Chapter 8 · 4 hours
Responsible development practices
Practice questions
Practice questions and answers
2 exam-style questions on this chapter, written for this site from the official syllabus. We haven’t found past IOE papers for this subject yet; if you have some, share them in the community.
- Practice · 6 marks
Describe the world energy resources and the pattern of energy consumption in developed and developing countries. Why is per capita energy consumption an indicator of development, and what are the problems of the present pattern?
Answer
World energy resources
- Commercial non-renewable: coal, oil, natural gas, uranium. Fossil fuels supply roughly 80 % of world primary energy. Rough reserve lives at present use are about 50 years for oil and gas and over 100 years for coal; the figures change with new discoveries and prices.
- Renewable: hydro (the largest renewable source for electricity), biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and wave. They supply about 15 % of primary energy, with the share rising.
- Non-commercial: firewood, crop residue and dung, still the main household fuel in many rural areas of developing countries.
Consumption pattern
| Point | Developed countries | Developing countries |
|---|---|---|
| Population share | about 20 % | about 80 % |
| Energy use share | about half or more | rest |
| Per capita use | 100–300 GJ/yr | 10–40 GJ/yr |
| Main sectors | Industry, transport, buildings | Households (cooking), agriculture |
| Fuel mix | Oil, gas, coal, nuclear | Biomass, coal, imported oil |
| Trend | Slow growth, efficiency gains | Fast growth with industrialisation |
Energy use per person is high in North America and the Gulf, lower in Europe and Japan (higher efficiency), and low in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
Per capita energy as an indicator
Energy use correlates with income, industrial output, transport, health and education; the Human Development Index rises quickly with energy up to a moderate level (a few tens of GJ per person), and gains flatten at high levels.
Problems
Uneven distribution and energy poverty; dependence on imports and price shocks; depletion of fossil fuels; air pollution and climate change from CO₂ (energy causes about two-thirds of greenhouse gas emissions); and indoor air pollution from cooking with biomass. Remedies are energy efficiency, renewables, conservation and fair access.
- Practice · 6 marks
Explain the relation between environment, development and society. Compare the state, private and community-based (common property) approaches to natural resource management with examples, and state what sustainable development means.
Answer
Environment, development and society
The environment provides resources (energy, water, soil, forest) and absorbs wastes. Development uses these to raise income, health and living standards. Society decides how they are shared and who bears the costs. Rapid development without care for the environment causes depletion and pollution, and poor management without development leaves people in poverty, which also damages the environment (e.g. over-cutting forest for fuelwood).
Sustainable development (Brundtland Commission, 1987) is "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs". It balances three pillars: economy, society and environment.
Approaches to natural resource management
| Point | State (centralised) | Private | Community-based (common property) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner and manager | Government agency | Individual or company | Local user group |
| Aim | National revenue, protection | Profit | Livelihood and sustainable use |
| Strengths | Large-scale planning, national parks, law | Efficiency, investment | Local knowledge, low monitoring cost, fair local sharing |
| Weaknesses | Poor local participation, costly policing | Neglects poor and long term, can over-exploit | Needs clear rules and legal rights, may exclude weak members |
| Example | National parks, state-owned hydropower | Private mines and plantations | Community forestry user groups, village irrigation, micro hydro committees |
Open-access resources suffer "tragedy of the commons" (overuse because no one owns them). Experience, such as community forestry in Nepal, shows that giving local users clear rights and duties can restore forests. Most countries now prefer co-management, where government, local communities and the private sector share roles.
Comparison summary
No single approach suits all cases; the best results come from clear property rights, local participation, transparent rules and monitoring, together with legal and technical support from the state.
Written from the official syllabus. Questions and answers are written for this site; check them against your class notes.
Chapter titles and hours from the IOE syllabus ↗