &= \frac{dV}{dI} = \frac{\eta V_T}{I+I_0}\\ &= \frac{0.02585}{2.29\times10^{-3}+10^{-6}} = 11.3\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Answer: forward current ≈ 2.29 mA; static resistance ≈ 87.3 Ω; dynamic resistance ≈ 11.3 Ω.

The static value is the ratio V/I at the operating point; the dynamic value is the slope resistance seen by small signals.

  • 2076 Asoj · 6 marks

An n-type silicon wafer is uniformly doped with 10¹⁶ antimony atoms per cm³. Where will be the Fermi level compared to its intrinsic Fermi level?

Answer

Antimony is a group V donor, so the wafer is n-type and the Fermi level moves above the intrinsic Fermi level EFiE_{Fi}.

Relation used

For a non-degenerate semiconductor

n=niexp⁡(EFn−EFikT)  ⇒  EFn−EFi=kTln⁡nnin = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_{Fn}-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right) \;\Rightarrow\; E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i}

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

At room temperature all donors are ionised and Nd=1016≫niN_d = 10^{16} \gg n_i, so

n≈Nd=1016 cm−3,p=ni2Nd=2.1×104 cm−3n \approx N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} = 2.1\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Calculation

EFn−EFi=0.02585ln⁡10161.45×1010=0.02585ln⁡(6.90×105)=0.02585×13.44=0.348 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}}\\ &= 0.02585\ln(6.90\times10^{5})\\ &= 0.02585\times13.44\\ &= 0.348\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Answer: the Fermi level lies about 0.348 eV above the intrinsic Fermi level (about 0.2 eV below EcE_c, since Ec−EFi≈0.55E_c - E_{Fi} \approx 0.55 eV).

 Ec -----------------------------
         ~0.20 eV
 EFn ............................
         0.348 eV
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
         ~0.55 eV
 Ev -----------------------------

The level is still well below EcE_c (more than 3kT3kT), so the non-degenerate formula used is valid.

  • 2076 Asoj · 8 marks

Define p-type semiconductor. Derive an expression for minority carrier suppression and hence prove that the conductivity in p-type semiconductor is mainly due to the hole.

Answer

A p-type semiconductor is an intrinsic semiconductor (Si, Ge) doped with a small amount of a trivalent (group III) impurity such as boron, aluminium, gallium or indium. Each impurity atom forms only three covalent bonds, so one bond is incomplete; it easily accepts an electron from the valence band, creating a hole. Such impurities are called acceptors (NaN_a). Holes are the majority carriers and electrons the minority carriers.

 Ec ------------------------
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - -
 EFp .......................
 Ea  - o - o - o - (acceptors, ~0.05 eV)
 Ev ------------------------

Derivation of minority carrier suppression

1. Mass action law. In equilibrium, for any non-degenerate semiconductor,

np=ni2np = n_i^2

2. Charge neutrality. Positive charges = negative charges:

p=n+Na−p = n + N_a^-

At room temperature all acceptors are ionised, Na−=NaN_a^- = N_a.

3. Solve. Put n=ni2/pn = n_i^2/p:

p2−Nap−ni2=0  ⇒  p=Na2+Na24+ni2p^2 - N_ap - n_i^2 = 0 \;\Rightarrow\; p = \frac{N_a}{2} + \sqrt{\frac{N_a^2}{4}+n_i^2}

For normal doping Na≫niN_a \gg n_i, so

p≈Na,n=ni2Nap \approx N_a,\qquad n = \frac{n_i^2}{N_a}

4. Suppression. Compare with the intrinsic value:

nni=niNa≪1\frac{n}{n_i} = \frac{n_i}{N_a} \ll 1

Adding acceptors raises pp above nin_i by the factor Na/niN_a/n_i and lowers nn below nin_i by the same factor. The extra holes recombine with the thermally generated electrons. This reduction of the minority electron concentration is called minority carrier suppression.

Example: Si with Na=1016N_a = 10^{16}: p=1016p = 10^{16}, n=(1.45×1010)2/1016=2.1×104 cm−3n = (1.45\times10^{10})^2/10^{16} = 2.1\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

Conductivity is due to holes

σ=e(nμe+pμh)=e(ni2Naμe+Naμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) = e\left(\frac{n_i^2}{N_a}\mu_e + N_a\mu_h\right)

Ratio of the two terms:

nμepμh=ni2Na2⋅μeμh\frac{n\mu_e}{p\mu_h} = \frac{n_i^2}{N_a^2}\cdot\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_h}

For the example: (1.45×1010/1016)2×3≈6×10−12(1.45\times10^{10}/10^{16})^2\times3 \approx 6\times10^{-12}. Even though μe≈3μh\mu_e \approx 3\mu_h, the electron term is negligible, so

σ≈eNaμh\sigma \approx eN_a\mu_h

Hence the conductivity of a p-type semiconductor is almost entirely due to holes and is fixed by the acceptor concentration.

  • 2076 Asoj · 4 marks

If it is desired to raise Fermi level to 0.7 eV above the intrinsic Fermi level at room temperature, what type of dopant is to be used? Also determine its doping level if the used intrinsic semiconductor is silicon.

Answer

To raise the Fermi level above EFiE_{Fi}, electrons must be made majority carriers, so a donor (n-type, group V) dopant such as phosphorus, arsenic or antimony must be used.

Doping level

For a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor

n=Nd=niexp⁡(EFn−EFikT)n = N_d = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_{Fn}-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right)

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

EFn−EFikT=0.70.02585=27.08Nd=1.45×1010×e27.08=1.45×1010×5.75×1011=8.34×1021 cm−3\begin{aligned} \frac{E_{Fn}-E_{Fi}}{kT} &= \frac{0.7}{0.02585} = 27.08\\ N_d &= 1.45\times10^{10}\times e^{27.08}\\ &= 1.45\times10^{10}\times5.75\times10^{11}\\ &= 8.34\times10^{21}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Answer: donor doping, Nd≈8.3×1021 cm−3N_d \approx 8.3\times10^{21}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (by the formula).

Important remark

For silicon Eg≈1.1E_g \approx 1.1 eV, so Ec−EFi≈0.55E_c - E_{Fi} \approx 0.55 eV. Raising EFE_F by 0.7 eV puts it about 0.15 eV inside the conduction band. The semiconductor is then degenerate:

  • NdN_d would exceed Nc≈2.8×1019 cm−3N_c \approx 2.8\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, and would be about 17% of the Si atomic density (5×10225\times10^{22}), far beyond normal doping (and beyond the solubility of most donors).
  • The Boltzmann formula is no longer exact, so the number above is only an estimate; the true requirement is "very heavy doping, Nd>NcN_d > N_c".

In practice this degenerate n⁺ doping behaves like a metal and is used for ohmic contacts and tunnel diodes.

  • 2075 Chaitra · 5+3 marks

Derive Einstein's relation between mobility and diffusion co-efficient. Also define the terms electron mobility, conductivity and resistivity.

Answer

Einstein relation

The Einstein relation links the diffusion coefficient DD and the drift mobility μ\mu of a carrier: Dμ=kTe\dfrac{D}{\mu} = \dfrac{kT}{e}.

Derivation. Take a non-uniformly doped n-type bar in thermal equilibrium (no external voltage). The donor and electron concentration n(x)n(x) falls with xx.

 n(x) high ---> low
 ---------------------------
 |  diffusion: e- move ->   |
 |  field E builds up        |
 |  drift:   e- move <-     |
 ---------------------------
  1. Electrons diffuse from high to low concentration. Electron diffusion current density:
Jdiff=eDedndxJ_{diff} = eD_e\frac{dn}{dx}
  1. The donors left behind are positive, so a built-in field E\mathcal{E} appears; it causes a drift current
Jdrift=enμeEJ_{drift} = en\mu_e\mathcal{E}
  1. In equilibrium there is no net current:
enμeE+eDedndx=0en\mu_e\mathcal{E} + eD_e\frac{dn}{dx} = 0
  1. In equilibrium the Fermi level is flat, so n(x)=Ncexp⁡[−(Ec(x)−EF)/kT]n(x) = N_c\exp[-(E_c(x)-E_F)/kT] and
dndx=−nkTdEcdx\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{n}{kT}\frac{dE_c}{dx}
  1. The field bends the band: dEc/dx=eEdE_c/dx = e\mathcal{E}. Hence
dndx=−neEkT\frac{dn}{dx} = -\frac{ne\mathcal{E}}{kT}
  1. Substitute in step 3:
enμeE−eDeneEkT=0Deμe=kTe\begin{aligned} en\mu_e\mathcal{E} - eD_e\frac{ne\mathcal{E}}{kT} &= 0\\ \frac{D_e}{\mu_e} &= \frac{kT}{e} \end{aligned}

Similarly for holes Dh/μh=kT/eD_h/\mu_h = kT/e. At 300 K, kT/e=0.0259kT/e = 0.0259 V; e.g. for Si electrons De=1350×0.0259≈35 cm2s−1D_e = 1350\times0.0259 \approx 35\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1}.

Electron mobility

Drift mobility is the drift velocity per unit applied field:

μe=vdE=eτme∗\mu_e = \frac{v_d}{\mathcal{E}} = \frac{e\tau}{m_e^*}

Unit: m² V⁻¹ s⁻¹ (or cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹). It shows how easily electrons move; it falls with lattice scattering (higher T) and impurity scattering (heavier doping).

Conductivity

Conductivity σ\sigma is the ratio of current density to electric field, J=σEJ = \sigma\mathcal{E}:

σ=e(nμe+pμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h)

Unit: S m⁻¹ (Ω⁻¹ m⁻¹).

Resistivity

Resistivity is the reciprocal of conductivity, i.e. the resistance of a unit cube of material:

ρ=1σ=RAL\rho = \frac{1}{\sigma} = \frac{RA}{L}

Unit: Ω m.

  • 2075 Chaitra · 6 marks

Describe the phenomenon of generation of electrons and holes, and conduction in semiconductor. Also derive equation for conductivity.

Answer

Generation of electrons and holes

In a pure semiconductor such as Si, every atom forms four covalent bonds with its neighbours. At 0 K all valence electrons are held in bonds; the valence band is full, the conduction band is empty, and the crystal is an insulator.

At a higher temperature the lattice vibrates. When a bond electron gains energy ≥Eg\ge E_g (1.1 eV for Si) from thermal vibration (or from a photon, hν≥Egh\nu \ge E_g), it breaks free and jumps to the conduction band. This leaves an empty bond, a hole, which acts as a positive charge +e+e in the valence band. So carriers are always produced in pairs: electron–hole pair generation.

 Ec ----- e-  (free electron) ----
          ^
          |  thermal energy >= Eg
          |
 Ev ----- h+  (hole) -------------

At the same time, free electrons meet holes and recombine. In equilibrium the generation rate equals the recombination rate, giving a steady concentration n=p=nin = p = n_i, where ni∝T3/2e−Eg/2kTn_i \propto T^{3/2}e^{-E_g/2kT} grows rapidly with temperature.

Conduction

When a field E\mathcal{E} is applied:

  • Free electrons in the CB drift opposite to E\mathcal{E}.
  • A neighbouring bond electron jumps into a hole, so the hole moves in the direction of E\mathcal{E}. Holes behave like positive particles.

Both movements give current in the same direction (along E\mathcal{E}), so the currents add.

Derivation of conductivity

Let nn, pp be the concentrations and vdev_{de}, vdhv_{dh} the drift velocities. The current density due to electrons is Je=envdeJ_e = env_{de}, and due to holes Jh=epvdhJ_h = epv_{dh}. With vde=μeEv_{de} = \mu_e\mathcal{E} and vdh=μhEv_{dh} = \mu_h\mathcal{E}:

J=Je+Jh=enμeE+epμhE=e(nμe+pμh)E\begin{aligned} J &= J_e + J_h = en\mu_e\mathcal{E} + ep\mu_h\mathcal{E}\\ &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h)\mathcal{E} \end{aligned}

Comparing with Ohm's law J=σEJ = \sigma\mathcal{E}:

σ=e(nμe+pμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h)

Special cases:

  • Intrinsic: σi=eni(μe+μh)\sigma_i = en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h)
  • n-type: σ≈eNdμe\sigma \approx eN_d\mu_e
  • p-type: σ≈eNaμh\sigma \approx eN_a\mu_h

Example: intrinsic Si, σi=1.45×1010×1.6×10−19×1800≈4.2×10−6\sigma_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\times1800 \approx 4.2\times10^{-6} S cm⁻¹.

  • 2075 Asoj · 6 marks

A silicon wafer is uniformly doped with 10¹⁶ Boron atoms per cm³. Where will be the Fermi level compared to its intrinsic Fermi level? Where will be the Fermi level is shifted if the sample is further doped with 10¹⁷ antimony atom per cm³?

Answer

Boron is an acceptor and antimony a donor. Use

EFi−EFp=kTln⁡pni,EFn−EFi=kTln⁡nniE_{Fi}-E_{Fp} = kT\ln\frac{p}{n_i},\qquad E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i}

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

Step 1: Only boron, Na=1016 cm−3N_a = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

The wafer is p-type, p≈Na=1016 cm−3p \approx N_a = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, so EFE_F lies below EFiE_{Fi}:

EFi−EFp=0.02585ln⁡10161.45×1010=0.02585×13.44=0.348 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fi}-E_{Fp} &= 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}}\\ &= 0.02585\times13.44 = 0.348\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Step 2: Add antimony, Nd=1017 cm−3N_d = 10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Now Nd>NaN_d > N_a, so the wafer is converted to n-type (compensated):

n=Nd−Na=1017−1016=9×1016 cm−3n = N_d - N_a = 10^{17} - 10^{16} = 9\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} EFn−EFi=0.02585ln⁡9×10161.45×1010=0.02585×15.64=0.404 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= 0.02585\ln\frac{9\times10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}}\\ &= 0.02585\times15.64 = 0.404\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Shift

ΔEF=0.348+0.404=0.752 eV (upwards)\Delta E_F = 0.348 + 0.404 = 0.752\ \text{eV (upwards)}
 Ec -------------------------------
 EFn ........ 0.404 eV above EFi (after Sb)
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 EFp ........ 0.348 eV below EFi (B only)
 Ev -------------------------------

Answer: with boron alone the Fermi level is 0.348 eV below EFiE_{Fi}; after adding antimony it moves to 0.404 eV above EFiE_{Fi}, a total upward shift of about 0.75 eV.

  • 2074 Chaitra · 6 marks

What is Built-in potential and depletion width? Derive the expression of these with necessary diagram.

Answer

When p-type and n-type regions meet, electrons diffuse from n to p and holes from p to n. They recombine near the junction and leave behind uncovered fixed ions: negative acceptor ions on the p side and positive donor ions on the n side. This region, empty of mobile carriers, is the depletion (space-charge) region, and its width W0=Wp+WnW_0 = W_p + W_n is the depletion width. The ions create an electric field and a potential difference V0V_0 across the region, called the built-in potential; it stops further diffusion.

   p side        |  W0  |       n side
  o o o o o  | - - | + + |  * * * * *
  holes      | - - | + + |  electrons
             |<Wp>|<-Wn->|
  field E0  <-----------
  potential: 0 ____/^^^^^ V0

Built-in potential

In equilibrium the Fermi level is flat. Far from the junction:

pp0=Na,pn0=ni2Ndp_{p0} = N_a,\qquad p_{n0} = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d}

The hole concentrations on the two sides are related by the Boltzmann factor of the potential energy step eV0eV_0:

pn0pp0=exp⁡(−eV0kT)\frac{p_{n0}}{p_{p0}} = \exp\left(-\frac{eV_0}{kT}\right)

Hence

V0=kTeln⁡pp0pn0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2V_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}} = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}

(The same result follows from equating the drift and diffusion currents of holes, using the Einstein relation.)

Depletion width

1. Charge neutrality: eNaWp=eNdWneN_aW_p = eN_dW_n.

2. Field from Gauss's law (Poisson's equation): the field rises linearly through each charged layer and peaks at the junction:

E0=−eNdWnε=−eNaWpε,ε=ε0εr\mathcal{E}_0 = -\frac{eN_dW_n}{\varepsilon} = -\frac{eN_aW_p}{\varepsilon},\qquad \varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r

3. Potential = area under the field triangle:

V0=12∣E0∣W0=eNdWnW02εV_0 = \frac{1}{2}|\mathcal{E}_0|W_0 = \frac{eN_dW_nW_0}{2\varepsilon}

4. Eliminate WnW_n: from step 1, Wn=W0NaNa+NdW_n = W_0\dfrac{N_a}{N_a+N_d}, so

V0=eW022ε⋅NaNdNa+NdV_0 = \frac{eW_0^2}{2\varepsilon}\cdot\frac{N_aN_d}{N_a+N_d} W0=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNdW_0 = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}}

with Wn=W0Na/(Na+Nd)W_n = W_0N_a/(N_a+N_d) and Wp=W0Nd/(Na+Nd)W_p = W_0N_d/(N_a+N_d). The depletion layer extends mostly into the lightly doped side. Under bias, V0V_0 is replaced by V0−VV_0 - V.

  • 2074 Chaitra · 4 marks

Calculate the diffusion coefficient of electrons at 300K in n-type silicon semiconductor. Also find current density if electron concentration gradient is 10³ electrons per centimeter.

Answer

The diffusion coefficient follows from the Einstein relation

Deμe=kTe\frac{D_e}{\mu_e} = \frac{kT}{e}

Data used: electron mobility in Si μe=1350 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e = 1350\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (not given, standard value), T=300T = 300 K, kT/e=0.02585kT/e = 0.02585 V.

Diffusion coefficient

De=μekTe=1350×0.02585=34.9 cm2s−1\begin{aligned} D_e &= \mu_e\frac{kT}{e} = 1350\times0.02585\\ &= 34.9\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} \end{aligned}

Diffusion current density

The gradient "10310^3 electrons per centimetre" is read as dn/dx=103 cm−3dn/dx = 10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} per cm =103 cm−4= 10^3\ \text{cm}^{-4}.

Jdiff=eDedndx=1.6×10−19×34.9×103=5.58×10−15 A cm−2\begin{aligned} J_{diff} &= eD_e\frac{dn}{dx}\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times34.9\times10^{3}\\ &= 5.58\times10^{-15}\ \text{A cm}^{-2} \end{aligned}

Answer: De≈34.9 cm2s−1D_e \approx 34.9\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} (3.49×10−3 m2s−13.49\times10^{-3}\ \text{m}^2\text{s}^{-1}); J≈5.6×10−15 A cm−2J \approx 5.6\times10^{-15}\ \text{A cm}^{-2}.

The current is tiny because the given gradient is extremely small; JJ is directly proportional to dn/dxdn/dx, so a realistic gradient such as 1020 cm−410^{20}\ \text{cm}^{-4} would give J≈0.56 A cm−2J \approx 0.56\ \text{A cm}^{-2}. The current flows in the direction of increasing nn (electrons diffuse the other way, and their charge is negative).

  • 2074 Asoj · 8 marks

Four micrograms of antimony are thoroughly mixed in molten form with 100 gms of pure germanium. Find the density of antimony atoms, density of donated electrons and the total resistance of a bar of such n-type material of 2 cm long, 0.012×0.012 cm in cross-section. Take, density of Ge = 5.46 gm/cm³ and atomic weight of Sb = 121.76.

Answer

Antimony (group V) is a donor; each Sb atom donates one electron.

Given: mGe=100m_{Ge} = 100 g, ρGe=5.46 g cm−3\rho_{Ge} = 5.46\ \text{g cm}^{-3}, mSb=4 μg=4×10−6m_{Sb} = 4\ \mu\text{g} = 4\times10^{-6} g, MSb=121.76M_{Sb} = 121.76; bar L = 2 cm, A=0.012×0.012=1.44×10−4 cm2A = 0.012\times0.012 = 1.44\times10^{-4}\ \text{cm}^2. Assumed: electron mobility in Ge μe=3900 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e = 3900\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (standard value, not given), NA=6.022×1023N_A = 6.022\times10^{23}.

Step 1: Volume of germanium

V=1005.46=18.32 cm3V = \frac{100}{5.46} = 18.32\ \text{cm}^3

Step 2: Number of Sb atoms

NSb=4×10−6121.76×6.022×1023=1.978×1016N_{Sb} = \frac{4\times10^{-6}}{121.76}\times6.022\times10^{23} = 1.978\times10^{16}

Step 3: Density of antimony atoms

Nd=1.978×101618.32=1.08×1015 cm−3N_d = \frac{1.978\times10^{16}}{18.32} = 1.08\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Step 4: Density of donated electrons

At room temperature every Sb atom is ionised, and Nd≫ni(Ge)=2.4×1013N_d \gg n_i(\text{Ge}) = 2.4\times10^{13}, so

n≈Nd=1.08×1015 cm−3n \approx N_d = 1.08\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Step 5: Conductivity and resistance

σ=eNdμe=1.6×10−19×1.08×1015×3900=0.674 S cm−1ρ=1/σ=1.484 Ω cmR=ρLA=1.484×21.44×10−4=2.06×104 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= eN_d\mu_e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times1.08\times10^{15}\times3900\\ &= 0.674\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 1/\sigma = 1.484\ \Omega\,\text{cm}\\ R &= \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{1.484\times2}{1.44\times10^{-4}}\\ &= 2.06\times10^{4}\ \Omega \end{aligned}
QuantityValue
Sb atom density1.08×1015 cm−31.08\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}
Donated electrons1.08×1015 cm−31.08\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}
Resistivity1.48 Ω cm
Resistance20.6 kΩ

Answer: Nd=n≈1.08×1015 cm−3N_d = n \approx 1.08\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3}; R≈20.6 kΩR \approx 20.6\ \text{k}\Omega (with μe=3800\mu_e = 3800 the resistance would be about 21.1 kΩ).

  • 2074 Asoj · 6 marks

The current density in semiconductor devices is affected both by diffusion and drifting of electrons and holes, justify.

Answer

In a semiconductor, current is carried by electrons and holes, and each carrier can move by two independent mechanisms: drift (due to an electric field) and diffusion (due to a concentration gradient). Metals have only drift current because their electron density is uniform; in semiconductors carrier concentrations can vary strongly with position (doping profiles, junctions, light injection), so both terms matter.

1. Drift current

When a field E\mathcal{E} is applied, electrons drift opposite to it and holes along it with velocities vd=μEv_d = \mu\mathcal{E}:

Je,drift=enμeE,Jh,drift=epμhEJ_{e,drift} = en\mu_e\mathcal{E},\qquad J_{h,drift} = ep\mu_h\mathcal{E}

2. Diffusion current

Carriers in random thermal motion spread from high to low concentration (Fick's law: flux =−D dn/dx= -D\,dn/dx):

Je,diff=eDedndx,Jh,diff=−eDhdpdxJ_{e,diff} = eD_e\frac{dn}{dx},\qquad J_{h,diff} = -eD_h\frac{dp}{dx}

(The signs differ because electrons are negative.)

 high n  ======>  low n     diffusion (no field)
 e- <---  E --->           drift (field)

3. Total current density

Je=enμeE+eDedndxJh=epμhE−eDhdpdxJ=Je+Jh\begin{aligned} J_e &= en\mu_e\mathcal{E} + eD_e\frac{dn}{dx}\\ J_h &= ep\mu_h\mathcal{E} - eD_h\frac{dp}{dx}\\ J &= J_e + J_h \end{aligned}

The two mechanisms are linked by the Einstein relation D/μ=kT/eD/\mu = kT/e, because both come from the same random thermal motion and scattering.

Justification with examples

SituationDominant current
Uniformly doped resistorDrift only (dn/dx=0dn/dx = 0)
pn junction in equilibriumDrift and diffusion equal and opposite, net J = 0
Forward-biased diodeDiffusion of injected minority carriers
Base of a BJTDiffusion
Non-uniformly doped regionBuilt-in field: both

So the current density in semiconductor devices is set by both drift and diffusion of electrons and holes.

  • 2074 Asoj · 6 marks

Sample of silicon wafer is doped with 10¹⁵ Antimony atoms/cm³. Find the carrier concentrations, its resistance and the shift in Fermi level from its intrinsic Fermi level at 27°C. If this sample is further doped with 10²² Boron atoms/cm³, what will be the change in its resistance. [Graph attached with the paper: log-log plot of electron drift mobility μₑ (cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹, 50 to 10⁴) versus temperature T (100 to 1000 K) for n-type Si with curves for Nd = 10¹⁴, 10¹⁶, 10¹⁷, 10¹⁸, 10¹⁹ cm⁻³; inset shows ln(μₑ) vs ln(T) rising as T^(3/2) for impurity scattering and falling as T^(−3/2) for lattice scattering.]

Answer

Antimony is a donor. The sample size is not given, so the resistance is found for a 1 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm cube (R in Ω = ρ in Ω cm).

Data used: ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=0.02585kT = 0.02585 eV at 300 K, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}. From the attached graph, at 300 K and Nd=1015N_d = 10^{15} (between the 101410^{14} and 101610^{16} curves) μe≈1350 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e \approx 1350\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}.

Carrier concentrations

n≈Nd=1015 cm−3,p=ni2n=(1.45×1010)21015=2.1×105 cm−3n \approx N_d = 10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{n} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{10^{15}} = 2.1\times10^{5}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Resistance

σ=e(nμe+pμh)≈eNdμe=1.6×10−19×1015×1350=0.216 S cm−1ρ=4.63 Ω cm  ⇒  R=4.63 Ω (1 cm cube)\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) \approx eN_d\mu_e\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{15}\times1350 = 0.216\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 4.63\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \;\Rightarrow\; R = 4.63\ \Omega\ (\text{1 cm cube}) \end{aligned}

Fermi level shift

EFn−EFi=kTln⁡Ndni=0.02585ln⁡10151.45×1010=0.288 eV above EFi\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= kT\ln\frac{N_d}{n_i} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{15}}{1.45\times10^{10}}\\ &= 0.288\ \text{eV above } E_{Fi} \end{aligned}

Further doped with 102210^{22} boron cm⁻³

Now Na≫NdN_a \gg N_d, so the sample becomes strongly p-type:

p=Na−Nd≈1022 cm−3,n=ni2/p≈0.02 cm−3p = N_a - N_d \approx 10^{22}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\qquad n = n_i^2/p \approx 0.02\ \text{cm}^{-3}

At such heavy doping impurity scattering dominates; the hole mobility falls to about its minimum value, taken as μh≈50 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h \approx 50\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (assumed; the graph gives only electron mobility).

σ=epμh=1.6×10−19×1022×50=8×104 S cm−1ρ=1.25×10−5 Ω cm  ⇒  R=1.25×10−5 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= ep\mu_h = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{22}\times50 = 8\times10^{4}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 1.25\times10^{-5}\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \;\Rightarrow\; R = 1.25\times10^{-5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Answer: n=1015n = 10^{15}, p=2.1×105 cm−3p = 2.1\times10^5\ \text{cm}^{-3}; R≈4.63 ΩR \approx 4.63\ \Omega (1 cm cube); EFE_F is 0.288 eV above EFiE_{Fi}. After boron doping, R≈1.25×10−5 ΩR \approx 1.25\times10^{-5}\ \Omega, so the resistance falls by a factor of about 3.7×1053.7\times10^{5}.

Note: 102210^{22} cm⁻³ is 20% of the Si atom density; such a sample is degenerate and almost metallic, so this result is only an estimate.

  • 2074 Asoj · 6 marks

Show that in n-type semiconductor minority carries concentrations are suppressed.

Answer

In an n-type semiconductor, donors (P, As, Sb) supply extra electrons, so electrons are the majority carriers. Minority carrier suppression means that the hole concentration becomes much smaller than the intrinsic value nin_i when donors are added.

Proof

1. Mass action law (valid in thermal equilibrium for a non-degenerate semiconductor):

np=ni2np = n_i^2

because n=Nce−(Ec−EF)/kTn = N_ce^{-(E_c-E_F)/kT} and p=Nve−(EF−Ev)/kTp = N_ve^{-(E_F-E_v)/kT}, so np=NcNve−Eg/kT=ni2np = N_cN_ve^{-E_g/kT} = n_i^2, independent of EFE_F (i.e. of doping).

2. Charge neutrality:

n=p+Nd+≈p+Ndn = p + N_d^+ \approx p + N_d

since all donors are ionised at room temperature.

3. Solve for n: substitute p=ni2/np = n_i^2/n:

n2−Ndn−ni2=0  ⇒  n=Nd2+Nd24+ni2n^2 - N_dn - n_i^2 = 0 \;\Rightarrow\; n = \frac{N_d}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{N_d^2}{4}+n_i^2}

For Nd≫niN_d \gg n_i:

n≈Nd,p=ni2Ndn \approx N_d,\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d}

4. Compare with intrinsic:

pni=niNd≪1\frac{p}{n_i} = \frac{n_i}{N_d} \ll 1

So nn is raised above nin_i by the factor Nd/niN_d/n_i, and pp is pushed below nin_i by the same factor. The minority holes are suppressed.

Physical reason

The large number of donor electrons greatly increases the chance that a thermally generated hole meets an electron and recombines. The recombination rate is proportional to npnp, while the generation rate depends only on temperature; equilibrium then requires npnp to stay at ni2n_i^2, so a large nn forces a small pp.

Numerical example (Si, 300 K)

Doping NdN_d (cm⁻³)n (cm⁻³)p (cm⁻³)
0 (intrinsic)1.45×10101.45\times10^{10}1.45×10101.45\times10^{10}
101410^{14}101410^{14}2.1×1062.1\times10^{6}
101610^{16}101610^{16}2.1×1042.1\times10^{4}

Since p≪np \ll n, the conductivity is σ≈eNdμe\sigma \approx eN_d\mu_e: it is controlled by the donor concentration only.

  • 2073 Shrawan · 6 marks

A silicon ingot is doped with 10¹⁶ arsenic atoms/cm³. Find the carrier concentrations, conductivity of the sample and the shift in Fermi level from its intrinsic Fermi level at 27°C.

Answer

Arsenic is a group V donor, so the ingot is n-type.

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

Carrier concentrations

All donors are ionised at 27°C and Nd=1016≫niN_d = 10^{16} \gg n_i:

n≈Nd=1016 cm−3p=ni2n=(1.45×1010)21016=2.1×104 cm−3\begin{aligned} n &\approx N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\\ p &= \frac{n_i^2}{n} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{10^{16}} = 2.1\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Conductivity

σ=e(nμe+pμh)=1.6×10−19(1016×1350+2.1×104×450)≈1.6×10−19×1.35×1019=2.16 S cm−1 (=216 S m−1)\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h)\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}(10^{16}\times1350 + 2.1\times10^{4}\times450)\\ &\approx 1.6\times10^{-19}\times1.35\times10^{19}\\ &= 2.16\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\ (= 216\ \text{S m}^{-1}) \end{aligned}

Resistivity ρ=1/σ=0.463 Ω\rho = 1/\sigma = 0.463\ \Omega cm. (If the doped-Si mobility from Kasap's graph, μe≈1200\mu_e \approx 1200, is used, σ≈1.92\sigma \approx 1.92 S cm⁻¹.)

Fermi level shift

EFn−EFi=kTln⁡nni=0.02585ln⁡10161.45×1010=0.02585×13.44=0.348 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}}\\ &= 0.02585\times13.44 = 0.348\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Answer: n=1016 cm−3n = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, p=2.1×104 cm−3p = 2.1\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, σ≈2.16\sigma \approx 2.16 S cm⁻¹, and the Fermi level lies 0.348 eV above the intrinsic Fermi level.

 Ec ------------------------
 EFn ....................... (0.348 eV above EFi)
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Ev ------------------------
  • 2072 Chaitra · 6 marks

If it is desired that the Fermi-level is to be raised to 0.1 eV above intrinsic Fermi-level at room temperature, what type of dopant is to be used? Determine its doping level.

Answer

To raise the Fermi level above the intrinsic level, the number of electrons must exceed the number of holes, so a donor (pentavalent, group V) impurity such as phosphorus, arsenic or antimony must be added, making the material n-type. (The semiconductor is taken as silicon.)

Relation used

For a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor with all donors ionised:

n=Nd=niexp⁡(EFn−EFikT)n = N_d = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_{Fn}-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right)

Data used (Si, 300 K): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT=8.617×10−5×300=0.02585 eVkT = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300 = 0.02585\ \text{eV}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19 Ce = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

Calculation

EFn−EFikT=0.10.02585=3.868e3.868=47.86Nd=1.45×1010×47.86=6.94×1011 cm−3\begin{aligned} \frac{E_{Fn}-E_{Fi}}{kT} &= \frac{0.1}{0.02585} = 3.868\\ e^{3.868} &= 47.86\\ N_d &= 1.45\times10^{10}\times47.86\\ &= 6.94\times10^{11}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Answer: a donor (n-type) dopant is needed, with Nd≈6.9×1011 cm−3N_d \approx 6.9\times10^{11}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (about 1 donor per 7×10107\times10^{10} Si atoms).

Check

NdN_d is about 48 times nin_i, so n≈Ndn \approx N_d is a fair approximation. (Solving exactly with n=Nd/2+Nd2/4+ni2n = N_d/2 + \sqrt{N_d^2/4 + n_i^2} changes the result by well under 1%.)

 Ec ---------------------------
 EFn .......................... 0.1 eV above EFi
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Ev ---------------------------

The Fermi level rises logarithmically with doping: each tenfold increase in NdN_d raises EFE_F by kTln⁡10≈0.06kT\ln10 \approx 0.06 eV.

  • 2071 Chaitra · 8 marks

Find the resistance of 1 cm³ silicon crystal doped with arsenic, the doping density is such that every Arsenic atom sites every 10⁹ silicon atoms. Atomic concentration of silicon is 5×10²² cm⁻³, ni = 1×10¹⁰ cm⁻³, μₑ = 1350 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ and μₕ = 450 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹. Find the resistance if the above silicon sample is further doped with Boron, the doping density is such that every Boron atom sites every 10⁶ silicon atoms.

Answer

Take the sample as a 1 cm cube (L = 1 cm, A = 1 cm²), so R=ρL/AR = \rho L/A is numerically equal to ρ\rho in Ω cm.

Given: Si atomic concentration 5×1022 cm−35\times10^{22}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, ni=1010 cm−3n_i = 10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C.

Part 1: Arsenic doped (1 As per 10910^9 Si)

Nd=5×1022109=5×1013 cm−3N_d = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^9} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3} n≈Nd=5×1013,p=ni2n=10205×1013=2×106 cm−3n \approx N_d = 5\times10^{13},\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{n} = \frac{10^{20}}{5\times10^{13}} = 2\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3} σ=e(nμe+pμh)=1.6×10−19(5×1013×1350+2×106×450)=1.08×10−2 S cm−1R=1σ=92.6 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h)\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}(5\times10^{13}\times1350 + 2\times10^{6}\times450)\\ &= 1.08\times10^{-2}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R &= \frac{1}{\sigma} = 92.6\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Part 2: Further doped with boron (1 B per 10610^6 Si)

Na=5×1022106=5×1016 cm−3N_a = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^6} = 5\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Since Na≫NdN_a \gg N_d, the sample becomes p-type:

p=Na−Nd=5×1016−5×1013=4.995×1016 cm−3p = N_a - N_d = 5\times10^{16} - 5\times10^{13} = 4.995\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} n=ni2p=2.0×103 cm−3n = \frac{n_i^2}{p} = 2.0\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} σ≈epμh=1.6×10−19×4.995×1016×450=3.596 S cm−1R=13.596=0.278 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &\approx ep\mu_h = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times4.995\times10^{16}\times450\\ &= 3.596\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R &= \frac{1}{3.596} = 0.278\ \Omega \end{aligned}
SampleMajority carrier (cm⁻³)R (1 cm cube)
Pure Si (for reference)n=p=1010n = p = 10^{10}3.47×105 Ω3.47\times10^{5}\ \Omega
As dopedn=5×1013n = 5\times10^{13}92.6 Ω
As + B dopedp=4.995×1016p = 4.995\times10^{16}0.278 Ω

Answer: with arsenic only, R≈92.6 ΩR \approx 92.6\ \Omega; after boron doping, R≈0.278 ΩR \approx 0.278\ \Omega (the sample is now p-type).

  • 2071 Chaitra · 6 marks

Prove that the position of Fermi level is near the middle of band gap in pure silicon semiconductor.

Answer

In an intrinsic (pure) semiconductor the number of electrons in the conduction band equals the number of holes in the valence band. Equating their expressions shows that the Fermi level lies at (or very near) the centre of the gap.

Carrier concentrations

Using the density of states and the Fermi–Dirac function (Boltzmann approximation):

n=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFkT],Nc=2(2πme∗kTh2)3/2n = N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c-E_F}{kT}\right],\qquad N_c = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_e^*kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2} p=Nvexp⁡[−EF−EvkT],Nv=2(2πmh∗kTh2)3/2p = N_v\exp\left[-\frac{E_F-E_v}{kT}\right],\qquad N_v = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_h^*kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}

Equate n and p (intrinsic, EF=EFiE_F = E_{Fi})

Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFikT]=Nvexp⁡[−EFi−EvkT]N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right] = N_v\exp\left[-\frac{E_{Fi}-E_v}{kT}\right]

Take logarithms:

2EFi−Ec−EvkT=ln⁡NvNcEFi=Ec+Ev2+kT2ln⁡NvNc\begin{aligned} \frac{2E_{Fi}-E_c-E_v}{kT} &= \ln\frac{N_v}{N_c}\\ E_{Fi} &= \frac{E_c+E_v}{2} + \frac{kT}{2}\ln\frac{N_v}{N_c} \end{aligned}

Since Nv/Nc=(mh∗/me∗)3/2N_v/N_c = (m_h^*/m_e^*)^{3/2}:

EFi=Ev+Eg2+34kTln⁡mh∗me∗E_{Fi} = E_v + \frac{E_g}{2} + \frac{3}{4}kT\ln\frac{m_h^*}{m_e^*}

Why it is near the middle for Si

  • The first term Ev+Eg/2E_v + E_g/2 is exactly mid-gap.
  • The second term is a small correction. For Si, me∗=1.08mem_e^* = 1.08m_e, mh∗=0.56mem_h^* = 0.56m_e, kT=0.0259kT = 0.0259 eV at 300 K:
34(0.0259)ln⁡0.561.08=−0.0127 eV\frac{3}{4}(0.0259)\ln\frac{0.56}{1.08} = -0.0127\ \text{eV}

This is only about 1% of Eg=1.1E_g = 1.1 eV. So EFiE_{Fi} lies about 0.013 eV below the exact middle, i.e. practically at mid-gap. If me∗=mh∗m_e^* = m_h^* (or at T = 0 K), it is exactly at the middle.

 Ec -------------------------
            0.55 eV
 mid ......................... Eg/2
 EFi - - - - - - (~0.013 eV below mid)
            0.55 eV
 Ev -------------------------

Physically, every electron excited to the CB leaves one hole in the VB; with similar densities of states on both sides, the level of 50% occupancy must sit midway between them.

  • 2070 Chaitra · 4 marks

What is reverse saturation current in pn junction semiconductor?

Answer

Reverse saturation current (I0I_0 or IsI_s) is the small, nearly constant current that flows through a reverse-biased pn junction. It is caused by minority carriers that are thermally generated near the junction and swept across by the junction field.

How it arises

  • Under reverse bias the barrier rises from eV0eV_0 to e(V0+Vr)e(V_0+V_r); majority carriers cannot cross it, so diffusion current becomes almost zero.
  • Minority carriers — holes in the n region and electrons in the p region — that reach the depletion edge by diffusion are pulled across by the field (drift).
  • Their number depends only on how fast they are thermally generated, not on the applied voltage. So once VrV_r exceeds a few kT/ekT/e (about 0.1 V), the current saturates.

Expression

From the ideal diode (Shockley) equation I=I0(eeV/kT−1)I = I_0(e^{eV/kT}-1), for large reverse VV: I→−I0I \to -I_0, where

I0=Aeni2(DhLhNd+DeLeNa)I_0 = Ae n_i^2\left(\frac{D_h}{L_hN_d} + \frac{D_e}{L_eN_a}\right)

AA = junction area, DD = diffusion coefficients, LL = diffusion lengths. There is also a thermal generation current in the depletion layer, proportional to niW/τn_iW/\tau, which is important in Si.

     I
     |        /  forward
     |       /
 ----+------/------- V
 ____|_____ -I0  (reverse, flat)
     |

Main features

  • Very small: nA for Si, µA for Ge (Ge has a smaller EgE_g, hence larger nin_i).
  • Strongly temperature dependent because I0∝ni2∝T3e−Eg/kTI_0 \propto n_i^2 \propto T^3e^{-E_g/kT}; roughly doubles every 10°C.
  • Nearly independent of reverse voltage until breakdown.
  • Increases with junction area and decreases with heavier doping.
  • Light shining on the junction generates more minority carriers and increases it (photodiode principle).
  • 2070 Chaitra · 6 marks

Explain how PN junction is formed when n-type and p-type semiconductor are brought together. Derive the relation of built-in-potential of a PN junction.

Answer

Formation of a pn junction

A pn junction is formed when one region of a single crystal is made p-type and the adjacent region n-type (e.g. by diffusion or ion implantation). On contact:

  1. Diffusion: the p side has many holes and the n side many electrons. Holes diffuse into the n side and electrons into the p side, where they recombine with majority carriers.
  2. Space charge: near the junction the p side loses holes and is left with fixed negative acceptor ions Na−N_a^-; the n side is left with fixed positive donor ions Nd+N_d^+. This carrier-free layer is the depletion region of width W0=Wp+WnW_0 = W_p + W_n.
  3. Built-in field: the ions set up a field E0\mathcal{E}_0 from n to p. It drives a drift current opposite to the diffusion current.
  4. Equilibrium: diffusion continues until drift exactly balances it. The net current is zero, the Fermi level is flat across the device, and a potential difference V0V_0 (the built-in potential) exists between the n and p sides.
    p              W0             n
 o o o o |- - - - |+ + + + | * * * *
 o o o o |- - - - |+ + + + | * * * *
         |<- Wp ->|<- Wn ->|
          E0 <---------------
 V:  0 ______/^^^^^^^^^^^^ V0

Derivation of built-in potential

Consider holes. In equilibrium the hole drift current balances the hole diffusion current:

epμhE−eDhdpdx=0ep\mu_h\mathcal{E} - eD_h\frac{dp}{dx} = 0

With E=−dV/dx\mathcal{E} = -dV/dx and the Einstein relation Dh/μh=kT/eD_h/\mu_h = kT/e:

−pdVdx=kTedpdx  ⇒  dV=−kTedpp-p\frac{dV}{dx} = \frac{kT}{e}\frac{dp}{dx}\;\Rightarrow\; dV = -\frac{kT}{e}\frac{dp}{p}

Integrate from the p side (V=0V = 0, p=pp0p = p_{p0}) to the n side (V=V0V = V_0, p=pn0p = p_{n0}):

V0=kTeln⁡pp0pn0V_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}}

With pp0=Nap_{p0} = N_a and pn0=ni2/Ndp_{n0} = n_i^2/N_d:

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2V_0 = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}

Equivalently, pn0/pp0=e−eV0/kTp_{n0}/p_{p0} = e^{-eV_0/kT}: the Boltzmann relation across the barrier.

Example: Si, Na=1018N_a = 10^{18}, Nd=1016 cm−3N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, 300 K: V0=0.02585ln⁡(1034/2.1×1020)≈0.81V_0 = 0.02585\ln(10^{34}/2.1\times10^{20}) \approx 0.81 V.

  • 2070 Chaitra · 8 marks

Calculate the resistance of pure silicon cubic crystal of 1 cm³ at room temperature. What will be the resistance of the cube when it is doped with 1 arsenic in 10⁹ silicon atoms and 1 boron atom per million silicon atoms? Atomic concentration of silicon is 5×10²² cm⁻³. Use other required data from above given list.

Answer

The cube is 1 cm³, so L = 1 cm, A = 1 cm² and R=ρL/AR = \rho L/A equals ρ\rho numerically.

Data used (the "list" in the paper): ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C, Si atoms 5×1022 cm−35\times10^{22}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

Pure silicon

σi=nie(μe+μh)=1.45×1010×1.6×10−19×(1350+450)=4.176×10−6 S cm−1Ri=1σi=2.39×105 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= n_ie(\mu_e+\mu_h)\\ &= 1.45\times10^{10}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\times(1350+450)\\ &= 4.176\times10^{-6}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R_i &= \frac{1}{\sigma_i} = 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega \end{aligned}

Doped with As and B

Nd=5×1022109=5×1013 cm−3,Na=5×1022106=5×1016 cm−3N_d = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^9} = 5\times10^{13}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\qquad N_a = \frac{5\times10^{22}}{10^6} = 5\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Na≫NdN_a \gg N_d, so the cube is p-type (compensated):

p=Na−Nd=4.995×1016 cm−3,n=ni2p=4.2×103 cm−3p = N_a - N_d = 4.995\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3},\qquad n = \frac{n_i^2}{p} = 4.2\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} σ=e(nμe+pμh)≈epμh=1.6×10−19×4.995×1016×450=3.596 S cm−1R=13.596=0.278 Ω\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) \approx ep\mu_h\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times4.995\times10^{16}\times450\\ &= 3.596\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ R &= \frac{1}{3.596} = 0.278\ \Omega \end{aligned}
SampleCarriers (cm⁻³)R (Ω)
Pure Sin=p=1.45×1010n = p = 1.45\times10^{10}2.39×1052.39\times10^{5}
As only (for comparison)n=5×1013n = 5\times10^{13}92.6
As + Bp=4.995×1016p = 4.995\times10^{16}0.278

Answer: pure cube R≈2.39×105 ΩR \approx 2.39\times10^{5}\ \Omega; doped cube R≈0.278 ΩR \approx 0.278\ \Omega (about 8.6×1058.6\times10^5 times smaller). Boron dominates because it is 1000 times more concentrated than arsenic.

  • 2070 Chaitra · 4 marks

An n-type semiconductor doped with 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ phosphorus atoms has been doped with 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ boron atoms. Calculate the electron concentration in the semiconductor.

Answer

Phosphorus is a donor and boron an acceptor. When both are present, the electrons given by the donors fill the acceptor states — this is compensation.

Given: Nd=1016 cm−3N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, Na=1016 cm−3N_a = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, silicon at 300 K, ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

Charge neutrality and mass action

n+Na=p+Nd,np=ni2n + N_a = p + N_d,\qquad np = n_i^2

Since Na=NdN_a = N_d, the neutrality equation gives n=pn = p. Then

n2=ni2  ⇒  n=nin^2 = n_i^2 \;\Rightarrow\; n = n_i n=p=1.45×1010 cm−3n = p = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}

Answer: electron concentration n=ni≈1.45×1010 cm−3n = n_i \approx 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (equal to the hole concentration).

Remarks

  • The sample is fully compensated: it behaves like intrinsic material in carrier numbers, and its Fermi level returns to EFiE_{Fi}.
  • It is not identical to pure Si: it contains 2×10162\times10^{16} ionised impurities per cm³, which scatter carriers, so the mobilities (and hence conductivity) are lower than in truly intrinsic silicon.
  • 2068 Baisakh · 2.5+2.5+1+2+2 marks

A pn-junction is formed at 300k. The acceptor and donor concentration in p-side and n-side are 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ and 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ respectively. Find: i) Built-in potential ii) Width of depletion layer iii) Maximum electric field iv) Width in n and p sides v) Fermi level n and p sides

Answer

Data used: ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT/e=0.02585kT/e = 0.02585 V at 300 K, ε=ε0εr=8.85×10−14×11.9=1.053×10−12 F cm−1\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r = 8.85\times10^{-14}\times11.9 = 1.053\times10^{-12}\ \text{F cm}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C. Na=1016 cm−3N_a = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (p side), Nd=1017 cm−3N_d = 10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (n side).

i) Built-in potential

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2=0.02585ln⁡1016×1017(1.45×1010)2=0.02585ln⁡(4.756×1012)=0.02585×29.19=0.755 V\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}\times10^{17}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}\\ &= 0.02585\ln(4.756\times10^{12}) = 0.02585\times29.19\\ &= 0.755\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

ii) Width of depletion layer

W0=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd=2×1.053×10−12×1.1×1017×0.7551.6×10−19×1033=3.31×10−5 cm=0.331 μm\begin{aligned} W_0 &= \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}}\\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times1.053\times10^{-12}\times1.1\times10^{17}\times0.755}{1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{33}}}\\ &= 3.31\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm} = 0.331\ \mu\text{m} \end{aligned}

iii) Maximum electric field (at the junction)

E0=eNdWnε=2V0W0=2×0.7553.31×10−5=4.57×104 V cm−1\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}_0 &= \frac{eN_dW_n}{\varepsilon} = \frac{2V_0}{W_0}\\ &= \frac{2\times0.755}{3.31\times10^{-5}} = 4.57\times10^{4}\ \text{V cm}^{-1} \end{aligned}

iv) Width on n and p sides

From NaWp=NdWnN_aW_p = N_dW_n:

Wn=W0NaNa+Nd=3.31×10−5×111=3.01×10−6 cmWp=W0NdNa+Nd=3.31×10−5×1011=3.01×10−5 cm\begin{aligned} W_n &= W_0\frac{N_a}{N_a+N_d} = 3.31\times10^{-5}\times\frac{1}{11} = 3.01\times10^{-6}\ \text{cm}\\ W_p &= W_0\frac{N_d}{N_a+N_d} = 3.31\times10^{-5}\times\frac{10}{11} = 3.01\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm} \end{aligned}

The depletion region lies mostly (91%) in the lightly doped p side.

v) Fermi level on n and p sides

EFn−EFi=kTln⁡Ndni=0.02585ln⁡10171.45×1010=0.407 eVEFi−EFp=kTln⁡Nani=0.02585ln⁡10161.45×1010=0.348 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fn}-E_{Fi} &= kT\ln\frac{N_d}{n_i} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{17}}{1.45\times10^{10}} = 0.407\ \text{eV}\\ E_{Fi}-E_{Fp} &= kT\ln\frac{N_a}{n_i} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}}{1.45\times10^{10}} = 0.348\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}

Check: 0.407+0.348=0.7550.407 + 0.348 = 0.755 eV =eV0= eV_0. ✔

 p side                     n side
 Ec ______
          \________________ Ec
 EF -------------------------- EF
 EFi_____ (0.348 above EF)
          \_______ EFi (0.407 below EF)
 Ev ______
          \________________ Ev
QuantityValue
V0V_00.755 V
W0W_00.331 µm
Emax\mathcal{E}_{max}4.57×1044.57\times10^{4} V/cm
WnW_n / WpW_p0.030 µm / 0.301 µm
EFE_F n side0.407 eV above EFiE_{Fi}
EFE_F p side0.348 eV below EFiE_{Fi}
  • 2068 Chaitra · 6 marks

A p-n junction is made by silicon doped with 10¹⁷ donor atoms per cm³ with silicon doped 10¹⁶ acceptor atoms per cm³ at room temperature. Calculate built in potential across the junction and diffusion co-efficient in both parts.

Answer

Data used: Si at 300 K, ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT/e=0.02585kT/e = 0.02585 V, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (standard values; doped-Si mobilities are somewhat lower). Nd=1017N_d = 10^{17}, Na=1016 cm−3N_a = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

Built-in potential

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2=0.02585ln⁡1016×1017(1.45×1010)2=0.02585ln⁡(4.756×1012)=0.02585×29.19=0.755 V\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2}\\ &= 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{16}\times10^{17}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}\\ &= 0.02585\ln(4.756\times10^{12})\\ &= 0.02585\times29.19 = 0.755\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

Diffusion coefficients (Einstein relation)

D=μkTeD = \mu\frac{kT}{e}

Diffusion across a junction is by minority carriers: electrons in the p part and holes in the n part.

p part (electrons diffusing):

De=1350×0.02585=34.9 cm2s−1D_e = 1350\times0.02585 = 34.9\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1}

n part (holes diffusing):

Dh=450×0.02585=11.6 cm2s−1D_h = 450\times0.02585 = 11.6\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1}

Answer: V0≈0.755V_0 \approx 0.755 V; De≈34.9 cm2s−1D_e \approx 34.9\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} (p side) and Dh≈11.6 cm2s−1D_h \approx 11.6\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} (n side).

The ratio D/μ=kT/e=0.02585D/\mu = kT/e = 0.02585 V is the same for both carriers at a given temperature; if mobilities read from a doping-dependent graph are used, D scales in the same proportion.

  • 2068 Chaitra · 8 marks

A pn junction is formed at 300k. The acceptor and donor concentration in p-side and n-side are 10¹⁸ cm⁻³ and 10¹⁶ cm⁻³ respectively. Calculate: i) Built in potential ii) Width of depletion layer iii) Maximum value of electric field

Answer

Data used: ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, kT/e=0.02585kT/e = 0.02585 V at 300 K, ε=ε0εr=8.85×10−14×11.9=1.053×10−12 F cm−1\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r = 8.85\times10^{-14}\times11.9 = 1.053\times10^{-12}\ \text{F cm}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C. Na=1018 cm−3N_a = 10^{18}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (p side), Nd=1016 cm−3N_d = 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (n side) — a p+np^+n junction.

i) Built-in potential

V0=kTeln⁡NaNdni2=0.02585ln⁡1018×1016(1.45×1010)2=0.02585ln⁡(4.756×1013)=0.02585×31.49=0.814 V\begin{aligned} V_0 &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{N_aN_d}{n_i^2} = 0.02585\ln\frac{10^{18}\times10^{16}}{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}\\ &= 0.02585\ln(4.756\times10^{13}) = 0.02585\times31.49\\ &= 0.814\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

ii) Width of depletion layer

W0=2ε(Na+Nd)V0eNaNd=2×1.053×10−12×1.01×1018×0.8141.6×10−19×1034=3.29×10−5 cm=0.329 μm\begin{aligned} W_0 &= \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)V_0}{eN_aN_d}}\\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\times1.053\times10^{-12}\times1.01\times10^{18}\times0.814}{1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{34}}}\\ &= 3.29\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm} = 0.329\ \mu\text{m} \end{aligned}

Split between the sides:

Wn=W0NaNa+Nd=3.26×10−5 cm,Wp=W0NdNa+Nd=3.26×10−7 cmW_n = W_0\frac{N_a}{N_a+N_d} = 3.26\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm},\qquad W_p = W_0\frac{N_d}{N_a+N_d} = 3.26\times10^{-7}\ \text{cm}

Almost all (99%) of the depletion layer is in the lightly doped n side.

iii) Maximum electric field

The field peaks at the metallurgical junction:

E0=eNdWnε=1.6×10−19×1016×3.26×10−51.053×10−12=4.95×104 V cm−1\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}_0 &= \frac{eN_dW_n}{\varepsilon} = \frac{1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{16}\times3.26\times10^{-5}}{1.053\times10^{-12}}\\ &= 4.95\times10^{4}\ \text{V cm}^{-1} \end{aligned}

Check: E0=2V0/W0=2×0.814/3.29×10−5=4.95×104\mathcal{E}_0 = 2V_0/W_0 = 2\times0.814/3.29\times10^{-5} = 4.95\times10^{4} V/cm. ✔

Answer: V0≈0.814V_0 \approx 0.814 V, W0≈0.329 μW_0 \approx 0.329\ \mum, Emax≈4.95×104\mathcal{E}_{max} \approx 4.95\times10^{4} V/cm (4.95×1064.95\times10^{6} V/m).

   E
   |   p+ |      n
   |      |\
   |      | \
   |      |  \
   |      |   \
   +------+----\---- x
        -Wp  0   Wn
   Emax at x = 0
  • 2068 Chaitra · 2+4 marks

Explain about intrinsic Fermi level of a pure semiconductor and derive a relationship of the intrinsic Fermi level assuming that intrinsic carrier concentration is known.

Answer

Intrinsic Fermi level

The intrinsic Fermi level EFiE_{Fi} is the Fermi level of a pure (undoped) semiconductor, where n=p=nin = p = n_i. It is the energy at which the probability of occupation is 1/2. Because each electron excited into the conduction band leaves one hole in the valence band, EFiE_{Fi} lies almost exactly at the middle of the band gap, shifted slightly towards the band with the smaller density of states. It serves as the reference level from which the Fermi level of doped material is measured (EF>EFiE_F > E_{Fi} for n-type, EF<EFiE_F < E_{Fi} for p-type).

Derivation (given nin_i)

In any non-degenerate semiconductor

n=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFkT],p=Nvexp⁡[−EF−EvkT]n = N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c-E_F}{kT}\right],\qquad p = N_v\exp\left[-\frac{E_F-E_v}{kT}\right]

For intrinsic material n=nin = n_i and EF=EFiE_F = E_{Fi}:

ni=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFikT]  ⇒  EFi=Ec−kTln⁡Ncnin_i = N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right] \;\Rightarrow\; E_{Fi} = E_c - kT\ln\frac{N_c}{n_i}

Similarly from p=nip = n_i:

EFi=Ev+kTln⁡NvniE_{Fi} = E_v + kT\ln\frac{N_v}{n_i}

Adding the two forms and dividing by 2:

EFi=Ec+Ev2+kT2ln⁡NvNc=Ev+Eg2+34kTln⁡mh∗me∗E_{Fi} = \frac{E_c+E_v}{2} + \frac{kT}{2}\ln\frac{N_v}{N_c} = E_v + \frac{E_g}{2} + \frac{3}{4}kT\ln\frac{m_h^*}{m_e^*}

Doped material in terms of nin_i

Dividing n=Nce−(Ec−EF)/kTn = N_ce^{-(E_c-E_F)/kT} by ni=Nce−(Ec−EFi)/kTn_i = N_ce^{-(E_c-E_{Fi})/kT}:

n=niexp⁡(EF−EFikT),p=niexp⁡(EFi−EFkT)n = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_F-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right),\qquad p = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_{Fi}-E_F}{kT}\right)

Example (Si, 300 K): Nc=2.8×1019N_c = 2.8\times10^{19}, ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}: Ec−EFi=0.02585ln⁡(1.93×109)=0.553E_c - E_{Fi} = 0.02585\ln(1.93\times10^9) = 0.553 eV, i.e. about half of Eg=1.1E_g = 1.1 eV.

  • 2068 Chaitra · 4 marks

What do you understand by diffusion of charge carriers in semiconductor? How does diffusion contribute to conductivity of a semiconductor?

Answer

Diffusion of charge carriers is the movement of electrons or holes from a region of high concentration to low concentration due to their random thermal motion, even when no electric field is present. It occurs whenever the carrier concentration is non-uniform, e.g. near a pn junction or when light injects extra carriers at one end of a bar.

Why it happens

Carriers move randomly with thermal velocity. Across any plane, more carriers cross from the crowded side than from the sparse side, so there is a net flow down the gradient. By Fick's law the flux is

F=−DdndxF = -D\frac{dn}{dx}

where DD (cm² s⁻¹) is the diffusion coefficient.

Diffusion current

Je,diff=eDedndx,Jh,diff=−eDhdpdxJ_{e,diff} = eD_e\frac{dn}{dx},\qquad J_{h,diff} = -eD_h\frac{dp}{dx}
 n high  o o o o o o  -->  o   o    n low
         electrons diffuse -->
         electron current  <--

Contribution to conduction

  • Diffusion adds a second current component to the drift current, so the total is
Je=enμeE+eDedndxJ_e = en\mu_e\mathcal{E} + eD_e\frac{dn}{dx}
  • It lets current flow where there is little or no field, e.g. minority carriers crossing the base of a transistor or the neutral regions of a forward-biased diode. The forward current of a diode is essentially a diffusion current.
  • DD and μ\mu are linked by the Einstein relation D/μ=kT/eD/\mu = kT/e, so a material with high mobility also diffuses carriers quickly. One can write an effective "diffusion conductance" in these terms.
  • In equilibrium (e.g. pn junction with no bias) diffusion is balanced by an equal and opposite drift current, so the net current is zero.

Thus diffusion does not change the bulk conductivity σ=e(nμe+pμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) of a uniform sample, but in devices with concentration gradients it is often the main way current is carried.

  • 2073 Chaitra · 6 marks

An n-type semiconductor doped with 10¹⁶cm⁻³ phosphorus atoms has been doped with 10¹⁷cm⁻³ boron atoms. Calculate the electron and hole concentrations and conductivity. [Graph attached with the paper: log-log plot of electron drift mobility μₑ (cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹, 50 to 10⁴) versus temperature T (100 to 1000 K) for n-type Si with curves for Nd = 10¹⁴, 10¹⁶, 10¹⁷, 10¹⁸, 10¹⁹ cm⁻³; inset shows ln(μₑ) vs ln(T) rising as T^(3/2) for impurity scattering and falling as T^(−3/2) for lattice scattering.]

Answer

Phosphorus is a donor and boron an acceptor. Since Na>NdN_a > N_d, the sample is converted to p-type (compensated).

Given: Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16}, Na=1017 cm−3N_a = 10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3}. Data used: ni=1.45×1010 cm−3n_i = 1.45\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (Si, 300 K), e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C.

Carrier concentrations

p=Na−Nd=1017−1016=9×1016 cm−3n=ni2p=(1.45×1010)29×1016=2.34×103 cm−3\begin{aligned} p &= N_a - N_d = 10^{17} - 10^{16} = 9\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\\ n &= \frac{n_i^2}{p} = \frac{(1.45\times10^{10})^2}{9\times10^{16}} = 2.34\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Mobility

Mobility is limited by scattering from all ionised impurities: Na+Nd=1.1×1017 cm−3N_a + N_d = 1.1\times10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3}. From the graph (electron curve for 101710^{17} at 300 K) μe≈800 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e \approx 800\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}. Holes have about 0.4 of that mobility in Si; the standard value for ∼1017 cm−3\sim10^{17}\ \text{cm}^{-3} doping is μh≈330 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h \approx 330\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (assumed, not on the graph).

Conductivity

The electron term is negligible (n≪pn \ll p):

σ=e(nμe+pμh)≈epμh=1.6×10−19×9×1016×330=4.75 S cm−1ρ=1/σ=0.210 Ω cm\begin{aligned} \sigma &= e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) \approx ep\mu_h\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times9\times10^{16}\times330\\ &= 4.75\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho &= 1/\sigma = 0.210\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \end{aligned}

Answer: p=9×1016 cm−3p = 9\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, n≈2.3×103 cm−3n \approx 2.3\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, σ≈4.75\sigma \approx 4.75 S cm⁻¹ (ρ≈0.21 Ω\rho \approx 0.21\ \Omega cm).

(If the lightly-doped value μh=450\mu_h = 450 is used, σ=6.48\sigma = 6.48 S cm⁻¹. The conductivity depends on the hole mobility chosen, but in either case the sample is p-type and conduction is by holes.)

  • 2072 Kartik · 3+4 marks

Describe the importance of Fermi energy. Also differentiate between a degenerate and a non-degenerate semiconductor.

Answer

Importance of Fermi energy

The Fermi energy EFE_F is the energy level at which the probability of occupation by an electron is exactly 1/2 (Fermi–Dirac function f(E)=1/[1+e(E−EF)/kT]f(E) = 1/[1+e^{(E-E_F)/kT}]). Its importance:

  1. Gives carrier concentrations directly: n=Nce−(Ec−EF)/kTn = N_ce^{-(E_c-E_F)/kT} and p=Nve−(EF−Ev)/kTp = N_ve^{-(E_F-E_v)/kT}. Its position tells how many electrons and holes are present.
  2. Identifies the type of material: EFE_F near mid-gap → intrinsic; near EcE_c → n-type; near EvE_v → p-type.
  3. Equilibrium condition: in thermal equilibrium EFE_F is constant throughout a system. This rule fixes the band bending and built-in potential of pn junctions and metal–semiconductor contacts (eV0=EFn−EFpeV_0 = E_{Fn} - E_{Fp}).
  4. Bias and devices: an applied voltage splits the Fermi levels (EFn−EFp=eVE_{Fn} - E_{Fp} = eV); quasi-Fermi levels describe diodes, transistors, LEDs.
  5. Work function and contact potential: Φ=Evac−EF\Phi = E_{vac} - E_F; differences in EFE_F give contact potentials and thermocouple emf.
  6. Temperature behaviour: its movement towards mid-gap with rising T shows when an extrinsic material becomes intrinsic.

Degenerate vs non-degenerate semiconductor

 Non-degenerate n     Degenerate n+
 Ec ---------         EF ......... (inside CB)
 EF ......  (>3kT)    Ec ---------
 Ev ---------         Ev ---------
PointNon-degenerateDegenerate
DopingLight/moderate, N≪NcN \ll N_c or NvN_vVery heavy, N≳NcN \gtrsim N_c or NvN_v (~101910^{19} cm⁻³ and above in Si)
Fermi levelIn the gap, more than ~3kT3kT from band edgesWithin 3kT3kT of, or inside, the CB (n⁺) or VB (p⁺)
StatisticsBoltzmann approximation validFull Fermi–Dirac statistics needed
Mass action lawnp=ni2np = n_i^2 holdsDoes not hold
Impurity levelsDiscrete, isolatedMerge into an impurity band; band gap narrows
BehaviourSemiconductor: σ rises with TMetal-like: σ nearly constant or falls with T
UsesOrdinary diodes, transistorsOhmic contacts, tunnel diodes, laser diodes
  • 2072 Kartik · 4 marks

Calculate the diffusion coefficient of electrons at 30°C in silicon doped with 10¹⁵ Arsenic atoms cm⁻³. Given that the drift mobility of electron with 10¹⁵ cm⁻³ dopants is 1300 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹.

Answer

The diffusion coefficient is found from the Einstein relation, which links diffusion and drift of the same carrier:

Deμe=kTe\frac{D_e}{\mu_e} = \frac{kT}{e}

Given: μe=1300 cm2V−1s−1\mu_e = 1300\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1} (for 101510^{15} cm⁻³ As), T=30∘C=303.15T = 30^\circ\text{C} = 303.15 K, k=8.617×10−5k = 8.617\times10^{-5} eV K⁻¹.

Thermal voltage

kTe=8.617×10−5×303.15=0.02612 V\frac{kT}{e} = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times303.15 = 0.02612\ \text{V}

Diffusion coefficient

De=μekTe=1300×0.02612=33.96 cm2s−1\begin{aligned} D_e &= \mu_e\frac{kT}{e} = 1300\times0.02612\\ &= 33.96\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} \end{aligned}

Answer: De≈34.0 cm2s−1=3.40×10−3 m2s−1D_e \approx 34.0\ \text{cm}^2\text{s}^{-1} = 3.40\times10^{-3}\ \text{m}^2\text{s}^{-1}.

Arsenic doping of 101510^{15} cm⁻³ is light, so the material is non-degenerate and the Einstein relation in this simple form is valid. The doping matters only through the mobility value given.

  • 2072 Kartik · 8 marks

The effective density of states at conduction band and valence band are 2.9×10¹⁹ cm⁻³ and 1.1×10¹⁹ cm⁻³ respectively. Calculate the intrinsic concentration and intrinsic resistivity of silicon at 300 K temperature.

Answer

For an intrinsic semiconductor

ni=NcNv exp⁡(−Eg2kT),ρi=1eni(μe+μh)n_i = \sqrt{N_cN_v}\,\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right),\qquad \rho_i = \frac{1}{en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h)}

Given: Nc=2.9×1019N_c = 2.9\times10^{19}, Nv=1.1×1019 cm−3N_v = 1.1\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, T = 300 K. Data used (Si): Eg=1.1E_g = 1.1 eV, kT=0.02585kT = 0.02585 eV, μe=1350\mu_e = 1350, μh=450 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 450\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C.

Intrinsic concentration

NcNv=2.9×1019×1.1×1019=1.786×1019 cm−3Eg2kT=1.12×0.02585=21.28e−21.28=5.755×10−10ni=1.786×1019×5.755×10−10=1.03×1010 cm−3\begin{aligned} \sqrt{N_cN_v} &= \sqrt{2.9\times10^{19}\times1.1\times10^{19}} = 1.786\times10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3}\\ \frac{E_g}{2kT} &= \frac{1.1}{2\times0.02585} = 21.28\\ e^{-21.28} &= 5.755\times10^{-10}\\ n_i &= 1.786\times10^{19}\times5.755\times10^{-10}\\ &= 1.03\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Intrinsic conductivity and resistivity

σi=eni(μe+μh)=1.6×10−19×1.028×1010×1800=2.96×10−6 S cm−1ρi=1σi=3.38×105 Ω cm\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h)\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times1.028\times10^{10}\times1800\\ &= 2.96\times10^{-6}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\\ \rho_i &= \frac{1}{\sigma_i} = 3.38\times10^{5}\ \Omega\,\text{cm} \end{aligned}

Answer: ni≈1.03×1010 cm−3n_i \approx 1.03\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}; ρi≈3.38×105 Ω\rho_i \approx 3.38\times10^{5}\ \Omega cm (3.38×103 Ω3.38\times10^{3}\ \Omega m).

Note: nin_i is very sensitive to EgE_g and T: because of the factor e−Eg/2kTe^{-E_g/2kT}, using Eg=1.12E_g = 1.12 eV instead of 1.1 eV would reduce nin_i by a factor of about 1.5.

  • 2071 Shrawan · 4 marks

Calculate the intrinsic conductivity and resistivity of GaAs at room temperature. The intrinsic concentration, electron mobility and hole mobility of GaAs are 1.8×10⁶ per cm⁻³, 8500 cm² v⁻¹s⁻¹ and 400 cm² v⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively at 300K.

Answer

For an intrinsic semiconductor n=p=nin = p = n_i, so

σi=eni(μe+μh),ρi=1σi\sigma_i = en_i(\mu_e+\mu_h),\qquad \rho_i = \frac{1}{\sigma_i}

Given (GaAs, 300 K): ni=1.8×106 cm−3n_i = 1.8\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, μe=8500\mu_e = 8500, μh=400 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = 400\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C.

Conductivity

σi=1.6×10−19×1.8×106×(8500+400)=1.6×10−19×1.8×106×8900=2.56×10−9 S cm−1 (=2.56×10−7 S m−1)\begin{aligned} \sigma_i &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times1.8\times10^{6}\times(8500+400)\\ &= 1.6\times10^{-19}\times1.8\times10^{6}\times8900\\ &= 2.56\times10^{-9}\ \text{S cm}^{-1}\ (= 2.56\times10^{-7}\ \text{S m}^{-1}) \end{aligned}

Resistivity

ρi=12.563×10−9=3.90×108 Ω cm (=3.90×106 Ω m)\rho_i = \frac{1}{2.563\times10^{-9}} = 3.90\times10^{8}\ \Omega\,\text{cm}\ (= 3.90\times10^{6}\ \Omega\,\text{m})

Answer: σi≈2.56×10−9\sigma_i \approx 2.56\times10^{-9} S cm⁻¹ and ρi≈3.9×108 Ω\rho_i \approx 3.9\times10^{8}\ \Omega cm.

Although electrons in GaAs are about six times more mobile than in Si, the much larger band gap (1.42 eV) makes nin_i about 10410^4 times smaller, so intrinsic GaAs is nearly an insulator ("semi-insulating" GaAs is used as a substrate).

  • 2071 Shrawan · 8 marks

What is minority carrier suppression? Prove electron concentration and conduction in n-type semiconductor is defined by impurity donor.

Answer

Minority carrier suppression is the reduction of the minority carrier concentration below the intrinsic value nin_i when a semiconductor is doped. In n-type material the holes are suppressed; in p-type the electrons are suppressed. It follows from the mass action law np=ni2np = n_i^2: if doping raises one carrier type, the other must fall in the same ratio.

Proof for n-type semiconductor

Consider Si doped with NdN_d donors per cm³ (P, As, Sb). Each donor level lies about 0.05 eV below EcE_c, so at room temperature practically all donors are ionised: Nd+=NdN_d^+ = N_d.

 Ec -------------------------
 Ed  - * - * - * - (donors, ~0.05 eV)
 EFn ........................
 EFi - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Ev -------------------------

1. Charge neutrality:

n=p+Ndn = p + N_d

2. Mass action law (thermal equilibrium):

np=ni2,ni2=NcNve−Eg/kTnp = n_i^2,\quad n_i^2 = N_cN_ve^{-E_g/kT}

3. Solve: substitute p=ni2/np = n_i^2/n:

n2−Ndn−ni2=0  ⇒  n=12[Nd+Nd2+4ni2]n^2 - N_dn - n_i^2 = 0 \;\Rightarrow\; n = \frac{1}{2}\left[N_d + \sqrt{N_d^2+4n_i^2}\right]

4. Normal doping, Nd≫niN_d \gg n_i:

n≈Nd,p=ni2Nd≪nin \approx N_d,\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{N_d} \ll n_i

So the electron concentration is fixed by the donor concentration only, not by temperature or band gap, and the holes are suppressed by the factor ni/Ndn_i/N_d.

Conduction is defined by the donors

σ=e(nμe+pμh)=e(Ndμe+ni2Ndμh)\sigma = e(n\mu_e + p\mu_h) = e\left(N_d\mu_e + \frac{n_i^2}{N_d}\mu_h\right)

The ratio of the hole term to the electron term is ni2μhNd2μe\dfrac{n_i^2\mu_h}{N_d^2\mu_e}, which is tiny. Hence

σ≈eNdμe\sigma \approx eN_d\mu_e

Example: Si with Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16}: n=1016n = 10^{16}, p=2.1×104p = 2.1\times10^{4} cm⁻³; hole/electron current ratio ≈7×10−13\approx 7\times10^{-13}. σ=1.6×10−19×1016×1350=2.16\sigma = 1.6\times10^{-19}\times10^{16}\times1350 = 2.16 S cm⁻¹.

Conclusions

  • Electron concentration ≈Nd\approx N_d (donor defined).
  • Conductivity ≈eNdμe\approx eN_d\mu_e (donor defined), and it can be set accurately by controlling the doping.
  • This holds over the extrinsic range of temperature; at very high T, nin_i becomes comparable to NdN_d and the material turns intrinsic.
  • 2071 Shrawan · 6 marks

Derive the relation for finding the concentration of electron in an extrinsic semi-conductor.

Answer

In an extrinsic semiconductor the electron concentration is found from two conditions: charge neutrality and the mass action law. The result is valid for both n-type and compensated material.

Step 1: Carrier concentrations in terms of EFE_F

For a non-degenerate semiconductor,

n=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFkT],p=Nvexp⁡[−EF−EvkT]n = N_c\exp\left[-\frac{E_c-E_F}{kT}\right],\qquad p = N_v\exp\left[-\frac{E_F-E_v}{kT}\right]

Step 2: Mass action law

Multiplying,

np=NcNvexp⁡(−EgkT)=ni2np = N_cN_v\exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{kT}\right) = n_i^2

This product does not depend on EFE_F, so it holds for doped material as well.

Step 3: Charge neutrality

With NdN_d donors and NaN_a acceptors, all ionised at room temperature:

n+Na=p+Ndn + N_a = p + N_d

Step 4: Solve for n

Put p=ni2/np = n_i^2/n:

n+Na=ni2n+Nd  ⇒  n2−(Nd−Na)n−ni2=0n + N_a = \frac{n_i^2}{n} + N_d \;\Rightarrow\; n^2 - (N_d - N_a)n - n_i^2 = 0

Taking the positive root:

n=Nd−Na2+(Nd−Na2)2+ni2,p=ni2nn = \frac{N_d-N_a}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{N_d-N_a}{2}\right)^2 + n_i^2},\qquad p = \frac{n_i^2}{n}

Special cases

CaseElectron concentration
n-type, Na=0N_a = 0, Nd≫niN_d \gg n_in≈Ndn \approx N_d
Compensated, Nd−Na≫niN_d - N_a \gg n_in≈Nd−Nan \approx N_d - N_a
p-type, Na≫NdN_a \gg N_dn≈ni2/(Na−Nd)n \approx n_i^2/(N_a-N_d)
Nd=NaN_d = N_a or undopedn=nin = n_i

Fermi level form

Dividing nn by ni=Nce−(Ec−EFi)/kTn_i = N_ce^{-(E_c-E_{Fi})/kT}:

n=niexp⁡(EF−EFikT)  ⇒  EF−EFi=kTln⁡nnin = n_i\exp\left(\frac{E_F-E_{Fi}}{kT}\right) \;\Rightarrow\; E_F - E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i}

Example: Si, Nd=1016N_d = 10^{16}, Na=0N_a = 0: n=1016n = 10^{16} cm⁻³, p=2.1×104p = 2.1\times10^{4} cm⁻³, EF−EFi=0.348E_F - E_{Fi} = 0.348 eV.

At low temperature (freeze-out) the donors are not fully ionised and n≈NcNd/2 e−ΔE/2kTn \approx \sqrt{N_cN_d/2}\,e^{-\Delta E/2kT}, where ΔE=Ec−Ed\Delta E = E_c - E_d; the formula above applies to the normal extrinsic range.

  • 2070 Asar · 8 marks

With the help of P-N junction, explain the phenomena of forward and reverse biased.

Answer

A pn junction in equilibrium has a depletion region of width W0W_0 and a built-in barrier V0V_0 that stops majority carriers from diffusing across. Applying an external voltage changes this barrier: lowering it is forward bias, raising it is reverse bias.

Forward bias (p to +, n to −)

   + |  p  |-|+|  n  | -
     | --> holes      |
     |      electrons<--
          W small, barrier V0 - V
  • The applied voltage VV opposes the built-in field. Barrier becomes V0−VV_0 - V; depletion width shrinks:
W=2ε(Na+Nd)(V0−V)eNaNdW = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)(V_0-V)}{eN_aN_d}}
  • Many more majority carriers can now cross. Holes are injected into the n side and electrons into the p side, where they become excess minority carriers:
pn(0)=pn0eeV/kT,np(0)=np0eeV/kTp_n(0) = p_{n0}e^{eV/kT},\qquad n_p(0) = n_{p0}e^{eV/kT}
  • These carriers diffuse away from the junction and recombine, giving a diffusion current that rises exponentially with V.
  • Large current (mA) flows once V exceeds the cut-in voltage (~0.6–0.7 V Si, ~0.2–0.3 V Ge).

Reverse bias (p to −, n to +)

   - |  p  |--|++|  n  | +
     |  majority pulled away  |
     | minority swept across  |
          W large, barrier V0 + Vr
  • The applied voltage adds to the built-in field; barrier becomes V0+VrV_0 + V_r and the depletion region widens.
  • Majority carriers cannot cross. Only minority carriers generated thermally near the junction are swept across by the field.
  • A tiny, almost constant reverse saturation current I0I_0 (nA in Si, µA in Ge) flows. It increases with temperature.
  • At a large reverse voltage, breakdown (Zener or avalanche) occurs and the current rises sharply.

Diode equation and characteristic

I=I0(eeV/ηkT−1)I = I_0\left(e^{eV/\eta kT} - 1\right)
        I (mA)
         |      /
         |     /  forward
         |    /
 Vbr ____|___/______ V
     |   |-I0 (uA/nA)
     |  reverse
PointForward biasReverse bias
Connectionp to +, n to −p to −, n to +
BarrierV0−VV_0 - V (lower)V0+VrV_0 + V_r (higher)
Depletion widthDecreasesIncreases
Current carriersMajority (injected)Minority
CurrentLarge, exponentialSmall, saturates at −I0-I_0
ResistanceLowVery high
  • 2070 Asar · 4 marks

Explain how are there many electrons available in conduction band in n-type semiconductor even if average thermal energy is insufficient to surmount the electrons from valence band to conduction band.

Answer

In an n-type semiconductor the conduction electrons do not come from the valence band. They come from donor atoms, whose energy levels lie just below the conduction band, so very little energy is needed to free them.

Explanation

  1. A pentavalent impurity (P, As, Sb) replaces a Si atom. Four of its five valence electrons form covalent bonds; the fifth electron is loosely bound to the donor ion, like the electron of a hydrogen atom placed in a medium of dielectric constant εr\varepsilon_r.
  2. Its binding (ionisation) energy is very small because it is reduced by εr2\varepsilon_r^2 and by the effective mass:
Eb=13.6 me∗/meεr2 eV≈0.03–0.05 eV (Si)E_b = 13.6\,\frac{m_e^*/m_e}{\varepsilon_r^2}\ \text{eV} \approx 0.03\text{–}0.05\ \text{eV}\ (\text{Si})
  1. On the band diagram this is a donor level EdE_d only about 0.05 eV below EcE_c (e.g. P: 0.045 eV, As: 0.049 eV in Si).
 Ec ---------------------------
      ^   ^   ^    ~0.05 eV (easy)
 Ed  -*- -*- -*-   donor level
 
      band gap 1.1 eV (hard)
 
 Ev ---------------------------
  1. Average thermal energy at room temperature is kT≈0.026kT \approx 0.026 eV. This is far too small to excite many electrons across the 1.1 eV gap (the chance goes as e−Eg/2kT≈e−21e^{-E_g/2kT} \approx e^{-21}), but it is comparable to Ec−EdE_c - E_d. With many lattice vibrations, almost every donor gets enough energy (∼e−2\sim e^{-2} chance per attempt, attempted very frequently) and is ionised.
  2. So, at 300 K, essentially all donors give their electron to the conduction band: n≈Ndn \approx N_d, e.g. 101610^{16} cm⁻³, compared with only 1.45×10101.45\times10^{10} cm⁻³ produced by band-to-band excitation.
  3. Ionising a donor leaves a fixed positive ion, not a mobile hole, so electrons greatly outnumber holes.

Thus the large electron population in the conduction band of an n-type semiconductor is due to the small ionisation energy of donor levels, not to excitation across the band gap.

  • 2069 Asar · 8 marks

Explain with energy band diagram, the forward biased P-N junction and derive mathematical expressions for the same.

Answer

Forward bias means connecting the p side to the positive terminal and the n side to the negative terminal. The applied voltage VV opposes the built-in potential V0V_0, lowers the barrier to e(V0−V)e(V_0 - V), and allows a large diffusion current of majority carriers.

Energy band diagram

In equilibrium EFE_F is flat and the bands bend by eV0eV_0. Under forward bias the n-side bands are raised by eVeV relative to the p side (the n side is at lower potential), so the Fermi levels separate by eVeV and the bending is reduced to e(V0−V)e(V_0 - V).

 Equilibrium            Forward bias V
 p          n           p           n
 Ec_                    Ec__
    \___ Ec                 \__ Ec
 EF ------- EF          EFp ---   -.- EFn
 Ev_            barrier:      eV gap
    \___ Ev   eV0       Ev__
                            \__ Ev
                         barrier e(V0-V)

Mathematical expressions

1. Barrier and width

W=2ε(Na+Nd)(V0−V)eNaNdW = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon(N_a+N_d)(V_0-V)}{eN_aN_d}}

2. Minority carrier injection (law of the junction). Using the Boltzmann relation across the lowered barrier:

pn(0)=pn0exp⁡(eVkT),np(0)=np0exp⁡(eVkT)p_n(0) = p_{n0}\exp\left(\frac{eV}{kT}\right),\qquad n_p(0) = n_{p0}\exp\left(\frac{eV}{kT}\right)

with pn0=ni2/Ndp_{n0} = n_i^2/N_d and np0=ni2/Nan_{p0} = n_i^2/N_a.

3. Excess carriers decay by recombination in the neutral n region:

Δpn(x)=Δpn(0) e−x/Lh,Lh=Dhτh\Delta p_n(x) = \Delta p_n(0)\,e^{-x/L_h},\qquad L_h = \sqrt{D_h\tau_h}

4. Diffusion current of holes at the edge x=0x = 0:

Jh=−eDhdΔpndx∣0=eDhLh ni2Nd(eeV/kT−1)J_h = -eD_h\frac{d\Delta p_n}{dx}\Big|_{0} = \frac{eD_h}{L_h}\,\frac{n_i^2}{N_d}\left(e^{eV/kT}-1\right)

Similarly for electrons in the p region:

Je=eDeLe ni2Na(eeV/kT−1)J_e = \frac{eD_e}{L_e}\,\frac{n_i^2}{N_a}\left(e^{eV/kT}-1\right)

5. Total current — Shockley diode equation

I=I0(eeV/ηkT−1),I0=Aeni2(DhLhNd+DeLeNa)I = I_0\left(e^{eV/\eta kT}-1\right),\qquad I_0 = Aen_i^2\left(\frac{D_h}{L_hN_d}+\frac{D_e}{L_eN_a}\right)

where η=1\eta = 1 for ideal diffusion current (Ge) and η≈2\eta \approx 2 when recombination in the depletion layer dominates (Si at low current).

Key results

  • The current rises exponentially with V; for V≫kT/eV \gg kT/e, I≈I0eeV/kTI \approx I_0e^{eV/kT}.
  • Each 60 mV increase in V raises the current about ten times at 300 K.
  • Noticeable conduction starts at the cut-in voltage (~0.7 V Si, ~0.3 V Ge).
  • 2069 Asar · 6 marks

What are the mechanisms for generation of only electrons or holes in semi-conductor? Explain in brief.

Answer

In a pure semiconductor, breaking a covalent bond (band-to-band generation) always creates an electron–hole pair. To create only electrons or only holes, the carrier must come from a localized energy level inside the band gap (an impurity or defect level), or be injected from outside. The main mechanisms are:

1. Ionization of donor impurities (only electrons)

A pentavalent atom (P, As, Sb) in Si uses four electrons for bonding; the fifth is loosely bound at the donor level EdE_d, about 0.05 eV below EcE_c. A small energy (thermal energy at room temperature is enough) frees it into the conduction band. The donor becomes a fixed positive ion Nd+N_d^+; no hole is formed in the valence band.

2. Ionization of acceptor impurities (only holes)

A trivalent atom (B, Al, Ga) has one incomplete bond. An electron from the valence band jumps to the acceptor level EaE_a (about 0.05 eV above EvE_v) to complete the bond. A hole is left in the valence band and the acceptor becomes a fixed negative ion Na−N_a^-; no free electron is formed in the conduction band.

3. Optical (photo) excitation of impurity levels

A photon with energy hν≥Ec−Edh\nu \ge E_c - E_d (but less than EgE_g) can excite a donor electron into the conduction band, giving only electrons. Similarly hν≥Ea−Evh\nu \ge E_a - E_v creates only holes. This is extrinsic photoconductivity, used in long-wavelength infrared detectors (e.g. Ge:Hg, Si:As).

4. Emission from traps / defect centres

Crystal defects and deep-level impurities (e.g. Au in Si) can hold an electron or a hole. When a filled trap releases its electron to the conduction band (or an empty trap captures an electron from the valence band), only one type of carrier is generated.

5. Carrier injection

Electrons or holes can be injected from outside: an ohmic metal contact or the n-side of a forward-biased p–n junction injects electrons into the p-region (minority carrier injection); the p-side injects holes into the n-region. Only one type of excess carrier is added to that region.

   Ec ----------------------   e- (only electrons)
   Ed  - - - + - - - - - - -   donor ionized (+)

   Ea  - - - - - - - - - -     acceptor ionized (-)
   Ev ----------- o --------   hole (only holes)
MechanismLevel usedCarrier produced
Band-to-band (thermal/optical)Ev→EcE_v \to E_celectron + hole
Donor ionizationEd→EcE_d \to E_celectron only
Acceptor ionizationEv→EaE_v \to E_ahole only
Trap emissiondeep levelone type
Injectionexternal sourceone type

These mechanisms are the basis of doping: they make n≠pn \ne p, which gives n-type and p-type extrinsic semiconductors.

  • 2069 Chaitra · 6 marks

Derive the relation for intrinsic concentration and explain how temperature effects intrinsic concentration with necessary diagram.

Answer

Intrinsic concentration nin_i is the number of electrons per unit volume in the conduction band (equal to the number of holes in the valence band) of a pure semiconductor at temperature TT.

Electron concentration in the conduction band

The number of electrons is the density of states gc(E)g_c(E) times the probability of occupancy f(E)f(E), integrated over the band:

n=∫Ec∞gc(E) f(E) dE,gc(E)=82 π me∗3/2h3E−Ecn = \int_{E_c}^{\infty} g_c(E)\, f(E)\, dE, \qquad g_c(E) = \frac{8\sqrt{2}\,\pi\, m_e^{*3/2}}{h^3}\sqrt{E-E_c}

For E−EF≫kTE - E_F \gg kT (non-degenerate case), f(E)≈exp⁡[−(E−EF)/kT]f(E) \approx \exp[-(E-E_F)/kT] (Boltzmann approximation). Integrating gives

n=Ncexp⁡[−Ec−EFkT],Nc=2(2πme∗kTh2)3/2n = N_c \exp\left[-\frac{E_c - E_F}{kT}\right], \qquad N_c = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_e^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}

where NcN_c is the effective density of states at the conduction band edge.

Hole concentration in the valence band

In the same way, using 1−f(E)1 - f(E) as the probability that a state is empty:

p=Nvexp⁡[−EF−EvkT],Nv=2(2πmh∗kTh2)3/2p = N_v \exp\left[-\frac{E_F - E_v}{kT}\right], \qquad N_v = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_h^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}

Intrinsic concentration (mass action law)

Multiplying nn and pp, the Fermi level cancels:

np=NcNvexp⁡[−Ec−EvkT]=NcNvexp⁡(−EgkT)For intrinsic: n=p=ni  ⇒  ni2=NcNve−Eg/kTni=NcNv exp⁡(−Eg2kT)\begin{aligned} np &= N_c N_v \exp\left[-\frac{E_c - E_v}{kT}\right] = N_c N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{kT}\right) \\ \text{For intrinsic: } n = p = n_i \;&\Rightarrow\; n_i^2 = N_c N_v e^{-E_g/kT} \\ n_i &= \sqrt{N_c N_v}\, \exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right) \end{aligned}

Since np=ni2np = n_i^2 does not depend on EFE_F, it holds for doped semiconductors too (mass action law). Setting n=pn = p also gives the intrinsic Fermi level EFi=Ec+Ev2+34kTln⁡(mh∗me∗)E_{Fi} = \frac{E_c+E_v}{2} + \frac{3}{4}kT\ln\left(\frac{m_h^*}{m_e^*}\right), which is close to mid-gap.

Effect of temperature

As Nc,Nv∝T3/2N_c, N_v \propto T^{3/2},

ni=C T3/2exp⁡(−Eg2kT)n_i = C\, T^{3/2} \exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right)
  • The exponential term dominates, so nin_i rises very rapidly with TT. For Si (EgE_g = 1.1 eV), nin_i is about 1.45×10101.45\times10^{10} cm⁻³ at 300 K and rises by roughly 2 times for every 8–10 K rise near room temperature.
  • A plot of ln⁡ni\ln n_i against 1/T1/T is nearly a straight line with slope −Eg/2k-E_g/2k; this is used to measure EgE_g.
  • Larger band gap means smaller nin_i (Ge > Si > GaAs at the same TT).
  • Because conductivity σ=nie(μe+μh)\sigma = n_i e(\mu_e + \mu_h), an intrinsic semiconductor's resistance falls sharply with temperature (negative temperature coefficient, used in thermistors).
 ln(ni)
   |\
   | \   slope = -Eg/2k
   |  \
   |   \     Ge
   |    \     \
   |     \ Si  \
   +------------------> 1/T

High nin_i at high temperature is also why doped devices stop working properly above a certain temperature: intrinsic carriers swamp the dopant carriers.

  • 2069 Chaitra · 6 marks

Find the built-in potential for a p-n Si junction at room temperature if the bulk resistivity of Si is 1 Ω cm. Electron mobility in Si at room temperature is 1400 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹; μn/μp = 3.1; ni = 1.05 × 10¹⁰ cm⁻³.

Answer

Assumption: both the p-side and the n-side have bulk resistivity ρ=1 Ω\rho = 1\ \Omega cm, room temperature T=300T = 300 K, so kT/e=0.02586kT/e = 0.02586 V. In each extrinsic region the majority carriers alone decide the conductivity.

Step 1: Hole mobility

μh=μe3.1=14003.1=451.6 cm2V−1s−1\mu_h = \frac{\mu_e}{3.1} = \frac{1400}{3.1} = 451.6\ \text{cm}^2\text{V}^{-1}\text{s}^{-1}

Step 2: Donor concentration on the n-side

σ=1/ρ=Ndeμe\sigma = 1/\rho = N_d e \mu_e, so

Nd=1ρ e μe=11×1.602×10−19×1400=4.46×1015 cm−3\begin{aligned} N_d &= \frac{1}{\rho\, e\, \mu_e} = \frac{1}{1 \times 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 1400} \\ &= 4.46\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Step 3: Acceptor concentration on the p-side

Na=1ρ e μh=11×1.602×10−19×451.6=1.38×1016 cm−3\begin{aligned} N_a &= \frac{1}{\rho\, e\, \mu_h} = \frac{1}{1 \times 1.602\times10^{-19} \times 451.6} \\ &= 1.38\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Step 4: Built-in potential

Vo=kTeln⁡(NaNdni2)=0.02586ln⁡(1.38×1016×4.46×1015(1.05×1010)2)=0.02586ln⁡(5.59×1011)=0.02586×27.05=0.70 V\begin{aligned} V_o &= \frac{kT}{e}\ln\left(\frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2}\right) \\ &= 0.02586 \ln\left(\frac{1.38\times10^{16} \times 4.46\times10^{15}}{(1.05\times10^{10})^2}\right) \\ &= 0.02586 \ln(5.59\times10^{11}) = 0.02586 \times 27.05 \\ &= 0.70\ \text{V} \end{aligned}

Answer: Nd=4.46×1015N_d = 4.46\times10^{15} cm⁻³, Na=1.38×1016N_a = 1.38\times10^{16} cm⁻³, built-in potential Vo≈0.70V_o \approx 0.70 V.

The p-side needs about 3.1 times more dopant than the n-side for the same resistivity because holes are 3.1 times less mobile than electrons.

  • 2069 Chaitra · 6 marks

An n-type silicon wafer is uniformly doped with 10¹⁰ antimony atoms per cm³. Where will be the Fermi level compared to its intrinsic Fermi level? Where will the Fermi level be shifted if the sample is further doped with 2×10¹⁵ boron atoms per cm³?

Answer

Take T=300T = 300 K, kT=0.02586kT = 0.02586 eV and ni=1.45×1010n_i = 1.45\times10^{10} cm⁻³ for Si. Fermi level positions are measured from the intrinsic Fermi level EFiE_{Fi}.

Part 1: Only Nd=1010N_d = 10^{10} cm⁻³ antimony

Here NdN_d is smaller than nin_i, so we cannot use n≈Ndn \approx N_d. Use charge neutrality n=Nd+pn = N_d + p with np=ni2np = n_i^2:

n2−Ndn−ni2=0n=Nd2+(Nd2)2+ni2=0.5×1010+(0.5×1010)2+(1.45×1010)2=2.03×1010 cm−3\begin{aligned} n^2 - N_d n - n_i^2 &= 0 \\ n &= \frac{N_d}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{N_d}{2}\right)^2 + n_i^2} \\ &= 0.5\times10^{10} + \sqrt{(0.5\times10^{10})^2 + (1.45\times10^{10})^2} \\ &= 2.03\times10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \end{aligned}

Since n=niexp⁡[(EF−EFi)/kT]n = n_i \exp[(E_F - E_{Fi})/kT]:

EF−EFi=kTln⁡nni=0.02586ln⁡2.03×10101.45×1010=0.0087 eVE_F - E_{Fi} = kT\ln\frac{n}{n_i} = 0.02586\ln\frac{2.03\times10^{10}}{1.45\times10^{10}} = 0.0087\ \text{eV}

The Fermi level is only about 8.7 meV above EFiE_{Fi}; such light doping makes the wafer almost intrinsic.

Part 2: Further doping with Na=2×1015N_a = 2\times10^{15} cm⁻³ boron

Now Na>NdN_a > N_d, so the sample becomes p-type (compensated). Net acceptor concentration:

Na−Nd=2×1015−1010≈2×1015 cm−3≫niN_a - N_d = 2\times10^{15} - 10^{10} \approx 2\times10^{15}\ \text{cm}^{-3} \gg n_i

So p≈2×1015p \approx 2\times10^{15} cm⁻³ and n=ni2/p≈1.05×105n = n_i^2/p \approx 1.05\times10^{5} cm⁻³.

EFi−EF=kTln⁡pni=0.02586ln⁡2×10151.45×1010=0.02586×11.83=0.306 eV\begin{aligned} E_{Fi} - E_F &= kT\ln\frac{p}{n_i} = 0.02586 \ln\frac{2\times10^{15}}{1.45\times10^{10}} \\ &= 0.02586 \times 11.83 = 0.306\ \text{eV} \end{aligned}
 Ec ---------------------------
     EF (part 1) 0.0087 eV above Ei
 Ei - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                 | 0.306 eV
 EF (part 2) ----+-------------
 Ev ---------------------------

Answer: With 101010^{10} cm⁻³ Sb, EFE_F is 0.0087 eV (8.7 meV) above EFiE_{Fi}. After adding 2×10152\times10^{15} cm⁻³ B, the sample is p-type and EFE_F shifts to 0.306 eV below EFiE_{Fi}, a total shift of about 0.315 eV.

Note: if the textbook version of this problem (101610^{16} Sb, then 2×10172\times10^{17} B) is intended, the same method gives EF−EFi=0.348E_F - E_{Fi} = 0.348 eV, then EFi−EF=0.424E_{Fi} - E_F = 0.424 eV.

  • 2068 Shrawan · 8 marks

Derive the expression of built in potential and width of depletion layer in forward biased P-N junction.

Answer

When p and n regions are joined, electrons diffuse to the p-side and holes to the n-side, leaving behind fixed ionized donors (++) and acceptors (−-). This depletion (space charge) region creates an electric field and a potential barrier, the built-in potential VoV_o.

        p-side   |  W  |   n-side
   o o o o o o |- - | + +| e e e e e
   o o o o o o |- - | + +| e e e e e
              -Wp   0   Wn
         E-field points n -> p

Built-in potential

In equilibrium the Fermi level is flat across the junction. On the p-side, far from the junction, pp0=Nap_{p0} = N_a; on the n-side, nn0=Ndn_{n0} = N_d and the minority hole density is pn0=ni2/Ndp_{n0} = n_i^2/N_d. The Boltzmann relation between hole densities on the two sides of the barrier is

pn0pp0=exp⁡(−eVokT)\frac{p_{n0}}{p_{p0}} = \exp\left(-\frac{eV_o}{kT}\right)

(the same result follows from setting hole drift current = hole diffusion current). Therefore

Vo=kTeln⁡pp0pn0=kTeln⁡(NaNdni2)V_o = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\frac{p_{p0}}{p_{n0}} = \frac{kT}{e}\ln\left(\frac{N_a N_d}{n_i^2}\right)

Depletion width at equilibrium

Assume an abrupt junction and full depletion. Charge neutrality: NaWp=NdWnN_a W_p = N_d W_n. Poisson's equation d2Vdx2=−ρ(x)ε\dfrac{d^2V}{dx^2} = -\dfrac{\rho(x)}{\varepsilon}, with ρ=−eNa\rho = -eN_a for −Wp<x<0-W_p<x<0 and ρ=eNd\rho = eN_d for 0<x<Wn0<x<W_n. Integrating once gives a triangular field with maximum at x=0x = 0:

Eo=−eNdWnε=−eNaWpεE_o = -\frac{eN_d W_n}{\varepsilon} = -\frac{eN_a W_p}{\varepsilon}

Integrating again, the potential drop equals the area of the field triangle:

Vo=12∣Eo∣W=eNaNdW22ε(Na+Nd)W=Wp+Wn=2ε(Na+Nd)VoeNaNd\begin{aligned} V_o &= \frac{1}{2}|E_o| W = \frac{e N_a N_d W^2}{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d)} \\ W &= W_p + W_n = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d) V_o}{e N_a N_d}} \end{aligned}

where ε=ε0εr\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r.

Forward bias

With forward voltage VV (p positive), the applied voltage opposes the built-in field. Almost all of VV drops across the high-resistance depletion region, so the barrier falls from VoV_o to Vo−VV_o - V:

Wfwd=2ε(Na+Nd)(Vo−V)eNaNdW_{fwd} = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon (N_a + N_d)(V_o - V)}{e N_a N_d}}
  • The depletion layer becomes narrower as VV increases (W∝Vo−VW \propto \sqrt{V_o - V}).
  • The lower barrier lets majority carriers cross; minority carrier density at the edges rises by eeV/kTe^{eV/kT}, giving the diode current I=Io(eeV/kT−1)I = I_o(e^{eV/kT} - 1).
  • For reverse bias, VV is replaced by −Vr-V_r, and WW widens.

For a one-sided junction (Na≫NdN_a \gg N_d), W≈2ε(Vo−V)/(eNd)W \approx \sqrt{2\varepsilon (V_o - V)/(eN_d)}, so the depletion region lies almost entirely in the lightly doped side.

  • 2082 Kartik (new course) · 4 marks

Explain how acceptor dopants contribute holes in valence band in p-type extrinsic semiconductor. Also prove that σ = peμₕ where symbols have their usual meanings.

Answer

Acceptors and holes in the valence band

A trivalent impurity (B, Al, Ga) in Si has only three valence electrons, so one of its four covalent bonds is incomplete. This empty bond creates a localized energy level EaE_a just above EvE_v (about 0.045 eV for B in Si). At room temperature, an electron from a neighbouring Si–Si bond (the valence band) easily gains this small energy and moves into the empty bond. The boron becomes a fixed negative ion B−B^-, and the missing electron in the valence band is a free hole that can move through the crystal.

 Ec -------------------------
 
 Ea  - - - - (-) (-) (-) - -   ionized acceptors
 Ev -----o-----o-----o-------  holes in VB

Each ionized acceptor gives one hole and no free electron, so when Na≫niN_a \gg n_i: p≈Nap \approx N_a and n=ni2/Na≪pn = n_i^2/N_a \ll p.

Proof of σ=peμh\sigma = pe\mu_h

Let an electric field EE act on a p-type sample of cross-section AA. Holes drift along EE with drift velocity vdh=μhEv_{dh} = \mu_h E. In time dtdt, holes in length vdhdtv_{dh}dt cross the area, carrying charge dQ=e p A vdh dtdQ = e\,p\,A\,v_{dh}\,dt. So

J=1AdQdt=e p vdh=e p μhEσ=JE=e p μh+e n μe\begin{aligned} J &= \frac{1}{A}\frac{dQ}{dt} = e\,p\,v_{dh} = e\,p\,\mu_h E \\ \sigma &= \frac{J}{E} = e\,p\,\mu_h + e\,n\,\mu_e \end{aligned}

Since n≪pn \ll p in a p-type semiconductor, the electron term is negligible:

σ≈peμh≈Naeμh\sigma \approx p e \mu_h \approx N_a e \mu_h
  • 2082 Kartik (new course) · 3 marks

Calculate the diffusion coefficient of electrons at 300 K in n-type silicon semiconductor with 10¹⁵ arsenic atoms per cm³. (μ = 1300 cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹)

Answer

The diffusion coefficient is related to mobility by the Einstein relation. With Nd=1015N_d = 10^{15} cm⁻³ the semiconductor is non-degenerate, so the relation applies, and electrons are the majority carriers.

Deμe=kTe=1.381×10−23×3001.602×10−19=0.02586 VDe=μekTe=1300×0.02586=33.6 cm2 s−1\begin{aligned} \frac{D_e}{\mu_e} &= \frac{kT}{e} = \frac{1.381\times10^{-23} \times 300}{1.602\times10^{-19}} = 0.02586\ \text{V} \\ D_e &= \mu_e \frac{kT}{e} = 1300 \times 0.02586 \\ &= 33.6\ \text{cm}^2\,\text{s}^{-1} \end{aligned}

Answer: De≈33.6D_e \approx 33.6 cm² s⁻¹ =3.36×10−3= 3.36\times10^{-3} m² s⁻¹.

Questions from Old Question Collection (EE 502) (IOE EE 502 exam papers from 2068 to 2081), Question bank (ioesolutions) (IOE EE 502 exam papers from 2068 to 2074) and 2080 course papers (ENEE 203) (IOE ENEE 203 exam papers, 2081 Chaitra and 2082 Kartik). Answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.

Chapter titles and hours from the IOE syllabus ↗