Chapter 1 · 3 hours
Design Process
Practice questions
Practice questions and answers
2 exam-style questions on this chapter, written for this site from the official syllabus. We haven’t found past IOE papers for this subject yet; if you have some, share them in the community.
- Practice · 8 marks
Explain the basic steps in the design and synthesis process of a machine element or product. Draw a block diagram showing the iterative nature of the process and state what is done in each step.
Answer
Design is the creative process of converting a need into a workable, manufacturable and economical product; synthesis means combining known elements, principles and materials into a new arrangement that meets the need. The process is iterative: results of a later step often send the designer back to an earlier one.
Recognition of need
|
Definition of problem
|
Gathering information <-----+
| |
Conceptualization | feedback
| | (iteration)
Evaluation of alternatives --+
|
Detailed design / analysis
|
Communication (drawings, report)
Steps of the process
- Recognition of need. The designer becomes aware of a problem or opportunity, for example the need for a low-cost grain mill for small farms. The need is often vague at first.
- Definition of the problem. The need is stated precisely: what the machine must do, inputs and outputs, size and cost limits, operating environment, life and safety requirements.
- Gathering relevant information. Existing products, patents, standards and codes, material data, available manufacturing facilities, user opinion and market data are collected.
- Functional requirements. The functions are listed in measurable form (for example power 2 kW, speed 300 rpm, mass below 40 kg, price below a limit). These become the specification.
- Conceptualization. Several possible solutions are generated by brainstorming, analogy and morphological charts. Rough sketches and simple calculations are made for each concept.
- Evaluation of alternatives. Concepts are compared against the specification using a decision matrix, cost estimates and feasibility checks. The best concept is selected or combined concepts are formed. If none is satisfactory, the designer returns to step 1, 2 or 5.
- Detailed design and analysis. The chosen concept is sized: loads, stresses, deflections, materials, fits and tolerances, standard parts. Prototypes may be tested.
- Communication. The design is presented as assembly and part drawings, bill of materials, calculation sheets, manufacturing and assembly instructions, and a report. A design that is not communicated cannot be made.
The cost of changes rises sharply in later steps, so most effort should go into correct problem definition and concept evaluation.
- Practice · 6 marks
A conveyor needs a speed-reduction drive, and four alternatives are to be evaluated: A (V-belt drive), B (chain drive), C (separate gearbox) and D (integral gear-motor). The criteria weights are: initial cost 5, reliability 4, ease of maintenance 3, compactness 2. The ratings given by the design team (scale 1 to 10, 10 best) in the order [cost, reliability, maintenance, compactness] are: A = [7, 8, 9, 6], B = [8, 6, 7, 7], C = [9, 5, 6, 7], D = [6, 8, 5, 9]. (a) Use a weighted decision matrix to rank the alternatives and state the best choice. (b) State two limitations of this method of evaluating alternatives.
Answer
A weighted decision matrix multiplies the rating of each alternative on every criterion by the weight of that criterion, and the totals are compared.
(a) Ranking
Weights: cost 5, reliability 4, maintenance 3, compactness 2 (sum = 14). Maximum possible score = 10 x 14 = 140.
Score of A
Score of B
Score of C
Score of D
| Alternative | Cost x5 | Reliab. x4 | Maint. x3 | Compact x2 | Total | Share of max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A V-belt | 35 | 32 | 27 | 12 | 106 | 0.76 |
| B Chain | 40 | 24 | 21 | 14 | 99 | 0.71 |
| C Gearbox | 45 | 20 | 18 | 14 | 97 | 0.69 |
| D Gear-motor | 30 | 32 | 15 | 18 | 95 | 0.68 |
Ranking: A > B > C > D.
Answer: Alternative A (V-belt drive) is the best choice with a score of 106 out of 140.
(b) Limitations
- The ratings and weights are subjective; a small change in weights can change the ranking (here B, C and D are within 4 points).
- The method treats the criteria as independent and adds them linearly, so a very poor rating on one critical criterion (for example safety) can be hidden by high ratings elsewhere. Important constraints must be checked separately as pass/fail.
Written from the official syllabus. Questions and answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.
Chapter titles and hours from the IOE syllabus ↗